Are you scared to talk about abortion? Don t worry almost everyone is. Either we think the subject is too impolite, or we don t want to be branded an intolerant fanatic, or we re afraid we won t represent the pro-life side well enough. Whatever the reason for this fear, it causes many of us pass up opportunities to speak out on behalf of the unborn. You can overcome this fear, says Trent Horn in his new book Persuasive Pro-Life. With a little knowledge and a few proven techniques, you can become a bold and effective apologist for life. Drawing on over a decade as a pro-life organizer, Horn helps you cut through the diversions and obfuscations of the pro-choice side in order to accurately frame the legal, historical, and medical issue surrounding abortion. Then he demonstrates with vivid personal examples from his years of campus activism the importance of being charitable in all abortion debates, no matter how strident the other side might be. We must be not just warriors for the pro-life cause, he says, but ambassadors for it. Then Horn leads you a guided tour of the many types of pro-abortion opponent or inquirer ( the pragmatist, the skeptic, the conflicted ) along with more real-life examples. In each case he teaches you specific approaches what to say, what not to say, and how to bear yourself that are custom-tailored to every situation. The struggle over abortion has never been hotter, and the stakes could not be higher. Read Persuasive Pro-Life today and never again be afraid to speak up for the precious and fundamental right to life.
After his conversion to the Catholic faith, Trent Horn pursued an undergraduate degree in history from Arizona State University. He then earned a graduate degree in theology from Franciscan University of Steubenville and is currently pursuing a graduate degree in philosophy from Holy Apostles College.
Trent is a regular guest on the radio program Catholic Answers Live, a lecturer who speaks across the country on issues related to the Catholic faith, and the author of two books, Answering Atheism and Persuasive Pro-life.
Abortion is perhaps the most paramount subject out there to debate about, and debating abortion without getting emotional can be difficult. This book lays out a blueprint for how people that are pro-life can have a dialogue with the pro-choice crowd that involves humility and facts. The most common arguments for abortion are addressed in this book very succinctly and I very much appreciate Horn’s charitable attitude. This book isn’t made just for Catholics but for everyone that wants to defend the unborn.
Rule 1: don't be weird. Immediately after reading those words I was hooked. Too often pro life advocates fail to approach people in the abortion debate in a loving, reasoned way. This book seeks to address those failings.
The author brings something much needed to the abortion debate: reason and empathy. Using an array of analogies, the author focuses on the single important question: what or who are the unborn? Answering this question, that the unborn are tiny, developing humans that deserve our protection, is the central issue that is really what the abortion issue boils down to. Everything else, add the author shows, is just noise attempting to get in the way of this undeniable fact.
Coupled with his reasoned analysis, the author reminds us that empathy is necessary. Most people either lack the information or are emotionally tied to the pro-choice stance. Loving your neighbor in this case requires patience and understanding, but never compromising on the truth.
Persuasive Pro-Life is simply a must-have for any pro-life advocate's library. It looks like there's no paperback copy available on Amazon (except a hugely overpriced copy from England), so if you'd prefer a paperback over a Kindle version, you should go to Catholic Answers' website and purchase it there.
Trent Horn used to work for Justice for All, and it really shows in this book. If you've ever been through a JFA seminar, this book is a terrific supplement to the seminar. It's basically the JFA seminar in print form.
Trent begins by explaining what's at stake in the issue, then turns to how to have more productive conversations on abortion. Instead of having conversations that devolve into shouting matches and name-calling, or even having civil conversations where both people talk past each other, Trent discusses skills to develop that will help you be more convincing in your conversations to be able to change hearts and minds on this issue.
After the conversation skill, Trent discusses the many different kinds of people you may encounter when you talk about this issue, and the best ways to respond to their concerns.
When I first heard that Trent was writing a book, I was told that the book would be similar to Scott Klusendorf's The Case for Life, only geared more toward Catholics. While Trent does quote many Catholic fathers and popes, this is not a book just for Catholics. Non-Catholics will get much out of the book, and the vast majority of information in this book can be accepted and used by non-Catholics. There are only two places in the book that I can recall that may not be specifically helpful to non-Catholics, but it is still very helpful to at least hear where Catholics are coming from on this issue, especially since they're the largest pro-life group of people in the world.
There was really only one misstep in the book that I can recall, but it's a minor one, as far as I'm concerned. In his discussion of abortions in the case of rape on page 207, Trent (in the mouth of a pro-life advocate) makes the statement that "rape is a tragic crime that men will never understand." But some men *are* raped. It's important to understand that while women are the vast majority of victims, there are still men who are raped, and may even be working for the pro-life field and can use that as a bit of common ground with the pro-choice advocate.
