What do you think?
Rate this book
The Bravehearts Chronicles #3
The Guardian
From Jack Whyte, the master of the sweeping historical epic, comes the continuing story of two heroes who reshaped and reconfigured the entire destiny of the kingdom of Scotland by defying the might and power of Edward Plantagenet, the king of England, who called himself the Hammer of the Scots. Wallace the Braveheart would become the only legendary, heroic commoner in medieval British history and the undying champion of the common man. The other, Robert Bruce, earl of Carrick, would perfect the techniques of guerrilla warfare developed by Wallace and use them to create his own place in history as the greatest king of Scots who ever lived.
In the spring of 1297, the two men meet in Ayr, in the south of Scotland, each having recently lost a young wife, one in childbirth and the other by murder. Each is heartbroken but determined in his grief to defy the ambitions of England and its malignant king, whose lust to conquer and consume the realm of Scotland is blatant and unyielding. Their combined anger at the injustices of the invading English is about to unleash a storm in Scotland that will last for sixteen years—and destroy England’s military power for decades—before giving rise to a new nation of free men.
In the spring of 1297, the two men meet in Ayr, in the south of Scotland, each having recently lost a young wife, one in childbirth and the other by murder. Each is heartbroken but determined in his grief to defy the ambitions of England and its malignant king, whose lust to conquer and consume the realm of Scotland is blatant and unyielding. Their combined anger at the injustices of the invading English is about to unleash a storm in Scotland that will last for sixteen years—and destroy England’s military power for decades—before giving rise to a new nation of free men.
720 pages, Hardcover
First published October 28, 2014
37 people are currently reading
818 people want to read
About the author
Jack Whyte
62 books772 followersJack Whyte is an author and writer born and raised in Scotland, but has been living in western Canada since 1967, and in Kelowna, British Columbia, since 1996.
Whyte's major work to date is the A Dream of Eagles series (as it is titled in Canada, but known as The Camulod Chronicles in the United States and elsewhere). This series of historical novels presents the tale of King Arthur set against the backdrop of Roman Britain. This retelling of the popular legend eschews the use of magic (as in T. H. White’s The Sword in the Stone) to explain Arthur’s ascent to power and instead relies on the historical condition (with some artistic license) of post-Roman Britain to support the theory that Arthur was meant to counter the anarchy left by the Roman departure from Britain in 410 AD and the subsequent colonization and invasion of Britain by various peoples from Northwestern Europe, including the Saxons, Jutes, Franks, and Angles). Whyte incorporates both traditional Arthurian names, places and events (albeit in gaelic or Latin form) as well as the names of various historical figures that have been suggested as being the possible basis for the original King Arthur legend. The tacit implication is that Whyte's version of history is the true story that has become distorted over time to become the legend and stories of magic that we know today.
Jack Whyte served as the official bard of The Calgary Highlanders and performed several tracks of poetry and song on the 1990 recording by the Regimental Pipes and Drums of The Calgary Highlanders entitled Eighty Years of Glory: The Regimental Pipes, Drums and Bard of The Calgary Highlanders.
Whyte's major work to date is the A Dream of Eagles series (as it is titled in Canada, but known as The Camulod Chronicles in the United States and elsewhere). This series of historical novels presents the tale of King Arthur set against the backdrop of Roman Britain. This retelling of the popular legend eschews the use of magic (as in T. H. White’s The Sword in the Stone) to explain Arthur’s ascent to power and instead relies on the historical condition (with some artistic license) of post-Roman Britain to support the theory that Arthur was meant to counter the anarchy left by the Roman departure from Britain in 410 AD and the subsequent colonization and invasion of Britain by various peoples from Northwestern Europe, including the Saxons, Jutes, Franks, and Angles). Whyte incorporates both traditional Arthurian names, places and events (albeit in gaelic or Latin form) as well as the names of various historical figures that have been suggested as being the possible basis for the original King Arthur legend. The tacit implication is that Whyte's version of history is the true story that has become distorted over time to become the legend and stories of magic that we know today.
Jack Whyte served as the official bard of The Calgary Highlanders and performed several tracks of poetry and song on the 1990 recording by the Regimental Pipes and Drums of The Calgary Highlanders entitled Eighty Years of Glory: The Regimental Pipes, Drums and Bard of The Calgary Highlanders.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 29 of 44 reviews
June 28, 2018
Recently I had the misfortune of running across "Outlander",the soft-porn bodice ripper masquerading as "historical fiction" set in the Scottish Highlands, expecting to read some cool fantasy/historical fiction story with Highlanders. Instead I got a bodice ripper. So to wash the bad taste out of my mouth-I thought I'd read a REAL historical fiction book about Scotland. Bless you Jack Whyte for writing precisely that- The Guardian.
