This volume in the Shakespeare Criticism series offers a range of approaches to Twelfth Night , including its critical reception, performance history, and relation to early modern culture. James Schiffer’s extensive introduction surveys the play’s critical reception and performance history, while individual essays explore a variety of topics relevant to a full appreciation of the early modern notions of love, friendship, sexuality, madness, festive ritual, exoticism, social mobility, and detection. The contributors approach these topics from a variety of perspectives, such as new critical, new historicist, cultural materialist, feminist and queer theory, and performance criticism, occasionally combining several approaches within a single essay. The new essays from leading figures in the field explore and extend the key debates surrounding Twelfth Night , creating the ideal book for readers approaching this text for the first time or wishing to further their knowledge of this stimulating, much loved play.
James Schiffer's introduction is all-embracing, thorough and learned; and the essays are often ground-breaking, like Ivo Kamps'. It is an honor for me to be included in this collection with my quasi-materialist essay on "Rings and vows in TN." Renaissance engagement rings did not differ from marriage rings, which often had a helmet or family crest on them. Diamonds didn't occur in rings until, roughly, DeBeers' monopoly. In my essay I remark that there's only one American in Shakespeare: Malvolio. (One could also make a fair argument for Othello's "American" motivations.) For wanting to marry the boss's daughter, or in fact the boss herself, he is treated as mad--put in a dark cage, questioned on theology (instead of questions on the meaning of "the rolling stone gathers no moss"--see One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest) by the psychiatrist preachers of the day, etc. The Clown/Preacher/Psychologist questions Malvolio on Pythagoras's idea of the Transmigration of the Soul(!--tougher than mere proverbs). Malvolio says he no way, as a Christian, approves this (Hindu?) belief. The Clown-Psychologist says M must stay in the dark crazyhouse until he agrees with Pythagoras, and "fear to kill a woodcock lest thou dispossess te soul of ty grandam." Malvolio's American idea to marry his boss-lady waited two centuries and a revolution to be accepted. And now this American cavalier-ness with social class may be endangered, as we develop our own aristocracy of hard cash, billionaires with tax havens. Well, looks like I have not reviewed the book, but I have written an ad for my own piece. Was it ever thus. Guess you'll have to check out the book yourself, and see what I am too self-centered to convey.
From our pages (Mar–Apr/11): "This collection examines Shakespeare’s classic comedy about mistaken identity through several critical lenses, exploring themes of sexuality, madness, and social mobility. Schiffer’s introduction includes a history of the play’s performances and critical reception."