What do you think?
Rate this book
The Cut Throat Trial
THE GAME IS ABOUT TO BEGIN . . .
It is one of the biggest trials of the year. Three seventeen-year-old boys are accused of the brutal murder of an elderly teacher on New Year's Eve.
Each boy denies it.
Each points the finger at the other two.
But they can’t all be innocent.
The three defence barristers have only one job: to persuade the jury that their client is not guilty. But they’re up against a prosecutor who needs to win the case, no matter the cost.
Because when the game is murder, the competition is deadly.
It is one of the biggest trials of the year. Three seventeen-year-old boys are accused of the brutal murder of an elderly teacher on New Year's Eve.
Each boy denies it.
Each points the finger at the other two.
But they can’t all be innocent.
The three defence barristers have only one job: to persuade the jury that their client is not guilty. But they’re up against a prosecutor who needs to win the case, no matter the cost.
Because when the game is murder, the competition is deadly.
432 pages, Hardcover
Published August 28, 2025
196 people are currently reading
1074 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 227 reviews
June 20, 2025
4.5 rounded up
There’s a murder trial at Ableford Crown Court. The King versus Craig Mervyn-Scott, Arron Freeman and Jamal Lowton are charged with the murder of Bernard Cooper, a 74 year-old retired headteacher on the 1st of January 2024. We’ll hear the prosecution case first with Aliyah Arshad KC being the prosecutor, His Honour Judge Jeremy Letts, with Mr Wyatt KC representing Craig, Mr. Evans KC for the second defendant and Miss Rennie for Jamal. The murder is an horrific one, will Aliyah secure convictions or are the defendants to be believed that there’s more to the story that meets the eye? The story is told from multiple perspectives which works extremely well.
The case is absolutely fascinating, it’s awful, brutal and at times the courtroom spectators must feel they’re viewing a dogfight, and it’s totally gripping. The courtroom dingdong back-and-forth questioning is superb, it’s written so well that I feel as if I’m in the jury listening to the evidence being presented or utterly destroyed.
The KC’s are an intriguing bunch, one is a pompous lover of theatrics, almost a Panto artist, one is cheesily ripe Brie but with an assassins smile and one who needles but knows they have a killer point up their sleeve but is probably hung over so whether the point will be delivered to best effect will be debatable. Add in a cluelessly incompetent disclosing officer who does not help Aliyah in any way, in fact frequently achieves the opposite and what it all amounts to is a terrific read which feels very authentic.
The multiple points of view is an excellent choice as it allows the reader to understand each character better, to get to know their issues, their problems and maybe shine some light on the truth. The latter is a definitely maybe because it’s way more complex than it initially seems. The author though does a really good job by clarifying things and yet at the same time making it feel very believable.
As the trial gets into its stride, the courtroom scenes becoming increasingly suspenseful as questions and answers bat back-and-forth, twisting and turning this way and that with interjections of blackly humorous (??) internal monologues often courtesy of His Honour the Judge. Probably as well some of those weren’t audible!!
Just as you think it’s all sorted, a killer of a twist comes in which literally changes everything… What a cracker of an ending which gives rise to many questions but principally what exactly is justice? This is a very compelling look at the imperfections of the justice system in and in addition demonstrates the huge burden that falls on the shoulders of Kings Counsellors especially for the prosecution.
Overall, this is an exceptionally good legal thriller which I can recommend.
With thanks to NetGalley and especially to the publishers for the much appreciated early copy in return for an honest review.
There’s a murder trial at Ableford Crown Court. The King versus Craig Mervyn-Scott, Arron Freeman and Jamal Lowton are charged with the murder of Bernard Cooper, a 74 year-old retired headteacher on the 1st of January 2024. We’ll hear the prosecution case first with Aliyah Arshad KC being the prosecutor, His Honour Judge Jeremy Letts, with Mr Wyatt KC representing Craig, Mr. Evans KC for the second defendant and Miss Rennie for Jamal. The murder is an horrific one, will Aliyah secure convictions or are the defendants to be believed that there’s more to the story that meets the eye? The story is told from multiple perspectives which works extremely well.
The case is absolutely fascinating, it’s awful, brutal and at times the courtroom spectators must feel they’re viewing a dogfight, and it’s totally gripping. The courtroom dingdong back-and-forth questioning is superb, it’s written so well that I feel as if I’m in the jury listening to the evidence being presented or utterly destroyed.
The KC’s are an intriguing bunch, one is a pompous lover of theatrics, almost a Panto artist, one is cheesily ripe Brie but with an assassins smile and one who needles but knows they have a killer point up their sleeve but is probably hung over so whether the point will be delivered to best effect will be debatable. Add in a cluelessly incompetent disclosing officer who does not help Aliyah in any way, in fact frequently achieves the opposite and what it all amounts to is a terrific read which feels very authentic.
The multiple points of view is an excellent choice as it allows the reader to understand each character better, to get to know their issues, their problems and maybe shine some light on the truth. The latter is a definitely maybe because it’s way more complex than it initially seems. The author though does a really good job by clarifying things and yet at the same time making it feel very believable.
As the trial gets into its stride, the courtroom scenes becoming increasingly suspenseful as questions and answers bat back-and-forth, twisting and turning this way and that with interjections of blackly humorous (??) internal monologues often courtesy of His Honour the Judge. Probably as well some of those weren’t audible!!
Just as you think it’s all sorted, a killer of a twist comes in which literally changes everything… What a cracker of an ending which gives rise to many questions but principally what exactly is justice? This is a very compelling look at the imperfections of the justice system in and in addition demonstrates the huge burden that falls on the shoulders of Kings Counsellors especially for the prosecution.
Overall, this is an exceptionally good legal thriller which I can recommend.
With thanks to NetGalley and especially to the publishers for the much appreciated early copy in return for an honest review.
October 26, 2025
The Cut Throat Trial by SJ Fleet
Synopsis /
It is one of the biggest trials of the year. Three seventeen-year-old boys are accused of the brutal murder of an elderly teacher on New Year's Eve.
Each boy denies it.
Each points the finger at the other two.
But they can’t all be innocent.
The three defence barristers have only one to persuade the jury that their client is not guilty. But they’re up against a prosecutor who needs to win the case, no matter the cost.
Because when the game is murder, the competition is deadly.
My Thoughts /
Semi-outlier review ahead.
