If there is a better book on this book's subject matter, I am unaware of it. BTAIM, issued in 1920, some observations of the world are somewhat dated (this is a minor point). OTOH, it lays out for the reader in both (wonderful) graphical and (adequate) text format in considerable detail how the Bible (mostly prophecies) can be divided (sectioned) up. The author, Clarence Larkin, was a true believer of a pre-millennial disposition and the results tell in how he sees things aligning in the Bible, history, etc.
Of course, Larkin, as a Christian, takes the Augustinian position (p. 153) "The New is in the Old contained; The Old is by the New Explained." He does not imagine that the New Testament's various interpretations of the Old Testament are the imaginations of its various authors--whose waking (and dreaming) lives were submerged in their cultish milieu--which is a plausible explanation especially in contrast to the notion that the spiritual economy got totally changed around with the New Testament in the way St. Augustine imagined. For instance, Why would the Lord God not offer an afterlife in the Old Testament? Why keep an afterlife secret? Were the Old Testament "saints" a lower form of life than those living later and an afterlife just not something they could use?
Having read the Bible as a believer cover-to-cover over 20 times myself, but being introduced to critical thinking ~25 years ago, I now recommend to those who insist on reading it, or getting an unbiased read of the Bible, to start at the beginning, Genesis 1:1 and pay attention to what is actually written rather than what anyone says. If one does that, I don't think one would be inclined to believe what the New Testament is selling.
Larkin, however is useful, not to disillusion would be Christians, but to succinctly (as much as possible) put forth the divisions (sections) in the Bible per a pre-millennial viewpoint.