Caveat: I'm currently about halfway through (approximately) and can already tell that this is utter garbage. I had expected the author, who has done extensive work with language analysis, would be better at actually writing, but was sadly mistaken. The flaws are numerous and range from simple formatting and spelling errors, to production issues, to overall plot and character problems.
Formatting and Spelling
Where to begin? The crazy spacing (both paragraph-internal and -external) is jarring. This is made worse by the odd paragraph here and there which doesn't retain the same formatting as everything else. And that's not even considering the way there is absolutely no effort given to what seems to be standard in all professional work these days of having page-width paragraphs (with character-spacing tweaking) for all lines (other than the final one) in each paragraph.
Then, of course, there are numerous spelling and grammatical errors throughout the book – all of which serve to reduce the sense of the quality of the work.
Production
I had never before realized how much I would miss having page numbers until they weren't there any more. And the unnecessary "naming" of each chapter, repeating a line or phrase found within the chapter is largely useless and feels like it's there simply to add "bloat" to the manuscript (such as it is).
For that matter, adding a Dramatis Personae would have been helpful as many of the characters seem interchangeable – possibly even in the author's mind as there are at least a couple of times the wrong character was named within the text.
Plot and Characters
And here is where everything falls apart even worse. It is clear he is trying to convey a bunch of information and philosophical concepts. However, in that context, it is only even readable by someone who has some vague inkling of what he's talking about because they've already heard those terms from listening to his podcasts previously.
For example, having "normal" characters use the phrase "this body's Life" without ever having provided any explanation or context for things like this mean force the reader to "pretend" they've had some sort of exposition and, at best, muster onwards.
Character descriptions get repeated, ad infinitum, without ever adding any useful (and relevant) details. As another example, I didn't need to be reminded, in just about every chapter she's present, that the female lead is a stripper and wears heels. Really, I got it – enough already!
Final Thoughts
The book reads like it was written by someone in high school who hasn't completed any sort of literature course, but has a "Really Cool Idea™" and wants to tell all of his friends about it – and then publish it for the world so everyone can see how Awesome he is. It's little more than "word vomit" that tries to say something, but fails miserably.
Realistically, this could have been so much better with only a few simple additional steps:
a) Having a proofreader or editor (even an amateur one) would have allowed significant clean-up of the overall work;
b) Using some sort of "real" pre-publication software or tool (other than what I can only assume was a simple word processor) to produce a publication quality level which it should have;
c) Inclusion of a viewpoint character – who can be "introduced" to all of the concepts and word salad he's trying to convey.
By assuming his readers would already understand any of what he's talking about, as well as (seemingly) "force-fitting" it into the current world, it becomes a horrible mess that, as I said at the start, winds up being pretty much garbage level.
Unless you are a die-hard fan of the author, I strongly recommend not purchasing nor reading this book.