What do you think?
Rate this book
How to Kill a Witch
'Fascinating and illuminating, this book tempers the justifiable rage with sharp and funny pinpricks to the pompous.' VAL MCDERMID, author of Past Lying
'As well as highly entertaining read, How To Kill A Witch is a tour de force of research, understanding and compassion.' PROFESSOR SUE BLACK, author of All That Remains.
'Serious and angry, but so completely accessible, How To Kill A Witch is a work of real historical investigation and a fierce warning for our times.' MALCOLM GASKILL, author of The Ruin Of All Witches
'At a time when women's rights are once again being threatened across the globe, this book could not be a more timely read if it tried.' SHIRLEY MANSON, Garbage
'Two of Scotland's most vivid storytellers.' THE TIMES
As a woman, if you lived in Scotland in the 1500s, there was a very good chance that you, or someone you knew, would be tried as a witch. Witch hunts ripped through the country for over 150 years, with at least 4,000 accused, and with many women's fates sealed by a grizzly execution of strangulation, followed by burning.
Inspired to correct this historic injustice, campaigners and writers Claire Mitchell, KC, and Zoe Venditozzi, have delved deeply into just why the trials exploded in Scotland to such a degree. In order to understand why it happened, they have broken down the entire horrifying process, step-by-step, from identification of individuals, to their accusation, 'pricking', torture, confessions, execution and beyond.
With characteristically sharp wit and a sense of outrage, they attempt to inhabit the minds of the persecutors, often men, revealing the inner workings of exactly why the Patriarchy went to such extraordinary lengths to silence women, and how this legally sanctioned victimisation proliferated in Scotland and around the world.
With testimony from a small army of experts, pen portraits of the women accused, trial transcripts, witness accounts and the documents that set the legal grounds for the hunts, How to Kill A Witch builds to form a rich patchwork of tragic stories, helping us comprehend the underlying reasons for this terrible injustice, and raises the serious question - could it ever happen again?
'As well as highly entertaining read, How To Kill A Witch is a tour de force of research, understanding and compassion.' PROFESSOR SUE BLACK, author of All That Remains.
'Serious and angry, but so completely accessible, How To Kill A Witch is a work of real historical investigation and a fierce warning for our times.' MALCOLM GASKILL, author of The Ruin Of All Witches
'At a time when women's rights are once again being threatened across the globe, this book could not be a more timely read if it tried.' SHIRLEY MANSON, Garbage
'Two of Scotland's most vivid storytellers.' THE TIMES
As a woman, if you lived in Scotland in the 1500s, there was a very good chance that you, or someone you knew, would be tried as a witch. Witch hunts ripped through the country for over 150 years, with at least 4,000 accused, and with many women's fates sealed by a grizzly execution of strangulation, followed by burning.
Inspired to correct this historic injustice, campaigners and writers Claire Mitchell, KC, and Zoe Venditozzi, have delved deeply into just why the trials exploded in Scotland to such a degree. In order to understand why it happened, they have broken down the entire horrifying process, step-by-step, from identification of individuals, to their accusation, 'pricking', torture, confessions, execution and beyond.
With characteristically sharp wit and a sense of outrage, they attempt to inhabit the minds of the persecutors, often men, revealing the inner workings of exactly why the Patriarchy went to such extraordinary lengths to silence women, and how this legally sanctioned victimisation proliferated in Scotland and around the world.
With testimony from a small army of experts, pen portraits of the women accused, trial transcripts, witness accounts and the documents that set the legal grounds for the hunts, How to Kill A Witch builds to form a rich patchwork of tragic stories, helping us comprehend the underlying reasons for this terrible injustice, and raises the serious question - could it ever happen again?
Audible Audio
First published May 15, 2025
389 people are currently reading
17649 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 131 reviews
June 22, 2025
This book is exactly what the blurb says it's going to be, with Zoe and Claire discussing the various Scottish witch trials and their forgotten victims (who were mostly women). It's a darkly humorous read with entertaining and witty commentary, but that doesn't mean that it isn't factual or well-researched. As an American, I never learned much about witch trials in school other than what happened in Salem in 1692-93 and the vague fact that others occurred in Europe around the same time. This book was incredibly eye-opening, as I had no idea that Scotland had even had their own witch trials, much less that they were as extensive as they were. And, according to the authors, apparently Scottish pupils don't learn much more about them than we do.
How to Kill a Witch is both captivating and infuriating in equal measures. It amazes me the things that happened — and are still happening in various places around the world — in the name of religion … and in order to punish and silence “quarrelsome” women. This book tells the stories of some of the individuals who were wrongfully accused, and it also gets into the details of the processes used for dealing with "witches," from accusation to execution. The authors speak to experts in the field and those working to exonerate and memorialize the convicted, and there is much about the historical figures who allowed — and even encouraged — these trials to happen. (James VI probably should have been punted out of an airplane without a parachute … or whatever the 1500/1600s equivalent of an airplane was. A really tall tower, maybe?)
This book is horrifying and fascinating and informative and sad, and it makes me want to go learn more about the witch trials — not just those that happened in Scotland and Salem, but also those that took place elsewhere around the world. And I'm definitely going to go check out Zoe and Claire's Witches of Scotland podcast now because it sounds amazing. If you're at all interested in the history of the witch trials (or in the reasons behind them), definitely consider giving How to Kill a Witch a read.
4.8 stars, rounded up.
Many thanks to NetGalley and Sourcebooks for providing me with an advance copy of this book to review. Its expected publication date is September 30, 2025.
How to Kill a Witch is both captivating and infuriating in equal measures. It amazes me the things that happened — and are still happening in various places around the world — in the name of religion … and in order to punish and silence “quarrelsome” women. This book tells the stories of some of the individuals who were wrongfully accused, and it also gets into the details of the processes used for dealing with "witches," from accusation to execution. The authors speak to experts in the field and those working to exonerate and memorialize the convicted, and there is much about the historical figures who allowed — and even encouraged — these trials to happen. (James VI probably should have been punted out of an airplane without a parachute … or whatever the 1500/1600s equivalent of an airplane was. A really tall tower, maybe?)
This book is horrifying and fascinating and informative and sad, and it makes me want to go learn more about the witch trials — not just those that happened in Scotland and Salem, but also those that took place elsewhere around the world. And I'm definitely going to go check out Zoe and Claire's Witches of Scotland podcast now because it sounds amazing. If you're at all interested in the history of the witch trials (or in the reasons behind them), definitely consider giving How to Kill a Witch a read.
4.8 stars, rounded up.
Many thanks to NetGalley and Sourcebooks for providing me with an advance copy of this book to review. Its expected publication date is September 30, 2025.
May 18, 2025
I am LOVING all my witch reads lately, whether it be fiction or fact.
Accusations of witchcraft were hugely prevalent in the 1600s in the reign of King James I. But this book brings those witchcraft trials to the present day, highlighting the underlying misogyny through the centuries.
This is a hugely readable and fascinating book, and every feminist should read it and shake their heads in outrage and disbelief.
Brilliant, and incredibly relevant and important today.
Accusations of witchcraft were hugely prevalent in the 1600s in the reign of King James I. But this book brings those witchcraft trials to the present day, highlighting the underlying misogyny through the centuries.
This is a hugely readable and fascinating book, and every feminist should read it and shake their heads in outrage and disbelief.
Brilliant, and incredibly relevant and important today.
August 8, 2025
5 stars — for the witches, the women, and the ones who wouldn’t shut up.
How to Kill a Witch by Claire Mitchell and Zoë Venditozzi is a sharp, lyrical unearthing of Scotland’s dark history — a history where thousands of (mostly) women were accused, tortured, and executed as witches. Not for spells or broomsticks, but for being too loud, too quiet, too clever, too poor, too unmarried, too inconvenient.