Told by Father Jamie Wallace, a priest and William Wallace's cousin, 3 decades after the death of the famous William Wallace. It is a recounting of Wallace's rebellion and the relationship he developed with Robert the Bruce. After Wallace's wife and children are killed by the English, William leads his band of outlaws from Selkirk forest to harry the English forces.
This story takes you from the start of William's rebellion in May of 1297 to his assuming the mantle of Guardian of Scotland in late 1297 (for reference sake-the famous Battle of Stirling Bridge was in September of 1297). We get to see Wallace not as he was portrayed in the Braveheart movie- but as he truly was. He wasn't a well-educated, well-traveled man like his was in the movie. Please bear in mind that the "Braveheart" version is based off a description of Wallace's background by a man known as Henry the Minstrel (Blind Harry) where he stated William Wallace to be the son of Sir Malcolm Wallace of Elderslie. However few people, save historians, know that there is a letter written by Wallace to the Hanseatic League wherein he names his father as Alan Wallace in Aryshire. Alan was a crown tenant (he farmed the land of a Royal house) and that makes far more sense considering it was likely (history is sparse about William's past) William served as an Archer in King Edward's foreign adventures. Had he been the son of a knight, even a minor one, he would have been a squire or a knight himself. Nobles, even minor ones, do not train to become archers.
This is the version that Whyte uses as his Wallace. William is highly intelligent, but a commoner. This is what eventually would cause the later issue with the Scots magnates support. William is a talented archer and has only recently adopted the use of the claymore sword he is most associated with. The heavy Scots accent is evident throughout the dialogue and is a pleasure to read, as it is quite accurate. The military strategy behind the Stirling Bridge battle is excellent. Whyte understand how the military forces of the time operated. From the use of the schiltron, a compact body of infantry armed with long spears in a phalanx disposition, to the use of natural terrain to deprive the English of their heavy cavalry-all of it is accurate and well described. The entirety of the story is told from the view of Father Jamie and his faculty with multiple languages and his standing as a cleric means we see not only William's side, but we also hear about the conflicts and conversations of famous players like Robert the Bruce (lord of Carrick, not the Lord of Annendale who was his father and Pro- King Edward) and Andrew Murray (a northern Scottish Knight who joined his rebellion with Williams) to the British Lords like Lord Cressingham (Edward's treasurer) and Lord John de Warrenne (6th Earl of Surrey).
An excellent historical fiction account of William Wallace's rebellion. I look forwards to reading the next part of this series.
Told by Father Jamie Wallace, a priest and William Wallace's cousin, 3 decades after the death of the famous William Wallace. It is a recounting of Wallace's rebellion and the relationship he developed with Robert the Bruce. After Wallace's wife and children are killed by the English, William leads his band of outlaws from Selkirk forest to harry the English forces.
This story takes you from the start of William's rebellion in May of 1297 to his assuming the mantle of Guardian of Scotland in late 1297 (for reference sake-the famous Battle of Stirling Bridge was in September of 1297). We get to see Wallace not as he was portrayed in the Braveheart movie- but as he truly was. He wasn't a well-educated, well-traveled man like his was in the movie. Please bear in mind that the "Braveheart" version is based off a description of Wallace's background by a man known as Henry the Minstrel (Blind Harry) where he stated William Wallace to be the son of Sir Malcolm Wallace of Elderslie. However few people, save historians, know that there is a letter written by Wallace to the Hanseatic League wherein he names his father as Alan Wallace in Aryshire. Alan was a crown tenant (he farmed the land of a Royal house) and that makes far more sense considering it was likely (history is sparse about William's past) William served as an Archer in King Edward's foreign adventures. Had he been the son of a knight, even a minor one, he would have been a squire or a knight himself. Nobles, even minor ones, do not train to become archers.
