*** REREAD January 2019 ***
upped to 4 stars to reflect cara's contribution. i didn't bother to reread the other two stories.
*** REREAD January 5, 2015 ***
only bothering with the maguire (mckenna). the rest aren't worth my time. but she'll get a regular revisit from me. sweet, sweet story. totally earned.
*** ORIGINAL REVIEW: December 2, 2014 ***
DO READ THIS BOOK for the Maguire tale.
COLLECTION: 3 stars in aggregate
MAGUIRE: 4+ stars
Holiday Rush by Samantha Hunter
2 stars: what should have been a fairly straightforward plot construct was shoehorned with implausibility, cheesiness, and unnecessary patronizing (misogynist-lite) behavior (minor spoilers):
(1) gideon flies to NYC on **christmas** as, i dunno, a favor.
(2) if the situation were that critical -- "drop all the things and fly to new york city! on christmas!" -- then why didn't calla's own family go help her?
(3) gideon's business plan for her -- public romance -- was rando, weird, and not believable (i'd totally be weirded out and walk away if my cake lady started feeling up some guy in her cake-making window).
(4) as soon as he shows, he begins taking over her life -- bossing her, stalking her in the name of protection, taking over her business plan. it's way less "sexy" than it is "totally patronizing and creepy IRL."
i may have thought this short a harmless but fairly forgettable read, but it compares unfavorably to the maguire (mckenna) short in this collection, Playing Games (review following), where the feminism is so carefully woven into the psyches of the two characters that it reads completely naturally (and makes Holiday Rush's ham-handed paternalism stand out even more).
Playing Games by Meg Maguire (Cara Mckenna)
4 stars: charming and thoroughly emotionally mapped (earned). some classic mckenna cuteness (see: dead spider in romance tub). there were one or two noticeable weak spots, but they were mere blips on the radar. in the aggregate, the story was a total win -- cohesive, well-directed, and emotionally engaging. and, bonus, her ladies are ALWAYS strong, self-actualized, and inherently feminist without ever being mary sues. she's a goddess, mckenna is; read all of her things.
ADD-ON AFTER FINISHING COLLECTION: one thing (among many) i just ADORE about meg maguire (cara mckenna) is that she is thoroughly realistic about her time lines and what she can accomplish believably within them: (1) she carefully paces emotional and psychological development, realistically and satisfyingly advancing and developing it within the story's time restrictions, but then at the same time (2) she doesn't push for her couples to be MORE committed than they naturally, realistically, should be by the end of the story; rather, things end with an optimistic, gleeful ambiguity that promises very, very good things but doesn't overdeliver. and when i read a story that emotionally delivers AND is believable? well. she's just THEBEST.
All Night Long by Debbi Rawlins
2 stars: moments of real charm thoroughly marred by the hero whose marked selfishness and creepy predation we're supposed to think is cute/forgivable/hot because he's GOODlooking. grody double-standard: if chubby, sweaty, middle-aged Norm from the factory floor had grabbed and bossed and innuendoed all over our heroine like that, we would have been horrified, blowing our rape whistles. but i guess because the cut of our hero's suit was nice and he's super rich, it's all, "NBD! 'coercive, aggressive asshole' looks good on you, bro! she totally wanted it. *high-five*" noooooo.
plus, the author sacrificed plot believability/cohesion in order to give the couple's chemistry time to develop. for example, within minutes of her arrival, he strong arms her off the factory floor into his office so they can be alone. minutes later he drags her back to the factory floor because he ought to mingle with his workers. minutes later, he drags her back to his office because whatever it is that had to happen on the factory floor has happened and now the author wants them to have alone time. all this in the space of, what, an hour? less? see what i mean? sort of nonsensical, all over the place. those elements needed to be better massaged, the action better mapped to the psychological development. furthermore, in the end, the time line (less than twenty-four hours) was MUCH too brief for me to buy their level of emotional commitment and talks of Forever by the end of the story.
it's too bad -- the author's voice had a tendency toward a really compelling, light playfulness that was overshadowed by the mechanical and philosophical problems.