This book balances righteous fury with dark humor, layering facts with feeling. It’s deeply researched, utterly readable, and quietly devastating.
The authors don’t just look backward; they draw a jagged line straight to the present. You’ll come away wondering how much has really changed. The witch hunts may be over, but the suspicion, control, and silencing of women? That’s alive and well.
Being a woman today is slightly less burny, sure — but still pretty witchy.
How to Kill a Witch by Claire Mitchell and Zoë Venditozzi is a sharp, lyrical unearthing of Scotland’s dark history — a history where thousands of (mostly) women were accused, tortured, and executed as witches. Not for spells or broomsticks, but for being too loud, too quiet, too clever, too poor, too unmarried, too inconvenient.
This book balances righteous fury with dark humor, layering facts with feeling. It’s deeply researched, utterly readable, and quietly devastating.
The authors don’t just look backward; they draw a jagged line straight to the present. You’ll come away wondering how much has really changed. The witch hunts may be over, but the suspicion, control, and silencing of women? That’s alive and well.
Being a woman today is slightly less burny, sure — but still pretty witchy.
July 15, 2025
I love the subject and I love the authors. However, the book felt disorganized and didn't flow as well as I expected, and I thought the use of an AI-generated artwork to accompany one of the accused women's stories was just bizarre.
I do really appreciate the campaign to get the accused people's names out and to remember them as victims of an oppressive system.
I do really appreciate the campaign to get the accused people's names out and to remember them as victims of an oppressive system.
May 8, 2025
This is a fabulous non-fiction book. From the title, it is obviously about witches and how women have been treated throughout history. The book focuses on the accused from history and then explains why they were treated as they were.
This is an addictive read, and it is one that lovers of historical fact and the role of women or how women have been treated centuries ago. Most of us are aware of witches from either fairy tales, folklore or myth. The author has used sections from transcripts, documents and the account of the time. I am no expert, but to me it feels very well researched, and there is a large list for further reading if you decide to delve further.
The author does use some of the more well-known characters or areas in history where there have been witch trials. But, this book focuses more on the Witches that were tried in Scotland. The author has a podcast called Witches of Scotland, and this is another great visit.
The way women have been portrayed in history changes depending on the viewpoint of others. A woman could be sought out to help with delivering a baby, but if something went wrong or there was some sort of affliction, then it would be common for either that woman or another from the area to be blamed. A snide remark, a wrong look or just not being liked or being seen as an outsider could be enough for you to be reported.
We are aware that the way the law worked was very different to today. Being moneyed, gentry, mayoral, important figure was enough for you to be part of the bench that would pass judgment. Not allowing women or other people to explain themselves and give their account of things was not part of the trial. Instead, confessions were used; these were obtained by force and then admitted as the overriding evidence.
While the book does explore the ways witches were sought out, what made them dangerous, how to capture and extract confessions, it is also about how women were treated by the largely patriarchal society of the time. Yes, it can be an infuriating read as the sense of injustice is very obvious.
This book looks at life in the 1500 and 1600s, and explores the role of women, their status in the family and society and how easy to was to pin the badge of witch to them if they stepped out of line. I thoroughly enjoyed reading this book and it is one I would definitely recommend.
This is an addictive read, and it is one that lovers of historical fact and the role of women or how women have been treated centuries ago. Most of us are aware of witches from either fairy tales, folklore or myth. The author has used sections from transcripts, documents and the account of the time. I am no expert, but to me it feels very well researched, and there is a large list for further reading if you decide to delve further.
The author does use some of the more well-known characters or areas in history where there have been witch trials. But, this book focuses more on the Witches that were tried in Scotland. The author has a podcast called Witches of Scotland, and this is another great visit.
The way women have been portrayed in history changes depending on the viewpoint of others. A woman could be sought out to help with delivering a baby, but if something went wrong or there was some sort of affliction, then it would be common for either that woman or another from the area to be blamed. A snide remark, a wrong look or just not being liked or being seen as an outsider could be enough for you to be reported.
We are aware that the way the law worked was very different to today. Being moneyed, gentry, mayoral, important figure was enough for you to be part of the bench that would pass judgment. Not allowing women or other people to explain themselves and give their account of things was not part of the trial. Instead, confessions were used; these were obtained by force and then admitted as the overriding evidence.
While the book does explore the ways witches were sought out, what made them dangerous, how to capture and extract confessions, it is also about how women were treated by the largely patriarchal society of the time. Yes, it can be an infuriating read as the sense of injustice is very obvious.
This book looks at life in the 1500 and 1600s, and explores the role of women, their status in the family and society and how easy to was to pin the badge of witch to them if they stepped out of line. I thoroughly enjoyed reading this book and it is one I would definitely recommend.
July 9, 2025
4 stars
This book is historical nonfiction that looks at the women of Scotland, who were accused of witchcraft. It includes several well-known women and their trials, the numerous instances of the patriarchy that lead to the horrific events of witch hunts and the treatment of women. It was very fascinating learning about these women's stories, how the political, social, religious climates were used and essentially weaponized against mainly women, especially those that stood out and dared to talk back. Also comparing the use of these terms and ideas in Scotland, with those in the USA and Nigeria both past and current. This book touched on a number of compelling topics, some I would not have even thought of that would be a factor in these events, not to mention the number of experts interviewed, was adding even more depth and understanding to what happened during this time period. While I did enjoy reading this book some things were a bit long and repetitive at times, but ultimately an excellent read. I would recommend it if you had any interest in history, witches, and Patriarchy, it is a very captivating read.
I received an ebook, via Netgalley. This review is my own honest opinion.
This book is historical nonfiction that looks at the women of Scotland, who were accused of witchcraft. It includes several well-known women and their trials, the numerous instances of the patriarchy that lead to the horrific events of witch hunts and the treatment of women. It was very fascinating learning about these women's stories, how the political, social, religious climates were used and essentially weaponized against mainly women, especially those that stood out and dared to talk back. Also comparing the use of these terms and ideas in Scotland, with those in the USA and Nigeria both past and current. This book touched on a number of compelling topics, some I would not have even thought of that would be a factor in these events, not to mention the number of experts interviewed, was adding even more depth and understanding to what happened during this time period. While I did enjoy reading this book some things were a bit long and repetitive at times, but ultimately an excellent read. I would recommend it if you had any interest in history, witches, and Patriarchy, it is a very captivating read.
I received an ebook, via Netgalley. This review is my own honest opinion.
May 29, 2025
I was umming and ahhing between 3 and 4 stars for this, but ultimately it is incredibly well researched and its relevance today is still as important as ever. I listened to the audiobook but think it would work better as a physical book as I personally found it difficult to keep track of who was who, and the old Scottish accent and dialect used was hard to make sense of without seeing it in writing. Nevertheless, a worthwhile read and a fascinating history lesson.
June 6, 2025
I’ve been following the Witches of Scotland for a wee while and have been waiting for the release of this book! I was excited to listen to it as an audiobook and hear Claire and Zoe’s passion through their reading. Overall an excellent non-fiction piece that has been thoroughly researched. If you’re going to read any book on the Scottish witch trials this should be the one!
October 1, 2025
Truly, one of the most incredible reads of this year. Poignant, well-researched, bright, funny, witty, and all around wonderful, this book is not to be missed.
I am truly in awe of the women who wrote this book - Claire Mitchell and Zoe Venditozzi. Both remarkable and brilliant women, with personal and professional lives that make them forces with which to be reckoned. On top of their personal and professional achievements, they began the Witches of Scotland podcast, which aimed to highlight the miscarriages of justice, against women accused of witchcraft. Born out of a recognition that women (very much falsely) accused of witchcraft in Scotland were mislabeled and then executed, and the annals of history barely record their names, Mitchell and Venditozzi set out to remember these women.