This is the version that Whyte uses as his Wallace. William is highly intelligent, but a commoner. This is what eventually would cause the later issue with the Scots magnates support. William is a talented archer and has only recently adopted the use of the claymore sword he is most associated with. The heavy Scots accent is evident throughout the dialogue and is a pleasure to read, as it is quite accurate. The military strategy behind the Stirling Bridge battle is excellent. Whyte understand how the military forces of the time operated. From the use of the schiltron, a compact body of infantry armed with long spears in a phalanx disposition, to the use of natural terrain to deprive the English of their heavy cavalry-all of it is accurate and well described. The entirety of the story is told from the view of Father Jamie and his faculty with multiple languages and his standing as a cleric means we see not only William's side, but we also hear about the conflicts and conversations of famous players like Robert the Bruce (lord of Carrick, not the Lord of Annendale who was his father and Pro- King Edward) and Andrew Murray (a northern Scottish Knight who joined his rebellion with Williams) to the British Lords like Lord Cressingham (Edward's treasurer) and Lord John de Warrenne (6th Earl of Surrey).
An excellent historical fiction account of William Wallace's rebellion. I look forwards to reading the next part of this series.
December 2, 2025
This is the third and final book in the three-book series that creates a fictional plot around an artistically adapted history of William Wallace and Robert the Bruce.
As the final novel, Jack Whyte leaves a lot of loose ends from the previous two novels unresolved. This is especially the case for the second novel that spent its 600 pages telling the story of Robert the Bruce up until his first defection from English loyalty. Given that this final novel barely touches on Bruce, there is a lot of intriguing history that is left untold surrounding Bruce’s heroic journey to becoming the King of Scots.
The first novel and this third one do a better job of telling the story of William Wallace. However, these two novels, some 1,200 pages, barely get the reader past Wallace’s only major victory against the English: The Battle of Stirling Bridge. Left out is Wallace’s defeat at the Battle of Fallkirk one year later, his diplomatic journey to France and Italy on behalf of Scotland, and his days spent in hiding after his return. The end of this novel reads as if a fourth novel would be offered, but such is not the case.
With this third, rather long book, I have finally arrived in Scotland [See Picture]. As such, my reading selections can now be turned back towards the more eclectic aspects of life, which can only be experienced through a greater variety stories than those that solely focus on the two heroes of the First War of Scottish Independence.
As the final novel, Jack Whyte leaves a lot of loose ends from the previous two novels unresolved. This is especially the case for the second novel that spent its 600 pages telling the story of Robert the Bruce up until his first defection from English loyalty. Given that this final novel barely touches on Bruce, there is a lot of intriguing history that is left untold surrounding Bruce’s heroic journey to becoming the King of Scots.
The first novel and this third one do a better job of telling the story of William Wallace. However, these two novels, some 1,200 pages, barely get the reader past Wallace’s only major victory against the English: The Battle of Stirling Bridge. Left out is Wallace’s defeat at the Battle of Fallkirk one year later, his diplomatic journey to France and Italy on behalf of Scotland, and his days spent in hiding after his return. The end of this novel reads as if a fourth novel would be offered, but such is not the case.
With this third, rather long book, I have finally arrived in Scotland [See Picture]. As such, my reading selections can now be turned back towards the more eclectic aspects of life, which can only be experienced through a greater variety stories than those that solely focus on the two heroes of the First War of Scottish Independence.
February 2, 2015
Again, a fascinating retelling of a part of British history that should be more well known to those of us educated south of Hadrian's wall.
I've been really annoyed by the lack of a good map, so I started one here.
I was led to believe that this was a trilogy, but I hope not, as it's far short of being finished. I trust Whyte's going to continue through at least the rest of Wallace's campaign, and preferably to Robert Bruce's coronation.
May 10, 2016
William Wallace and Andrew Murray, as known by a slightly distanced observer: Wallace's cousin, Father Jamie Wallace, a priest. Seen through Jamie's eyes are intrigue, espionage, and a battle scene like none other I've read. For the first time I really felt the shocking impact of it, and the masterful nature of their military strategy, from their hit-and-run raids to their use of the land itself as a weapon, much as the Welsh had earlier.
I didn't realize this was the third book in a series when I picked it up, but really, it's history - it's one big series, for the most part! It was a surprise to discover that it was supposed to be Andrew Murray's book though, as I'd say he featured in only about a third. That's not a criticism on my part, but an observation. The cover also confused me a little until I figured this out, because the mail-wearing person was obviously not Wallace yet it appeared to be a book about Wallace, even down to the title...
