What do you think?
Rate this book
Memoirs of a Happy Failure
Alice von Hildebrand is a household name to many who know her from her countless EWTN appearances, her books, and her extensive articles and essays. What is little known is the story of her life, notably the thirty-seven years she spent at Hunter College in New York City. There, despite systematic opposition she left a mark on a generation of students through her defense of truth with reason, wit, and love. By showing her students how truth fulfills the deepest longings of the heart, she liberated countless students from the oppressive relativism of the day, enabling many of them to find their way to God. Now, for the first time, discover the details of Alice von Hildebrand's life as a "Happy Failure," including: . her thrilling escape from Europe that was nearly halted by a Nazi sub . her early days in America and her dedication to education and cultivating wisdom . her marriage to the great philosopher Dietrich von Hildebrand, . her victories and defeats at Hunter where she combated a culture of relativism . and much more "Memoirs of a Happy Failure "is a fascinating and essential glimpse into the life of one of contemporary Catholicism s most compelling minds. It is the story of courage, faith, and the grace of God acting in the world."
200 pages, Hardcover
First published August 28, 2014
About the author
Alice von Hildebrand
34 books168 followersAlice von Hildebrand DCSG (born Alice Jourdain; 11 March 1923 in Brussels, Belgium) was a Catholic philosopher, theologian, and professor.
She came to the U.S. in 1940 and began teaching at Hunter College in New York City in 1947. She earned a doctorate from Fordham University in 1949. In 1959 she married the philosopher and theologian Dietrich von Hildebrand (1889–1977). She retired in 1984.
Alice von Hildebrand lived in the United States and was a lecturer and author whose works include: The Privilege of Being a Woman (2002) and The Soul of a Lion: The Life of Dietrich von Hildebrand (2000), a biography of her husband. In 2014, she published her autobiography, Memoirs of a Happy Failure, about her escape from Nazi Europe and her teaching career at Hunter College.
She came to the U.S. in 1940 and began teaching at Hunter College in New York City in 1947. She earned a doctorate from Fordham University in 1949. In 1959 she married the philosopher and theologian Dietrich von Hildebrand (1889–1977). She retired in 1984.
Alice von Hildebrand lived in the United States and was a lecturer and author whose works include: The Privilege of Being a Woman (2002) and The Soul of a Lion: The Life of Dietrich von Hildebrand (2000), a biography of her husband. In 2014, she published her autobiography, Memoirs of a Happy Failure, about her escape from Nazi Europe and her teaching career at Hunter College.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 37 reviews
January 22, 2015
When I first came across Alice Von Hildebrand while watching Mother Angelica Live I was rapidly impressed with her. Her quick wit, intelligence, and common sense was a delight. Since then I have been interested in what she had to say. Around the same time I became acquainted with the works of her late husband Dietrich Von Hildebrand. I have by no means fully dipped into all his works, but I want to go further. His Transformation in Christ is a book I dearly love.
When her biography of her husband came out The Soul of a Lion: The Life of Dietrich von Hildebrand I quickly attained and read it. Such an amazing story and an equally amazing man. You would think somebody who was a named enemy of Hitler would have his story more well known. There is at least a new book out called My Battle Against Hitler: Faith, Truth, and Defiance in the Shadow of the Third Reich.
When I read Soul of a Lion I wondered about his later years since the story ends, as I remember, after his escape and ultimately ending up in New York. Some of this is covered in Alice Von Hildebrand’s new book Memoirs of a Happy Failure. While this autobiography does go into how she met her future husband and some of her life with him, she is mostly quiet on her personal life in this regard except when there are interactions with her students.
What this book does cover is her life growing up in Belgium before World War II and her subsequent move to the United States during the war. The book starts out with her on a ship headed for New York that was threatened by a German sub with orders to evacuate before being sunk. I was quite interested in her descriptions of being raised in a very Catholic culture and the descriptions of her family members including the roles they played during the war. There were differences in both sides of her family that caused some tension.