What started as a tongue-in-cheek campaign, metamorphosed into a beautifully written recorded history of the women accused of witchcraft. This book goes beyond just sixteenth and eighteenth century Scotland, and draws direct parallels to modern day society. One thing we tend to forget, or indeed, even romanticize, is that these women were NOT witches. They were women who, for whatever reason, were targeted by their neighbors/families/friends/enemies/religious leaders. Because they didn’t fit into the prescribed boxes for pious women (which, understanding the religio-political climate of the times, makes it hard to even know exactly what religion to follow, in order to be a “godly” woman), and were subsequently punished - and murdered - for it.
This book recounts those women. Their stories. Their lives. Their womanhood. It reclaims their stories and makes a record of them, so that others may learn from the past, and honor the deaths of these women. While the full title, “How to Kill a Witch: The Patriarchy’s Guide for Silencing Women” does feel cheeky, it really does break down the steps and ways in which men of the time, in positions of extreme and total power, were able to manipulate society’s fears, insecurities, and vulnerabilities, and create the ultimate scapegoat.
As a nonfiction, historical book, “How to Kill a Witch” could be a dry, unengaging text. However, Mitchell and Venditozzi infuse humor, wit, and grace into this book, almost imperceptibly. The content is dark and horrific, thinking of the things that happened to these women and their families, and their utter powerlessness. But, Venditozzi and Mitchell ensure we can learn about the past in a way that is engaging, meaningful, easy to connect with, while honoring the pain and suffering. There were moments that made me laugh, moments that moved me to tears, and every range of emotion in between. I have a degree in History (and Literature), and I cannot emphasize how much I wish I had this book during my studies. Students, both official and mere life-long learners, will be enraptured from the first page, and will stay that way, until the very end.
I recommend this book with my whole chest. I wish this was required reading in schools - the amount of information about human nature and how to avoid these grave and deadly actions in the future, is truly invaluable. The feminist read of 2025.
I am truly in awe of the women who wrote this book - Claire Mitchell and Zoe Venditozzi. Both remarkable and brilliant women, with personal and professional lives that make them forces with which to be reckoned. On top of their personal and professional achievements, they began the Witches of Scotland podcast, which aimed to highlight the miscarriages of justice, against women accused of witchcraft. Born out of a recognition that women (very much falsely) accused of witchcraft in Scotland were mislabeled and then executed, and the annals of history barely record their names, Mitchell and Venditozzi set out to remember these women.
What started as a tongue-in-cheek campaign, metamorphosed into a beautifully written recorded history of the women accused of witchcraft. This book goes beyond just sixteenth and eighteenth century Scotland, and draws direct parallels to modern day society. One thing we tend to forget, or indeed, even romanticize, is that these women were NOT witches. They were women who, for whatever reason, were targeted by their neighbors/families/friends/enemies/religious leaders. Because they didn’t fit into the prescribed boxes for pious women (which, understanding the religio-political climate of the times, makes it hard to even know exactly what religion to follow, in order to be a “godly” woman), and were subsequently punished - and murdered - for it.
This book recounts those women. Their stories. Their lives. Their womanhood. It reclaims their stories and makes a record of them, so that others may learn from the past, and honor the deaths of these women. While the full title, “How to Kill a Witch: The Patriarchy’s Guide for Silencing Women” does feel cheeky, it really does break down the steps and ways in which men of the time, in positions of extreme and total power, were able to manipulate society’s fears, insecurities, and vulnerabilities, and create the ultimate scapegoat.
As a nonfiction, historical book, “How to Kill a Witch” could be a dry, unengaging text. However, Mitchell and Venditozzi infuse humor, wit, and grace into this book, almost imperceptibly. The content is dark and horrific, thinking of the things that happened to these women and their families, and their utter powerlessness. But, Venditozzi and Mitchell ensure we can learn about the past in a way that is engaging, meaningful, easy to connect with, while honoring the pain and suffering. There were moments that made me laugh, moments that moved me to tears, and every range of emotion in between. I have a degree in History (and Literature), and I cannot emphasize how much I wish I had this book during my studies. Students, both official and mere life-long learners, will be enraptured from the first page, and will stay that way, until the very end.
I recommend this book with my whole chest. I wish this was required reading in schools - the amount of information about human nature and how to avoid these grave and deadly actions in the future, is truly invaluable. The feminist read of 2025.
July 24, 2025
It took me a couple of months to finish this one—not because it was slow or boring or overly dense, but because I kept pausing to Google people, places, and events mentioned throughout. That’s how engaging and educational this book is.
How to Kill a Witch explores witch hunts and trials through a global lens but focuses heavily on Scotland’s dark and often overlooked history. One of the most striking revelations? Even many Scots are more familiar with the Salem witch trials than with their own country’s tragic past. That says a lot.
Claire Mitchell and Zoe Venditozzi clearly poured their hearts into this work. You can feel their passion and dedication to honoring the victims by bringing their stories into the light. The emotional weight of this book hit me often. I found myself tearing up while reading these accounts.
What makes the book stand out is how it seamlessly blends historical facts with fictional vignettes, giving us a more vivid sense of what these women may have experienced. These fictional passages are clearly marked (thank you, font change!), so there’s no confusion between what’s real and what’s imagined.
But what really hit me was how the authors connect the past to the present, showing how the same patterns of injustice, misogyny, and fear-driven violence still exist today. It’s a powerful and necessary reading.
If you’re even remotely interested in women’s history, Scottish history, or the ongoing fight for justice and recognition, this book belongs on your shelf.
How to Kill a Witch explores witch hunts and trials through a global lens but focuses heavily on Scotland’s dark and often overlooked history. One of the most striking revelations? Even many Scots are more familiar with the Salem witch trials than with their own country’s tragic past. That says a lot.
Claire Mitchell and Zoe Venditozzi clearly poured their hearts into this work. You can feel their passion and dedication to honoring the victims by bringing their stories into the light. The emotional weight of this book hit me often. I found myself tearing up while reading these accounts.
What makes the book stand out is how it seamlessly blends historical facts with fictional vignettes, giving us a more vivid sense of what these women may have experienced. These fictional passages are clearly marked (thank you, font change!), so there’s no confusion between what’s real and what’s imagined.
But what really hit me was how the authors connect the past to the present, showing how the same patterns of injustice, misogyny, and fear-driven violence still exist today. It’s a powerful and necessary reading.
If you’re even remotely interested in women’s history, Scottish history, or the ongoing fight for justice and recognition, this book belongs on your shelf.
September 30, 2025
Thank you to NetGalley and Sourcebooks for an advanced copy!
Holy moly. This book was incredible. I did read it slower than I normally read books, just because there's a lot of information to take in. I didn't realize that witch killings were so bad in Scotland, and I learned a lot. If you're not a nonfiction reader (like me), I STRONGLY URGE you to read this. Claire and Zoe bring you through important history in Scotland and other parts of the world, while sprinkling in hilarious footnotes.
What I loved the most was Claire and Zoe bringing it back to today with what's going on in the world RIGHT FRICKEN NOW. How scary it is and how real it is that witch accusations are STILL happening throughout the world.
I leave you with my favorite quotes:
"Memorialization is about connection. If we make the link between the past and ourselves, we're more likely not to repeat the more horrifying aspects of our history."
"Do not let the patriarchy silence you."
"So we say, fuck "being nice" to keep the peace or to keep other people happy. Fuck having to keep quiet for fear of being labeled difficult (they'll do that anyway). Fuck living, laughing, loving. Try shouting, swearing, fighting. Call out misogyny, challenge the norm, be a quarrelsome dame."
Holy moly. This book was incredible. I did read it slower than I normally read books, just because there's a lot of information to take in. I didn't realize that witch killings were so bad in Scotland, and I learned a lot. If you're not a nonfiction reader (like me), I STRONGLY URGE you to read this. Claire and Zoe bring you through important history in Scotland and other parts of the world, while sprinkling in hilarious footnotes.