I couldn't tell whether it was the writing or my relative unfamiliarity with the period, but I found it taxing to keep track of who was who. (I was also trying to mentally slot in the events with others that I did know, from south of the border, which didn't help!) I've been a little spoiled by some other authors (like Sharon Penman) who write quite detailed notes in the back to explain what was fictionalized, what was changed and why, and I missed that here, and I didn't quite feel myself "in" the period.
(Side note: why on earth are publishers using such huge font sizes in hardbacks? It was too heavy to hold and read easily with one hand, which limited my reading oppotunities. Do they get paid per page?! Any more I'll read as ebook.)
I didn't realize this was the third book in a series when I picked it up, but really, it's history - it's one big series, for the most part! It was a surprise to discover that it was supposed to be Andrew Murray's book though, as I'd say he featured in only about a third. That's not a criticism on my part, but an observation. The cover also confused me a little until I figured this out, because the mail-wearing person was obviously not Wallace yet it appeared to be a book about Wallace, even down to the title...
I couldn't tell whether it was the writing or my relative unfamiliarity with the period, but I found it taxing to keep track of who was who. (I was also trying to mentally slot in the events with others that I did know, from south of the border, which didn't help!) I've been a little spoiled by some other authors (like Sharon Penman) who write quite detailed notes in the back to explain what was fictionalized, what was changed and why, and I missed that here, and I didn't quite feel myself "in" the period.
(Side note: why on earth are publishers using such huge font sizes in hardbacks? It was too heavy to hold and read easily with one hand, which limited my reading oppotunities. Do they get paid per page?! Any more I'll read as ebook.)
May 25, 2016
Quando ho acquistato questa trilogia che raccontava la storia di William Wallace non mi aspettavo un libro del genere. Anche in questo libro la storia viene raccontata attraverso il vissuto di padre Jamie Wallace ma mentre in Figli della Libertà il protagonista racconta la storia che vive in prima persona in compagnia di Will, in questo romanzo quasi tutto é raccontato attraverso discussioni con altri personaggi secondari. Questo modo di raccontare gli eventi non mi ha emozionato particolarmente e ha reso la lettura in filo noiosa.
In particolare la battagli Stirling mi ha lasciato sconcertato: pochissime pagine dedicate ad una battaglia epica mentre un capitolo intero dedicato alla cura dei feriti (posso capire che nel contesto del racconto visto dagli occhi di un sacerdote quella fosse la parte che doveva "concernere" il protagonista ma due parole in più sulla battaglia in si potevano sprecare!) Bisogna comunque apprezzare l'abilità di Jack White nel tessere la trama restando fedelissimo al contesto storico e spiegando in modo eccellente il modificarsi della società borghese.
IN BREVE:
Se volete un romanzo di avventura leggero e guerrigliero non é questo il romanzo che fa per voi. Se invece non vi spaventa la lettura di qualcosa di un Po più lento ma ricco e preciso dal punto di vista storico, potrebbe essere il libro (e la saga) adatto.
In particolare la battagli Stirling mi ha lasciato sconcertato: pochissime pagine dedicate ad una battaglia epica mentre un capitolo intero dedicato alla cura dei feriti (posso capire che nel contesto del racconto visto dagli occhi di un sacerdote quella fosse la parte che doveva "concernere" il protagonista ma due parole in più sulla battaglia in si potevano sprecare!) Bisogna comunque apprezzare l'abilità di Jack White nel tessere la trama restando fedelissimo al contesto storico e spiegando in modo eccellente il modificarsi della società borghese.
IN BREVE:
Se volete un romanzo di avventura leggero e guerrigliero non é questo il romanzo che fa per voi. Se invece non vi spaventa la lettura di qualcosa di un Po più lento ma ricco e preciso dal punto di vista storico, potrebbe essere il libro (e la saga) adatto.
May 31, 2019
This was better than #2 but not by much. It still has the same tropes and cliches: contrived conversations for the purpose of exposition, one side of the conversation being difficult, no action, melodrama, and contradictory characters. The last meaning that in one scene a character will say he believes something, then later act like he doesn't. But these were much more toned down here, and sprinkled with better stuff like interesting asides during said contrived conversations. And like the previous ones, it serves the primary purpose of historical fiction: puts you in the time and place you're reading while giving you a sense for the characters and events in a way a mere historical reading could not. The last problem I would name is that the series ends prematurely. Each book leads up to some big battle or event, and then stops. Soooo... what about the end of the war? Why spend so much time on this other stuff and leave the rest, the bigger events out?
