I finally read Thomas Merton’s Seven Story Mountain. Mostly out of obligation because if you tell anyone you’ve read Merton they ask if you’ve read Seven Story Mountain.
First, one neat story. Merton was at Cambridge, studying sociology, economics, history (196). On Merton’s first day of school, he accidentally seated himself in a class on the works of Shakespeare. So he got up, then sat back down, stayed. Later that day he went to the registrar and officially added the course. Here’s what he said about it:
"The material of literature and especially of drama, is chiefly human acts--that is, free acts, moral acts. And, as a matter of fact, literature, drama, poetry, make certain statements about these acts that can be made in no other way" (197).
Merton describes a sort of progressive conversion, first mind, heart, will, body, imagination. He sampled several religious orders, and eventually became a Trappist Monk. He explains about these monastic orders: Fransicians, Benedictines. Of course, the Trappists have a reputation for being most extreme in terms of penance and discipline—they grow their own food, make their own shoes, fast for more than half of every year. Second only to the Carthusians who are basically hermits. But there weren’t any Carthusians in North America so Merton had to settle for the Trappists.
Here's what I've learned about "the seven stories." It’s not a story of how he rose to higher ranks in the faith. The stories represent 7 layers of sinfullness and how he rose through them finally reaching the point where it was possible to be saved.
Of course when you read a Trappist monk say that he’s led a horribly undisciplined and shallow life, you start to feel pretty miserable. But I took away a few new ideas.
• Merton tells a story about his childhood. He had a little brother John Paul who always wanted to be with his older brother. Of course, being older, Merton would send him away. And he carried incredible guilt about this (26). Then there’s this great scene…neighbourhood gang is out front, the boys are kicked out the back door, they sneak to safety. Then John Paul comes bravely walking down the center—it’s disinterested love. Merton said, “We did not chase him away.” I love that he only implied the metaphor, the image of Christ, walking bravely toward the cross because we were on the opposite side.
• I don’t think this first point was said directly, but the implication was strong enough that it sent me back searching for a direct passage. It’s this: we sometimes talk about ourselves as being divided. We believe one thing, but act in another way. Don’t know why. Merton suggests that there’s no disagreement. We act according to what we believe. The seclusion of monastics is evidence that they believe prayer is more effective than works.
• Secondly, we have basic desires—not just sinful ones, but for comfort, food, success—and we act according to what we want. Merton says it’s an illusion that we can act without self-interest, we can act without serving our desires (224).
• What it boils down to is this: it’s all about converting your will, converting your intentions. Sometimes that means going without, fasting, etc.
• Here’s a cool idea. Union with God. How does that happen? Is that when you’re singing the worship song so hard there’s sweat dripping, and you acsend into some sort of spiritual euphoria? Merton says that from a physical point of view it’s impossible. We are matter and God is spirit. You can’t join those. Except when it comes to your intentions—basically, your will. If you can conform your will to God’s, that’s unity (253, 407).
• Which is better, the active life or the interior life? Which best serves God, activity: teaching, soup kitchens, delivering aid to Indonesia, building churches or a life cloistering yourself away from the world centred in contemplation and prayer—in isolation, mostly. The answer would seem obvious—that we’re called to be working. I’ve never understood the rationale of a monastery. How could my time spent along in reading, writing, thinking, prayer, help anyone else? Of course I’ve always felt a bit guilty because my preference is usually to be left alone and it’s pretty selfish and all. Anyhow—Merton presented a way to redeem my antisociallness.
• It works like this. If—and this is a weighty if—if we really believe in the mystical body of Christ—that in reality we are one person with many parts, then when one of us reads, thinks, learns, writes, prays, it does serve the rest. Merton claims that the reason God hasn’t destroyed the US is because a little Trappist monastery tucked away in the hills of Kentucky. I don’t think he’s far off (454).
It’s not a matter of trying to share each other’s joys and sorrows—unity isn’t something to achieve, it’s not a metaphor, it’s a spiritual reality. This tied-togetherness is what I love most about the faith. It’s what I love about Christian community and about the school where I teach. You see it in something as simple as curriculum sharing… It makes sense. Because if we do believe in the mystical body of Christ, there isn’t room for competition, jealousy, hoarding. Because if one person advances, if one of us does well, then it really does help the rest.
That one quality is so obviously lacking in the world. And it works both ways. (Here I’ll soap box for just a minute.) When Christian leaders kill 100,000 civilians in Iraq, it really does hurt the rest of the world. When a colleague ends her career amid scandal, it's not just sympathy pains, it's real pain.