Reacting to the tumultuous crises of the twentieth century, especially the horrors of World War I, avant-garde artists and writers sought to destroy art by transforming it into the substance of everyday life. Following the evolution of these revolutionary groups, How to Be Avant-Garde charts its pioneers and radical ideas.
Avant-gardists challenged the confines of the definition of art along with the confines of the canvas itself. Art historian Morgan Falconer starts with the Futurist founder Filippo Tommaso Marinetti, whose manifesto seeded avant-gardes across Europe. In turn, Dadaists Hugo Ball and Emmy Hennings sought to replace art with political cabaret, and the Surrealists tried to exchange it for tools to plumb the unconscious. He guides us through the Russian Constructivists with their adventures in advertising and utopianism and De Stijl with the geometric abstractions of Piet Mondrian. The Bauhaus broke more boundaries, transmuting art into architecture and design. Finally, the Situationists swapped art for politics, with their ideas inspiring the 1968 Paris student protests.
How to Be Avant-Garde is a journey through the interlocking networks of these creative lives with their visions of a better world, their sometimes sympathetic but often strange conversations, and their objects and writings that defied categorization.
This was an interesting overview of some avant garde movements in art. The problem is the pretext. How do you become avant garde when art is back to being a commodity. The description of Miami’s Art Basel was great as most modern art is uninteresting and sterile. I wanted to read about things that I was not privy to, but, instead, I will make my own art.
Make no mistake, this is a SOCIAL history of the Avant-Garde. That is, all about the social lives and party-like conduct of the leaders of movements like Dada and Surrealism.
A high point was learning about Kandinski's synesthesia. Synesthesia is a gift that all humans have, although not in as extreme a version as the painter. Those who learn my system of Aura Reading Through All Your Senses® learn to use, and benefit from, their talent for synesthesia.
Mostly, though, I found this book annoying. I didn't want to learn who went where and other partygoer-like details. Most annoying was the audiobook narration from Brian. He has a handsome voice and speaks clearly, but he also has the worst French accent I've ever heard. Was he even trying? Think of the equivalent of a tone deaf singer; that was his pronunciation of the many French words in this book.
RATING THIS BOOK
Unless I absolutely love or loathe a book, my policy is to rate it in terms of my imagined response of the intended readers. These intended readers like party-like details, skimming the social doings of celebs. For them, I could see this book deserving FIVE STARS.
it suffers from the common issue of getting a title that doesn't match the tone of the book AND a loving writer who researched with such depth and enthusiasm that they can't help but include every detail. but is that any reason to give it fewer than 4 stars?
this is a social history about avant-garde artists and their work and how the whole concept came to be. if that's what you're looking for, this is perfect for you.
the audiobook narrator, brian wiggins... hmm. in this, there's a specific modulation formula he has for a certain kind of sentence that he repeats so often and so distinctly that i couldn't stand to hear it one more time and switched to reading the ebook myself at 70%. i'm sure he is great for other genres (he seems to do a lot of voicing fantasy characters).
Struggling to figure out if I didn’t care for this book or if I’m just disappointed it wasn’t what I expected. I would have liked more discussion on specific works and how they bring the ideas to life, or even a little more discussion on what some of the movements actually were. Especially toward the end of the book it begins to move through movements at a wild clip and I don’t know that I ever really grasped what the various players ideologies were.
Honestly I thought this book was at its best when the author discussed an art movement and its ethos/idiosyncrasies and then unwound how he tried to incorporate those things in his own life. I do feel like I know more about art from reading it but don’t quiz me on it