1.5 rounded up, because I feel the story was a bit more cohesive than AROGB, and I think the songkeepers were a pretty solid addition to the lore—their magic system felt a lot more logical and thought-out than the fairies’. (Though, I thought the ways they “changed” the canon of human and wolf history were super predictable from the colonization allegory.) I wrote a long, ramble-y, nearly incoherent StoryGraph review that’s at least 10 paragraphs long and I stayed up until 4am to finish, so I’m writing a shorter one for Goodreads. (I’m still keeping it up because I spent a lot of time on it and it’s funny. It 100% showed how this series has become a reluctant hyperfixation of mine.)
I still have a lot of the same criticisms for this book as book 1: the dialogue is terrible, the plot predictable, the villainous characters feel like they’re from Saturday morning cartoons, and the euphemisms for the sex scenes make me wince. The “reluctant allies to lovers” dynamic feels reused at this point, and it just felt frustrating when a) Sadie was doing a purposefully shitty job of hiding her feelings in her internal monologue. She’s not a “girlboss” who “softened her hardened exterior to finally let someone in”, she’s like a cis and more petulant version of book 1 Calla, b) until we got to the sanctuary part of the plot, it felt like the story didn’t give a shit about the conflict in Navin and Sadie’s relationship being mutual.
I expected my stance on Sadie to change by the time we got chapters in her head, and while I caught some of her impulsivity and reluctance to vulnerability in AROGB, I definitely underestimated just how many of her cues I missed. She was kind of unhinged, lol? Not in a fun way. Her penchant for violence felt more like a Tumblr textpost, and less like an actual flaw to be dissected. I feel like some of her thoughts about the humans earlier on were a little excessively violent, too?! (Which I’m only pointing out because, sure, she was talking about Olmdere humans who used to be rooks, but… you’re seriously *that* disappointed about not being able to “teach them a lesson with public hangings”?? Did we?? Forget abt the wolf and human dynamic/allegory and how exactly that might be a little yikes??) She was sometimes stubborn to the point of being childish, and it made me wince.
Not sure how to feel about Navin? It was nice to have a gentler(?) love interest for a change, but the way the narrative chose to initially characterize him as “mysterious” was frustratingly lazy. Even when him and Sadie aren’t on good terms, he “hints” at “having a lot of secrets” to her, and if he doesn’t say that, Sadie rephrases it in her head to show he’s “layered”. It’s not even the only time that’s done with a character in the first third of the book, the mystery elements are executed so poorly. I think it’s just a thing with all the love interests, but he also had some forcefully poetic and dramatic lines that were terrible to read or listen to. The one scene of him being weirdly into Sadie’s wolf form was hilarious, though. (The LitJoy edition’s unfortunately burned it into my brain.)
As for the kink, I appreciate it being consensual and relatively healthy (which is WAY more than I can say with other romances), but nothing else about it wowed me? It still felt a little under-negotiated, like a fanfiction where the characters always know what the other wants, and even though Navin being the dominant one takes on a different context within the Golden Court’s world, the gender roles (as in, the woman being the submissive to someone more masculine-presenting) still felt stereotypical enough by real-world context to make me annoyed whenever the dynamic was talked about as “revolutionary”. (Although, I did like how Sadie choosing to be submissive was actually a show of power in its own way. That’s definitely different.) However, Sadie not being constrained (haha) to being vanilla meant that the sex scenes in her POV already felt less repetitive than Calla’s in book 1, even if the kink elements were relatively tame!
(Take this with a grain of salt, I’m quite possibly the worst person to be bitching about this.) Calla got way less chapters than I thought they would, even though I knew they’d take a backseat to Sadie’s story. Of the fifty-something chapters (they don’t number them, I’m estimating here), only 15 of them are in their perspective, which was a little aggravating to see in a book advertised as dual POV. Especially because I think their plot was more compelling than the (often contrived) drama Sadie had! They’re literally a newly-crowned monarch figuring out how to balance their responsibilities, and a rescue mission going awry, with having a genderqueer identity in a very binary institution (and, in some cases, trying to figure out if being closeted would be the best case for the diplomacy their kingdom desperately needs). I so badly wanted to see more of their dynamic with Briar, especially. I feel she hasn’t been given much time to be on-page instead of a damsel in distress, and there’s so many dilemmas or questions around Calla occupying the role she was raised to have (but never took on) that just won’t be written with depth, even if I hope for it. Alas, some of their already very few chapters were paced poorly, and I disliked how the politicking was written.
I did like their dynamic with Grae this time, though, it was sweet. Perhaps it’s because their relationship isn’t a centerpiece this book, perhaps it’s because they’re an established couple and no longer have to do the back-and-forth that plagued book 1. I’m not saying there’s no cringy lines (I’m astonished by how comforting your partner after they get misgendered was made into something corny), but I’ve always enjoyed to some level how Calla and Grae are kinda sappy to the point of being saccharine sweet, and seeing that in the context of them being newlyweds is a little satisfying! blah blah blah i also think either i’m losing my mind atp or that the smut quality is a little better
I can’t end this review without saying that Ora was done EXTREMELY dirty. Most of their characterization was done through others describing them, they only get to be a plot device (which feels egregious, given how important they are to Calla at this point in their journey), and. ugh. Even their kidnapping was off-page, done before the story even started. I know this world isn’t supposed to be queernormative, and homophobia and transphobia are a thing we have to deal with irl, but it’s frustrating to see the openly queer characters be thrust into danger at every opportunity. (Briar’s treatment by the narrative continues to piss me off.)
I feel shitty criticizing queer rep in a series by a queer author. I feel like I shouldn’t be doing that, maybe it’s just a difference in experiences? If nonbinary or/and lesbian people have read the Golden Court, feel free to comment on this with your own thoughts. If you’re cishet and reading my thoughts, please note that I’m not the sole authority on the representation within this series.
The narration was mostly… okay. That’s it. I already don’t really vibe with the narration style for Sadie’s POV (her male voices sound especially forced, and she’s always just a tad too dramatic), but even Calla’s POV had these key emotional moments I just could not get myself to be overly invested in because of their delivery. Oof.
I at least liked that this is one of the few times I see multiple pronouns rep with a nonbinary character (Calla uses they/she like the author does, not they/them! I didn’t know that), being plunged into a different part of Aotreas for Sadie’s POV took away a bit of the predictability because the rules and setting still had to be established, the choice of who the sorceress would be for book 3 was interesting and I actually didn’t expect it, and this was more entertaining than the first book. I hope Briar has a distinct voice for the third and final book.