One liner review: The Cut Throat Trial is a masterclass in courtroom procedure, but fell down in pacing and narrative from multiple POVs.
About seven years ago, a book about 'stories of life inside the courtroom' was published by an unknown junior barrister and took the publishing world by storm. The Secret Barrister: Stories of the Law and How It's Broken is a first-hand account of the human cost of the criminal justice system; and in it, the author "let's loose" on the state of the legal system in Britain. Now, The Secret Barrister, writing as S.J. Fleet, has turned their hand at penning a fictional story (about a murder trial being held at Ableford Crown Court) called The Cut Throat Trial, which I was eager to read.
The novel is set out how a trial might normally run. There are witness statements. The reading of the Indictment – a document which sets out the offence(s) the Defendants are being charged with. The Trial: The Prosecution's case. The Defendants' cases. The closing; and post-trial proceedings.
In this particular case before the court, there are three defendants, each of whom is charged with killing a single man, retired teacher, Bernard Hooper. Each of the Defendants are represented by their own barrister. Fleet has written the narrative from the POV of each of the participants in the trial – 1 Judge, 1 Prosecutor; 3 Defendants and 3 Defence Barristers. That's 8 POVs. And that was my first issue – too many POVs for this reader.
There is no denying that the attention to detail regarding legal procedure in this book is nothing short of outstanding – as it should be nothing less than perfect, when written by someone who spends their living in a courtroom. However, for this reader, that high level of legal speak and procedure (which is maintained throughout the entirety of the book); made the novel feel more like a work of non-fiction – full of detail, yet dry and unappealing – like eating burnt toast with peanut butter. Barristers are in a league of their own and work on the premise that the more words you can use to make your point the better. Use big words. Unusual words. Words which only seem to confound the jury and have them scrabbling for their Oxford English [Dictionaries].
Fleet does a good job of placing you into the courtroom. You feel as though you are the thirteenth juror sitting on this trial. Looking at it from that perspective I can imagine sitting through this trial and having my attention captured; but as a reader there was nothing that was capturing and keeping my attention. With the conclusion of each chapter we moved forward – some. Then the next chapter was from another POV and we'd step back – seemingly to the beginning of the previous chapter – especially when each of the 3 Defence Barristers would cross-examine a Defendant. One step forward, three steps back.
While the story of the murder of Bernard Hooper ie. the "case" itself was interesting – the characters were not. None of whom were likeable and in the case of one Defendant, was so bland and uninteresting he could have been written out and I really wouldn't have noticed. The Barristers display of peacockery is eyerolling; as they strut around like actors on a stage having carefully rehearsed their lines for the audience (jury). Each needing to best their learned colleagues.
This trial went for 20 days and, although not as long as some, would still be a substantial amount of time for a jury to pay attention. I have to say that mine was waning. I think the book could have benefitted from some intense editing – down to maybe 300+ pages instead of 426.
If you enjoy reading legal thrillers I would urge you to give this one a go. You might find yourself enjoying it more than this reader – as there are many more 4-5 star reviewers that can attest to how good this book is.
Synopsis /
It is one of the biggest trials of the year. Three seventeen-year-old boys are accused of the brutal murder of an elderly teacher on New Year's Eve.
Each boy denies it.
Each points the finger at the other two.
But they can’t all be innocent.
The three defence barristers have only one to persuade the jury that their client is not guilty. But they’re up against a prosecutor who needs to win the case, no matter the cost.
Because when the game is murder, the competition is deadly.
My Thoughts /
Semi-outlier review ahead.
One liner review: The Cut Throat Trial is a masterclass in courtroom procedure, but fell down in pacing and narrative from multiple POVs.
About seven years ago, a book about 'stories of life inside the courtroom' was published by an unknown junior barrister and took the publishing world by storm. The Secret Barrister: Stories of the Law and How It's Broken is a first-hand account of the human cost of the criminal justice system; and in it, the author "let's loose" on the state of the legal system in Britain. Now, The Secret Barrister, writing as S.J. Fleet, has turned their hand at penning a fictional story (about a murder trial being held at Ableford Crown Court) called The Cut Throat Trial, which I was eager to read.
The novel is set out how a trial might normally run. There are witness statements. The reading of the Indictment – a document which sets out the offence(s) the Defendants are being charged with. The Trial: The Prosecution's case. The Defendants' cases. The closing; and post-trial proceedings.
In this particular case before the court, there are three defendants, each of whom is charged with killing a single man, retired teacher, Bernard Hooper. Each of the Defendants are represented by their own barrister. Fleet has written the narrative from the POV of each of the participants in the trial – 1 Judge, 1 Prosecutor; 3 Defendants and 3 Defence Barristers. That's 8 POVs. And that was my first issue – too many POVs for this reader.
There is no denying that the attention to detail regarding legal procedure in this book is nothing short of outstanding – as it should be nothing less than perfect, when written by someone who spends their living in a courtroom. However, for this reader, that high level of legal speak and procedure (which is maintained throughout the entirety of the book); made the novel feel more like a work of non-fiction – full of detail, yet dry and unappealing – like eating burnt toast with peanut butter. Barristers are in a league of their own and work on the premise that the more words you can use to make your point the better. Use big words. Unusual words. Words which only seem to confound the jury and have them scrabbling for their Oxford English [Dictionaries].
Fleet does a good job of placing you into the courtroom. You feel as though you are the thirteenth juror sitting on this trial. Looking at it from that perspective I can imagine sitting through this trial and having my attention captured; but as a reader there was nothing that was capturing and keeping my attention. With the conclusion of each chapter we moved forward – some. Then the next chapter was from another POV and we'd step back – seemingly to the beginning of the previous chapter – especially when each of the 3 Defence Barristers would cross-examine a Defendant. One step forward, three steps back.
While the story of the murder of Bernard Hooper ie. the "case" itself was interesting – the characters were not. None of whom were likeable and in the case of one Defendant, was so bland and uninteresting he could have been written out and I really wouldn't have noticed. The Barristers display of peacockery is eyerolling; as they strut around like actors on a stage having carefully rehearsed their lines for the audience (jury). Each needing to best their learned colleagues.
This trial went for 20 days and, although not as long as some, would still be a substantial amount of time for a jury to pay attention. I have to say that mine was waning. I think the book could have benefitted from some intense editing – down to maybe 300+ pages instead of 426.