The large majority of this book covers her years as a teacher at Hunter College which is part of the City University of New York. This was to be where she ended up teaching philosophy throughout her career. Now having heard her speak I was aware of the difficulties she had regarding students versed in moral relativism as she taught the objectivity of truth. I just didn’t realize that this was a continual philosophical battle.
What shouldn’t have surprised me is that this was rather minor considering even worse problems with the other faculty and those above her. The stories she relates regarding how she was treated by her fellow academics in such a pitiless back-biting manner raises your ire as she relates them. A Darwinian survival of the fittest where the fittest meant you had the right politics and sneer regarding subjective truth. Part of this was due to her being a women, but no doubt a lot of it was due to her being Catholic or really for being a faithful Catholic. Academics have no problem with Catholics just as long as they don’t believe that stuff. She describes how her education as taught by nuns little prepared her for such an atmosphere of prejudice and ill will.
What I enjoyed most was her stories of students. It was quite obvious her love of teaching and her love of her students. There are many wonderful stories regarding the opposition she got and when the truth of what she was saying clicked with many of her students. Even stories of students converting to the Catholic Church despite the fact that she never talked about the Church at all in her lectures. Not all the stories regarding her students go well and some are rather sad. Still there were several that came into the orbit of her personal life along with her husband. Despite the opposition she was getting from the school and the many attempts to sabotage her career and to force her to leave, she endured. It must have really annoyed them the number of students who elected to take her classes over other philosophy professors more in tune with the zeitgeist.
The title of her autobiography is quite apt. From the measure of the academic world she was mostly a failure. From the measure of her students that was not correct and even ultimately the school had to grudgingly admit this. I enjoyed the good humor she uses as she relates all these episodes. Experiences that might leave many bitter, yet her happiness shines through along with her love of the truth.
On a side note this book provides another example to me regarding the cultural revolution of the sixties. In that it was not as if everything was in good condition before then and that this was a sudden revolution. Her examples of attitudes in the 1950’s show just how much the culture was infected with moral relativism and that it was even worse in academia. Cultural termites had already weakened the foundations of the culture.
When her biography of her husband came out The Soul of a Lion: The Life of Dietrich von Hildebrand I quickly attained and read it. Such an amazing story and an equally amazing man. You would think somebody who was a named enemy of Hitler would have his story more well known. There is at least a new book out called My Battle Against Hitler: Faith, Truth, and Defiance in the Shadow of the Third Reich.
When I read Soul of a Lion I wondered about his later years since the story ends, as I remember, after his escape and ultimately ending up in New York. Some of this is covered in Alice Von Hildebrand’s new book Memoirs of a Happy Failure. While this autobiography does go into how she met her future husband and some of her life with him, she is mostly quiet on her personal life in this regard except when there are interactions with her students.
What this book does cover is her life growing up in Belgium before World War II and her subsequent move to the United States during the war. The book starts out with her on a ship headed for New York that was threatened by a German sub with orders to evacuate before being sunk. I was quite interested in her descriptions of being raised in a very Catholic culture and the descriptions of her family members including the roles they played during the war. There were differences in both sides of her family that caused some tension.
The large majority of this book covers her years as a teacher at Hunter College which is part of the City University of New York. This was to be where she ended up teaching philosophy throughout her career. Now having heard her speak I was aware of the difficulties she had regarding students versed in moral relativism as she taught the objectivity of truth. I just didn’t realize that this was a continual philosophical battle.
What shouldn’t have surprised me is that this was rather minor considering even worse problems with the other faculty and those above her. The stories she relates regarding how she was treated by her fellow academics in such a pitiless back-biting manner raises your ire as she relates them. A Darwinian survival of the fittest where the fittest meant you had the right politics and sneer regarding subjective truth. Part of this was due to her being a women, but no doubt a lot of it was due to her being Catholic or really for being a faithful Catholic. Academics have no problem with Catholics just as long as they don’t believe that stuff. She describes how her education as taught by nuns little prepared her for such an atmosphere of prejudice and ill will.
