The author travels to different countries trying to understand the policies and practices that sustain long lives for people and buoy up strong social ties. He highlights the importance of intergenerational living (Spain) not age segregated communities, neighborhood design that fosters social interactions instead of car-dominant living (Spain), challenges to ageist stereotypes (Japan), life long learning (Korea), working longer and more flexibly (Japan), focus on in person instead of online interactions (Italy and the Sunday night dinners!), volunteering!!! All of this data and research just makes sense
But I didn't like the book because of the judgmental and even ageist attitude of the author. In the Intro, the author tells the story of Table 23 -- the table where he sat at a wedding. This table was on the outskirts of the action and were all guests of the bride's parents in the 60s and beyond. Several people at the table talked about their post retirement life -- one woman had the time to read books during the day, another volunteered for a local non profit board and another gushed about all the new cooking he was doing. The author was SO judgmental , claiming that the people at Table 23 were living lives of quiet desperation instead of meaning and he referred to Table 23 throughout the book even in the conclusion. How dare he judge the meaning of someone else's life! I think he was upset because he was placed at a table on the outskirts with people he thought were old and boring and washed up. And he didn't want a seat at that table. I have done this as well. I judge some family members who go cruising for retirement and fix their kitchens and go to the early bird dinner. Maybe I'm mad at my own snobbiness. All I can say is that the recommendations throughout the book (working, volunteering, learning, giving back) all make sense and as I make my way figuring out what this eldering time will be, I will focus on it being a time for growth and giving back (generativity).