October 12, 2020
"The Guardian" is solid historical fiction, I would recommend the book to anyone who likes to read novels and has a passing interest in Scotland. Plus, I love that this is a local author. My main critique is the use of the protagonist's asking of questions to deliver exposition. These exposition dumps come across as a bit on the nose, and tend to pull me out from immersion.
There is a scene in the book where two of the main men meet, and physically work through their past differences before moving on as friends. This is my favourite example of guys dealing with their differences through a fight, and coming out as friends, that I have ever read. And it reminds me of several instances when I was a teenager.
There is a scene in the book where two of the main men meet, and physically work through their past differences before moving on as friends. This is my favourite example of guys dealing with their differences through a fight, and coming out as friends, that I have ever read. And it reminds me of several instances when I was a teenager.
November 15, 2023
I am slightly disappointed in the conclusion of this trilogy. I think the main reason was that books one and two set you up to expect a specific kind of story, but book 3 turns that all on its head.
This book is seemingly a collection of events that are being told to our main character, Jamie Wallace (who I think is an author creation), so we keep reading about events that have happened instead of reading the events themselves. As he travels up and down Scotland we do end up seeing an important event or two, but the book is a very slow and not exciting read at all.
Would have given the book a lower score if not for my residual love of the author and the fact that the book is well written and seemingly well researched.
This book is seemingly a collection of events that are being told to our main character, Jamie Wallace (who I think is an author creation), so we keep reading about events that have happened instead of reading the events themselves. As he travels up and down Scotland we do end up seeing an important event or two, but the book is a very slow and not exciting read at all.
Would have given the book a lower score if not for my residual love of the author and the fact that the book is well written and seemingly well researched.
June 2, 2021
2.7 stars out of 5 - I read a hardbound from the library over the past few evenings. It was a bit of a slog, the author often getting bogged down in long descriptions and discussions of complications which may have reflected the historical reality but which were often too complex to follow. At the same time it often seemed that the "action" scenes got short shrift. I end up glad I read the three book series, but regretful that the reading quality slipped book by book.
July 12, 2017
very disappointing!
July 19, 2017
I was disappointed that this was not the entirety of the Scottish rebellion with Wallace and The Bruce. Too much conversation that acts like narrative, and not enough action.
January 4, 2018
Very enjoyable account. I agree with those who believe a faithful telling of this history would have made an equally enjoyable movie as opposed to Braveheart.
October 25, 2018
He likes this series to look like romance covers. Great portrsayal of Robert Bruce
February 24, 2019
I've yet to read a Jack Whyte novel that did not fully engulf me. Wonderful as always
May 24, 2019
Learned more than I knew about Scottish history. Didn’t want to stop reading.Jack Whyte at his best.
March 15, 2021
A good novel in the Scotland Heroes Series. I wish there was a fourth book for us to read.
Rest in Peace Jack.
Rest in Peace Jack.
March 26, 2023
This author has a totally organized mind.
February 18, 2024
I was so glad to hear Jamie return as narrator for the third book! As always, the book was excellent but he makes it a little more personable.
October 12, 2024
I've read all three books and the first and third were my favourites. Although the author took some liberties with the historical accuracy in all three books they were enjoyable.
November 26, 2025
Yeah I read the third book second, it was shite either way
April 21, 2016
Source: Free advanced reader copy from Forge Books in exchange for a review
Rating: 4 stars for very good
The Guardians Trilogy:
The Forest Laird, William Wallace
The Renegade, Robert Bruce--this book can be confusing in the title. It is newly titled as Robert the Bruce
The Guardian, Andrew Murray, also known as Andrew de Moray
I noticed there is a discrepancy in the change of book titles. This can be confusing. All of the trilogy books are A Tale of Scottish Independence and The Guardian Series. The first book is about William Wallace, the second is Robert the Bruce, and the third is Andrew Murray.
I wish there was a map included in my advanced reader copy.
The book begins with the "Author's Note". Jack Whyte answers and explains, "What is historical fiction?" I loved this introduction piece from the author. It is true, some readers do not know the definition of historical fiction.
Father James Wallace, or Jamie, is the narrator of the story. He is the cousin of William Wallace. Chapter one is dated 1343, Jamie is looking back on life in regards to the history of his cousin William Wallace, and Andrew Murray. Andrew Murray joined forces with William Wallace in the Wars of Scottish Independence. They battled the English king, Edward I, and his army.