What I enjoyed most was her stories of students. It was quite obvious her love of teaching and her love of her students. There are many wonderful stories regarding the opposition she got and when the truth of what she was saying clicked with many of her students. Even stories of students converting to the Catholic Church despite the fact that she never talked about the Church at all in her lectures. Not all the stories regarding her students go well and some are rather sad. Still there were several that came into the orbit of her personal life along with her husband. Despite the opposition she was getting from the school and the many attempts to sabotage her career and to force her to leave, she endured. It must have really annoyed them the number of students who elected to take her classes over other philosophy professors more in tune with the zeitgeist.
The title of her autobiography is quite apt. From the measure of the academic world she was mostly a failure. From the measure of her students that was not correct and even ultimately the school had to grudgingly admit this. I enjoyed the good humor she uses as she relates all these episodes. Experiences that might leave many bitter, yet her happiness shines through along with her love of the truth.
On a side note this book provides another example to me regarding the cultural revolution of the sixties. In that it was not as if everything was in good condition before then and that this was a sudden revolution. Her examples of attitudes in the 1950’s show just how much the culture was infected with moral relativism and that it was even worse in academia. Cultural termites had already weakened the foundations of the culture.
September 2, 2022
Can I give 10 stars!?!?
September 27, 2015
Very much enjoyed this book, but only gave it 3 stars because it was so frustrating. Here she was married to one of the most famous theologians of the 20th century, and she hardly mentions him in the book. What is the point of writing a memoir, if you are not going to talk about your marriage, at least a little bit? This book really only covers her career at Hunter College. So if that is what you are interested in, you won't be disappointed. She recounts her struggles there in great detail, and of course we are horrified to read how she was mistreated by that secular institution. There are some inspiring anecdotes about successes with particular students, as well as some amusing, bizarre episodes that reflect the student body of that city school. It reads very quickly and is enjoyable. But the lack of information about her early life, and her adult life with Dietrich, is a major flaw of this memoir.
April 25, 2026
This is a really well-written, though brief, memoir by Alice von Hildebrand, philosophy professor and wife of famous philosopher Dietrich von Hildebrand. It covers her time teaching at Hunter College in New York, detailing several decades of highly coordinated and often quite vicious discrimination that she suffered during her academic career. All of these adjectives are mine and not the author's. She merely imparts the facts, and acknowledges the discrimination, which today would be considered a profoundly hostile work environment. There is no excuse for what she was made to endure; it is a stain on Hunter College and on the discipline of philosophy itself.
The author escaped to the US from Belgium at the start of World War II to flee Nazi occupation. Her family was highly respectable and devoutly Catholic. In her initial years as a teen in New York, she stayed with her aunt and uncle at the Waldorf Astoria. This was her home. It is fair to say, then, that her background prior to arriving in the US was likely fairly sheltered.
Women with academic leanings at the time were rarely allowed to teach at Catholic higher education institutions, so once von Hildebrand had completed her PhD, she took up a teaching position in the philosophy department at the secular Hunter College. She remained a devout Catholic throughout her studies and beyond, and her faith, she believes, triggered the systematic discrimination that she experienced for her entire career. Though she never mentioned religion explicitly in her class, her emphasis on teaching the objectivity of truth was a bone of contention for her colleagues, who were intent on following more contemporary fashions in philosophy that taught that truth is relative.
It is fascinating to read that politics and cut-throat hostility around this issue was going on in academic settings at that time. She describes how, at one point, colleagues in the philosophy department recruited students to take her classes to spy on her. While she does not accuse her colleagues of professional jealousy and resentment, the facts of the book alone would suggest that this was a possible motive, at least in some cases. Her classes were wildly popular. When one of her senior adversaries pulled her from teaching an ethics course that was full, students actually walked out when they realised that he was now teaching the course, rather than von Hildebrand, as had been advertised. Ultimately, the course had to be cancelled that semester.
