What's seen is the money they made, but what's unseen is the choices that they've made. Its what allows them to continue to be wealthy, It's more about taking a very long view with all the potential negatives that we all fear.
A global wealth tax would simply put more money in the hands of federal and state bureaucracies that have generally been inept at managing their own budgets.
The annual loss people suffered from their own folly was greater than the 1 percent an adviser charged to manage their money.
Moral licensing: once people have disclosed their conflict of interest, the burden shifts. In this case, to the client who has been told and should be able to act prudently.
If the opportunity is gone tomorrow, it may mean that your money and your adviser could be gone tomorrow. There is no investment you need to make right now.
Peopl can go too far in the other direction. They could save too much and not enjoy themselves as they go through life . There is a happy medium. We're not here to be unhappy. That's what this process is all about, living your best financial life.
Bordeaux dilemma: a desire to drink that wine all the time, but the knowledge that it would limit your ability to pay for more essential things in life. Any premium item can induce the same feeling, from fine food to luxury cars to the feel of a bespoke suit. These things are better than their mass-produced less expensive versions, and once you've had one, it's hard to return to what once seemed just fine. I know only three cures for this: poverty, incredible wealth, or self-restraint mixed with occasional indulgence. This last is a great balancing act, and the key to being on the right side of the thin green line.
I pay my taxes on time. I consider it the price of living in a stable, civilised country. I believe that people who try not to pay their taxes are misguided; you have so many ways to pay exactly the tax you owe - which is lower than you would think - but few legal ways to avoid taxes entirely, short of dying with a bunch of appreciated stock and property. Whether poor, rich, or wealthy, people love to complain about taxes, and the complaint is almost always the same: they pay too much and get too little, at least of what they want. (I have yet to hear someone say: I pay so little in taxes for all these services that make my life easier.)
The biggest thing is delayed gratification. That would go for an executive, an athlete or anyone.We buy into the hype that we need a bigger car, a bigger home. If you can concentrate on the long-term objectives, those things will fall into place.
An accumulator - someone who gets more pleasure in not spending but will spend when necessary or justified. Our spending skews toward experiences or the highest-quality version of what we need, from clothes to cookware. I wouldn't turn down another bespoke suit, but I'd rather use the money to buy plane tickets tfor a vacation. You only need so much stuff, but you can never have enough stories.
The successful college dropouts dropped out of top colleges, and grew up with parents who were well educated and successful. They had been prepped to succeed.
In order to see opportunity, you need to be positioned in a place where it's in your line of sight.
SAT scores are a fairly meaningless predictor of future success. Grades, he found, are better because they show students' ability to apply themselves over a longer period and to actually learn something.
Teaching kids or young adults social skills like staying on task, showing up on time, wearing a tie, and understanding the need to put together a CV - these lessons based on experience are highly valued.
Life is trial and error. But many of these kids are afraid to experiment. It gets to be very imbalanced, more so now with the emphasis on test scores. You need to learn that you can experiment and that you can fail.
Having a narcissistic sense of entitlement may be a natural reaction to being raised without boundaries and a sense of how the child's world compares to the wider one and the responsibilities the child has in it.
The ways to combat entitlement were not terribly difficult on the surface. The parent needed to model gratitude and appreciation in their own lives. Children needed to hear their parents say and show that they appreciate what they had. And parents needed to walk their children through how the parents made a decision.
Parents make the mistake of wanting to be the provider of money. It goes all the way back to childhood and allowances. If a child wants to go off to Guatemala or wherever, they need to have some skin in the game. The mistake many wealthy families make is to subsidise it.
For many flaneurs, so many opportunities mean they struggle to focus on any of them.
Money doesn't make good or bad parents. Engagement in the child's life determines that. Money just buys things a child needs or wants. And money doesn't turn children into flaneurs. Distracted parents who use money to make up for their lack of involvement do.
Its one of the mark of privileges that you don't have to know how much things cost. When I got my first cell phone, price didn't come into it. The discussion was about responsibility and curfew.
Money does not make people mature about financial matters - having less money is more likely to do that since children will hear parents discussing financial matters more often and deeply in the home.
most people can imagine how much better their lives would be with some sum of money, how it would free them and allow them to travel and be all-around happier people. What such thinking misses is that money without purpose is soul-sapping.
The essence of entitlement is the difference being grateful for what you have and feeling the world has ensured that you will always have it no matter what.
His conclusions show wealthier people favour money over community. It made perfect sense to me. If you have a lot of money, you can pay people to do things you would otherwise ask your friends to do.
The idea that richer people make more utilitarian decisions because of their reduced compassion is hard. But there's a positive twist to not feeling the suffering of another person when you need to make that choice, in certain kinds of situations, wealthier people were more able to balance the costs and benefits because they were less sensitive to the suffering of one person versus many.
The kind of acceptance, of things that contradict what you believe should happen, is a key to being on the right side of the thin green line.
The future of financial planning and productive thinking about money would not emphasise returns but instead be a discussion of what motivated people around money - how they actually thought about saving, spending and investing.