Lieutenant-General Sir John Bagot Glubb, KCB, CMG, DSO, OBE, MC (a.k.a. "Glubb Pasha") was a British Army officer who was for many years seconded to the Arab Legion of the Trans-Jordan (later The Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan), which he ultimately commanded until dismissed by King Hussein in March 1956. He wrote many books after his retirement, primarily on the history of the Middle East and on Military History.
Whether this still stacks up as history I can't tell you, but in my eyes it's one of those histories that survive an amount of outdatedness. He has an amazing tale to tell and writes it grippingly, for a historian... but then he was a soldier-scholar, spent his service years with Jordan's Arab Legion 1930-56.
For me, he explains the conquests, as near as. At uni we were set an essay on why these great and sudden conquests happened, and after the texts that must have been the fashion I answered with economic and climatic factors. What nonsense -- I'm ashamed now.
Glubb, who fought with and led Arab troops -- around much of this geography -- doesn't tell you there was a drought at the right time. He explains how the tribes might be unified and how important a banner can be. In short, mental factors, and he doesn't squeeze out religious enthusiasm, as I was taught in uni. At the major battles he tells you the advantages nomad troops had and knew they had and used -- such as a night fight. Think of a people who live in tents against a people who live in towns: who's going to win at the dead of night?
This was a heroic age, if ever there was one in historical times, short-lived -- ruined of course by success. He lets you feel the spirit of the times. He picks out anecdotes that convey that spirit, and he uses them as evidence, evidence of behaviour: towards an acknowledgement of how unusual this brief age was, and how driven by human factors. He doesn't, with hindsight, forget that these conquests were impossible (except for the fact they happened) -- he doesn't assume the opposition was ripe and rotten, just because they lost.
Early in life I found this highly romantic; read it again later in life and found it valuable history. It's not that I've read much since on the Arab conquests, and I've no idea what experts think of Glubb; but it's a classic in my library.
This book was written by John Bagot Glubb, one of the 'Arabists', the group of British Empire officers that devoted themselves to living and working among the Arabs. Glubb was an officer in the Arab Legion, a mainly Jordanian Bedouin unit of the British Army. Glubb applies his scholarship, military experience and knowledge of Arab culture to a book about the rise of Islam and the explosion of the Bedouin tribes from Arabia which overwhelmed the two greatest empires (Byzantine and Persian) of the time. The story of Mohammed's rise to become the prophet-leader of all the tribes of Arabia is told without embellishment and Glubb introduces us to an entire cast of fascinating characters as he analyzes how Islam grew into an overwhelming force. Glubb is a clever storyteller and isnt afraid to speculate about the motives and personalities of the people involved. This book, the first of a series of three, follows the progress of the Arabs and covers the great conflict that split Islam in two. Lovers of military history and political history will be well satisfied with this flawlessly written, fascinating and now timely book.
I have to say this is one of the best books on the beginnings of Islam. For anyone who is interested in the birth of Islam. The tribal rivalries that sometimes interplayed with it and the first conquests of the new empire this is a great book.
Very readable history of the early Arab conquests in the Middle East, with extensive maps to aid clarity (one oer chapter). The author is clearly fascinated by this period.
This book was very interesting for me, as someone who likes history in general, and the history of changing cultures/religions in particular. But I would not say it was an engaging read overall. Some passages captivated me in their descriptions of the terrain of ancient lands in Iran, Africa, and Iraq. Other parts, detailing the blow-by-blow (as best as can be determined from few and contradictory sources) of various invasions, I skimmed. I read it on my kindle and I highlighted the key dates and interpretations and I am transferring these highlights to a file on my computer so I can reference the cliff notes version of this book in the future.