In To Rescue the American Spirit, Bret Baier delivers a fast-paced, richly detailed biography of Theodore “Teddy” Roosevelt, portraying him as the embodiment of an energetic, forward-looking, moral leadership that pushed America into its role as a superpower. Baier, better known as a Fox News anchor and political journalist, draws on archival research and evocative storytelling to bring Roosevelt vividly to life.
Baier’s Roosevelt is larger than life — a sickly, bespectacled child who overcomes frail health to become a tireless reformer, naturalist, soldier, and president. Baier tracks Roosevelt from his gilded but troubled youth in New York, to his dramatic flight west, to his time as New York City police commissioner walking the beat at night, then as governor battling the old guard, and ultimately to the White House after the assassination of President McKinley. Baier emphasizes Roosevelt’s moral core, his belief in virtue over wealth, his stewardship ethos, and his muscular brand of statesmanship: “speak softly, and carry a big stick.”
A particularly poignant thread in Baier’s narrative is Roosevelt’s personal tragedy. On February 14, 1884, Roosevelt lost both his first wife, Alice Hathaway Lee, and his mother, Martha “Mittie” Roosevelt, on the same day.
Baier treats this catastrophe not just as a biographical footnote, but as the crucible out of which Roosevelt’s resilience and sense of purpose arose. In the wake of the double death, a heartbroken Roosevelt reportedly marked the day in his journal with a large “X” and confessed, “for joy or for sorrow my life has now been lived out.”
Baier also explores Roosevelt’s complicated relationship with his daughter, Alice Roosevelt Longworth, who's birth was bookended by two deaths. Baier doesn’t shy away from Roosevelt’s emotional distance: he largely handed over her upbringing to his sister, resembled her to her departed mother, and later quipped, “I can do one of two things. I can be president of the United States, or I can control Alice. I cannot possibly do both.”
Baier’s depiction captures the tension between Roosevelt’s public ambition and private vulnerability: his love for his daughter, but also his inability to fully reconcile his grief and responsibilities.
Beyond the personal, Baier excels at weaving Roosevelt’s public achievements into a broader national narrative. He charts Roosevelt’s conservationism, his pioneering of the Panama Canal, his role in brokering peace during the Russo-Japanese War, the launching of the “Great White Fleet,” and his domestic reforms — all set against the backdrop of America’s rise.
Through these episodes, Baier argues that Roosevelt’s vision was deeply moral, rooted in duty, stewardship, and a belief in the common good.
Praise and Strengths
Many reviewers praise Baier’s book as a compelling, accessible, and urgently relevant biography. According to a RealClearPolitics review, Roosevelt “comes bursting out of the book on every page,” and Baier’s research yields “nuggets … lost to history,” shaping the portrait of a complex but heroic figure.
The Washington Examiner similarly describes it as a “nonstop page-turner” with vivid detail.
Washington Examiner
Baier’s narrative flair, combined with his journalistic discipline, gives the book both momentum and gravitas — and, for many, a sense that Roosevelt’s spirit still matters today.
Criticisms and Tensions
Still, the book is not without its flaws. One major criticism stems less from the scholarship than from Baier’s framing, given his role as a Fox News figure. While Baier clearly grounds his narrative in historical evidence, his political lens sometimes seems to steer the story toward partisan resonance. In his Fox News commentary, Baier explicitly draws parallels between Roosevelt and President Donald Trump — invoking their “larger-than-life” personalities, their combative relationships with the press, and their willingness to disrupt the political status quo.
This comparison raises uncomfortable questions. Roosevelt and Trump lived in radically different contexts, with different ideologies and objectives. Roosevelt’s “big stick” diplomacy, conservation legacy, and progressive reforms do not map cleanly onto Trump’s nationalist populism, media strategy, or policy agenda. By leaning into these analogies, Baier risks flattening Roosevelt into a vehicle for contemporary political messaging, rather than letting him remain a fully historical figure.