If you enjoy reading legal thrillers I would urge you to give this one a go. You might find yourself enjoying it more than this reader – as there are many more 4-5 star reviewers that can attest to how good this book is.
June 9, 2025
Actual rating 4.5..
I wasn’t sure what to expect with this one as I haven’t read any of the Secret Barrister books, but I thought this was so clever and compelling, whilst also maintaining a surprising sense of humour given the violent nature of the crime at the heart of the story!
Anyone squeamish around blood and violence may struggle, and it does also have quite a few different narrative voices, but I just found it all quite fascinating and thought provoking, and had no idea which way it would go - and the ending certainly shocked me! I’d definitely read more fiction from the author.
I wasn’t sure what to expect with this one as I haven’t read any of the Secret Barrister books, but I thought this was so clever and compelling, whilst also maintaining a surprising sense of humour given the violent nature of the crime at the heart of the story!
Anyone squeamish around blood and violence may struggle, and it does also have quite a few different narrative voices, but I just found it all quite fascinating and thought provoking, and had no idea which way it would go - and the ending certainly shocked me! I’d definitely read more fiction from the author.
August 29, 2025
My love for legal courtroom thrillers began many, many moons ago with John Grisham. But lately, he’s just not been delivering the goods. In my most humble opinion, of course. So I’ve been rather impatiently waiting for someone to fill that gap, and by golly, I think someone has finally stepped up to the plate.
Three teenagers are on trial for the brutal murder of septuagenarian Bernard Hooper. Each of the defendants has his own barrister, and each one of them is pointing the finger to the other ones. There is obviously also the, rather unlikeable, prosecutor and the judge. All these characters get the opportunity to speak, to show you what’s going on behind the scenes. Some of it you’ll gladly nod along with, other things will make you frown. As happens quite a bit, I’m sure, some have already made up their minds about the guilt or innocence of these defendants, without even a shred of evidence being presented. And there are some others who seem to find it perfectly okay not to disclose everything. Justice, indeed.
Just when I thought I had a handle on things, something happened, or someone would say something, and I found myself right back at square one. Trying to reach a decision on the fate of these three teenaged boys was no easy feat. The investigation was a bit of a shambles, to be fair. I realised quite early on I was missing vital information, and I had many questions that remained unanswered. I found there were some tiny clues scattered around that I tried to keep track of in the back of my head, but I still failed to see the big picture.
The way "The Cut Throat Trial" is written, it puts the reader right there in the courtroom. I felt like I was an actual member of the jury. There are no unnecessary bells and whistles, there is absolutely no need for them either. It’s just solid and extremely compelling storytelling from the very first page until the last, offering you a front row seat at a murder trial.
Imagining I was sitting in a row of the jury box seemed fun at first, but it soon became apparent what a massive responsibility it would be. Dazzling twists and turns would have taken that impact away, I think, so I appreciate that the author shied away from that. The events that occur all feel rather natural, not meant to blind or distract the reader. Instead you're able to focus on what you're being told by the various characters, to decide for yourself if you should believe them or not.
While I obviously had more information to hand than the jury members, I was very interested to know if we would reach the same conclusions. Spoiler : we did not, and only agreed on two. It wasn’t at all hard to grasp the difficulty in ignoring background and character, and to focus solely on the evidence, or lack thereof. Here again, I was smug to think it was a job well done and then the final pages … well, jaw-dropping doesn’t quite come close. Well played.
This legal thriller is entirely on a different level than the ones I’ve read before. It’s realistic and believable, utterly absorbing and so incredibly well written and plotted. I had high expectations, which S.J. Fleet surpassed most convincingly. It wouldn’t at all surprise me if "The Cut Throat Trial" would find its way onto my list of books of the year. Definitely recommended and I look forward to what’s next!
Three teenagers are on trial for the brutal murder of septuagenarian Bernard Hooper. Each of the defendants has his own barrister, and each one of them is pointing the finger to the other ones. There is obviously also the, rather unlikeable, prosecutor and the judge. All these characters get the opportunity to speak, to show you what’s going on behind the scenes. Some of it you’ll gladly nod along with, other things will make you frown. As happens quite a bit, I’m sure, some have already made up their minds about the guilt or innocence of these defendants, without even a shred of evidence being presented. And there are some others who seem to find it perfectly okay not to disclose everything. Justice, indeed.
Just when I thought I had a handle on things, something happened, or someone would say something, and I found myself right back at square one. Trying to reach a decision on the fate of these three teenaged boys was no easy feat. The investigation was a bit of a shambles, to be fair. I realised quite early on I was missing vital information, and I had many questions that remained unanswered. I found there were some tiny clues scattered around that I tried to keep track of in the back of my head, but I still failed to see the big picture.
The way "The Cut Throat Trial" is written, it puts the reader right there in the courtroom. I felt like I was an actual member of the jury. There are no unnecessary bells and whistles, there is absolutely no need for them either. It’s just solid and extremely compelling storytelling from the very first page until the last, offering you a front row seat at a murder trial.
Imagining I was sitting in a row of the jury box seemed fun at first, but it soon became apparent what a massive responsibility it would be. Dazzling twists and turns would have taken that impact away, I think, so I appreciate that the author shied away from that. The events that occur all feel rather natural, not meant to blind or distract the reader. Instead you're able to focus on what you're being told by the various characters, to decide for yourself if you should believe them or not.
While I obviously had more information to hand than the jury members, I was very interested to know if we would reach the same conclusions. Spoiler : we did not, and only agreed on two. It wasn’t at all hard to grasp the difficulty in ignoring background and character, and to focus solely on the evidence, or lack thereof. Here again, I was smug to think it was a job well done and then the final pages … well, jaw-dropping doesn’t quite come close. Well played.
This legal thriller is entirely on a different level than the ones I’ve read before. It’s realistic and believable, utterly absorbing and so incredibly well written and plotted. I had high expectations, which S.J. Fleet surpassed most convincingly. It wouldn’t at all surprise me if "The Cut Throat Trial" would find its way onto my list of books of the year. Definitely recommended and I look forward to what’s next!
June 28, 2025
Three teenage boys. One murdered man. A courtroom full of lies, strategy, and shifting allegiances.