Trent's book is simply one of the better books you can own on the abortion issue. It will help you present a much more persuasive case for the pro-life position, not just because it presents good, compelling arguments, but also because it will help you be a much more persuasive arguer by treating the person you're talking to with respect, listening to their concerns, and finding common ground without compromising your pro-life convictions.
What an annoying book. Another advocate using vatican two propoganda nonsense to try and force down our throats tolerance to other peoples religion and views, etc etc. Blah blah blah.
Steer clear from this book if you are looking for quality in educating catholics how to properly conduct and construct arguments AGAINST abortionists. Especially if you are in the mind set that the Catholic Church holds the fullness of truth - DO NOT come to this book.
Because it advocates this: " that the state, cannot like the vatican two document dignitatis humanae states, impose upon people the profession of any religion, through fear or other means " blah blah blah. Page 97 Which means this - that the state cannot hold or use the Catholic Faith as the basis for the reason WHY abortion is wrong - because by doing this then in actual fact this means that you are IMPOSING your faith on these people who do not want to accept objections against abortion - you are imposing your religion on people by saying something is morally wrong for the fact that religion says so. And mind you, this is not ANY religion. This is particularly the Catholic Faith. And here Trent Horn uses a quote from a vatican two document. Fantastic. To top this off this is all According To Trent Horn - Catholic Apologist. Which means to say- fluffy, puffy lukewarm Catholic Apologist who is not an CATHOLIC APOLOGIST at all.
Wow. To top this off the actual title for THAT segment is called " i can not impose my faith " whereby Trent quotes some American senator named John Kerry and how he, this dimwit, says that we cannot impose our Catholic Faith on other religions, such as Protestant or Jew.
Uhm. What darn relevance does ANY OF THIS have to do with conversation AGAINST abortion? Huh? What relevance? Only to open up the channel of saying if you donot agree, then that's fine. Your view is your view. And your choice your choice. Implying there is NO objective truth and morality.
So folks. Here it is. Here is another book on the propaganda of religious indifferentism.
Yes. This review, like any upcoming reviews on books that are propogating anything vatican two or modernism, is harsh and directly against modernist ideas or views which directly or indirectly counter the True Catholic Faith. Like it or leave it
This Is my message folks. The time has come. The Catholic Faith will and is declining. The time has come when quite soon, sooner than we anticipate, the Church will return to the catacombs. And Catholics will be forced into hiding, risking their lives to attend the True holy mass. Let us understand that examples of books such as this by Trent Horn enables NOTHING (good) but religious indifferentism and open tolerance to falsehoods which are clearly untrue. Prepare, dear Christians, your souls for the world was once pagan and became Christian. And now that the world is entirely Christian will once again become pagan. And the end will come.
Steer clear from such nonsense. For the sake of your souls, God and truth.
If you want, not only to learn how to defend pro-life position with respect and humility but also get to know pro-choice position better this is the right book for you. It goes through all the arguments that pro-choice people have, answers them, analyzing them and giving lot of analogies to understand everything much better. The read is easy, as usual in Trent Horn's books, which I really appreciate.
Mr. Horn uses logic and reason to dismantle most, if not all, arguments for abortion. He supports his points with clear, thorough, and compelling evidence from a secular point-of-view (but he also gives tips for discussing the issue of abortion with people who try to use religious arguments to defend it). This book is a must-read.
Well written, logical, and at the same time compassionate. Recommend for any who are pro-life but have trouble articulating why and those who are unsure of how they feel about abortion. The arguments for the pro-life cause here are flawless.
Awesome, powerful book that should be required reading for everyone in this country. Clearly shows that the unborn are people who should have human rights, including the right to live, by comprehensively presenting logical, rational, "non-religious" arguments directly addressing all those opposed. (While the specific audience is for pro-lifers wanting to engage in a reasonable, respectful dialogue with those who disagree, this book presents all the arguments made for abortion and why they're ultimately untenable.)
4 + .... Important information in an organized, easy to read format. I don't know how one could continue to rationalize to themselves to maintain a pro-choice stance after reading it...I'm sure some will, but Trent shows how it would be very illogical or intellectually inconsistent.
A thorough examination of all pro-choice justifications and the pro-life arguments against each of them. This book offers quotes from pro-choice and neutral parties and explains what makes sense, what doesn't, and why. 4 stars instead of 5 because IMO there are a few places where the author's wording muddies the message.