While reading this, it was impossible not to think about how jealousy, resentment, bigotry (in this case, anti-Catholic), and misogyny often hide behind a veneer of intellectual sophistication. Yet von Hildebrand, rather charitably in my opinion, attributes the consistent dirty tricks campaigns to a passionate belief in 'absolute dogma in the liberal world, namely the universal relativity and subjectivity of all values. To challenge this dogma is already to violate the separation of church and state.' She wryly notes one of the main contradictions of liberalism:
Anyone with a half a brain can see how these ideas have filtered into the culture over the last number of decades, literally infecting relationships. I recall a conversation a few months ago in which I asked a person who was once close to me for the facts of a situation that mattered to me. The person said, "I will tell you my truth when I am ready." My response, to the effect that I was actually looking for the facts of the situation, which consisted of objective truth, was regarded with complete dismay. People talk about their truth a lot these days, and by that they may often mean their perspective on a situation. However, I have noticed that it is a term very often also used to obscure the objective reality of a situation and to deceive others. This is no accident.
Despite all of the persecution, denied promotions, a long wait for tenure, and relegation to evening classes, students flocked to von Hildebrand's courses throughout her career, and she seems to have found teaching a truly rewarding experience, if also at times enervating. She admits that when she began her career, she was ill-prepared for the arrogance not only of some staff members, but also of some of the students in her classes. This was due to differences in the educational cultures of the US and Europe, as well as the burgeoning youth culture in the US of the '60s and '70s. Students in European educational settings were simply more teachable. They realised they were there to learn.
She is dismissive of the unrest among students in relation to the Vietnam War. This is slightly understandable, given the challenges she already faced in her time at Hunter. However, her description of the student protests is disapproving. There is no attempt to understand some of the reasons for the discontent among students. She provides a throwaway sentence to the effect that sometimes it is necessary to fight communism to prevent it from infecting more souls. There is a lack of awareness in the text that perhaps the youth of the time may not have wished to be drafted into a war they did not fully understand. That said, no two missions are the same and it could be that ministering to these students simply wasn't her spiritually assigned task in life.
Nevertheless, this utter lack of empathy for the students questioning a system that would send them off to a war in which thousands were dying strikes me as strange, coming from someone who initially arrived in the US to flee Nazi violence. One does not necessarily need to agree with all of the students' methods to make some effort to understand their grievances.
Her efforts to help students experiencing other, more personal crises are extremely striking. She recognises academic ability in her evening classes regardless of class, creed, or age. But when it comes to a more systematic, widespread questioning of the idea of being sent abroad to possibly kill civilians and/or come home in body bags, it seems von Hildebrand reaches a wall, despite having fled the Nazis. Sadly, this is is true of many Catholics and other Christians. Assertions of the sanctity of life have certain limits, depending on the context, especially if it's all occurring abroad and relates to somebody else's son, father, or brother. Out of sight, out of mind.
There are various moving descriptions of students who found peace through conversion to Catholicism after taking her classes and pondering the objectivity of truth. These are truly fascinating, given that she claims not to have mentioned religion in her classes, and one can only admire the author's life-long tenacity, philosophical conviction, and profound faith.
The author escaped to the US from Belgium at the start of World War II to flee Nazi occupation. Her family was highly respectable and devoutly Catholic. In her initial years as a teen in New York, she stayed with her aunt and uncle at the Waldorf Astoria. This was her home. It is fair to say, then, that her background prior to arriving in the US was likely fairly sheltered.
Women with academic leanings at the time were rarely allowed to teach at Catholic higher education institutions, so once von Hildebrand had completed her PhD, she took up a teaching position in the philosophy department at the secular Hunter College. She remained a devout Catholic throughout her studies and beyond, and her faith, she believes, triggered the systematic discrimination that she experienced for her entire career. Though she never mentioned religion explicitly in her class, her emphasis on teaching the objectivity of truth was a bone of contention for her colleagues, who were intent on following more contemporary fashions in philosophy that taught that truth is relative.
It is fascinating to read that politics and cut-throat hostility around this issue was going on in academic settings at that time. She describes how, at one point, colleagues in the philosophy department recruited students to take her classes to spy on her. While she does not accuse her colleagues of professional jealousy and resentment, the facts of the book alone would suggest that this was a possible motive, at least in some cases. Her classes were wildly popular. When one of her senior adversaries pulled her from teaching an ethics course that was full, students actually walked out when they realised that he was now teaching the course, rather than von Hildebrand, as had been advertised. Ultimately, the course had to be cancelled that semester.