I devoured this. Sharp, pacey, and unexpectedly emotional, The Cut Throat Trial is a legal thriller that doesn’t just grip — it unsettles.
Told through multiple perspectives — the prosecutor, judge, three defendants, and a defence barrister — the narrative structure adds depth and tension. Each voice slants the truth just enough to keep you constantly questioning. You’re never quite sure whose version is real, and that uncertainty becomes the engine of the story.
This is a novel that feels like being in court: claustrophobic, calculated, crackling with unspoken power plays. The cut-throat defence (where each teen blames the others) is a brutal legal strategy, and watching the barristers navigate it is both compelling and chilling — especially when it’s unclear if any of their clients are telling the truth.
I’ve always been drawn to courtroom drama — criminal law was once my dream job — and this scratched that itch completely. The legal detail is spot on but never slows the pace. The judge’s commentary adds a dry, dark humour that cuts through the tension — I laughed more than I expected with such weighty subject matter.
Fleet’s writing is razor-sharp — spare, strategic, and perfectly judged. The way it balances intensity with bleak wit is masterful.
There’s a strong emotional core too: guilt, fear, loyalty, and how the justice system treats young defendants. The novel leans into moral ambiguity, and the emotional weight builds subtly. I found myself switching allegiances more than once. And that final twist? It flips everything.
One of the most engaging trial narratives I’ve read in a long time — confident, clever, and completely absorbing.
🎯 Verdict: Guilty… of being unputdownable!
Huge thanks to the publisher for the advance copy. All views are my own. The Cut Throat Trial publishes this August.
I devoured this. Sharp, pacey, and unexpectedly emotional, The Cut Throat Trial is a legal thriller that doesn’t just grip — it unsettles.
Told through multiple perspectives — the prosecutor, judge, three defendants, and a defence barrister — the narrative structure adds depth and tension. Each voice slants the truth just enough to keep you constantly questioning. You’re never quite sure whose version is real, and that uncertainty becomes the engine of the story.
This is a novel that feels like being in court: claustrophobic, calculated, crackling with unspoken power plays. The cut-throat defence (where each teen blames the others) is a brutal legal strategy, and watching the barristers navigate it is both compelling and chilling — especially when it’s unclear if any of their clients are telling the truth.
I’ve always been drawn to courtroom drama — criminal law was once my dream job — and this scratched that itch completely. The legal detail is spot on but never slows the pace. The judge’s commentary adds a dry, dark humour that cuts through the tension — I laughed more than I expected with such weighty subject matter.
Fleet’s writing is razor-sharp — spare, strategic, and perfectly judged. The way it balances intensity with bleak wit is masterful.
There’s a strong emotional core too: guilt, fear, loyalty, and how the justice system treats young defendants. The novel leans into moral ambiguity, and the emotional weight builds subtly. I found myself switching allegiances more than once. And that final twist? It flips everything.
One of the most engaging trial narratives I’ve read in a long time — confident, clever, and completely absorbing.
🎯 Verdict: Guilty… of being unputdownable!
Huge thanks to the publisher for the advance copy. All views are my own. The Cut Throat Trial publishes this August.
October 24, 2025
If you enjoy reading/listening to a trial this is the book for you. I borrowed from BorrowBox and thoroughly enjoyed it. The pomposity of court and characters was captured beautifully which led to me disliking them immensely or rooting for them.
May 26, 2025
S. J. Fleet’s The Cut Throat Trial places readers at the tense intersection of youth, crime, and the legal system.
Centered around the courtroom drama of three seventeen-year-old boys accused of murdering an elderly teacher on New Year’s Eve, the novel is an immersive legal thriller that lingers on the ambiguous nature of truth and justice. It challenges assumptions about innocence and guilt by focusing not just on the facts of the case, but on the personalities and motivations of everyone involved. Closely examining courtroom tension, character dynamics, and the novel’s underlying themes, this essay reflects on the book’s capacity to provoke thought about the boundaries and burdens of justice.
The story’s heartbeat lies in its nuanced depiction of the accused and their legal representatives. Each boy, facing a charge that could define his life, responds differently under pressure: they turn suspicion on one another, amplifying the tangled uncertainty of the trial. Their personalities, vulnerabilities, and loyalties unfold gradually, forcing readers to reconsider initial judgments about responsibility. These are not caricatures of guilt or innocence, but young people caught in circumstances far beyond their years.
The defense barristers become more than procedural mouthpieces. Their backgrounds, personal doubts, and unique strategies highlight the complexities of advocacy in a high-stakes context. The depiction of the prosecutor, unyielding in his campaign for conviction, serves as a reminder of how the search for justice can blur into the pursuit of victory. The interplay between these legal professionals underscores the pressures within the criminal justice system, where every word and gesture can tip the balance between freedom and punishment.
Fleet’s novel confronts challenges inherent in the pursuit of truth within legal proceedings. The shifting narratives and carefully constructed testimonies expose the malleable nature of evidence and demonstrate how personal biases and tactics shape perceptions of reality. These elements reflect ongoing debates about the fairness and reliability of criminal justice, particularly for young defendants. The book raises difficult questions about the capacity of juries and society to determine guilt impartially and about the weight that adult legal systems impose on adolescents.
The narrative also considers the wider human consequences of legal decisions. By inviting empathy for each character, regardless of their role in the case, the story reminds readers that trials reach far beyond verdicts; they ripple into the lives and futures of everyone connected to them. The emotional turmoil inside the courtroom feels immediate and claustrophobic, reinforcing the idea that justice is not a distant ideal, but a process experienced with real fear, hope, and vulnerability.
Fleet’s style is marked by clarity and precision, qualities likely stemming from a strong understanding of legal realities. The accessible language and detailed courtroom scenes sustain suspense without sacrificing authenticity. The structure, shaped by the rhythm of the trial, moves briskly and casts the reader as an observer, almost as if seated among the jury. While some passages may feel dense to those less drawn to procedural detail, this granular approach enhances the narrative’s credibility.
The Cut Throat Trial stands as a compelling and thoughtful contribution to contemporary crime fiction. Its impact lasts beyond the final page, stemming from an honest portrayal of how justice is pursued and how its imperfections touch all involved.
By refusing to simplify guilt or innocence, Fleet leaves readers with a sharper awareness of the burdens that legal proceedings place on individuals, especially young people, and of the ethical questions that persist in the search for justice.