The story is narrated and from the perspective of Jamie. He is both a man of the priesthood and a (sometime) soldier. He has written the tale to set the story straight on William Wallace. He believes his cousin has become a "demigod" and he wants an honest portrayal to be presented.
The year is 1297.
Edward I (ruled 1272-1307) invaded Scotland wanting to claim lands. Scottish forces gathered and fought to defend and reclaim their homeland.
Over-all I loved this story. This is the first book I've read from Jack Whyte. I plan to read more!
Several points lead me to award this book 4 stars for very good.
Historical accuracy.
Portrays the brotherhood of the men in arms. Their devotion, camaraderie, commitment, strength, and sacrifice.
Shows the transformation of William Wallace. He had a dramatic change in his demeanor and focus after his family's death.
Records the life of Andrew Murray. His motivations, family, and part in the Battle of Stirling Bridge.
Impressive and descriptive view of Stirling Castle.
A masculine story, but filled with the imagery of humanity and its vulnerability.
Powerful account of battles and the battlefield afterwords.
Jamie is an insightful and reflective man. Through his lens I saw how he processed the horrors of a battle, carnage, and death.
An especially emotional moment in the book when Jamie stops to give viatica or viaticum, last rights.
The book is more of Jamie's reflection on this period in time, 1297. The book contains the characters, William Wallace and Andrew Murray. However, it did not reflect strongly the one man, Andrew Murray (in the subtitle). The story is wonderful, but it does not relay to me what the subtitle referred. I feel Jamie, Father James Wallace is the principal character.
Rating: 4 stars for very good
The Guardians Trilogy:
The Forest Laird, William Wallace
The Renegade, Robert Bruce--this book can be confusing in the title. It is newly titled as Robert the Bruce
The Guardian, Andrew Murray, also known as Andrew de Moray
I noticed there is a discrepancy in the change of book titles. This can be confusing. All of the trilogy books are A Tale of Scottish Independence and The Guardian Series. The first book is about William Wallace, the second is Robert the Bruce, and the third is Andrew Murray.
I wish there was a map included in my advanced reader copy.
The book begins with the "Author's Note". Jack Whyte answers and explains, "What is historical fiction?" I loved this introduction piece from the author. It is true, some readers do not know the definition of historical fiction.
Father James Wallace, or Jamie, is the narrator of the story. He is the cousin of William Wallace. Chapter one is dated 1343, Jamie is looking back on life in regards to the history of his cousin William Wallace, and Andrew Murray. Andrew Murray joined forces with William Wallace in the Wars of Scottish Independence. They battled the English king, Edward I, and his army.
The story is narrated and from the perspective of Jamie. He is both a man of the priesthood and a (sometime) soldier. He has written the tale to set the story straight on William Wallace. He believes his cousin has become a "demigod" and he wants an honest portrayal to be presented.
The year is 1297.
Edward I (ruled 1272-1307) invaded Scotland wanting to claim lands. Scottish forces gathered and fought to defend and reclaim their homeland.
Over-all I loved this story. This is the first book I've read from Jack Whyte. I plan to read more!
Several points lead me to award this book 4 stars for very good.
Historical accuracy.
Portrays the brotherhood of the men in arms. Their devotion, camaraderie, commitment, strength, and sacrifice.
Shows the transformation of William Wallace. He had a dramatic change in his demeanor and focus after his family's death.
Records the life of Andrew Murray. His motivations, family, and part in the Battle of Stirling Bridge.
Impressive and descriptive view of Stirling Castle.
A masculine story, but filled with the imagery of humanity and its vulnerability.
Powerful account of battles and the battlefield afterwords.
Jamie is an insightful and reflective man. Through his lens I saw how he processed the horrors of a battle, carnage, and death.
An especially emotional moment in the book when Jamie stops to give viatica or viaticum, last rights.
The book is more of Jamie's reflection on this period in time, 1297. The book contains the characters, William Wallace and Andrew Murray. However, it did not reflect strongly the one man, Andrew Murray (in the subtitle). The story is wonderful, but it does not relay to me what the subtitle referred. I feel Jamie, Father James Wallace is the principal character.
April 15, 2016
Jack Whyte has always been a favorite author of mine. In the novel THE GUARDIAN, Jack Whyte delves deep into 13th century Scottish history.