While reading this, it was impossible not to think about how jealousy, resentment, bigotry (in this case, anti-Catholic), and misogyny often hide behind a veneer of intellectual sophistication. Yet von Hildebrand, rather charitably in my opinion, attributes the consistent dirty tricks campaigns to a passionate belief in 'absolute dogma in the liberal world, namely the universal relativity and subjectivity of all values. To challenge this dogma is already to violate the separation of church and state.' She wryly notes one of the main contradictions of liberalism:
There is no limit to one's right to speak about many points of view and many interpretations; but to teach that a particular position is true, that in turn is a violation of academic freedom. I remember a faculty meeting during which my colleagues discussed what should be covered in Introduction to Philosophy. I suggested that the question of truth be made a primary topic to which one of my colleagues responded, "whose truth?" Some of my colleagues snickered. I should have asked, "whose freedom?"
Anyone with a half a brain can see how these ideas have filtered into the culture over the last number of decades, literally infecting relationships. I recall a conversation a few months ago in which I asked a person who was once close to me for the facts of a situation that mattered to me. The person said, "I will tell you my truth when I am ready." My response, to the effect that I was actually looking for the facts of the situation, which consisted of objective truth, was regarded with complete dismay. People talk about their truth a lot these days, and by that they may often mean their perspective on a situation. However, I have noticed that it is a term very often also used to obscure the objective reality of a situation and to deceive others. This is no accident.
Despite all of the persecution, denied promotions, a long wait for tenure, and relegation to evening classes, students flocked to von Hildebrand's courses throughout her career, and she seems to have found teaching a truly rewarding experience, if also at times enervating. She admits that when she began her career, she was ill-prepared for the arrogance not only of some staff members, but also of some of the students in her classes. This was due to differences in the educational cultures of the US and Europe, as well as the burgeoning youth culture in the US of the '60s and '70s. Students in European educational settings were simply more teachable. They realised they were there to learn.
She is dismissive of the unrest among students in relation to the Vietnam War. This is slightly understandable, given the challenges she already faced in her time at Hunter. However, her description of the student protests is disapproving. There is no attempt to understand some of the reasons for the discontent among students. She provides a throwaway sentence to the effect that sometimes it is necessary to fight communism to prevent it from infecting more souls. There is a lack of awareness in the text that perhaps the youth of the time may not have wished to be drafted into a war they did not fully understand. That said, no two missions are the same and it could be that ministering to these students simply wasn't her spiritually assigned task in life.
Nevertheless, this utter lack of empathy for the students questioning a system that would send them off to a war in which thousands were dying strikes me as strange, coming from someone who initially arrived in the US to flee Nazi violence. One does not necessarily need to agree with all of the students' methods to make some effort to understand their grievances.
Her efforts to help students experiencing other, more personal crises are extremely striking. She recognises academic ability in her evening classes regardless of class, creed, or age. But when it comes to a more systematic, widespread questioning of the idea of being sent abroad to possibly kill civilians and/or come home in body bags, it seems von Hildebrand reaches a wall, despite having fled the Nazis. Sadly, this is is true of many Catholics and other Christians. Assertions of the sanctity of life have certain limits, depending on the context, especially if it's all occurring abroad and relates to somebody else's son, father, or brother. Out of sight, out of mind.
There are various moving descriptions of students who found peace through conversion to Catholicism after taking her classes and pondering the objectivity of truth. These are truly fascinating, given that she claims not to have mentioned religion in her classes, and one can only admire the author's life-long tenacity, philosophical conviction, and profound faith.
August 31, 2024
I loved this story of a tough woman in trying times.
August 14, 2023
(4⭐️) I’ve read some of Alice von Hildebrand’s work and have always wanted to read some of Dietrich’s work. I didn’t realize that her professional journey was marked with so many trials, but she really persevered as a woman in academia (teaching philosophy, no less) as a practicing Catholic in the 1960s-1970s. Her chapters were short, punchy reflections. I will say that it got repetitive after a while, but it’s worth sticking with because she does have many incredible insights and stories to share, not to mention the countless number of people who converted to Catholicism thanks to her continual pursuit of sharing the objective truth, though she never explicitly spoke of religion in the classroom.
