3.5 stars
I was shocked to discover that this book was not written for me, a Jamaican who grew up intimately familiar with Rastafari culture. I found this book squarely aimed at the western raised, (likely Christian or Agnostic) staunch feminist reader. A reader whose innate knowledge doesn’t include the parameters of Babylon.
I thought that because Sinclair and I share a reality shared by so few, this would read as a Toni Morrison book for me: filled with unexplained secrets only we can understand. Instead, Sinclair paints colorful portraits of the Jamaica I know, but attaches them to wafts of judgment I can only recognize at times as the distinctly western or European gaze. I imagine this book would be a raging success in any white, feminist book circle.
For me, it was almost painful to read. I saw a girl forced to interpret a religion through her father’s mistakes. Sinclair comes so close to realizing that the problem is her father, not Rastafari. But, time and again she gives him an out through the religion. the memoir makes regular note of Christians doing something, and later talks about a Rasta doing the same things— always blaming the Rasta’s action on the religion but saying nothing of the Christian’s identical actions.
There is her Christian maternal grandfather, who married a girl decades his junior, and groped another young girl versus A young 18 old Rasta woman who married a man decades her senior. Sinclair makes specific note of the unfairness of the age gap only for the Rasta.
There is her Christian paternal grandmother, who cannot (or will not) speak a word against her husband no matter how mean he is to her children and grandchildren versus Sinclair’s own mother who suffers from the same inability. Sinclair makes specific note of how the tenets of the Rastafari are the evils that stole her mother’s freedom. But says nothing of the reasons behind her grandmothers nonexistent freedom.
She says Rasta women are always in the kitchen talking while the men huddle outside beating drums and singing… Interpreting this separation in a way only a western mind can: as unfairness. (And conveniently ignoring that this is true of Jamaican culture regardless of the religion)
In my view, the common enemy in her life’s story is “men”. It’s an enemy that reappears all throughout the memoir regardless of religion, and one we share as children of old-school Jamaican parents. No matter the religion, this stifling evil seems to spread around the island like a plague. Because of her father’s militancy, though, Sinclair came to name the evil Rastafari. Whenever she introduced a new evil from tenets of Rastafari, I read them as a young girl unveiling the evils that resulted from her father’s misunderstandings of Rastafari.
Nevertheless, I found Sinclair’s story intoxicating for several reasons. First, I have only ever lived as a Jamaican. I grew up being warned of Babylon, hearing Haile Selassie I referred to as “his imperial majesty” (even today, it’s the only way my father refers to him), and interpreting the veiled, and sometimes twisted Rasta man speak with the expertise of a mother tongue language. I had never thought of any of it as history before. this memoir changed that. I realized it’s a history so few know and it was a strange beauty to read it, although from a seemingly western point of view, with all its honorifics and historical violence included.
Second, Sinclair’s writing is powerful. It moves any reader who is attentive to her string of words that seem to make the soul dance. I also really appreciated her voice in this space. She’s the first woman I’ve ever heard publicly voice their qualms with the Rasta culture. (I’m sure there are many more out there). I had only ever heard/internalized the rastafari that creates strong, lionhearted men and women. I admired it (I am not a Rasta or a Christian— but my Christian grandmother reminds me so much of Sinclair’s paternal grandmother, and my own parents of Sinclair’s parents. Although my own father is more closely aligned with the 12 tribes). It was a great balancing experience to read about and atone with the abusive side of the religion.
Third, I read this memoir as an intricate story of hurt and longing for the love of the one who hurt you. It’s a poetic cycle. By trying so hard to erase his parents’ wrongs, Sinclair’s father unintentionally recreated them. Sinclair, armed with the strength only a woman can possess, breaks free from the cycle, heals, and lives to tell the tale.