I guess this is a 3.5. This is a good start! There was very little in this book that I found objectionable, and it focused on the right things: emulating Jesus & his character in evangelism; being scriptural and prayerful; relying on the Spirit rather than your own persuasive technique; etc. There are a few minor missteps & imprecise uses of language (e.g., using the term “metaphors” to categorize soteriological concepts which are not un-literal, as metaphors are), but it’s clearly written as a light book so it’s easier (for me) to dismiss little slips like that.
The biggest issue with this book (in my opinion) was the initial framing for evangelism, which essentially said “If we love something enough, we’ll talk about it; so we should talk about Jesus.” Tons of people use that rationale, but unfortunately it doesn’t exactly align with reality and isn’t a biblical argument. There are lots of times when I don’t talk about things because of audience, setting, etc., even if I love them. Also, what if my emotional love for Jesus feels low one day? Does that lessen/remove the moral obligation toward sharing the gospel? I think it’s better to follow what Jesus says: abide in him, follow his commands, “in love” but not just out of the feeling of that love. (That’s just a side note though & doesn’t make a major impact on the book. That’s more my private soapbox.)
Despite that, though, the book grew on me as it continued. And again, it’s clearly not meant to be interpreted really precisely. It doesn’t offer explanations to the harder questions about evangelism/prayer, and doesn’t really advance anything new/unexpected, but is a good starting place for what it’s meant for.