The novel encourages deep reflection on the societal implications of judgment and the often elusive nature of truth.
Centered around the courtroom drama of three seventeen-year-old boys accused of murdering an elderly teacher on New Year’s Eve, the novel is an immersive legal thriller that lingers on the ambiguous nature of truth and justice. It challenges assumptions about innocence and guilt by focusing not just on the facts of the case, but on the personalities and motivations of everyone involved. Closely examining courtroom tension, character dynamics, and the novel’s underlying themes, this essay reflects on the book’s capacity to provoke thought about the boundaries and burdens of justice.
The story’s heartbeat lies in its nuanced depiction of the accused and their legal representatives. Each boy, facing a charge that could define his life, responds differently under pressure: they turn suspicion on one another, amplifying the tangled uncertainty of the trial. Their personalities, vulnerabilities, and loyalties unfold gradually, forcing readers to reconsider initial judgments about responsibility. These are not caricatures of guilt or innocence, but young people caught in circumstances far beyond their years.
The defense barristers become more than procedural mouthpieces. Their backgrounds, personal doubts, and unique strategies highlight the complexities of advocacy in a high-stakes context. The depiction of the prosecutor, unyielding in his campaign for conviction, serves as a reminder of how the search for justice can blur into the pursuit of victory. The interplay between these legal professionals underscores the pressures within the criminal justice system, where every word and gesture can tip the balance between freedom and punishment.
Fleet’s novel confronts challenges inherent in the pursuit of truth within legal proceedings. The shifting narratives and carefully constructed testimonies expose the malleable nature of evidence and demonstrate how personal biases and tactics shape perceptions of reality. These elements reflect ongoing debates about the fairness and reliability of criminal justice, particularly for young defendants. The book raises difficult questions about the capacity of juries and society to determine guilt impartially and about the weight that adult legal systems impose on adolescents.
The narrative also considers the wider human consequences of legal decisions. By inviting empathy for each character, regardless of their role in the case, the story reminds readers that trials reach far beyond verdicts; they ripple into the lives and futures of everyone connected to them. The emotional turmoil inside the courtroom feels immediate and claustrophobic, reinforcing the idea that justice is not a distant ideal, but a process experienced with real fear, hope, and vulnerability.
Fleet’s style is marked by clarity and precision, qualities likely stemming from a strong understanding of legal realities. The accessible language and detailed courtroom scenes sustain suspense without sacrificing authenticity. The structure, shaped by the rhythm of the trial, moves briskly and casts the reader as an observer, almost as if seated among the jury. While some passages may feel dense to those less drawn to procedural detail, this granular approach enhances the narrative’s credibility.
The Cut Throat Trial stands as a compelling and thoughtful contribution to contemporary crime fiction. Its impact lasts beyond the final page, stemming from an honest portrayal of how justice is pursued and how its imperfections touch all involved.
By refusing to simplify guilt or innocence, Fleet leaves readers with a sharper awareness of the burdens that legal proceedings place on individuals, especially young people, and of the ethical questions that persist in the search for justice.
The novel encourages deep reflection on the societal implications of judgment and the often elusive nature of truth.
October 6, 2025
4.0 / 5.0
Solid book from start to finish, but one that requires consistent concentration and understanding. This is pure British legal thriller at its best, I genuinely felt like I was the 13th person of the jury listening in to everything. My only bone to pick, and maybe just the level of legal talk presented was more than I anticipated, I had to reread a few pages because the legal jargon and talk is strong here. Whilst the book is thrilling, with curveballs thrown left right and centre like a dodgeball match, it only makes sense if you follow through with it and understand each element. That’s not to say I don’t do that for all books, what I mean is given the legal talk it takes a few for sentences or how things are done/ spoken to the Judge that it’s confusing then keeping it plain and simple. That’s my only bone to pick. The book shows us elements of what it’s like being a barrister on the defence, prosecutor as well as the Judge. I have a new found appreciation for the difficulty and stress you are under representing a client when the stakes are a matter of life imprisonment or freedom. I like how the element of doubt is portrayed throughout the book, I like how realistic this is- not eveyrone will have it perfect, there will be holes and gaps from all parties - it’s how you prove guilt.
The book is centred around the events of New Year’s Day, when the police find a multilateral body of a 74 year old man Bernard Hooper with a knife sticking out his chest. 3 teenage boys are soaked in blood and charged with murder. The crown court say that this was a random charged attacks whilst each of the teenaged point the finger to each other, everyone of them have their own story but someone is clearly lying. It’s three defenders barristers who’s job it is to persuade the jury that their client is not guilty, but they’re up against a prosecute who needs to win the case no matter the cost. The trial doesn’t always go to plain, things are missed, vital evidence goes missing, and everyone pulling every trick out their bags to score big points. Quite simply the trial is cut throat.
The book captures all perspectives of the case minus the jurors, it’s a great book from start to finish. Definitely worth the time investment if you ever are able to get your hands on it!!
Solid book from start to finish, but one that requires consistent concentration and understanding. This is pure British legal thriller at its best, I genuinely felt like I was the 13th person of the jury listening in to everything. My only bone to pick, and maybe just the level of legal talk presented was more than I anticipated, I had to reread a few pages because the legal jargon and talk is strong here. Whilst the book is thrilling, with curveballs thrown left right and centre like a dodgeball match, it only makes sense if you follow through with it and understand each element. That’s not to say I don’t do that for all books, what I mean is given the legal talk it takes a few for sentences or how things are done/ spoken to the Judge that it’s confusing then keeping it plain and simple. That’s my only bone to pick. The book shows us elements of what it’s like being a barrister on the defence, prosecutor as well as the Judge. I have a new found appreciation for the difficulty and stress you are under representing a client when the stakes are a matter of life imprisonment or freedom. I like how the element of doubt is portrayed throughout the book, I like how realistic this is- not eveyrone will have it perfect, there will be holes and gaps from all parties - it’s how you prove guilt.
The book is centred around the events of New Year’s Day, when the police find a multilateral body of a 74 year old man Bernard Hooper with a knife sticking out his chest. 3 teenage boys are soaked in blood and charged with murder. The crown court say that this was a random charged attacks whilst each of the teenaged point the finger to each other, everyone of them have their own story but someone is clearly lying. It’s three defenders barristers who’s job it is to persuade the jury that their client is not guilty, but they’re up against a prosecute who needs to win the case no matter the cost. The trial doesn’t always go to plain, things are missed, vital evidence goes missing, and everyone pulling every trick out their bags to score big points. Quite simply the trial is cut throat.