Moreover, Baier’s emotional storytelling sometimes glosses over more critical or controversial aspects of Roosevelt’s character. For example, while Baier emphasizes Roosevelt’s moral clarity, he does not deeply interrogate the contradictions in Roosevelt’s imperialist ambitions, or his paternalism toward marginalized groups. Roosevelt’s conservationism, while visionary in many respects, also carried elitist undertones; his social reform impulses were mixed with classist assumptions. A more critical biography would engage with these tensions more directly.
Another tension lies in how Baier handles Roosevelt’s personal grief over his wife and mother. The tragedy of February 1884 is powerfully rendered — but Baier might overuse it as a turning point in Roosevelt’s life, simplifying how grief shaped him. Historical evidence suggests that Roosevelt’s coping with loss was more complex: he burned letters, erased much of his diary about Alice Lee, and never fully spoke of his first wife to his daughter.
While Baier acknowledges these facts, he tends to frame them in a heroic redemption arc, rather than exploring long-term emotional damage.
Finally, Baier’s status as a Fox News anchor naturally colors the book’s reception and purpose. His journalistic instincts — to dramatize, to find relevance to the present, to offer moral lessons — sometimes overshadow pure historiography. Critics might reasonably ask whether this is a biography first, or a political manifesto dressed as history.
On the Trump-Roosevelt Comparison
Baier’s decision to compare Roosevelt to Trump is perhaps the most controversial choice in the book and his public commentary. He points to shared traits: forceful communication, disdain for conventional media, and a populist streak.
But these parallels are superficial and risk misleading readers.
Here are a few key ways in which Trump and Roosevelt are not similar, despite Baier’s framing:
Policy Vision and Ideological Foundations
Roosevelt was a progressive republican, deeply invested in social reform, trust-busting, conservation, and international peace. His “New Nationalism” emphasized civic responsibility, public welfare, and regulation. Trump’s ideology, by contrast, has centered more on deregulation, nationalist populism, and transactional diplomacy. Their foundational beliefs about government's role are fundamentally different.
Foreign Policy Approach
Roosevelt believed in America’s responsibility to lead, broker peace, and project strength through diplomacy and moral purpose. His “speak softly, carry a big stick” metaphor encapsulated a vision of leadership grounded in restraint but readiness. Trump’s foreign policy, though sometimes transactional and forceful, lacks that consistent moral stewardship; it has often been more unilateral and contractual than visionary.
Character and Legacy
Roosevelt’s legacy includes the conservation movement (establishing national parks), progressive reforms, and a long-term commitment to institution-building. His public service was driven by ideals, duty, and a belief in civic character. Trump’s legacy is still contested, but many of his decisions and rhetoric were more reactive, polarized, and focused on personal authority than institutional strengthening or long-term nation-building.
Conclusion
Bret Baier’s To Rescue the American Spirit is an ambitious and emotionally resonant biography of Theodore Roosevelt. It succeeds brilliantly in painting Roosevelt as a dynamic, passionate leader shaped by both triumph and tragedy. Baier’s journalistic style brings the story alive, and his use of archival sources offers compelling insights into Roosevelt’s character and life.
Yet the book is not without shortcomings. Baier’s role as a Fox News figure and political narrator colors the biography with a contemporary agenda — especially in his comparisons between Roosevelt and Donald Trump. These comparisons tend to obscure more than illuminate, flattening Roosevelt’s complexity and projecting modern partisan battles onto a very different era.
While Roosevelt and Trump may share certain performative traits, their core philosophies, motives, and legacies diverge sharply. The morally driven conservationist and international statesman Roosevelt has little in common with the transactional, polarizing populist Trump, beyond surface-level similarities.
In the end, Baier has delivered a vivid and readable portrait of one of America’s most consequential presidents — but readers seeking a dispassionate, critical, academic biography may find his framing too infused with present-day politics. And by tying Roosevelt too closely to Trump, Baier risks diluting Roosevelt’s own history in service of contemporary narratives.