At the heart of the story are William Wallace (Braveheart) and Robert Bruce (Earl of Carrick), which the author skilfully brings to vivid life. They seemed so real, so credible, that I became very attached to them, emotionally connected even. For those of you who regularly follow Jack Whyte, then you know you can expect a richly written story that is immaculately researched with plenty of fascinating primary and secondary characters. And for those who are not familiar with Jack Whyte, then you can be assured that you are in for a treat. Especially if this is the first book of his you read.
THE GUARDIAN is pure historical fiction that strictly follows the path of history. Historical details are written in to conversations to make it more interesting and easy to understand. Battle scenes and military tactics are always a specialty of the author. He writes them with such clarity, I envisioned them perfectly - including the sights, smells, and sounds. Whyte knows the 13th century well, expertly weaving fact and fiction seamlessly together to recreate history in a larger than life faction. His prose is immensely readable, engaging, and simple, keeping a steady interesting pace throughout.
For these reasons and more, Jack Whyte is always a reader's favorite - definitely mine for sure!
Many thanks to the author and publisher. I received a free copy of this book in exchange for an honest review. Thank you for visiting my blog, http://greathistoricals.blogspot.ca, where the greatest historical fiction is reviewed! For fascinating women of history bios and women's fiction please visit http://www.historyandwomen.com.
At the heart of the story are William Wallace (Braveheart) and Robert Bruce (Earl of Carrick), which the author skilfully brings to vivid life. They seemed so real, so credible, that I became very attached to them, emotionally connected even. For those of you who regularly follow Jack Whyte, then you know you can expect a richly written story that is immaculately researched with plenty of fascinating primary and secondary characters. And for those who are not familiar with Jack Whyte, then you can be assured that you are in for a treat. Especially if this is the first book of his you read.
THE GUARDIAN is pure historical fiction that strictly follows the path of history. Historical details are written in to conversations to make it more interesting and easy to understand. Battle scenes and military tactics are always a specialty of the author. He writes them with such clarity, I envisioned them perfectly - including the sights, smells, and sounds. Whyte knows the 13th century well, expertly weaving fact and fiction seamlessly together to recreate history in a larger than life faction. His prose is immensely readable, engaging, and simple, keeping a steady interesting pace throughout.
For these reasons and more, Jack Whyte is always a reader's favorite - definitely mine for sure!
Many thanks to the author and publisher. I received a free copy of this book in exchange for an honest review. Thank you for visiting my blog, http://greathistoricals.blogspot.ca, where the greatest historical fiction is reviewed! For fascinating women of history bios and women's fiction please visit http://www.historyandwomen.com.
October 5, 2016
Jack Whyte has again thrilled me with this, the last book of his Guardians of Scotland series. I'm an unrequited fan (have been since reading "The Sky Stone") and have always been held captivated by his down-to-earth style of writing.
If I had one disappointment it was the focus of the book. The two previous books - "The Forest Laird" and "The Renegade" - focused specifically on their primary characters: William Wallace and Robert Bruce respectively. "The Guardian," which was supposed to be the story of Andrew Murray, wandered away from Murray frequently to focus on Wallace and, to a lesser extent, Bruce. I would have liked a narrative that followed Murray closer than it did.
I hope this isn't the last book on this era of Scotland's history that Whyte writes. There's still the Battle of Falkirk (which is alluded to in "The Forest Laird"), Bruce's seeming betrayal of Wallace and, of course, the Battle of Bannockburn, which won Scotland it's independence (for a while, at least). I'd love to read Whyte's narrative of those event. Even a stand alone volume, in the nature of "Uther" would be a welcome addition to this history.
If I had one disappointment it was the focus of the book. The two previous books - "The Forest Laird" and "The Renegade" - focused specifically on their primary characters: William Wallace and Robert Bruce respectively. "The Guardian," which was supposed to be the story of Andrew Murray, wandered away from Murray frequently to focus on Wallace and, to a lesser extent, Bruce. I would have liked a narrative that followed Murray closer than it did.
I hope this isn't the last book on this era of Scotland's history that Whyte writes. There's still the Battle of Falkirk (which is alluded to in "The Forest Laird"), Bruce's seeming betrayal of Wallace and, of course, the Battle of Bannockburn, which won Scotland it's independence (for a while, at least). I'd love to read Whyte's narrative of those event. Even a stand alone volume, in the nature of "Uther" would be a welcome addition to this history.
