The terrible new art is the least of your worries. They modernised the text.
I have been reading the Dork Diaries books since I was nine years old. That is, 12 years. You can understand it means a lot to me. The concept of a full-colour edition of the iconic first book? Bring it on!
I only heard of this mere days before release. I heard through booktwt's devastation over the new art style. The original illustrations haven't been coloured in, but rather completely redrawn; in a cheap, pandering, corporate, AI-reminiscent style. The character models reek of 2025 in the worst way. The colouring and shading sickens me. The fill tool on MS paint would have done this book more favours.
I thought that was all I had to worry about. I thought I'd have a fun time effectively re-reading Dork Diaries while cringing a bit at the new illustrations.
Then the changes came.
Some were to be expected and were positive. I remember the original book using the R-slur and am pleased it's nowhere to be seen here. I was also pleasantly surprised by the removal of insults such as brain dead.
Some tweaks would have greatly pleased my younger self but just surprised me here. Nikki's rant about the diary changing the page count from 288 to the accurate 376? Satisfying.
But then I noticed little things. I don't have my old collection to hand, but I knew certain conversations had been altered for no discernable reason. It just confused me. This was not advertised as a reworked text.
When Nikki's going on about the uses of a smartphone, she lists SENDING REELS and DOOMSCROLLING.
Dork Diaries was published in 2009.
I don't know what the original book said at this precise page, but upon my honour, it did NOT mention those sickeningly modern social media terms.
I began to wonder how much of the original text had been preserved. Why are they pandering to gen alpha? Yes the original books scream late '00s to early '10s and that is the beauty! Preserve the history, don't you dare try to tell me that either spilling the tea was a slang term in 2009, or that Dork Diaries now takes place post-COVID.
And listen, if they're SOOOO aware of modern terms and what appeals to the youth of today, WHY on page 178 is there a magazine with the title CP? There's no context to it, it's a throwaway background detail in an illustration, I can't remember if it was in the original book, but that abbreviation has the most abhorrent association these days and has for quite some time. No one picked up on it?
I can't remember if the Itsy Bitsy Spider rap is lifted from the original text, but if it isn't, I hope it's a Cupcakke reference.
Also, entire interactions and crucial moments are missing. Like the scene where Nikki grabs her parents' anniversary present to submit as her art project, so you have context for later when she apologises. Here we have the apology but not the setup.
There's more, there's worse, but I can sum it up by saying they removed the Twilight references. And that might be the most deplorable sin this book commits.
For the record I read the UK first print hardback entitled Dork In Colour on the 21st of November 2025, but we all know what Goodreads is like with accurate editions and dates.