I started taking red pills around 2015, and each one took some time to digest. Not so with abortion; I remember the moment that I learned what a 1st trimester 'abortion' involved: the dismemberment of a living human fetus, and a suctioning of its remains through a tube. Abortion was the kindest way to describe this brutal process.
And yet, as sincere as my natural repulsion was, I could not call myself 'pro-life.' I did not want to associate myself with any political movement.
But abortion is not a political question, it is a moral question. After reading Trent's book I discarded any preconceived notions about that label and welcomed anyone that disagreed with the moral premise that the unborn have the right to life, and nothing justifies their killing; they are innocent. Trent expertly and charitably demonstrates how every pro-choice argument--from philosophical to utilitarian to emotional--is morally wrong.
Since reading this book, I am equipped for a conversation with every type of abortion apologist. In my own dialogues, the most disturbing to me are those that are "politically correct:" they acknowledge that a human fetus is living, but side with the mother's choice to abort because "her life is more valuable." Otherwise compassionate people who choose choice to be politically consistent when the politics are demonstrably amoral. Evil is the ends of political correctness as it blinds and deflects a person's inherent call to justice.
Abortion was my wake up call. No longer could I be in the dispassionate/cowardly public, afraid to engage others about this absolute evil. Trent's book gave me the confidence and charity to be prepared for this conversation wherever I go, and I recommend it for anyone passionate for saving the lives of the unborn.
Persuasive Pro-Life provides robust and comprehensive explanations and methods of outreach for the pro-life position. After reading it, I think differently, and I think more logically and clearly, about the pro-life worldview and believe I have tools that will give me more confidence in discussing abortion and the pro-life perspective. I recommend this book and feel those who read it can gain a better understanding of what it means to be authentically pro-life and learn to more effectively communicate those beliefs.
Great read ! I feel more confident in defending the unborn ! If you are looking for a book that gives you great answers to those tough questions, this is it.
What a read! Trent Horn is one of my all-time favorite apologists and speakers, and his defense of the pro-life position is bulletproof. Persuasive Pro-Life is a testament to the many years of research and practice Trent has devoted to debating on the topic of abortion.
Disclaimer: this book is intended for those who already have a solid understanding and belief in the pro-life position. It aims to give pro-life advocates the tools they need to answer any argument a pro-choice advocate may propose… but goes too in-depth for someone still deciding their position on abortion. For people looking for a basic explanation of the pro-life viewpoint from a scientific and logic-based perspective, I’d recommend “Why We’re Pro-Life” from Catholic Answers instead.
Parts I through III are very insightful and provide an approach to dialogue championed by Justice for All, an organization devoted solely to dialogue about abortion. They help the reader understand, by use of many real-world situations, as well as scripted “potential conversations,” how to steer a conversation back to the essential question: “Are the unborn human persons, thereby deserving a right to life?”
By dividing the opponents of the pro-life cause into various “types,” Trent makes it easy to determine what sort of person you are dealing with in a conversation, what their motivations may be, and what strategies will best appeal to their point of view. As a pro-life advocate on campus, I plan to use this book as a reference to come back to after a day of tabling, reviewing the types of people I encountered in conversations, and building my understanding of the best ways to respond to them in the future.
In my opinion, Part IV got too far “into the weeds” in a lot of cases. In many cases, these people with “Tough Questions” simply need someone to listen to them, and go from there… detailing a thousand possible scenarios isn’t necessarily helpful for answering these people. While some of the philosophical or religious arguments for the pro-choice side are interesting, albeit easy to refute, I have never encountered them in multiple years of advocacy, so it may not be worth the time learning these rare cases by heart. I’d recommend using this later portion of the book as a reference in case you come across someone who does approach you in one of these ways. That said, Trent’s description of potential motivations of “The Fighter” in sections on Feminists & The Post-Abortive was really well-articulated and I’d definitely recommend giving them a read!
Overall, solid book - especially if you will be engaging in regular pro-life advocacy and/or debate. This is perfect for college students debating the issue at tabling events, who need a bit more than the standard arguments. And don’t skip the conclusion - this was a serious call to action for me, and should be for any and all pro-lifers - it is *our responsibility* not to be silent, for truly lives hang in the balance.
Review: Trent Horn sets out to do something ambitious and yet restrained: to change minds on one of the most divisive moral issues of our time without resorting to outrage, slogans, or emotional manipulation. Rather than framing the abortion debate as a cultural war to be won, Horn presents it as a conversation to be entered — carefully, respectfully, and with honesty.
