Pankey has always worked within the literary precincts of poem-lore, for as he says, "there is no cause, only correspondence," whence "in the realm of the poem only words are native," yet I sense in Crow-Work the beagle's nose for the world's information: in a Spanish cave, its shadowy images a present to amaze us, "we mean that which cannot extricate itself from the gaze," even where the visible's remnant is no more than spectral, and where one is involved in it, "one imagines past grandeur" as a poem-lore such that one "doubt[s] a correspondence | Between the animal and the spiritual." Just so, however, Pankey falls in love with that glimpse of a self the past offers spectrally. The volume finds a gnostic divinity ekphrastically working after Anish Kapoor's disc-ed chapel spaces, wherein Kapoor's slits, crow-like apertures in otherwise ordinary walls, are "An empty space disrupted by time -- | Embodies the caesura | Between gaze and gazed upon, | Threshold and entry. " About his own incredulities, Pankey concludes, "One does not possess a wilderness, | One enters it," which opens this gazer up to all sorts of function in what he's looking at. Crow enters the fray. I found it very creaturely, indeed, to be stamping around the couplets in the volume's last two, long sequences, wondering what they were called, remembering to go look it up.