What I loved the most was Claire and Zoe bringing it back to today with what's going on in the world RIGHT FRICKEN NOW. How scary it is and how real it is that witch accusations are STILL happening throughout the world.
I leave you with my favorite quotes:
"Memorialization is about connection. If we make the link between the past and ourselves, we're more likely not to repeat the more horrifying aspects of our history."
"Do not let the patriarchy silence you."
"So we say, fuck "being nice" to keep the peace or to keep other people happy. Fuck having to keep quiet for fear of being labeled difficult (they'll do that anyway). Fuck living, laughing, loving. Try shouting, swearing, fighting. Call out misogyny, challenge the norm, be a quarrelsome dame."
October 12, 2025
Lots of great stuff in here. The campaign is admirable — nay, vital — and the stories and facts fascinating. It breaks things down in easily digestible ways that avoid it getting too lost in the weeds of history. But it’s a bit scattershot at times, the structure doesn’t entirely work, the copy errors are distracting, and the irreverence that works in the podcast doesn’t translate well to text. At once both too wide-ranging and not detailed enough, I really, really wish I got more from this expansion.
May 12, 2025
An incredible book of the past, its relevancy to the present and the importance of remembering those who got caught in an epidemic of misogyny. The research that has gone into this is evident and you can tell it’s been written with the purpose of educating and informing.
Some of the footnotes feel slightly irrelevant and the inclusion of an AI ‘artwork’ was jarring given how factual and authentic the rest of the book was.
Some of the footnotes feel slightly irrelevant and the inclusion of an AI ‘artwork’ was jarring given how factual and authentic the rest of the book was.
July 17, 2025
Well-written, easy to read and (obviously) makes a great point: Scotland’s witches, and witches in general, should be remembered and lessons have to be learned from the witch trails. That being said, this book lacked nuance in many areas. To name one example: around the 80-90 page mark, the authors cite a historian they’ve spoken to about John Knox. She mentions research isn’t clear about how ‘sexist’ he really was; from a modern day standpoint he is, but back then he expressed opinions many had, and was good friends with a few women as well. But the authors write ‘despite [her] take on Knox, his sexism, to us, runs very deeply’, followed by cherry picking The First Blast of the Trumpet ánd claiming only Mary Queen of Scots was affected by this (multiple women were!). His story is far more nuanced than the authors claim, but they decide to sidestep historians to make this segment fit their overall point. To top it all off, Knox gets his own fictional mini chapter in this book, where he performs a truly villanous speech. And the authors don’t just do this with Knox either: this cherry picking also goes for James I’s writings, how women were perceived, witch hunts outside of Scotland (why mention the US, mention Ireland and Norway briefly but then claim Scotland is in this aspect completely different from every other country?), … and that’s only the stuff I’ve had lectures on and/or written 2 thesis’ about.
Midway through explaining historic events, the authors also put in ‘funny’ things that are meant to take us back to reality, like comparing past events with the present, and frequently writing down things along the lines of ‘ugh, men, right’ or ‘wow people those days’. That’s just… not necessary. I do appreciate that they’re bringing POC into this, and their anger and call for action is justified. But when they mention how someone wanted to burn Harry Potter books, they happen to completely gloss over JKR’s statements recently. I’m sorry, but you can’t keep bringing little sidenotes and links to the present into the mix, raising your voice for all women, and then casually mention the Harry Potter books without raising your voice for trans women, too.
This nuance also lacked in how the authors view popular culture surrounding witches. You’d think the authors would be pleased with people coming to see witches’ scales or visiting Salem, but according to them this can only be ‘dark tourism’. And yeah, if someone goes to Salem to ‘enjoy’ this history and get a kick out of it, then that’s not ethical. But if people visit to learn more about this history, to have it make an impact on them by being there and realising it’s not a fictional place… why wouldn’t we want that? They mention visiting battlefields, cemeteries and castles counts as dark tourism too, because obviously you can’t simply be interested in the history of these places.
I’ve found that popular books about witches often lack nuance. They’re written from a point of (totally justified!) activism, but then obscure some of the nuances. That’s the case here too. The authors speak to historians and researchers who support their work and whom they’re on good terms with, but if someone else contradicts this view that’s not worth investigating further. This book’s activism, however justified this is, seems one-sided, and to top it all off, one of the later chapters features an AI artwork (made by someone else, but still, whyy??). If you’re unfamiliar with this timeperiod or witch trials in general you’ll probably really enjoy this, but I found this lacking.
Midway through explaining historic events, the authors also put in ‘funny’ things that are meant to take us back to reality, like comparing past events with the present, and frequently writing down things along the lines of ‘ugh, men, right’ or ‘wow people those days’. That’s just… not necessary. I do appreciate that they’re bringing POC into this, and their anger and call for action is justified. But when they mention how someone wanted to burn Harry Potter books, they happen to completely gloss over JKR’s statements recently. I’m sorry, but you can’t keep bringing little sidenotes and links to the present into the mix, raising your voice for all women, and then casually mention the Harry Potter books without raising your voice for trans women, too.
This nuance also lacked in how the authors view popular culture surrounding witches. You’d think the authors would be pleased with people coming to see witches’ scales or visiting Salem, but according to them this can only be ‘dark tourism’. And yeah, if someone goes to Salem to ‘enjoy’ this history and get a kick out of it, then that’s not ethical. But if people visit to learn more about this history, to have it make an impact on them by being there and realising it’s not a fictional place… why wouldn’t we want that? They mention visiting battlefields, cemeteries and castles counts as dark tourism too, because obviously you can’t simply be interested in the history of these places.
I’ve found that popular books about witches often lack nuance. They’re written from a point of (totally justified!) activism, but then obscure some of the nuances. That’s the case here too. The authors speak to historians and researchers who support their work and whom they’re on good terms with, but if someone else contradicts this view that’s not worth investigating further. This book’s activism, however justified this is, seems one-sided, and to top it all off, one of the later chapters features an AI artwork (made by someone else, but still, whyy??). If you’re unfamiliar with this timeperiod or witch trials in general you’ll probably really enjoy this, but I found this lacking.
September 25, 2025
How to Kill a Witch was such a heavy but detailed read. It's educational and provided the references within each chapter so that you could understand the verbiage used and where the facts used came from during the authors' research process.
I went into this book semi-blind. The title and the cover drew me in, when I got approved access on NetGalley, I almost thought it was a mystery book, but when I got into it, I realized the magic I had in my hands.
This book, gave me so much insight, not only to the past - and to the women that suffered at the hands of men and the patriarchy - for what true reason other than power? But it also gave me even greater insight to what we're dealing with in America RIGHT NOW and what the current patriachy is doing to silence us - minus the hanging, ducking and burning (at the moment - soooo *knocks on wood*).
What I will say is, read this book. Take your time, take it in - in bits. Absorb it. It took me a lot of time to read this book. A few chapters at a time. Because it's a lot to take in. This is a book I want on my shelf once the book is released in stores. This is a book I would recommend to anyone that identifies as a woman or considers themselves allies to women. READ THIS BOOK.
The past, clearly, has a habit of repeating itself. The more you know the more protected you are.
I received a copy of this book from NetGalley.
I went into this book semi-blind. The title and the cover drew me in, when I got approved access on NetGalley, I almost thought it was a mystery book, but when I got into it, I realized the magic I had in my hands.
This book, gave me so much insight, not only to the past - and to the women that suffered at the hands of men and the patriarchy - for what true reason other than power? But it also gave me even greater insight to what we're dealing with in America RIGHT NOW and what the current patriachy is doing to silence us - minus the hanging, ducking and burning (at the moment - soooo *knocks on wood*).
