Seeing Through Language: A Guide to Styles of English Writing

by Ronald Carter, Walter Nash

Riddle : Why is a telescope like a bad excuse? Answer : Because anyone can see through it.
The authors of this book would like to help anyone - but particularly students of English - to "see through" language, whether as the instrument of perception or as the evasive code. They write about texts, and the making of texts, and how texts are made to carry various kinds of meaning; and the topics they choose to write about range from the lexicon of car maintenance manuals to the role of grammatical modality in literary criticism. Their aim is to help students who may have little experience of linguistic studies to develop the articulate awareness of language that may subsequently be of service to them.
The book has something to say about aesthetics, but it is not addressed to aesthetes; and much to say about the functions of language. One of its aims is to be of value to students and teachers of English by providing close and extensive readings of non-literary as well as literary texts. It is thus a demonstration of techniques and themes in stylistics, but it also has claims as a manual of self-defence for citizens beset by the salesmanship of words. Above all, it is concerned with creativeness, particularly as developed through the complementary processes of textual analysis and textual composition. The programme of exercises with which the book concludes is designed to enhance not only the student's understanding of various types of text, but also the ability to turn perception into productivity through the process of writing.

280 pages, Paperback

First published January 1, 1990

Reviews

[Joris · Rating 4 out of 5]

rimta knyga

[emilia · Rating 5 out of 5]

4.5/5

really interesting and readable, only the examples felt quite outdated

[aimee]

wasn’t not going to include this in my goodreads that’s 200 pages of pure waffle i just read i deserve a medal

[Roberta · Rating 5 out of 5]

Good things: very readable, practical guide to English stylistics. The foundation is entirely made up of sample texts, and nothing stays theoretical for very long, which is just as it should be. The writers also took the radical step (for the time) to treat literary (whatever that is) and non-literary texts together, so as to display the true power of the language used, and how the choice of words of grammatical structures can modify our perceptions of a text.

A negative point was that, at least in this edition, there were far too many typos in the book, to the point where it becomes a noticeable and irritating issue. A better editor was needed.

[Arivome]

Section on parodies made me laugh

[Stephanie · Rating 4 out of 5]

changed the way i read & analyze nbd