The book’s premise is simple & challenging: most people avoid talking about abortion because they fear the conversation. Horn argues that pro-life advocates often remain silent out of discomfort, uncertainty, or concern about appearing judgmental. His response is not to encourage louder voices, but better ones — voices grounded in reason, clarity, and empathy.
What distinguishes Persuasive Pro-Life from many ideological texts is its instructional nature. Horn is not merely asserting what to believe, but teaching how to communicate belief effectively. Drawing on his experience, he breaks down arguments into manageable components, encouraging readers to understand the philosophical foundations of their position before attempting to defend it. The book emphasises that persuasion begins with listening.
Horn structures much of the book around common pro-choice arguments, addressing issues such as bodily autonomy, personhood, viability, and legality. He focuses on definitions, logical consistency, and ethical reasoning. This deliberate restraint gives the book a measured tone, one that seeks credibility through calm analysis rather than provocation.
One of the book’s greatest strengths is its insistence on civility. Horn repeatedly reminds readers that the goal is not to “win” arguments but to speak truthfully without dehumanising the person on the other side. This emphasis is especially notable in a cultural climate where abortion discussions are often framed in absolutes — good versus evil, freedom versus oppression.
Persuasive Pro-Life does not pretend to be something it is not. It is not a memoir, nor a policy proposal, nor a theological treatise. It is a guide — a manual for thoughtful engagement — and it succeeds precisely because of that clarity of purpose. Horn’s writing is accessible without being simplistic, firm without being inflammatory, and confident without becoming dismissive.
For readers interested in understanding how moral arguments are constructed — and how they can be communicated without hostility — Persuasive Pro-Life provides a disciplined, thoughtful contribution to a conversation that too often collapses under the weight of its own intensity.
After sitting on my Kindle for several years I finally decided to read this after a conversation with a work colleague convinced me that I needed to brush up on how to approach these discussions with people who disagree with the pro-life stance.
The book is well-researched, with plenty of citations, including from pro-choice writers. But it is a little unwieldy and perhaps should have been edited down to a fraction of the size.
In his effort to be completely thorough, Horn includes all arguments he can conceive of, some good and some not very good. In the flurry of arguments it's a little exhausting for a casual critical reader to keep track of the merits or lack thereof of all of the points being made.
For example, the arguments about personhood presuppose that your interlocutor accepts Boethius' definition of personhood as being a member of a rational kind. Most pro-choice arguments don't, however, so these arguments aren't likely to find much purchase. There is also a misquote of a pro-choice philosopher, where Horn misrepresents Jeff McMahan's position. Horn quotes him as saying that a utilitarian view of human value "rests on distressingly insecure foundations", whereas the linked footnote shows that the original quote implies the opposite - that egalitarian principles rest on insecure foundations because our moral statuses appear to be a matter of degree.
There are also some passages where Horn counters a pro-choice argument by invoking a pro-choice philosopher or physician who disagrees with the pro-choice argument and agrees with the pro-life position on one matter, but this begs the question as to why these people are nevertheless pro-choice. What are the more convincing arguments that they rely on for their pro-choice position?
In spite of the above flaws, I think the book is very worthwhile. It provides a number of rhetorical strategies, like replacing a foetus with a toddler, that serve to redirect the conversation back to the central question of what differentiates an unborn foetus from a born baby in terms of moral status.
It also makes a reasonable defense of the use of graphic images, which I am a bit uneasy with, by giving anecdotes of when they have successfully changed people's minds.
For anyone looking to brush up on their pro-life advocacy, there is definitely some benefit to skimming through the book.
This was a FANTASTIC read. I cannot recommend it enough. This was written to equip readers to be knowledgeable pro-life apologists and to encourage them that it is worthwhile to do so.
As a pro-life Catholic who does not like to discuss politics, this was an encouraging read. Trent Horn has assessed the arguments on both sides from just about every angle; while I may not have the same eloquence he or other prominent pro-life activists do, I certainly know enough to answer the basic questions. It all comes down to the central question that he answers and references throughout the text: “What are the unborn?” (And if you think you can easily answer it in an anti-life way, I encourage you to give this a read!)