What I will say is, read this book. Take your time, take it in - in bits. Absorb it. It took me a lot of time to read this book. A few chapters at a time. Because it's a lot to take in. This is a book I want on my shelf once the book is released in stores. This is a book I would recommend to anyone that identifies as a woman or considers themselves allies to women. READ THIS BOOK.
The past, clearly, has a habit of repeating itself. The more you know the more protected you are.
I received a copy of this book from NetGalley.
May 16, 2025
Watch the Scottish witch trials unfold before the Salem witch trials in this short informational narrative. Christian perspectives of women’s expectations that are then taken to extremes are the heart of this one. The chapters are brief with enough information to understand what influenced the Scottish, Salem, and modern Nigerian witch trials. Why are women commonly associated with witchcraft to be demonized and murdered.
Some witches are real but they are not performing the magic we see on media – it is practical. Societies hate for women is the root cause of the trials and murders. This narrative focuses on the central idea and how each set of witch trials extends from extremist beliefs to further harm and fear amongst women. The brief information presented is enough to begin to satisfy cravings learning about the truth of the witch trials beyond Hocus Pocus!
Witchcraft is the scapegoat to misplace society’s impact of blocking women as the pitfalls of society. Otherness is what enables the witch trials to occur even in modern times. This story is a warning for what follows any community that engages in practices that demean women’s place in society. 3.5 rounded up because this will direct you to research more on the intricacies of the witch trials - very spellbinding if you will. Thank you Net Galley for an opportunity to read this in exchange for an honest review.
Read more of my reviews on https://brujerialibrary.wordpress.com
Some witches are real but they are not performing the magic we see on media – it is practical. Societies hate for women is the root cause of the trials and murders. This narrative focuses on the central idea and how each set of witch trials extends from extremist beliefs to further harm and fear amongst women. The brief information presented is enough to begin to satisfy cravings learning about the truth of the witch trials beyond Hocus Pocus!
Witchcraft is the scapegoat to misplace society’s impact of blocking women as the pitfalls of society. Otherness is what enables the witch trials to occur even in modern times. This story is a warning for what follows any community that engages in practices that demean women’s place in society. 3.5 rounded up because this will direct you to research more on the intricacies of the witch trials - very spellbinding if you will. Thank you Net Galley for an opportunity to read this in exchange for an honest review.
Read more of my reviews on https://brujerialibrary.wordpress.com
August 15, 2025
Thank you to NetGalley and the publisher for this ARC!
There’s just some books out there that make you want to maintain your rage, and this one of them. There’s so much that we still ascribe to women of the past (and, indeed, the present) in terms of propensity for witchcraft, not realising that these conditions are fully replicable today. This book draws attention to that in a masterful way, and makes many, many pit stops along the way.
While the tone of the writing can be a little juvenile and irritating at times, the book as a whole makes for an interesting read. You can tell that it is meticulously researched, and while it doesn’t cover every possible case and fact about witches and witchcraft, it gives a detail insight into a number of cases.
I really was riveted by this read, and it just drew attention to the fact that we still have so much to learn from the past. There’s a level of menace in the concept of modern day ‘witch hunting’, and it always pays to be aware of that.
I also appreciated this book taking the time to detail a non-Western approach to witch hunts. It’s got a lot of info about modern day ‘prosecutions’, and it’s terrifying to know we still have so much further to go. I really appreciated this book, and it paints a detailed picture of Scotland and beyond.
There’s just some books out there that make you want to maintain your rage, and this one of them. There’s so much that we still ascribe to women of the past (and, indeed, the present) in terms of propensity for witchcraft, not realising that these conditions are fully replicable today. This book draws attention to that in a masterful way, and makes many, many pit stops along the way.
While the tone of the writing can be a little juvenile and irritating at times, the book as a whole makes for an interesting read. You can tell that it is meticulously researched, and while it doesn’t cover every possible case and fact about witches and witchcraft, it gives a detail insight into a number of cases.
I really was riveted by this read, and it just drew attention to the fact that we still have so much to learn from the past. There’s a level of menace in the concept of modern day ‘witch hunting’, and it always pays to be aware of that.
I also appreciated this book taking the time to detail a non-Western approach to witch hunts. It’s got a lot of info about modern day ‘prosecutions’, and it’s terrifying to know we still have so much further to go. I really appreciated this book, and it paints a detailed picture of Scotland and beyond.
June 2, 2025
I loved this book; the history it presents is incredibly relevant. This story is not just about events that occurred hundreds of years ago in Scotland (and the smaller but more infamous Salem witch hunts), but it reflects circumstances that still happen in parts of the world today. In some areas of Nigeria, people continue to suffer from witchcraft accusations, which can be life-destroying and sometimes fatal. Moreover, women politicians in America are once again being accused of witchcraft.
The discussion on contemporary relevance in the closing chapter, particularly concerning online harassment and abortion bans, strongly echoes the past.
I write this while wearing my ‘Witches of Scotland’ tartan to attend the debate on my petition to decriminalise abortion in Westminster.
“Do not let the patriarchy silence you.
Forget being nice to keep the peace or to make others happy; forget having to keep quiet for fear of being labelled difficult—they will do that anyway.
Forget living, laughing, loving—try shouting, swearing, scaring. Call out misogyny, challenge the norm, be a quarrelsome dame.”
The discussion on contemporary relevance in the closing chapter, particularly concerning online harassment and abortion bans, strongly echoes the past.
I write this while wearing my ‘Witches of Scotland’ tartan to attend the debate on my petition to decriminalise abortion in Westminster.
“Do not let the patriarchy silence you.
Forget being nice to keep the peace or to make others happy; forget having to keep quiet for fear of being labelled difficult—they will do that anyway.
Forget living, laughing, loving—try shouting, swearing, scaring. Call out misogyny, challenge the norm, be a quarrelsome dame.”
May 24, 2025
Looking at one of darkest times in history "How to kill a witch " tells the true story of witch trials, especially in Scotland.
The authors humanise the victims (mostly women targeted due to fear, the overuse of power and unfair laws) of this heinous and pointless crime by individual stories and allowing readers to connect with real people and not just "faceless statistics "
As someone who's a big geek about all "witchy stuff" I was very excited to read this book. And this book was amazing. It was a real roller coaster for me.
I felt for the victims, for their pain and fear. I was angry of the injustice of "stupid " beliefs and superstitions. Not to mention, the way men overused their power and literally got away with murder made me fume. So yes ... this book really took me on an emotional journey.
I loved this book and highly recommend to everyone
The authors humanise the victims (mostly women targeted due to fear, the overuse of power and unfair laws) of this heinous and pointless crime by individual stories and allowing readers to connect with real people and not just "faceless statistics "
As someone who's a big geek about all "witchy stuff" I was very excited to read this book. And this book was amazing. It was a real roller coaster for me.
I felt for the victims, for their pain and fear. I was angry of the injustice of "stupid " beliefs and superstitions. Not to mention, the way men overused their power and literally got away with murder made me fume. So yes ... this book really took me on an emotional journey.
I loved this book and highly recommend to everyone
September 30, 2025
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
I love history books, but even as a historian by day, I especially love nonfiction written with the storytelling vibes of fiction. And this deep dive look at the witch trials in Scotland that connects the past horrors with Scottish and European history at large and to the world we are all currently living in.
Interspersed with deep dives into the profiles of the victims of the Scottish witch hunts, How to Kill a Witch looks at the way the witch trials in the 17th and 18th centuries were able to grow as quickly as they did, how witches were accused and tried and executed, and with the ways in which these witch hunts were indicative of Scotland’s culture and patriarchy writ large. I’m a European history teacher who teaches about the European witch hunts and I still LEARNED SO SO MUCH. I cannot wait to incorporate so much of this info, especially about the role of King James I, into my courses (sorry not sorry kids). Most importantly, in my opinion, the authors connect the historical horrors with the modern period - with both actual witch hunts that are happening right now AND the ways in which the patriarchy continues to use the same foundations to hurt women throughout the modern world. I cannot recommend this book, which despite its dark topic manages to be darkly funny, enough if you’re at all interested in the history of witches!! It’s out today and it’s excellent!!
