This third book of a philosophical trilogy is a charming and entertaining seminar by a learned (and talking) chimpanzee holding court among thinkers from throughout history. The chimpanzee is Graybeard, presumably inspired by David Greybeard, the chimpanzee who played a pivotal role in Jane Goodall’s primate research. The discussion reminds me of the TV program, Meeting of the Minds, from the 1970’s, in which Steve Allen interacted with an assortment of historical figures.
In the case of Graybeard, there are twenty personages, including ten philosophers (from Plato to Sartre), four religious figures (from Lao Tzu to Albert Schweitzer), scientists (from Darwin to Einstein), psychoanalysts (Freud and Jung) and the environmentalist Edward Abbey. They are there to hear what Graybeard has to say, and Graybeard interacts with them, pointing out commonalities or gently expressing disagreement.
The author is strongly Darwinian, and so a chimpanzee sage expresses his solidarity with the animal kingdom and with nature in general. As an old friend of the author, I know that he is a voracious reader and has digested the writing of the people mentioned. Sometimes the personages disagree among themselves, allowing Graybeard to resolve the differences.
The author is strongly impressed by Schopenhauer’s concept of Will, and Graybeard identifies that as the driving force of evolution. Rather than seeing evolution to be blind, Graybeard sees biological imperatives as providing a purpose for the universe, expressed in the will to be free. Graybeard’s philosophy is too complex to summarize, but I can raise the central dilemma and dynamic.
At one point the author has Hegel say to Graybeard, “You’ve made more than a few references to my ideas like the Absolute Idea and a notion of the dialectic. But the way you use them is very different from how I’ve used them. You’re taking liberties. You have done it with Nietzsche too. How does this work?”
Graybeard answers, “You know, the beauty of your work is that it stimulates me. It gives me a different perspective. I can read your work and talk about what you’ve said, or I can read it to inspire my own thinking. Maybe you and I see the same patterns out there, but you interpret them one way and I another.”
Graybeard gets strong philosophical reactions out of me, and he will provide a workout for any reader interested in the history of thought. J.D. Steens has found in Graybeard a way to describe his own development through reaction to the philosophical masters. Though the development of anyone’s thinking is highly individual, Graybeard offers a wonderful personification (or shall I say “chimpification”?) of the process for all to see.