If you are pro-choice, I would strongly recommend reading this. While it is hard to read from authors who oppose your viewpoints, Horn uses primarily neutral (such as governmental) or pro-choice sources in much of his writing. This is not just a book about why Christians don’t like abortion; it is a lengthy treatment on the moral, philosophical, scientific, and legal debates around abortion and how we can think more critically about them. Sure, he discusses scripture in some of the text, but this book is in no way a defense of life from a solely Christian point of view. I think that his strongest arguments are present in the sections not discussing religion at all. Ultimately, I pray that this book can inspire current pro-life individuals to have those tough conversations and encourage pro-choice individuals to reflect on this worldview.
Brilliant book. I'm a big fan of Trent Horn. He's an excellent apologist and writer. This is the second of his books that I've read, behind 'Answering Atheism' (also exceptional).
This book prepares to pro-life advocate to charitably and effectively dialogue and engage in conversation/debate with pro-choice individuals. Trent Horn brings to the table the many types of Pro-Choice individuals we meet and their own peculiar agendas an how to address each and every one of them to always re-route back to the fundamental question of, "what are the unborn?"
Horn is able to help readers feel more comfortable with each type of pro-choice person (not that they all fit the bill for a certain 'type') and how to respond with grace and knowledge during debate. It's especially important in this day and age to be factual and relevant to our ever-swaying-with-the-wind culture/society, and Trent guides his readers along the paths to do so.
The cardinal virtue Trent points out about this controversy is, "Don't Be Weird"; let's use this book as reference to fight the good fight for those who can't, and let's do so with grace and charity!
I know for sure that I will be referring to this book multiple times in the future to recall how to address a particular rebuttal of a claim I might make, or how to answer something that seems difficult. Thank you, Trent, for an incredible guide to this especially important march.
Straw mans the disqualifiers. Fine for an simple understanding, but not good if you actually want to debate the topic with people who know what they're talking about.
Additionally doesn't provide a stance on irreversibly comatose (i.e. braindead) patients. It would appear from all of his arguments that he would be forced to say that they are persons, but this leads to a problem in that it can be very costly to maintain such patients and it can upset the family since they can't have a funeral, and they wouldn't be allowed to be declared dead. And if he were to respond that they are not persons, then certainly there are at least some other "humans" that would also not qualify as persons despite being human and alive.
I enjoy most of Mr. Horn’s work, and this book was no exception. It is of special note because it does not rely on the assumption that the reader is Catholic, or even religious. This book provides arguments for the pro-life position that rely purely on science and philosophy, and rarely touch on religion at all. The book gives simple, intermediate, and advanced arguments for the pro-life position, and also provides advice for approaching conversations about the extremely sensitive issue of abortion with grace and charity, without being heavy handed or antagonistic. Overall, for anyone seeking to learn how to defend their opposition to abortion, I can’t think of a better book than this.
This is such a tough subject. I've had different views about this topic throughout different stages of my life, as I think many have, and reading this book has changed me even more. It definitely gives one alot to think about. Being able to have productive, non-aggressive conversations is important when it comes to such sensitive content. I definitely recommend reading, regardless of where your stance is on this topic, there's always a need to find more common ground and understanding. Trent Horn does a great job of covering all of the bases and arguments on this topic, from both sides.
A clear layout of pro-life apologetics, and a surprisingly easy read for a book nearly 300 pages that goes into philosophy, science, etc. This book can be thought of as a resource book to turn to in order to deepen one's ability to respond to pro-choice arguments. He also gives tips for responding to emotional people with both self-respect and compassion. The author is Catholic, but he acknowledges that the pro-life movement is diverse, and the arguments in this book can be used by any pro-life advocate.
Perfect introduction to pro-life apologetics. The author is fair yet has tight arguments and a consistent framework. The book is comprehensive but obviously cannot address EVERY rebuttal or objection. Despite this I feel this book demonstrates that the pro choice position is untenable and ultimately self defeating without leading to absurd conclusions. This is the first book I've ever given five stars and for good reason.
This is of course a pro-life book. It will guide you on how to speak to pro-choice advocates. It will guide you on what to say and how to say it so as not to offend your listener. Trent Horn attempts to offer you every argument proffered by the pro-choice person you are speaking with. It is well written and definitely comprehensive.
great book on defending all the prolife positions and reaffirms on where I should lie on. trent horn does a fantastic job explaining and meticulously pulling apart the prochoice movement. a book that I will certainly go back and reread a million times over. worth the read and is a fantastic guide if you're wanting to begin to defend life
A comprehensive and well written defense of the pro-life position. The most important takeaway is that the discussion should always return to the question, “What are the unborn?” Anything else is irrelevant to the main issue. I want to reread this and take notes at some point. A lot of the philosophical arguments went over my head during my initial read through.