In Archaeological Thinking, Charles E. Orser, Jr., provides a commonsense guide to applying critical thinking skills to archaeological questions and evidence.
Perhaps it's on me for misunderstanding what this book was going to be about, but I bought it thinking it would be about archaeology and history. Really, it's about logical fallacies, conspiracy theories, and how to pick them apart. Still useful information, but not what I was hoping for. I'll probably come back to this when I'm in the mood for what it's really trying to say, but at the moment I'm just disappointed it isn't really about archaeology or its related studies. It's about not being taken advantage of by conmen and rage baiters.