October 24, 2017
A beautiful reflection about being faithful to teaching truth amidst discrimination. I wish I could have had Alice Von Hildebrand as my professor. I enjoyed the small glimpses into her marriage as well. After reading this I want to dive more into Dietrich’s writing and better understand objective truth.
February 26, 2022
This book is a must read. Absolutely wonderful.
November 10, 2016
What a joy to read stories from the life of a woman who spent her life teaching evening students of Hunter College in New York City the objectivity of truth. She did this in a time where secularism and relativism was becoming the sea in which everyone was swimming.
All I could think about through nearly all of the book is how fortunate those students were to have such a person dedicated to teaching them such valuable perspective. All while she endured prejudice and discrimination due to her faith. What a gift and hidden gem she has been to the people of New York City.
I loved this book! Highly recommended.
All I could think about through nearly all of the book is how fortunate those students were to have such a person dedicated to teaching them such valuable perspective. All while she endured prejudice and discrimination due to her faith. What a gift and hidden gem she has been to the people of New York City.
I loved this book! Highly recommended.
January 27, 2015
I loved this book, but I am already a Dr. Alice fan. I wish that I could have attended one of her classes.
April 15, 2016
Wow, talk about suffering for your Faith in the workplace! I don't know how she did it for soooo long, but I'm sure she influenced many lives by sticking with it. Inspiring.
January 14, 2024
Alice von Hildebrand was a highly respected philosopher and the second wife of Dietrich von Hildebrand. They married in 1959. She was born in Belgium in 1923 and died in 2022 in New York. She taught at a secular university, Hunter College, in New York for 37 years. Alice came with her sister to America during the war as her family wanted to send her somewhere safe. After completing her PhD in Philsophy she taught at Hunter College. She was paid a low salary and tenure as a professor was denied for many years and she had few friends among the faculty. She was known to be a Roman Catholic and that turned many of the academics of the day against her. She taught that there was "absolute truth" an unpopular belief at the time when relativism was the only accepted stance. She was accused of spreading Catholicism but swore that she did not even mention to students that she was a Catholic (although the story was spread around). Still, God worked through her teaching and several students eventually converted to Catholicism. "Some students on the verge of despair found a reason for living; many, despite the fact that she never mentioned religion, converted to Catholicism." John Henry Crosby, President of the Hildebrand Project.
One wonders why she went through all the 'torture' of teaching at such a liberal college but she says that she felt God wanted her there and it seems He did. She was "happy" because she loved her students and saw their genuine interest in philosophy.
One wonders why she went through all the 'torture' of teaching at such a liberal college but she says that she felt God wanted her there and it seems He did. She was "happy" because she loved her students and saw their genuine interest in philosophy.
January 13, 2025
What a wonderful book! I felt that as a Catholic, I should probably learn more about the life of the Von Hildebrands, since they are so widely admired. I enjoyed this in its audiobook format while piddling around the house. It was so pleasant to listen to her interesting early life, and a compilation of 24 years worth of stories in the classroom. I am amazed at what she endured at Hunter College. How inspiring that her teaching in philosophy brought about so many conversions, all the while Von Hildebrand only teaching objective truth and never once mentioning Roman Catholicism. She is anything but a “failure”! This was such a pleasant read, I loved the whole thing. God is full of surprises in this book.
December 2, 2022
I too was disappointed in the book. Academicians can be petty, narcissistic, and overly preoccupied with their (increasingly) tiny areas of research, while their tendency to reach beyond their areas of specialization in the form of "I have spoken" articles and op-ed pieces, has grown exponentially since Professor von Hildebrand had to deal with an earlier generation of twits.
But I'm not sure I was prepared for detailed discussions of slights major and minor, over a long period of time. Most of the adversaries are little if any remembered today, while the legacy of her husband continues to stand the test of time.
