To say this book has aged poorly is an understatement of epic proportions. It was published in 1981 (set in the mid-50s) and I read it at some point probably around the mid to late 80s. I recently found my copy on a shelf at my parents' house and thought I'd read it again. But when I read it today, I was angry at almost every character in the book.
The crux of the story is that Helen's 3-year old dog is going blind. Because he's saved her life twice, she's determined to save his. Aww, heartwarming! Except not.
So spoilers are ahead.
The things wrong with this book. Where to start?
1. The male author makes sure to mention how "shapely" the young girl's mother is. Why is this relevant? Because Helen, age 11, feels ugly.
2. But don't worry - at the end of the book, because she has persevered in training her dog (Tuck), she gives us the final line. "I've never felt so good. So confident. So beautiful." Well then!
3. Tuck saves Helen from an attempted abduction and rape. Seems appropriate for the audience!
4. They take him to the vet for help. At first, I was on-board because the vet didn't give them false hope. He told them there was no hope, no surgery, nothing that could be done. Then:
a) He doesn't give them any guidance about what they can do.
b) When they return to his office for guidance, he offers to "put the dog away" immediately.
c) His alternative suggestion is to turn the dog over to a research lab, so maybe he can help other dogs in the future.
d) When the family insists that's not cool, he tells them to consider what's best for the dog, that it's unfair to him to be on a rope.
e) He further shares that the worst bite he ever got was from a friendly but blind (and scared) dog (this is ok, but not so much how he says it).
f) When they express (natural) concern for the dog being tied up, he says they can expect him to get hit by a car, shows them a cat with a head wound, and says, "This is what it looks like when an animal is hit by a car."
g) The dog IS soon hit by a car and the family is terrified, but when the child asks if the dog will live, the doctor "laughed heartily" before assuring her he would be ok this time.
5. Several times, hitting the dog is mentioned as an acceptable option (though a last resort) when he's resisting his training or otherwise acting out.
6. They also leave the dog chained outside all day once he is hit by the car. The girl makes sure he has water, acknowledging the terrible southern CA heat.
6. There's very little consequence to the girl lying repeatedly, including to a school for the (human) blind where she tries to get her dog an assistance dog or when she runs away because she was eavesdropping.
That's more than enough reasons to dislike this book.