This discussion of the social character of the Christian churches is intended to be a practical contribution to the ethical problem of Denominationalism. The effort to distinguish churches primarily by reference to their doctrine & to approach the problem of church unity from a purely theological point of view appeared to be a procedure so artificial & fruitless that the author turned from theology to history, sociology & ethics for a more satisfactory account of denominational differences & a more significant approach to the question of union. Preface The ethical failure of the divided church The churches of the disinherited The churches of the middle class Nationalism & the churches Sectionalism & denominationalism in America The churches of the immigrants Denominationalism & the color line Ways to unity Notes Index
Helmut Richard Niebuhr was one of the most important Christian theological-ethicists in 20th century America, most known for his 1951 book Christ and Culture and his posthumously published book The Responsible Self. The younger brother of theologian Reinhold Niebuhr, Richard Niebuhr taught for several decades at Yale Divinity School. His theology (together with that of his colleague at Yale, Hans Wilhelm Frei) has been one of the main sources of post-liberal theology, sometimes called the "Yale school". He influenced such figures as James Gustafson and Stanley Hauerwas.
Despite the academic-sounding title, this is a passionate work. It argues that the distinct Christian churches (Lutheran, Presbyterian, Catholic, ad infinitum) prove the church's ethical failure. Sects form because existing churches become an entrenched middle-class institution and abandon the poor who founded them. The church has thus come to mimic the social and economic divisions in the society at large, rather than speaking with the single voice of Christ. To truly teach Christ's word, says Niebuhr, the churches will have to rediscover their true unity.
A fun story to this book. You know those crummy old book sales that school libraries put on? I'm a sucker for those. I can't imagine possibly missing out on a $0.20 treasure. This bad habit has led to me having too many books that I don't end up liking or don't read. Well I found this book for $0.20 and couldn't pass it up because my passion and calling in life is to help churches unite to serve their neighbors. I'm also an academic geek inside so this book hit on all the cords. I LOVE reading a book that gives perspective on issues I care about, but from decades earlier. Pretty sure this book first came out in the 1920's. It is packed with hard hitting concepts that remain absurdly relevant in today's socially divided church in America. Niebuhr's central point: Divisions amongst the church are entrenched in social issues (economics, politics, racism) much more than anything to do with theology. "the ideal of unity and equality has never been recognized in reality until the inferior group, whether women or slaves or a racial group, has asserted that equality and compelled the church to translate its principles into practice." Speaking about a gospel centered church: "It requires from its members the sacrifice of privilege and pride and bids each count the other better than himself. It can plant within the nations a fellowship of reconciliation which will resist the animosities nurtured by strife for political and economic values- a fellowship which , doubtless, may often be required to carry crosses of shame and pain when the passions of men have been aroused to conflict."
Though written almost a century ago, 'The Social Sources of Denominationalism' remains a classic work in the sociology of religion and contains insights still relevant today. One notable absence is a discussion of charismatic/pentecostal movements.
Starts out with some incredible theory and deeply convicting statements (honestly Niebuhr predicts the dwindling relevancy of the church and mass exit back in the 30s) and follows it with...about 150 pages of actual church denomination history. It's an interesting read if that's your bag. I thought the splintering of denominations at the end of the civil war was especially compelling with the current interplay between white evangelism and #BLM, but this, you have to dig to get through.
Most people think of differing denominations in terms of the differing doctrinal stands they represent. H. Richard Niebuhr turns the assumption upside-down by arguing that it is primarily various social forces - not doctrine - which has driven the many divisions of the church throughout the centuries.