So I liked Nathan Harris's previous book, "The Sweetness of Water," quite a lot, and gave it a QUALIFIED 4 stars, despite some serious problems I had with the book. I'm inserting my full review of that book below, but I closed with "This debut novel was very much worth my time, and I look forward to reading Nathan Harris for many years to come." Thus, when I requested and received a digital ARC of "Amity," I was super excited and elated.
Unfortunately, this book did not follow up on the promise of "Sweetness." One of my many issues with Harris's debut was how highly anachronistic it was, and how much "willing suspension of disbelief" was required in how characters spoke and related to each other. I was willing to give the benefit of the doubt to the previous novel because it spoke so powerfully to me and to my fellow book club members, our library's patrons, and other friends and acquaintances. I couldn't do the same with "Amity" because immediately, from the very first paragraphs, it felt inauthentic in speech, characters, and situations. So disappointing.
Many thanks to NetGalley, the author, and the publishers for a digital ARC of this book in exchange for my honest opinions.
My first completed book, and first book review, of 2022. Received the print ARC from this book last year, and was very much looking forward to reading it, especially as I chose it for a book club at the library where I work.
I loved the book a lot, but I could only give it between a 3.5 to a 4, as parts of the book were problematic. Among other issues, I found some of the ways that various characters spoke and acted on the anachronistic side. For example, the story is set in Georgia as the Civil War is ending. One of the main characters meeting the Union general now in charge of the town says, "You must be General Glass," and he responds, "And you must be Isabelle." Sorry, but there's no way he would have addressed her as such, it would be a complete breach of 19th c. etiquette. In addition, even with "willing suspension of disbelief," I am forced "to call BS" on the often brazen and even confrontational ways that one of the Freedmen speaks and acts. As a reader, and a person of color, it's great to see a fictional person of color have this kind of agency, boldness, and self-assurance, but historically, it's unlikely that that person would have survived for long.
I also found some characters and/or aspects of the story a bit undercooked; Caleb, I'm looking at you. In addition, the LGBTQ subplot, while appreciated, doesn't quite jell. It does tie into a huge tragedy, in a way that was slightly confusing, but more importantly, I didn't feel I got enough of the relationship between those particular protagonists. It's meant to be a transgressive relationship, I think, and while the author is very successful in showing us a fairly wide variety of other relationships in this era that would have been transgressive in one or more ways, the LGBTQ+ subplot felt underwhelming and even almost unnecessary, which I say even as a gay man who appreciates representation.
Having said all that, again, I loved this book. Among other defining aspects, Nathan Harris explores what freedom would have meant to men and women only recently freed from enslaved status, both in terms of their pasts and in how they could live their futures, including this:
"What he would give to be so careless! To not look over his shoulder. To miss a signpost and find himself two towns over, drinking ale on a stranger's porch and speaking with him of the last stranger who had made the same mistake. He wished to do WRONG, too. That was what George, what Caleb, what no one could quite get... It wasn't just that he could be free, he realized. He could be HAPPY."
There were so many other beautiful passages in this book, and so many finely wrought observations. I very much thank Nathan Harris for this book, which opened up my eyes and filled my heart. This debut novel was very much worth my time, and I look forward to reading Nathan Harris for many years to come.