Yes, I do realise that Open House for Butterflies obviously appears to be both very much loved and appreciated by many (as the majority of the Goodreads reviews I have read are in fact unfailingly positive is nature). And indeed, a goodly number of author Ruth Krauss’ short and pithy nuggets of childhood inspired musings have definitely produced a certain amount of smiles, understanding and nostalgia in me (such as for example when Krauss points out that for many children, a new baby in the house would also probably mean that older siblings might now have someone younger than them over whom they can have influence, whom they can boss around a bit). However and personally, I would definitely much prefer it if Open House for Butterflies were a bit less random and more focused on a structured narrative (and not basically Ruth Krauss just presenting a list of short little sayings and ideas), if there were an actual story featured (or at the very least, even a few longer explanations regarding the featured words). Because I for one do kind of feel as though far too many of the sayings and musings are just kind of hovering around in space so to speak with no real reasons as to why the presented children would think and talk in the way they are.
And combined with the fact that while Maurice Sendak’s accompanying artwork is expressive and often imbued with quite a bit of subtle humour, I still do find the lack of colour a bit aesthetically frustrating, I can personally not really consider the combination of Ruth Krauss’ text and Maurice Sendak’s images as all that much to my tastes. And indeed, since I most probably would have had the same rather no-hum at best reaction to Open House for Butterflies as a child, for me, Open House for Butterflies is most definitely only a two star book, although I do of course realise that I seem to be the minority here.