Ladies and Gentlemen of the jury: I intend to prove that the book “Diary of a Wimpy Kid the Third Wheel,” by Jeff Kinney is a very good book at telling many different sub-plots besides the main one. However, there were areas in this book that were not quite as good at giving an ending or a reasonable ending to all of the sub-plots. Narrated by a first-person narrator, Greg Hefley is a Junior High School student who is having some trouble with love. The main issue in this book is the Valentine’s Day Dance, where Greg is desperate to find a date, and possibly his date’s love.
My first example is about Greg and his family going to a restaurant. So there is this restaurant near their neighborhood named Corny’s. Now at Corny’s, they have a rule that if you were a tie into the restaurant, they will cut it off and put it on a cork board called the wall of shame. Well, the first time they went to Corny’s, Greg’s dad was wearing a tie. One of the waiters at the restaurant came over with a big pair of scissors and cut the tie off. As you can see from this example, we know what happens to Dad because we read earlier that all the ties that are cut off go on the wall of shame, thus explaining a reasonable ending to a sub-plot.
My next example will be about the story of the mad panster. It all began when one kid pants another kid in gym class. Pretty soon everyone started pantsing each other. Finally, Vice Principal Roy had to come in and talk to everyone in the class about how you shouldn’t pants anyone. Right in the middle of his lecture, some kid pulled down Vice Principal Roy’s pants down from underneath the bleachers. No one knew who did pants Vice Principal Roy, but they call him the mad pantser. As you can see, the author didn’t just randomly mention the mad panster in the middle of the story; he explained how the mad pantser came to be, thus explaining an example of a reasonable explanation.
My last example will be about a negative statement, one that doesn’t have a reasonable ending or explanation. It’s a story that’s also about the mad pantser. So we know that there is a mad pantser, but the author doesn’t explain at the end of the book whom the mad panster is. He doesn’t even give any hints at all of whom it could be. This is an example of not giving a reasonable explanation ending to all the sub-plots.
As you can see from the examples above, this book is very good at telling many different sub-plots, but it doesn’t give us and reasonable explanations or endings to all of them. I think the intended audience for this book is for people who like to laugh a lot, because of the entire miss haps that Greg keeps getting himself into. I would recommend this book to anyone because this book probably has a wider audience to reach out to. This is why I like this book.