This book as a project had so much potential. On many counts, it did not reach that potential. On her own terms, though, Whitelock has probably succeeded. In the introduction, she states that The Sun Rising is intended to provoke similar works on global perspectives of James and his reign. By this criterion, Whitelock has been successful. The Sun Rising is an interesting read and is a work of great contextualisation. Along those lines, it will be a very useful work as a point of reference. I can’t help but feel slightly underwhelmed at it though. It seems that, in her lines of argument and enquiry, Whitelock established many threads but leaves them loose with a somewhat puzzling conclusion. Particular highlights were the chapters on the Virginia Company and Plymouth Plantation. There is little referring back to European contexts and developments regarding the consequences of the first two parts of this book. Indeed, part 3 does refer to the European landscape but only on its own terms and a political narrative of the Thirty Years War which is already familiar. Globalised it ain’t! What really bugged me in the conclusion was James being classified as a supporting character, in favour of entrepreneurs. Yet, throughout the book he is an active force. There’s no acknowledgment of the subtlety of royal image and kingship in the early modern period. Admittedly, James may not have boarded the Mayflower himself or sailed to Persia to kiss hands in the pursuit of cheap silk. Yet, his image and his figure were omnipresent as ways of introducing the British throughout the world in this narrative. It was to him that the Indonesians pledged fealty on Pulo Run. It was under his charter that these companies operated. He was an essential figurehead for the political, diplomatic, and economic ventures of the explorers of the Jacobean period. In that, he was not supporting but essential as a point of reference and a conveyor of authority. Taken on the political terms of the early modern period, which I would argue are the best criteria to evaluate and argue against, James was anything but a supporting figure. This judgement I have reached using the evidence Whitelock presents. I can’t help but feel as if it is not a coherent product nor does the analysis shape up to do justice to the commendable research she has clearly undertaken in preparing this book. I hope this book - somewhat deflating yet still interesting - acts as a spur for future scholarship on a global Jacobean political scale. Particularly with regard to image fashioning. In that, Whitelock has done the scholarship a great service which deserves to be recognised.