The book captures all perspectives of the case minus the jurors, it’s a great book from start to finish. Definitely worth the time investment if you ever are able to get your hands on it!!
August 25, 2025
The Cut Throat Trial is a twisty, gripping story following the trial of three teenage boys accused of murdering a pensioner on New Year’s Eve. Taking place almost entirely in the courtroom, we watch the trial unfold before us and it makes for additive reading.
This book is so well written, I finished it in no time. We are given different perspectives of those involved and each chapter reveals a little more to us as we unearth the truth of what happened that night, which I loved, as well as the workings of a high profile court case such as this which is incredibly interesting to read about.
For me, it also felt realistic - often courtroom dramas/ thrillers like these feel ridiculous or overdone, but in The Cut Throat Trial, the absolutely riveting subject matter has no need for unnecessary or unrealistic dramatics. The ins and outs of the trial, testimony from witnesses and defendants, and surprise evidence along the way (all with the question of who is telling the truth and what really happened that night) are enough to keep any reader engrossed.
The snidey (and amusing) comments from some characters add some light relief amidst the dark and gruesome case at the book’s centre. None of the characters are clear cut - each are complex and have faults. But which of the defenders are lying and which might, just might, be telling the truth?
The book ends with a satisfying, surprising conclusion. I hope we’ll get to enjoy many more releases from the S J Fleet, aka ‘The Secret Barrister’, as this was a brilliant read I’d highly recommend.
This book is so well written, I finished it in no time. We are given different perspectives of those involved and each chapter reveals a little more to us as we unearth the truth of what happened that night, which I loved, as well as the workings of a high profile court case such as this which is incredibly interesting to read about.
For me, it also felt realistic - often courtroom dramas/ thrillers like these feel ridiculous or overdone, but in The Cut Throat Trial, the absolutely riveting subject matter has no need for unnecessary or unrealistic dramatics. The ins and outs of the trial, testimony from witnesses and defendants, and surprise evidence along the way (all with the question of who is telling the truth and what really happened that night) are enough to keep any reader engrossed.
The snidey (and amusing) comments from some characters add some light relief amidst the dark and gruesome case at the book’s centre. None of the characters are clear cut - each are complex and have faults. But which of the defenders are lying and which might, just might, be telling the truth?
The book ends with a satisfying, surprising conclusion. I hope we’ll get to enjoy many more releases from the S J Fleet, aka ‘The Secret Barrister’, as this was a brilliant read I’d highly recommend.
August 17, 2025
Before retiring I worked as an usher in both Magistrates and Crown court so reading The Cut throat Trial was somewhat akin to a day at the office ;) and what an enjoyable experience that has been… Bernard Hooper an elderly gentleman in his 70’s has popped out to purchase a bottle of wine but this will be a New years eve like no other. In less than an hour Bernard will have been murdered in a brutal Zombie (knife) attack by three teenage assailants captured on CCTV leaving the scene.
The Cut throat Trial is the story (trial) of the alleged perpetrators taking place over some 3 to 4 weeks. We meet the barristers representing the defendants, the overworked prosecutor, and the arrogant pompous self opinionated judge: His Honour Judge Letts. The story is told in the first person by all the main parties, including the defendants. It is a tense, dramatic, edge of the seat spectacle with even a little humour ……” Prosecuting counsel is like a Western gunslinger swinging open the saloon doors only to find the furniture overturned and everyone inside fatally wounded. Sometimes all you need to do is discharge a few rounds into the bodies for show, and help yourself to a drink from the bar”....... that unfolds in front of us and I was glued to every word on every page. With a shocking, unexpected conclusion this is a brilliant read told by one who has lived his life in Her/His Majesty’s Courts. I thoroughly enjoyed and marvelled at every scene as it was played out in front of me…Highly recommended.
The Cut throat Trial is the story (trial) of the alleged perpetrators taking place over some 3 to 4 weeks. We meet the barristers representing the defendants, the overworked prosecutor, and the arrogant pompous self opinionated judge: His Honour Judge Letts. The story is told in the first person by all the main parties, including the defendants. It is a tense, dramatic, edge of the seat spectacle with even a little humour ……” Prosecuting counsel is like a Western gunslinger swinging open the saloon doors only to find the furniture overturned and everyone inside fatally wounded. Sometimes all you need to do is discharge a few rounds into the bodies for show, and help yourself to a drink from the bar”....... that unfolds in front of us and I was glued to every word on every page. With a shocking, unexpected conclusion this is a brilliant read told by one who has lived his life in Her/His Majesty’s Courts. I thoroughly enjoyed and marvelled at every scene as it was played out in front of me…Highly recommended.
July 27, 2025
I really enjoyed this book. It is the story of a trial. 3 young men are accused of the brutal murder of a pensioner. Each say they're innocent and blame the other two. The story is told from a number of different perspectives, including 2 of the accused, the judge himself and the prosecution barrister. I found it interesting from the point of view of the court procedures as well as the story itself. This kept me on the edge of my seat to the end, and I'm glad the true account of what happened is revealed to the reader at the end.
Thanks to NetGalley for a preview copy.
Thanks to NetGalley for a preview copy.
July 14, 2025
Thanks to NetGalley for the advance copy of The Trial by S J Fleet. I was completely hooked from the start – it felt like I was right there in the jury box. Full of twists, turns, and hidden truths, this story kept me guessing throughout. The tension builds brilliantly, and I loved how the layers of lies were gradually peeled away. An addictive, thought-provoking read. Highly recommend!
August 29, 2025
The Cut Throat Trial is an excellent court procedural by The Secret Barrister (writing as SJ Fleet).
We begin the statement with Rita Hooper, the widow of murdered Bernard Hooper, who sets out what happened to her husband on New Year's Eve 2025.
What follows is the story of the trial of the three young men (Craig, Arron and Jamal) accused of Hooper's murder. The narrative is split between the judge -Jeremy, the prosecutor - Aaliyah, the defending Barrister for Jamal -Jennifer plus Craig and Arron.
As the stories unfold there are several twists that leave you guessing right to the end as to who is convicted and who the actual killers are. I certainly guessed and changed my mind several times during the course of the book.