October 3, 2015
The Guardian is the third book in The Guardians of Scotland series, novels that take you back to the late 13th and early 14th centuries at the time of the Wars of Scottish Independence. Although the series centers around William Wallace's rebellion (known by many because of the Braveheart movie), the three books so far each focus on a different main contributor to those monumental events in Scotland. The first one (The Forest Laird) is a tale of William Wallace himself, the second (The Renegade) is a tale of Robert de Bruce, and this third installment is a tale of Andrew Murray.
Although these books can often be found in the fantasy section of your local bookstores, they are not fantasy, but rather historical fiction. Far from just an exposé on Scottish history, the author brings us known historical facts and presents them to us as a story, from the point of view of the protagonists as they live through it, and filling in the gaps with what could very well have happened, both in actions and in dialogues.
The "phonetic" Scots accent scattered throughout the book adds to the authenticity and makes you feel as if you were right there with those famous characters.
Although these books can often be found in the fantasy section of your local bookstores, they are not fantasy, but rather historical fiction. Far from just an exposé on Scottish history, the author brings us known historical facts and presents them to us as a story, from the point of view of the protagonists as they live through it, and filling in the gaps with what could very well have happened, both in actions and in dialogues.
The "phonetic" Scots accent scattered throughout the book adds to the authenticity and makes you feel as if you were right there with those famous characters.
July 25, 2015
Love anything written by Jack Whyte! This book was the third (and I think last) of this series. Whyte focuses on Andrew Murray and William Wallace's meeting, friendship, and working together to fight the English army at Stirling and gaining a much-needed victory for the common, community of Scotland. Robert Bruce is also brought back into the story, but done more at the beginning and end of the book. Wallace has always been the "every day man's" hero, so most of us today can relate to his popularity during the times. Murray was more aligned with the nobility during the time, but his ideas supported Wallace's in that he also want the country to come together to fight to get King Edward's English troops out of Scotland. I hate what happened to Murray at the end, but that is history after all! In this way, Wallace accepted Bruce's help in the end to become the one and only Guardian of Scotland.
July 19, 2016
This was the third book in the trilogy...I will go back and read the first two.
The Scottish had been abused by the English and their King Edward for several years. It unleashed a type of warfare by the Scots that lasted sixteen years. A young commoner named William Wallace lost everything by the English hands; his young son, his pregnant wife and his home. He took to the forest and began building a mighty army that would destroy the English military for decades. The friendship of Sir Andrew Murray de Moray would lead them both to fight for Scotland and after Andrews death Will joined the Earl of Carrick (Robert Bruce) to continue the war.
William was named "The Guardian of Scotland" and Knighted by Robert Bruce.
The story was narrated by a priest who was William Wallace's first cousin, James Wallace.
The Scottish had been abused by the English and their King Edward for several years. It unleashed a type of warfare by the Scots that lasted sixteen years. A young commoner named William Wallace lost everything by the English hands; his young son, his pregnant wife and his home. He took to the forest and began building a mighty army that would destroy the English military for decades. The friendship of Sir Andrew Murray de Moray would lead them both to fight for Scotland and after Andrews death Will joined the Earl of Carrick (Robert Bruce) to continue the war.
William was named "The Guardian of Scotland" and Knighted by Robert Bruce.
The story was narrated by a priest who was William Wallace's first cousin, James Wallace.
December 23, 2014
I am an unconditional fan of Jack Whyte's and thoroughly enjoyed "The Guardian". The story, the third of a triology that followed Willam Wallace, Robert Bruce and now Andrew Murray, is told from the perspective of William Wallace's cousin, James, a priest. We are essentially taken into the politics and the strategy behind the Battle of Stirling so there is not a lot of action per se, but learning about the background and the key players was fascinating.
October 30, 2015
I enjoyed it a lot, but did anyone notice that Father Jamie is really, really stupid? It made some of the dialogue and events difficult to believe, because the story refused to acknowledge it (and went so far as to have a bunch of people call him clever). Don't get me wrong, I love Jack Whyte's work and I really enjoyed this series.
Read
January 17, 2016As much as I love Jack Whyte's writing, I had a hard time getting through this. The story had more to do with William Wallace than Andrew Murray, and a large portion of the book was spent rehashing info from the first 2 books in the series. I wish Whyte had stuck with the original plan, of the 3rd book in the series being about the Black Douglas.
Displaying 1 - 29 of 44 reviews