I love history books, but even as a historian by day, I especially love nonfiction written with the storytelling vibes of fiction. And this deep dive look at the witch trials in Scotland that connects the past horrors with Scottish and European history at large and to the world we are all currently living in.
Interspersed with deep dives into the profiles of the victims of the Scottish witch hunts, How to Kill a Witch looks at the way the witch trials in the 17th and 18th centuries were able to grow as quickly as they did, how witches were accused and tried and executed, and with the ways in which these witch hunts were indicative of Scotland’s culture and patriarchy writ large. I’m a European history teacher who teaches about the European witch hunts and I still LEARNED SO SO MUCH. I cannot wait to incorporate so much of this info, especially about the role of King James I, into my courses (sorry not sorry kids). Most importantly, in my opinion, the authors connect the historical horrors with the modern period - with both actual witch hunts that are happening right now AND the ways in which the patriarchy continues to use the same foundations to hurt women throughout the modern world. I cannot recommend this book, which despite its dark topic manages to be darkly funny, enough if you’re at all interested in the history of witches!! It’s out today and it’s excellent!!
October 19, 2025
outlines the process of a witch hunt, specifically using the scottish witch trials as a guide, from identifying a witch to executing a witch. really insightful, with tons of details on a series of witch trials whose records have been majorly lost to time, and ultimately targets the patriarchal systems underlying these events.
funny too! lots of tidbits i didnt need to know but made the whole thing more immersive.
AND we end with a really lovely reflection on modern rhetoric being used by the american right.
“on September 28, 2024, then-US vice-presidential candidate JD Vance spoke at an event hosted by an evangelical leader who had previously suggested Vice President Kamala Harris used witchcraft. He said, “She can look presidential. That’s the seduction of what I would say is witchcraft. (…) That spirit, that occult spirit, I believe is operating on her and through her.”
a reminder that no matter how far we progress, we do not change all that quickly!
funny too! lots of tidbits i didnt need to know but made the whole thing more immersive.
AND we end with a really lovely reflection on modern rhetoric being used by the american right.
“on September 28, 2024, then-US vice-presidential candidate JD Vance spoke at an event hosted by an evangelical leader who had previously suggested Vice President Kamala Harris used witchcraft. He said, “She can look presidential. That’s the seduction of what I would say is witchcraft. (…) That spirit, that occult spirit, I believe is operating on her and through her.”
a reminder that no matter how far we progress, we do not change all that quickly!
May 18, 2025
Firstly thanks to NetGalley and the publishers for the advanced copy of this book in return for my honest opinion.
This book was so interesting - I have read many fictional stories based on the Scottish witch trials so a few of the names in this book were familiar to me. It was written in such a way that you were made to feel how scary it was to be a woman at this time and if you had said or done anything out of the ordinary you could be the next one accused. I found it a compelling read and it’s unbelievable that even in this day and age that this is still going on in some countries . If you love history this is a must read
This book was so interesting - I have read many fictional stories based on the Scottish witch trials so a few of the names in this book were familiar to me. It was written in such a way that you were made to feel how scary it was to be a woman at this time and if you had said or done anything out of the ordinary you could be the next one accused. I found it a compelling read and it’s unbelievable that even in this day and age that this is still going on in some countries . If you love history this is a must read
September 4, 2025
4.5 stars.
I don't usually enjoy engaging with nonfiction history topics, but I found this fascinating and learned so much. Some of it was horrifying, yes, but it was well researched and easy to understand. Fascinating how the castigation of women has been going on for centuries, just in different forms at different times.
I usually skip reading the footnotes, but many of these were great and perhaps should have been included in the main text. Don't skip them!
Thank you to NetGalley and Sourcebooks for providing me with an advance reader's copy in exchange for an honest review.
Publishes September 30, 2025.
I don't usually enjoy engaging with nonfiction history topics, but I found this fascinating and learned so much. Some of it was horrifying, yes, but it was well researched and easy to understand. Fascinating how the castigation of women has been going on for centuries, just in different forms at different times.
I usually skip reading the footnotes, but many of these were great and perhaps should have been included in the main text. Don't skip them!
Thank you to NetGalley and Sourcebooks for providing me with an advance reader's copy in exchange for an honest review.
Publishes September 30, 2025.
September 2, 2025
A very readable account of the history of Scottish witchcraft. I have read much about the Salem witchcraft trials but very little of Scotland's application of the "Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live" directive. I did find the occasional misogynistic comments humorous even though I am a male. I highly recommend this book. I decided to open Sir Walter Scott's Demonology and Witchcraft for his view. Scott stated, "It would be disgusting to follow the numerous cases in which the same uniform credulity, he same extorted confessions, the same prejudiced and exaggerated evidence, concluded in the same tragedy at the stake and the pile."
June 23, 2025
If you’re not already angry about the injustices of the current world, you’re about to have your eyes opened because it’s not new. This non-fiction piece written passionately by Claire Mitchell KC and Zoe Venditozzi (WoS, a campaign I follow closely) is a thoughtful and provocative look at women’s history (because they were WOMEN, not witches) and its alarming how many parallels there are with current events. We have known for a long time that it wasn’t about witches flying around on broomsticks, but what this book thoughtfully outlines is that sometimes the women accused did literally nothing to deserve the torture, ridicule, exile and ultimately death that they endured.
This book serves as a reminder of the history of the witch trials of Scotland (and further), a memorial of the women accused and as a prompt to “call out misogyny, challenge the norm, BE A QUARRELSOME DAME”
This book serves as a reminder of the history of the witch trials of Scotland (and further), a memorial of the women accused and as a prompt to “call out misogyny, challenge the norm, BE A QUARRELSOME DAME”
August 16, 2025
A fascinating read. Very thought provoking
June 16, 2025
One of the most interesting books I've read in a long time. Historically fascinating and with huge contemporary relevance for women today.
July 29, 2025
This is such an important project and book. The intentions and the already achieved results (for example the public and official apology, the gathering of information, etc.) are commendable and impressive. It's also lovely that this edition has the cover with their tartan.
However, for me personally, the writing style greatly undermines the overall quality of the content. I’ve learned that it’s possible to hold somebody in very high esteem, have great respect for their work but still not like the work itself.
The writing is, to my taste, often rather unsophisticated and very immature, riddled with childish things likecrossings out and correcting them, writing (we jest) after a sentence or footnotes that don't give information but are only a joke. Three examples of those ‘funny’ footnotes:
- ‘It appears that the patriarchy is doing well in hell, what with the only man getting the desk job.’
- Under a text about attaching each part of a cat to the chieftest part of a dead man: ‘If the chieftest part of a man is what we are imagining it is, that must have been pretty hard to attach.’
- After describing that the version of Daemonology intended for London was a little fancier, saying ‘no doubt to suit the more refined tastes of a metropolitan London audience’, there’s the footnote: ‘Plus ça change, eh?’ Not so not unnecessary and immature, but also untrue. The second edition was published when James, the author, became king, and after the first edition already has success. A slightly fancier version suited the occasion and success. Also, why, if you want to make that joke, does it need to be a footnote? You can just put that as a new sentence.
There are many like that, and they’re all unnecessary and often unfunny.
There are many footnotes in general. Even if they do contain helpful information, nine out of ten times they could have just been added to the main text. This many footnotes makes the pages look messy, in my opinion.
