First thing - this is a young adult fantasy novella. And there is absolutely nothing wrong with that, I read YA fantasy, and I count some authors of it in instabuy (pre order as soon as possible) roll. I liked would have picked this book knowing it was YA but it was not clear to me when I picked it up, just making it clear. It's Young Adult (or even younger) - a coming of age, personal growth fantasy story. It's not that very common thing which is romantic YA or romantasy-ish fantasy, this is almost non sexual in a way reminiscent of Frances Hardinge.
This is being marked as "adult" on tags and others, and to make it clear, it is not. It's simple, and simply written and earnestly didactic - charmingly so, and that is a right for YA fiction at any era, but my problem with this is really how basic everything is meant to be, not much layers, not much depth, no real twists or surprises even when you have trickster gods in the mix.
In fact the whole theology is simplistic. I was actually objecting to a few things we are told like peaches being spring fruit (oh come on, peach trees blossom in spring, and they blossom relatively late at that) or the whole zoology bits about wolves being the bad guys because ruthless brutal killers, and foxes are ethical creatures who only tease equally and have a deep concern for kindness and justice (no polls were conducted on chickens, I guess, about it..). Oh, come on. But yeah, the whole book is basic, unchallenging.
A remark, the most interesting bit of the book was IMO one of the speeches of the fox god
“Because middling art is the most inspiring kind of art! When something is awful, it’s a joke; a bad piece of art makes people talk, sure, but it’s always in scorn or derision. No one experiences truly ghastly art and wants to improve it. And the same with truly beautiful work. Those heights of achievement are exquisite and capture something ecstatic in the universe, yes. But if one measures themselves against greatness, they’ll always be upset at themselves for not matching it, because few do.
This is great art teacher (or creative writing teacher or whatever) speech. (I wonder what other jobs the author has had other than writing). But thinking about it, as a reader, no, middling books are not the best books for a reader. Creation for the sake of creation is good for the artist, for those who teach artists. But for those who spend time and money in books, the best books are the best books. I only got time to read a few books a year, in my life, the time I spend reading a middling book I could have spent it reading something better. The interests of creators and consumers of what is created are different in that I guess. But this book made me think of it, so here goes the remark.
In all, middling YA fantasy. Not bad at all, but does not reach for greatness...