The Reverend Clarence Larkin was one of the most widely influential pop theologians of the early twentieth century: his works are the source of many of the "prophecies" and "truths" end-times Christians hold to even today. Here, in this 1887 pamphlet, Larkin summarizes the history of his particular sect of Christianity-the Baptists-by exploring: . why water is essential to baptism . the baptismal practices of the early churches . the object of baptism . why baptism is not essential to salvation . why Baptists insist on immersion in water for true baptism . the evils of infant baptism . baptism in the New Testament . and more. American Baptist pastor and author CLARENCE LARKIN (1850-1924) was born in Pennsylvania, and later set up his ministry there. He wrote extensively and popularly on a wide range of Biblical and theological matters.
This book is primarily an explanation and an apologetic for baptism by immersion. It is written for laymen and provides a very good summary overview of the major arguments that Baptists advance for immersion. It is very dated in places, especially the section that gives current membership numbers for Baptists in North America. As a Southern Baptist, I found Larkin's views to be representative of Southern Baptists today on baptism. However, on the issue of closed communion I disagreed with Larkin on several points.
Early in the book, Larkin acknowledges that he has compiled arguments and evidence from various authors. However, he does not give any citations. Had Larkin identified his sources, his book might possess even greater historical value.
Overall, I enjoyed this book and would recommend it to anyone considering the issue of baptism.
An interesting summary of baptist ideas toward the end of the nineteenth century. Unfortunately it reflects the revisionist history of those who try to link modern baptists with the apostolic times without being tainted with Romanism.
Larkin focuses a lot on baptism per se and makes his arguments with fundamentalistic confidence that is equal parts refreshing and concerning. In other words, he's monochromatic. Which often serves this discussion well. And certainly reflects his era. But which can easily derail. It is easy to see ways in which many baptists have not moved past the approaches and issues of Larkin's day.
But all said, it was a good reminder of why I'm baptist. And the importance of holding that loosely.