But I'm not sure I was prepared for detailed discussions of slights major and minor, over a long period of time. Most of the adversaries are little if any remembered today, while the legacy of her husband continues to stand the test of time.
May 7, 2023
A brief account of Alice von Hildebrand’s tenure as a professor of philosophy at Hunter University, this book was incredibly inspiring. I found one quote particularly encouraging: “God, in His goodness, shows us only a small part of the path He is leading us on.”
I was shocked to read about issues she experienced that are so similar to some we experience today. Like discrimination against Catholics, the anti-liberalism of liberals, and more.
I look forward to reading more of Alice and Dietrich’s writings.
I was shocked to read about issues she experienced that are so similar to some we experience today. Like discrimination against Catholics, the anti-liberalism of liberals, and more.
I look forward to reading more of Alice and Dietrich’s writings.
July 20, 2020
I saw an interview of "Lilly," Alice Von Hildebrand on Socrates in the City ( with Eric Metaxas) . She was brilliant! This book chronicled her early life and her life as a college professor with her doctorate in philosophy in a day when women did not have much headway in that field. She tells some amazing stories of teaching about truth and how that opened the door for many of her students to come to Faith in Christ. Lilly is a truly courageous woman of faith!
September 1, 2021
Alice besides being a brilliant philosopher and teacher is at the same time a phenomenal writer. Every page was engaging and her personality and wit came across in each line. This book gives a succinct portrait of the woman who is at the same time the wife of Hitler’s number one enemy and also distinguished in her own right, this being recognized even by the Pope with his conferral of the honor of Dame Grand Cross upon Mrs. Alice von Hildebrand. This book is well worth the read!
April 22, 2022
Not sure that I give the book a 4, but I give the story, and the woman behind it a 5+. That being said, I think the audience for this book is pretty small: Catholic academics. I am not sure how I came across this book, but I am glad I did. Powerful story of faith, and surviving the grueling reality of academia. BTW: I do not know her from EWTN or any other essays, I am guessing I found her work through Commonweal Magazine.
February 22, 2019
I would have enjoyed her story more if she spoke to how her faith helped her overcome her adversity. I do understand that most of her fight was as an underdog, as a Catholic woman professor in a male dominant Jewish college. I am sympathetic to her story. I was hoping it would end with more about how her faith played an impact.
September 19, 2017
It may just be me. It was a good view of the struggles of a female, Catholic professor during the time but it ended up just being whining. Why, one would ponder, did she not just go elsewhere? It could have summed it up in half the pages and still made the point clear.
July 2, 2023
I think a lot of people subscribe to the idea of avoiding "toxic" situations and only doing what serves you. But this is a refreshing story of a woman who faced many obstacles and decided to continue on in the work laid before her.
March 23, 2026
3.5 stars
I really enjoyed it, but I wish it were longer and didn't jump around so often. Alice von Hildebrand is so cool and clearly lived such an interesting life, so I was hoping for more detail outside of her stories from teaching.
I really enjoyed it, but I wish it were longer and didn't jump around so often. Alice von Hildebrand is so cool and clearly lived such an interesting life, so I was hoping for more detail outside of her stories from teaching.
December 18, 2018
A short autobiography of an amazingly gifted woman. Dr. Von Hildebrand is truly an inspirational and strong role model for all woman.
October 2, 2019
Amazing. Every woman should read this book.
Read
January 27, 2022I would have enjoyed this more if it wasn't my first real experience with her writing. It was mostly a recounting of all the anti-Catholic discrimination she experienced at the college she taught at.
March 24, 2022
I loved reading this book. Her insight and dedication to objective truth is inspiring. God bless Alice Von Hildebrand!
January 15, 2023
This book was recommended to me, so I was excited to read it. I also love Alice. But I found her memoir hard to relate to, more of a narration of her academic career.
July 12, 2024
One of the most… enrapturing? books I’ve read. Just absolutely wonderful, engaging, demonstrative of the small martyrdoms we face every day.
July 6, 2025
What pleasure to discover Alice for the first time! Can’t wait to read more
September 7, 2025
Incredible woman
Displaying 1 - 30 of 37 reviews