The story is compelling and I found the added interest of the court procedures fascinating. I mean you know that prosecution and defence are going to twist the story to fit their narrative but its quite shocking to see it written down. Obviously this is fiction but I would assume it is based on truth.
The other part I should warn you about is the actual murder which is described in graphic detail at several points. It's not done to shock though, all the descriptions are necessary.
I thoroughly enjoyed this book (in spite of the gore). As far as I know this is The Secret Barrister's first foray into fiction. I sincerely hope more follow it. S/he certainly has a talent for storytelling. I would recommend this book to fans of early Grisham, those who like a compelling story or those interested in court procedurals.
Thankyou to Netgalley and Pan Macmillan for the advance review copy.
We begin the statement with Rita Hooper, the widow of murdered Bernard Hooper, who sets out what happened to her husband on New Year's Eve 2025.
What follows is the story of the trial of the three young men (Craig, Arron and Jamal) accused of Hooper's murder. The narrative is split between the judge -Jeremy, the prosecutor - Aaliyah, the defending Barrister for Jamal -Jennifer plus Craig and Arron.
As the stories unfold there are several twists that leave you guessing right to the end as to who is convicted and who the actual killers are. I certainly guessed and changed my mind several times during the course of the book.
The story is compelling and I found the added interest of the court procedures fascinating. I mean you know that prosecution and defence are going to twist the story to fit their narrative but its quite shocking to see it written down. Obviously this is fiction but I would assume it is based on truth.
The other part I should warn you about is the actual murder which is described in graphic detail at several points. It's not done to shock though, all the descriptions are necessary.
I thoroughly enjoyed this book (in spite of the gore). As far as I know this is The Secret Barrister's first foray into fiction. I sincerely hope more follow it. S/he certainly has a talent for storytelling. I would recommend this book to fans of early Grisham, those who like a compelling story or those interested in court procedurals.
Thankyou to Netgalley and Pan Macmillan for the advance review copy.
September 11, 2025
Having thoroughly enjoyed the Secret Barrister’s non-fiction novels and blog posts, I’ve always thought they must have some fascinating tales to tell. So it should be no surprise that (a) they’ve turned their immensely talented hand to fiction and (b) it’s a spectacularly entertaining and engrossing read. I love a courtroom drama but always get annoyed by the gavel-banging, “objection!”-shouting inaccuracies in so many UK novels. Not so here; instead, we’re gifted a gripping plot, fantastic turns of phrase, and plausible (if eyebrow raising) legal twists and turns. Highly recommended and, I hope, the first of many more.
September 5, 2025
S.J. Fleet’s The Cut Throat Trial is a gripping legal thriller that throws readers right into the drama of the courtroom. The story centers on a high-stakes murder case where the evidence is shaky, the motives are buried, and the truth is constantly shifting. From the opening pages, the tension builds steadily, keeping you invested in every twist and revelation.
What I appreciated most is the way Fleet balances the legal details with strong character development. The lawyers, the witnesses, and even the accused feel believable, each with their own flaws and secrets. The courtroom scenes are sharp and realistic, while the psychological layers give the story extra depth. You are not just following a trial, you are also exploring the moral dilemmas and personal costs of seeking justice.
The pacing is tight, the dialogue feels authentic, and the surprises are delivered at just the right moments. Some readers may find the number of twists a bit overwhelming, but overall they make the story unpredictable and exciting.
What I appreciated most is the way Fleet balances the legal details with strong character development. The lawyers, the witnesses, and even the accused feel believable, each with their own flaws and secrets. The courtroom scenes are sharp and realistic, while the psychological layers give the story extra depth. You are not just following a trial, you are also exploring the moral dilemmas and personal costs of seeking justice.
The pacing is tight, the dialogue feels authentic, and the surprises are delivered at just the right moments. Some readers may find the number of twists a bit overwhelming, but overall they make the story unpredictable and exciting.
July 10, 2025
A cut throat trial which sees three young men accused of having brutally stabbed an old man to death - and it’s told from multiple viewpoints (all three of the accused, one of their barristers I think, the judge, and the prosecuting barrister). The varying points of view means that we slowly (and it is fairly slow) begin to see all the details and nuances that make us reevaluate what we think we know and realise it’s not quite as black and white as innocent old man and vicious attackers… it was quite a delay to the denouement, and I admit it was hard to like any of the characters really! But it was well written and with a satisfying final wrapping up that makes you reconsider everything you thought you knew about the story and people!
I received a free ARC copy of this via NetGalley and the publishers in return for an unbiased review.
I received a free ARC copy of this via NetGalley and the publishers in return for an unbiased review.
June 24, 2025
Three 17 year olds are on trial for the murder of a man on New Year's Eve. The title relates to a cut throat defence where a defendant gives evidence which is designed to damage a co-defendant's case and hopefully exonerate him/herself. The case is related to us in four parts and through six different points of view; the prosecutor, the judge, the three defendants and the counsel for the third defendant.
The way the book follows the different stages of the trial including witness testimony, police testimony and judge's comments keeps the reader guessing as to whether the defendants are guilty or not. It also gives an insight into how cases are put together for presentation in court and the information juries have to listen to and absorb before returning their verdict. I found myself changing my mind between the guilt or innocence of the three defendants several times whilst reading and the ending came as quite a surprise.
Thoroughly enjoyed reading this book and hope that there will be more to come from the author.
Thanks to Netgalley, Pan Macmillan and S J Fleet for an eARC in return for an honest review.
The way the book follows the different stages of the trial including witness testimony, police testimony and judge's comments keeps the reader guessing as to whether the defendants are guilty or not. It also gives an insight into how cases are put together for presentation in court and the information juries have to listen to and absorb before returning their verdict. I found myself changing my mind between the guilt or innocence of the three defendants several times whilst reading and the ending came as quite a surprise.
Thoroughly enjoyed reading this book and hope that there will be more to come from the author.
Thanks to Netgalley, Pan Macmillan and S J Fleet for an eARC in return for an honest review.
