If I could sum up Next To Heaven in one word it would be repetitious.
There is so much repetition that it if were removed the book would be at least 20 pages shorter, and I’m being generous. That’s bad enough but when you factor in clunky run-on sentences with odd punctuation choices, or punctuation that is missing entirely, it becomes a struggle to read.
“His fund grew to three billion four billion six eight ten fourteen. Their fortune grew five hundred million one point five billion three.”
See what I mean?
As ARC readers we are supposed to gloss over things that will hopefully be fixed prior to release, but there’s just so much here that needs reworking and tightening up that it’s incredibly hard to disregard. This manner of writing makes reading the book a chore.
“The town protects the land and limits what can be done with it and on it, and bobcats, bears, packs of coyotes and coywolves, herds of deer, wild turkeys, hawks eagles ducks geese and owls are regularly seen going about their business.”
Honestly, sometimes reading this book makes me feel like I’m having a stroke.
Then we have the massive info dumps among the myriad of run on sentences. Now, I understand why Frey is writing in this manner; he wants to give out as much information as possible without burying the reader in paragraph upon paragraph of details. Unfortunately, it can become incredibly irksome to read. Like this example:
“She gained three times the weight, she was depressed, rashes came and went, she had abdominal pains, migraines, there were days she couldn’t get out of bed, it all compounded, each issue made the other worse, she was scared, so scared, she was so so very scared.”
There are long rambling chapters of characters’ backgrounds and their relationships interspersed with chunks of information on new characters which doesn’t lend to a smoothly flowing story. The reader is subjected to lengthy background information drops about a character or two, and then more characters are introduced without the story moving forward.
There’s also A LOT of nonessential information about the town of New Bethlehem that completely drags down the story. The long winded sections about the origin of the town as well as the chapters on zoning laws or the history of the 2 grocery stores are completely unnecessary, and they only stop what little momentum that Frey manages to create.
At 47% and nothing has really happened. Frey finally gets around to the plot of the book and immediately after he takes a detour at the next chapter to talk about New Bethlehem’s extensive parks and lands rather than simply having the characters meet there like usual.
Later on we have 3 pages of terrible poetry about how beautiful Connecticut is… Was there an editor?
I personally don’t think this book is trashy or sexy like some reviews have stated, and there’s really not much smut (it’s spice adjacent I would say). Trashy seems to be the buzzword attached to it but there’s too much needless padding of boring details for it to elicit that response, imo. There is a section where a man refers to his genitalia as a “yogurt cannon”, but that’s just cringeworthy and gross. Comparing this to White Lotus is extremely generous… White Lotus is interesting, twisty, and entertaining, whereas this is simply rambling and tedious.
The murder finally occurs at 73%, and you don’t find out who did it until 97%, although it’s so obvious who it was and why. So much of Next To Heaven could have and should have been edited out. To say that I disliked this book is an understatement.
If you like reading about wealthy people thinking they are above others as well as the law, reading run on sentences about grocery stores and what animals live in a fictional town, and reading lots of superfluous details that have nothing to do with the plot, then maybe you will enjoy this book. As stated earlier there’s mild spice, most of it is closed door and just mentioned in passing, but it’s there.
I know I read an uncorrected proof, however the punctuation (or lack thereof) and odd grammar choices seems intentional. It’s been decades since I read anything by Frey (I read his infamous debut book when it was first published and vividly recall the media hullabaloo that ensued), so I don’t know if this is just how he writes or if it’s a stylistic choice specifically for this book. Either way, it’s awful.
**UPDATE: I just learned today 6/8 that this Frey has been openly discussing how he used AI to “write” this garbage. Nothing was mentioned on NetGalley that AI was used or I wouldn’t have read this ARC. Just wanted to be clear that I had no idea it was AI when I read it, I just thought it was a terrible book.
I received an ARC of this book via NetGalley and Authors Equity, however this review is completely my own unbiased personal opinion, left of my own volition.