What are we to make of Steiner’s claims, much less of his curriculum for attaining verification? He is not a moonchild and a dreamer only, nor is he a scientist walking us through his experimental results. In a nutshell, he claims to be able to teach clairvoyance.
Steiner himself pre-empts our doubts about his work at the outset by explaining that it is scientific knowledge for someone who has developed the same abilities as he has, but to those who have not developed those abilities they must take his claims somewhat on faith. So this rhetorical double-bind leaves us relying on feelings and interactions to assess his work. Not a good start.
His path to cognitive verification involves feeling and making time for reflective veneration, devotion, wonder and awe. He says that recollection, quiet time, and tranquility - essentially the Buddhist idea of shamatha - helps develop supersensible cognition. He says we should develop spiritual ears and eyes - whatever that means - in order to verify his findings.
Chapter two concerns developing these organs of cognition in three stages.
In the first stage PREPARATION he makes three directions for developing this cognition: first by meditating on the inner feelings of flourishing and decaying, second by distinguishing the inner quality of living sound versus inanimate sound, and third by listening to other humans selflessly.
In the second stage ENLIGHTENMENT he directs us to cognise the order of a stone, plant, and animal; meditate on the inner nature of a seed and plant; strive to cognise the astral form of a human desire; strive to cognise the astral form of a fulfilled human desire. Many warnings about morality, silence, modesty and basic decency hedge these suggestions.
In the third stage INITIATION Steiner suddenly talks about all kinds of esotericism: three trials by fire, water and air. He talks about strength of character (fire), reliance on some kind of astral writing based on the grammar of the previous two stages (water), and some kind of initiatory commitment (air).
Chapter three gives advice on developing supersensible cognition successfully: patience, gentleness, stability, understanding, observation. Chapter four concerns itself with high quality morality as a help in this cognition.
Chapter five gives detailed advice for using thoughts and feelings to develop the chakras. It is long, detailed, technical, confusing, and a bit overwhelming.
Chapters 6&7 are a short dull digression on sleep and dream. This provides the basis for Chapter 8 where Steiner announces that thinking willing and feeling will become separate persons!
Chapter 9 presents an unusually poetic way of dealing with first personal then collective karma. It seems kind of oddball.
In the appendix he says that the proposed course of action occurs all in thought and the everyday self goes about its business while the inner life flourishes along quite different lines. He justifies the long chapter five on the chakra by saying that knowing these chakras enables one to be aware of their astral body without which one would be a baby.
What to say about all this? I think the main thing is to judge his work on a thorough test or else ignore his ideas. Also, it’s clear Steiner is talking about INNER practice only; spiritual trappings are the opposite of what he has in mind. So clearly he is suggesting an inner course of reflection and contemplation aimed at verifying non-physical realities. And it is up to the reader whether she wants to pursue that course of verification.