July 3, 2025
I was not sure what to expect and I was very surprised by this powerful and intricate novel! Gory details were depicted though which I found disturbing.... So many characters, but the author always mentioned who they are and what they represent (defendant, prosecutor...) at the beginning of each chapter. The characters are absolutely fascinating, no clichés here. Some have colourful language as well as intriguing personalities. What they all have in common is the wish to win. Very thought provoking when one deals with Justice.... The plot is brilliant in the sense that the reader has to make up her/his mind as to the verdict, the same as the jury. I had no idea what/whom to believe!! The conclusion came as a shock in more than one way! Very well done!
I received a digital copy of this novel from NetGalley and I have voluntarily written an honest review.
I received a digital copy of this novel from NetGalley and I have voluntarily written an honest review.
September 4, 2025
This was my first time reading (listening) a court room procedure like this and it definitely won’t be my last. Loved the attention to detail explaining how the courtroom works. The evidence and testimonies had me constantly second guessing and that ending wow!
The audio book with the full cast was spot on and so immersive.
Thank you bookbreak for the audio copy opinions my own.
The audio book with the full cast was spot on and so immersive.
Thank you bookbreak for the audio copy opinions my own.
October 10, 2025
This tickled my brain and got it running in ways a book hasn’t for a long time
A little bit of confusion but in a really good way
The only thing I can’t make my mind up on is that it read like a non-fiction… like I was reading a real trial… does that make it impeccable or did I want something that felt a bit more out there in terms of twists?
Still undecided
But great writing nonetheless
A little bit of confusion but in a really good way
The only thing I can’t make my mind up on is that it read like a non-fiction… like I was reading a real trial… does that make it impeccable or did I want something that felt a bit more out there in terms of twists?
Still undecided
But great writing nonetheless
September 11, 2025
Whilst I have read legal thrillers before, this was quite different. Essentially, it followed a trial through with lots of accurate detail on the process. At times I found the detail too much, especially on closing speeches and judge’s summing up but that might be because of knowledge of the subject.
Lots of thought provoking issues raised on fairness and failings within the criminal justice system, alongside character development on all the key figures. Multiple POV approach worked well, with some twists adding to the interest.
Lots of thought provoking issues raised on fairness and failings within the criminal justice system, alongside character development on all the key figures. Multiple POV approach worked well, with some twists adding to the interest.
November 5, 2025
Thoroughly enjoyable! I often find that legal fiction books are far fetched and being in the job, it’s easy to pick them apart but this one is so well written and kept me gripped throughout! Highly recommend.
November 8, 2025
Pretty decent courtroom thriller. I kind of dropped interest a little bit in the middle but it picked up in the end. Definitely gave me a better understanding of the trial process from not only the defendants but also the barrister/judges pov.
November 17, 2025
The Secret Barrister: Cut-Throat Trial by S.J. Fleet
Rating: ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
It’s not often an audiobook keeps me up until 2am, utterly engrossed - but this one did. The performances by the readers were brilliant, breathing life into the courtroom and making every exchange feel immediate and real.
This gripping legal thriller follows a high‑stakes murder trial where nothing is quite as it seems. The narrative keeps you guessing, twisting itself upside down and inside out, while the inner monologues reveal the fragile humanity behind the law. Judges, barristers, defendants - all are shown not as archetypes, but as people with fears, flaws, and fragile hopes.
The blend of suspense, sharp legal insight, and emotional truth made for a listen I couldn’t put down. If you love courtroom drama that feels both razor‑sharp and deeply human, this one is a must.
Rating: ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
It’s not often an audiobook keeps me up until 2am, utterly engrossed - but this one did. The performances by the readers were brilliant, breathing life into the courtroom and making every exchange feel immediate and real.
This gripping legal thriller follows a high‑stakes murder trial where nothing is quite as it seems. The narrative keeps you guessing, twisting itself upside down and inside out, while the inner monologues reveal the fragile humanity behind the law. Judges, barristers, defendants - all are shown not as archetypes, but as people with fears, flaws, and fragile hopes.
The blend of suspense, sharp legal insight, and emotional truth made for a listen I couldn’t put down. If you love courtroom drama that feels both razor‑sharp and deeply human, this one is a must.
October 12, 2025
Ending pissed me off.
August 19, 2025
A guessing game and a half – and then some. The complexities of law and its application are eye-watering and opening. Invited into the minds of each character – defendants, barristers, the judge, the reader forms opinions. But are those opinions valid? S.J. Fleet intends that you should pay attention – then throws all sorts of spanners into the works, forcing new sentiments.
Not only is the reader privy to the baggage and history of the defendants, but also those of the barristers, police, and the judge. With deviish and deliciously dark humour, snobbishness and daily assumptions are laid bare to tremendous effect.
A great legal thriller and you are unlikely to guess the final twist. Devious and oh-so possible.
Not only is the reader privy to the baggage and history of the defendants, but also those of the barristers, police, and the judge. With deviish and deliciously dark humour, snobbishness and daily assumptions are laid bare to tremendous effect.
A great legal thriller and you are unlikely to guess the final twist. Devious and oh-so possible.
September 9, 2025
I’m in the job, so can say it was all hyper real. Unsure what non-lawyers make of it though, with the various evidential issues, applications etc. So i’ll read some other reviews…
June 4, 2025
The prosecution opens, addressing the jury with a narrative laying out what she intends to prove; Seventy four year old retired teacher, Bernard Hooper was murdered by three teenage boys on New Years Eve, their weapon of choice an illegal Zombie Knife which they used in a frenzied attack lasting several minutes.
The crime was brutal, the evidence damning. But with each of the accused telling a different story, the prosecutor and defence counsel had their work cut out in this stunning read.
From the prosecutions opening speech to the final verdict this novel had me under its spell, its clever and its scary in its accuracy of the legal process, its challenges and its unreliable witnesses who don't hold up under cross-examination. Totally compelling from start to finish, the best legal thriller I've read in a long time.
Due for publication August '25 - My thanks to Pan Macmillan for the early read, I was under no obligation and all opinions expressed are my own.
The crime was brutal, the evidence damning. But with each of the accused telling a different story, the prosecutor and defence counsel had their work cut out in this stunning read.
From the prosecutions opening speech to the final verdict this novel had me under its spell, its clever and its scary in its accuracy of the legal process, its challenges and its unreliable witnesses who don't hold up under cross-examination. Totally compelling from start to finish, the best legal thriller I've read in a long time.
Due for publication August '25 - My thanks to Pan Macmillan for the early read, I was under no obligation and all opinions expressed are my own.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 227 reviews