Robbins follows the gems of Hammett and Chandler of the '30s, but in the vein of the soft-boiled detective in late '50s New York, as McBain did after him, more specifically. His continuity in this genre is all that really connects the pieces, 79 Park Avenue being framed in the court procedural around an assistant D.A. and former detective, but it's really about the history between the DA's attorney and the madame of the modelling agency - played by Lesley Ann Warren in the 1977 film, one of the world's underrated beauties, starlet of the '60s and '70s, suitably apt for the role of femme fatale, there a brunette with brown eyes, a slip off the tropic track which Robbins adheres to.
So we get the picture, and it is all about salaciousness, seduction and sex. And it's as sexist as the period: '... her face, her body, the way she walked—everything told you this was a woman. The kind that was made for man.' (New English Library, 1985, p.143). But those original gems were also, if not blatantly sexist, works which used their pioneering tropes almost as caricatures of sexist demarcation - but they worked, within their emergent genres and rules. Does Robbin's' casual sexism in this '50s New York yarn counterbalance these crisp sexist demarcations with elements of the strong woman, like a Miss Sternwood or a Bridget O'Shaughnessy? Well, yes, partly, for in a significant sense, this is centrally what this narrative is about.
The first person is the effective means of revealing our principal's inner thoughts, the floating person perspective, a kind of observational stream of consciousness that gives insight into likes and dislikes, intolerance and sufferance, emotional motivation and turmoil, besides present action. All the behavioural cues that persist in everyday human transactions are a veneer akin to clothing. But we get the one-sided view of the 'hero' immediately laid out like a deal of solitaire, and gain insight into the 'heroine' via his past and present interactions, even while the longer interstitial slices of backstory are in the third person - and much weaker for it. A fuller, deeper novel comes through the floating person perspective, and this is what Robbins really needed to keep us fully engaged. It is partially employed through the omniscient narrator, of course. The slick quick delivery via only the eyes of Keyes (rhymes with 'eyes', for some reason) is true to generic type but insufficient to keep us really involved.
Yet we are immediately intrigued by that femme fatale - for the very notion of the femme fatale means intrigue, in a cartoon kind of way. And this feel is what comes off the pages. The quick intro in clipped wise ripostes, the cagey superficiality of loyalties and grating work buddies, the established antipathy-attraction between the principals, as though sparring partners in a play about cartoon characters they act out within some street-smart farce they themselves are above and observing and smirking upon, sharing the real secret: what lies between them. Faces, places and spaces are well set up, and fast. This is a style, not lack of it.
Robbins uses time slicing to tell Maryann's backstory, the bulk of the narrative, alternating between the court case and her past at different stages, starting at 15, where she is using her body to her advantage in a poor neighbourhood with a cleaner mum and a dirty step-father (see what I did there). She buys cigarettes at five a nickel and connives with her friends to get little favours where she can. She doesn't see a way out of her shabby life without using that body, her pretty face, her blonde hair, and her womanly wiles. Then Ross Drego turns up in his car, and his quiet friend, Mike Keyes.
But by now the clipped style reminiscent of Hammett and Chandler has disappeared, the narrative is sluggish and not even undistinguished, the backstory simplistic, slow, superficial, trite. This wasn't the story I was expecting, even in secondary exposition. Where was the gritty crime novel it flagged it might be? The stock characters just became cartoon. And it wasn't even well written. Mildly salacious fiction for the semi-literate.
I thought 79 Park Avenue was going to bridge the golden era of the hard-boiled detective classics of '30s L.A. and San Francisco and the New York police procedurals of the '70s, two memorable periods in a saturated genre, even if their tropes became over time almost caricature, almost cartoon. Yet it feels like it belongs to a former century, before we were most of us born, which hinted at part of the development that led us all the way to police-procedural horror, to Hannibal Lecter and Nordic Noir, but then skewed off.
It is neither noir nor hard-boiled; in framework it's more a slice of life belonging to Columbo (1968-2003), peering into the lives of the rich and quietly infamous, the invisible privileged with classic human failings. Maryann Flood (Marja Fluudjincki) feels like she's riding the skimmed cream of a fat and fatuous social elite, playing within their own rules, corruption as accepted a vice as sex and cigarettes. The stakes are therefore much much lower than murder or serial killing, despite its shallow immersion in organised crime.
The backstory becomes as prosaic as small talk, the poor beginnings, the glimpses of prosperity and love, the corners turned to get away, fleeing the poverty and want, the typical helplessness of directionless youth, pushed about by others' fancies. It becomes mired in a split romance, one turned bad, one turning good, friends becoming enemies, the set-up for a life of walking the line between fake morality and legality.
If we accept that prostitution should never have been nor be illegal (as crazy a notion as ducking witches), the only real case against our 'heroine' is extortion and blackmail. While she and the officials she bribes skirt the grey areas between law and morality, there is a clear-cut case of black and white between the first and the last charges, so it seems her fate is sealed if proved: 10 years.
But she has already had her share of injustice in the patriarchal system, been raped, becoming pregnant before her time, forced from her little brother into a correctional facility. The backstory is sordid, flat, predictable, uninteresting. Not the book I hoped it might be, it ploughed on in its facile way, and my opinion of Robbins slunk into the dross of the life he flatly determined to expose us to. It suggested that those girls who used their bodies to get on in the world were inevitably subject to its patriarchal hypocrisy and oppressions. Not a life of the mind anywhere in sight, except for Mike's ambitions. And now here he was facing his former girl in a courtroom, prosecuting her for making her way in the world with the assets Robbins champions and he himself had fallen for as a lad.
But do we care about its dénouement? Well, it ends in a glimmer of light amidst all its murk. That, at least.