“He looked pissed. Beyond pissed. And not at Donny. At me. Shit. Why was he pissed at me? I hadn’t done anything! …Had I?”
well, it’s been a nice run, but I think this might be where I cut ties with julie johnson. I love MMCs that do what they want but when they inevitably fuck around and find out with the FMC, I like groveling and idk an actual apology, maybe some accountability. that never happens with julie johnson. NEVER. not one single time in any of her books I’ve read which leads to situations wherein the male lead just kind of goes around doing fucked up shit in the name of “protection” and it just gets brushed over.
imogen is clairvoyant and gets visions when she touches people (looking at you, miss theodora crain). she’s lived her entire life on the run, trying to escape a life of exploitation and abuse, and she ends up in our very own Salem. she meets cade, a detective from book one, and when shit hits the fan and a little boy goes missing on halloween and she’s asked to help, she has to choose between a life of running or sticking around and using her past as a key for the future. typical, witchy small town suspense romance.
suspense romance is a subgenre I’ve only ventured in a few times, but in most cases I’m usually sold on the tropes - y’know, the angst, the protectiveness, etc. cade hightower is just another one of julie johnson’s male leads that’s made me question if being protective in romantic fiction is really all its cracked up to be. to be fair, I knew and was prepared for this prior to starting this book, as this is a pattern for her, but I always have this annoying little voice in my head telling me to give her a second chance, maybe this book will be different. for the record, it’s not. cade would rather yell at imogen for ‘placing herself in a dangerous situation’ than use a single brain cell to sit and comfort her first or try to figure out WHY she was involved. most of the dangerous situations are things imogen couldn’t have avoided or were done with selfless intent to help somebody else, but that meant little to nothing to cade. this is made implicitly clear because it happens repeatedly throughout the book. it’s always about cade being overprotective and getting angry and then making decisions for her to keep her safe as if she’s got no autonomy.
from their very first meeting, cade immediately takes control of the situation and decides what’s best for imogen. listen, I watched the vampire diaries, I READ the vampire diaries, I lived through my delena era - I know what overprotective characters are like and how far they can push the line before they reach the point of no return for me. not to mention that this dynamic also only works if and only if the FMC is willing to push and fight back, not get angry for .03 seconds and then let it go. there is zero apology, zero accountability and it makes me feel claustrophobic on behalf of imogen and all the other FMCs julie johnson has tortured for however many books. imogen’s serious lack of autonomy in regards to her relationship with cade is something I cannot get behind, no bueno. toxic characters are my niche - again, klaus mikaelson anyone? - but I don’t trust julie johnson anymore to write them properly in a way that isn’t going to piss me off.
3/5.