"Women's history does not need to be exceptional to be relevant."
This was an engaging read! While Clark explains the major points of Henry VIII's marriages, this book will be enjoyed more so by readers who have a familiarity of his reign. This shouldn't be anyone's first dive into the fuckery that is Henry and women, in that I'm not sure all the details regarding the women's stories can be fully appreciated without an understanding of the traditional narrative -- how the women's stories are usually told (or, rather, not told).
For example, while reading, I learned about the shifting political alliances that likely determined Henry's decision to divorce Anna of Cleves. In the past, I have encountered two common explanations of this decision: 1.) Her portrait was inaccurate OR 2.) She wasn't nice enough to Henry when he jump-scared her as their first meeting. So, learning about the politics and hearing some excerpts from Anna's ambassador to England (he accused Henry of treating Anna as a prostitute!!) expanded my understanding of their marriage and this period of Henry's reign.
I found Clark's writing to be accessible, though there were two patterns that bothered me:
1.) Clark has a tendency to start chapters in media res, with juicy details to pull the reader in. However, these occurrences were rarely dated -- I had to keep reading for a few pages to determine what year we were in. Clark shared the women's stories mostly in chronological order, but as she discussed many people, sometimes the chronology was not clear. I would have appreciated more signposting whether in the text itself or in chapter headings to know where we were in time.
2.) What makes this book really special is the inclusion of knowledge/gossip/rumors from archival materials -- Clark has obviously spent time close reading letters/poems/etc and shares the deets with us (see the prostitute tidbit above!!!). However, when Clark quotes from these sources directly, she doesn't always interpret or explain the excerpt. I often had to pause to puzzle over the Tudor syntax and diction, and would move on without fully getting the quotation. I wish Clark would have taken a step beyond presenting this archival material to more fully interpret it for those of us who aren't as familiar with Tudor-era language.
Overall, I enjoyed this! Recommend for my Six-listening, Tudors-watching, Royal Diaries of Elizabeth I-reading casual Tudor fans.