The writing style is very informal, which I sometimes found off-putting and amateuristic. I'm not talking about a bit of humour being inappropriate for the subject; I love me some dark humour and I don't see that as disrespectful. It wasn't that. It's more that feeling that they write how they talk and that sometimes and partially works, but not always. And also that it's a bit over the top, a bit of a 'look how funny we are' vibe with the reader going 'o.k., boomer...' (they're not boomers, I know, and I am their age, but I'm just describing that cringy feeling. Hard to explain. As an example, here are the four last sentences of the chapter in which it is explained that magic in those days was considered fact. ‘The belief in magic, then, real as it was, did not cause the bloody horror of the witchcraft trials. The causes of those? Oh, they were very much man-made. Let us explain…’ I find this style, with the question, the oh and the three dots almost physically irksome. Something similar is the last sentence of a paragraph explaining how king James argues that witches exist. ‘OK, witches are real. What next?’ is the sentence before the next chapter. It’s a style that strikes me as what a 15-year-old aspiring writer would do in their naive enthusiasm, not two women even slightly older than I am.
I think one aspect of an editor’s job is to see if the writer uses the same words or phrases too often. Clearly, this editor was fine with them writing that somebody ‘had no truck with’ something seemingly every other page.
We are already informed in the introduction that there are short fiction chapters in the book, written to set the mood. The book doesn’t need those. The facts are already more than enough to set the mood and to use fiction undermines the factual narrative, even though the fiction passages are clearly marked as such. I tried reading two and stopped reading them after that, unless it said that it was mostly actual quotes. For me, making things up to set the mood doesn't go with trying to uncover as many facts as we can.
Truly rude I found how they describe the Bodlean and National Library of Scotland, writing in a derogatory way about how they couldn’t enjoy the view because of blinds protecting the book from ‘dangerous sunshine’ and how the air conditioning was checked by the librarian ‘presumably so the books didn’t spontaneously overheat and burst into flames.’ Why this disrespectful, derogatory nastiness? And so utterly ignorant too.
The build-up of chapters, the structure, somehow doesn't flow. I see what they tried to do - go through every step of the process chronologically. In theory, that should work well but in this case, it really doesn't.
The chosen font, the main one but especially the chapter headers, adds to the book feeling very unserious and gimmicky.
There are many possible illustrations for this topic. But if you want to raise awareness about the facts, then stick to the facts, and don't use ai-created imagery!
Overall, I think that even though the subject matter appeals to a very broad demographic, as it should, and even though many different kinds of people will buy it, only the swooning Outlander crowd will stick around after reading. You can see that in many comments on social media. People messing up facts, idealising the times, etc. People claiming they have not one, but two witches in their ancestry, completely missing the whole point of witches not existing and seemingly too thick to realise that ancestry cannot be traced in any of the known cases. People talking about what lovely dresses witches must've had or that they'd love to have the same herb gardens as 'those healers'. People thinking the Witches of Scotland tartan originated in that time... I even stopped following the Instagram account after too much eyerolling. You even see some of those kinds of things in some of the reviews here. Anyway, my point is - that seems almost the sole demographic they appeal to and, unfortunately, I get that, given how the authors come across in their writing and media. Unfortunately too, I think hardly any man will read it; as a woman, these women make me go "Ah no, don't be like that, you're actually perpetuating the stereotype that most women want to be rid of", so I would fully understand most men rolling their eyes and/or being miffed that even though the authors say they stick to the facts, they're also maintaining the 'all men are tw*ts' vibe.
It happens sometimes, with great causes, that I think: “I wish somebody else was fronting this organisation/talk/march/press conference, as this person, even though I agree with every word, is the type of person that will only annoy rather than engage the intended demographic, or confirm their prejudice or dislike.” That’s what I feel here too.
However, for me personally, the writing style greatly undermines the overall quality of the content. I’ve learned that it’s possible to hold somebody in very high esteem, have great respect for their work but still not like the work itself.
The writing is, to my taste, often rather unsophisticated and very immature, riddled with childish things like
- ‘It appears that the patriarchy is doing well in hell, what with the only man getting the desk job.’
- Under a text about attaching each part of a cat to the chieftest part of a dead man: ‘If the chieftest part of a man is what we are imagining it is, that must have been pretty hard to attach.’
- After describing that the version of Daemonology intended for London was a little fancier, saying ‘no doubt to suit the more refined tastes of a metropolitan London audience’, there’s the footnote: ‘Plus ça change, eh?’ Not so not unnecessary and immature, but also untrue. The second edition was published when James, the author, became king, and after the first edition already has success. A slightly fancier version suited the occasion and success. Also, why, if you want to make that joke, does it need to be a footnote? You can just put that as a new sentence.
There are many like that, and they’re all unnecessary and often unfunny.
There are many footnotes in general. Even if they do contain helpful information, nine out of ten times they could have just been added to the main text. This many footnotes makes the pages look messy, in my opinion.
The writing style is very informal, which I sometimes found off-putting and amateuristic. I'm not talking about a bit of humour being inappropriate for the subject; I love me some dark humour and I don't see that as disrespectful. It wasn't that. It's more that feeling that they write how they talk and that sometimes and partially works, but not always. And also that it's a bit over the top, a bit of a 'look how funny we are' vibe with the reader going 'o.k., boomer...' (they're not boomers, I know, and I am their age, but I'm just describing that cringy feeling. Hard to explain. As an example, here are the four last sentences of the chapter in which it is explained that magic in those days was considered fact. ‘The belief in magic, then, real as it was, did not cause the bloody horror of the witchcraft trials. The causes of those? Oh, they were very much man-made. Let us explain…’ I find this style, with the question, the oh and the three dots almost physically irksome. Something similar is the last sentence of a paragraph explaining how king James argues that witches exist. ‘OK, witches are real. What next?’ is the sentence before the next chapter. It’s a style that strikes me as what a 15-year-old aspiring writer would do in their naive enthusiasm, not two women even slightly older than I am.
I think one aspect of an editor’s job is to see if the writer uses the same words or phrases too often. Clearly, this editor was fine with them writing that somebody ‘had no truck with’ something seemingly every other page.
We are already informed in the introduction that there are short fiction chapters in the book, written to set the mood. The book doesn’t need those. The facts are already more than enough to set the mood and to use fiction undermines the factual narrative, even though the fiction passages are clearly marked as such. I tried reading two and stopped reading them after that, unless it said that it was mostly actual quotes. For me, making things up to set the mood doesn't go with trying to uncover as many facts as we can.
Truly rude I found how they describe the Bodlean and National Library of Scotland, writing in a derogatory way about how they couldn’t enjoy the view because of blinds protecting the book from ‘dangerous sunshine’ and how the air conditioning was checked by the librarian ‘presumably so the books didn’t spontaneously overheat and burst into flames.’ Why this disrespectful, derogatory nastiness? And so utterly ignorant too.
The build-up of chapters, the structure, somehow doesn't flow. I see what they tried to do - go through every step of the process chronologically. In theory, that should work well but in this case, it really doesn't.
The chosen font, the main one but especially the chapter headers, adds to the book feeling very unserious and gimmicky.
There are many possible illustrations for this topic. But if you want to raise awareness about the facts, then stick to the facts, and don't use ai-created imagery!
Overall, I think that even though the subject matter appeals to a very broad demographic, as it should, and even though many different kinds of people will buy it, only the swooning Outlander crowd will stick around after reading. You can see that in many comments on social media. People messing up facts, idealising the times, etc. People claiming they have not one, but two witches in their ancestry, completely missing the whole point of witches not existing and seemingly too thick to realise that ancestry cannot be traced in any of the known cases. People talking about what lovely dresses witches must've had or that they'd love to have the same herb gardens as 'those healers'. People thinking the Witches of Scotland tartan originated in that time... I even stopped following the Instagram account after too much eyerolling. You even see some of those kinds of things in some of the reviews here. Anyway, my point is - that seems almost the sole demographic they appeal to and, unfortunately, I get that, given how the authors come across in their writing and media. Unfortunately too, I think hardly any man will read it; as a woman, these women make me go "Ah no, don't be like that, you're actually perpetuating the stereotype that most women want to be rid of", so I would fully understand most men rolling their eyes and/or being miffed that even though the authors say they stick to the facts, they're also maintaining the 'all men are tw*ts' vibe.
