This story was absolutely incredible, but for some reason I found myself drifting at times, which I'll get into in a minute.
Last year one of my students brought in "The Lonely Doll," the really weird children's book from the 60s. The parent even warned the teacher, "It's, uh, weird." Ha! I was struck that the illustrations were these detailed photographs, and also that, of course, it was so weird. I mean, creepy, for realz. Recently I looked it up to show a friend, and I saw this biography of the author, and was completely hooked by the synopsis. It makes total sense that such a strange book would have a strange author, but I didn't realize the depths of the bizarre this book would get into.
Basically, if you've seen "Grey Gardens," that was the relationship Dare Wright had with her mother (interesting, her name was also Edie). The doll starring in "The Lonely Doll" was named Edith after her. They have this sick, codependent relationship from the time Dare is born, but what's extra odd about it is that, rather than isolating themselves among cats and raccoons a la Grey Gardens, they're super out and about in the world. To the point where Edie (a well-respected painter) did a portrait of Greta Garbo and much of Cleveland society. They were these society ladies who hung out with very wealthy and well-known people, and yet they were still desperate for their own, creepy world in which they played dress-up and slept in the same bed well into adulthood (ew).
Nathan does a great job of interviewing the gazillion people who knew them - as I said, they were Super Society Ladies, and so I basically had to give up keeping track of everyone they knew and that Nathan mentions. It isn't that she isn't organized - the book is extremely well done. It's just . . . too many. One criticism I have is actually that I would have preferred more in-depth statements from friends of the family than dozens of sound-bites from a plethora of individuals. I felt like I was getting a lot of "what" without enough "how" or "why."
Many people who knew Dare said that she sparkled; men followed her everywhere, adored her, but she at one point literally ran away from a man in a panic. Edie is spoken about factually, but even these bare facts allude to her obsession with Dare. While I appreciate that the author is being factual, I wish I had just a slight bit of judgment from someone, somewhere. I mean, c'mon. These two were nuts. I read a lot of this with my jaw hanging open. And then I started to get annoyed at everyone who would go to their house, eat their food, and enjoy their company, but would never comment on or admit that this was extremely twisted. The "looking the other way" gets to the point of being obnoxious because, as I said, they weren't hiding.
The only person who seems to blatantly agree with me about Edie and Dare's relationship is Dare's brother Blaine, whom she met in adulthood; one of themes is the struggle Dare had between her mother and brother. But, then again, don't get too attached to Blaine because the moment they met, he and Dare were so obsessed with each other they considered just, like, living as husband and wife - which, holy shit, Jean Nathan, that is ONE LINE. You CANNOT just drop the mic on something like that.
Anyway, my anger at the supposed objectivity of this book increased reading about Dare's ridiculously sad end. It made me really upset, if I'm being honest. Because anybody who knew her should've known she'd end up the way she did. There's really no excuse for it, none at all. Thank God she had nurses that could at least attempt to help her, and did more for her than all of her shallow, stupid friends who liked her outfits and were entertained by her childishness.
Listen. I definitely recommend this book. The story is unbelievable and heartbreaking. Dare Wright is proof that the world is unlikely to ever be boring. She was unique, and the author does a great job of interpreting her photos and stories in line with her life. I just wish she had probed a bit more into the psychosis occurring, and perhaps had been a bit more blatant with the, "Guys, just keep in mind, this is wrong" aspect of the story. Sometimes objectivity comes off too much like approval, though I'm sure that that wasn't her intention. I just needed a bit more depth, and she had so much access to Wright's friends and family, I think it was possible to achieve.