It happens sometimes, with great causes, that I think: “I wish somebody else was fronting this organisation/talk/march/press conference, as this person, even though I agree with every word, is the type of person that will only annoy rather than engage the intended demographic, or confirm their prejudice or dislike.” That’s what I feel here too.
September 25, 2025
In 2022, two self-described "quarrelsome dames" achieved something remarkable: they successfully petitioned the Scottish government to issue a formal state apology to the estimated 4,000 people accused of witchcraft between 1563 and 1736. Claire Mitchell and Zoe Venditozzi's "How to Kill a Witch" chronicles both their journey to that historic moment and the dark history that inspired their campaign—transforming what could have been a conventional historical survey into something far more urgent and politically charged.
"How to Kill a Witch" is not a conventional academic history. Instead, it is an activist-driven exploration that brings the machinery of persecution from the distant past into sharp relief while framing it as a cautionary tale for our present. The authors—a human rights lawyer and a novelist who bonded over true crime podcasts—explicitly frame their work as "the experience of two women learning about their history and casting a fresh light on their present."
The book is structured as a forensic "how-to" manual, breaking down the persecution process into systematic stages: "How to Accuse a Witch," "How to Prick a Witch," "How to Try a Witch," and so forth. This procedural breakdown reveals that these miscarriages of justice were calculated, not accidental. The witch hunts reached their peaks during periods of intense social upheaval—the 1590s following King James VI's obsession with witchcraft after his stormy voyage to Denmark, the 1640s-50s during religious and political turmoil, and most dramatically in the 1660s during the Great Scottish Witch Hunt. Rather than spontaneous mob violence, these were systematic campaigns orchestrated by church and state authorities working in terrifying harmony.
Mitchell and Venditozzi distinguish their work by making dense historical material genuinely accessible. They ground their broader arguments in compelling individual cases. Isobel Gowdie's four fantastical 1662 confessions—describing shape-shifting, sexual encounters with the Devil, and "elf-shots" fired at neighbors—receive extensive analysis revealing the period's worldview. The torture of Allison Balfour provides a horrific case study in systematic brutality: she confessed only after witnessing her elderly husband and small children tortured before her eyes, with the final breaking point coming when her seven-year-old daughter's fingers were crushed in thumbscrews. These stories illuminate the book's central argument about why 85 percent of the accused were women, deemed the "frailer sex" and therefore more susceptible to the Devil's temptations.
The book's treatment of figures like the witch prickers John Kincaid and Christian Caddell reveals the financial incentives driving persecution. Paid by the head for each witch they identified, these professional accusers developed fraudulent techniques using retractable pins to "discover" the Devil's mark on their victims. Kincaid alone was responsible for 150-200 executions before being exposed and imprisoned for fraud in 1662.
Mitchell and Venditozzi work transparently within the constraints of Scotland's historical record. They acknowledge that "poor recordkeeping" leaves them "bereft of much of the detail" compared to the better-documented Salem trials, where contemporary recognition of injustice led to preserved records and family campaigns for vindication. Often, Scottish trials are documented only by financial records noting payments to executioners or the cost of hiring witch prickers. The authors' strength lies in synthesizing existing scholarship—particularly the foundational Survey of Scottish Witchcraft database—and making it accessible to modern readers, not in uncovering new archival material.
But don't think this book is only about a distant past that we have left behind long ago. The authors demonstrate the contemporary relevance of these historical events. Through interviews with activists like Leo Igwe of Advocacy for Alleged Witches, they document ongoing witchcraft accusations in Nigeria and Malawi, where people are still tortured and killed based on supernatural beliefs. The inclusion of "Miss B," a young girl tortured by her family in Nigeria in 2023, creates a shocking bridge between past and present. The authors draw explicit connections to faith-based child abuse in the UK, the rise of the misogynistic "trad wives" movement, and the battle over reproductive rights in the United States—noting that the judge cited in the draft opinion overturning "Roe v. Wade," Matthew Hale, was the same 17th-century figure who presided over English witch trials that influenced Salem.
The writing itself reflects the authors' backgrounds, combining Mitchell's legal precision with Venditozzi's narrative flair. They approach their subject with what they call "reverence to those who were accused of witchcraft and irreverence to everything else," employing humor and sarcasm to critique historical power structures while maintaining deep respect for the victims. Footnotes speculate whether the witches' practice of kissing the Devil's buttocks might be the origin of "kiss my ass," while observing that "the patriarchy is doing well in hell, what with the only man getting the desk job."
The authors take an unapologetically partisan stance and explicitly reject the notion of academic neutrality. The book is history as activism, designed to serve as a "pragmatic learning tool" to challenge "damaging patriarchal norms." The authors' goal is not scholarly debate but public mobilization—to "create a worldwide regiment of quarrelsome dames who are fighting for an equal place in the world."
By refusing to treat the witch trials as merely historical curiosities, Mitchell and Venditozzi demonstrate how the mechanisms that enabled persecution—fear, social anxiety, misogyny, and the scapegoating of vulnerable populations—remain active today. They warn that in an age of social media conspiracy theories and political polarization, a new iteration of witch trials is not out of the realm of possibility.
With "How to Kill a Witch," Mitchell and Venditozzi have created a work of popular history that achieves genuine political impact while remaining intellectually rigorous and emotionally powerful. Their campaign's success in securing Scotland's formal apology is just the beginning of an ongoing effort to establish memorials and legislative pardons. By transforming historical tragedy into a source of modern empowerment and vigilance, they have produced a book that does justice to its subject while serving as a crucial intervention in contemporary debates about power, persecution, and the enduring struggle for historical justice.
This review is of an advance reader's edition provided by NetGalley and Sourcebooks.
"How to Kill a Witch" is not a conventional academic history. Instead, it is an activist-driven exploration that brings the machinery of persecution from the distant past into sharp relief while framing it as a cautionary tale for our present. The authors—a human rights lawyer and a novelist who bonded over true crime podcasts—explicitly frame their work as "the experience of two women learning about their history and casting a fresh light on their present."
The book is structured as a forensic "how-to" manual, breaking down the persecution process into systematic stages: "How to Accuse a Witch," "How to Prick a Witch," "How to Try a Witch," and so forth. This procedural breakdown reveals that these miscarriages of justice were calculated, not accidental. The witch hunts reached their peaks during periods of intense social upheaval—the 1590s following King James VI's obsession with witchcraft after his stormy voyage to Denmark, the 1640s-50s during religious and political turmoil, and most dramatically in the 1660s during the Great Scottish Witch Hunt. Rather than spontaneous mob violence, these were systematic campaigns orchestrated by church and state authorities working in terrifying harmony.
Mitchell and Venditozzi distinguish their work by making dense historical material genuinely accessible. They ground their broader arguments in compelling individual cases. Isobel Gowdie's four fantastical 1662 confessions—describing shape-shifting, sexual encounters with the Devil, and "elf-shots" fired at neighbors—receive extensive analysis revealing the period's worldview. The torture of Allison Balfour provides a horrific case study in systematic brutality: she confessed only after witnessing her elderly husband and small children tortured before her eyes, with the final breaking point coming when her seven-year-old daughter's fingers were crushed in thumbscrews. These stories illuminate the book's central argument about why 85 percent of the accused were women, deemed the "frailer sex" and therefore more susceptible to the Devil's temptations.
The book's treatment of figures like the witch prickers John Kincaid and Christian Caddell reveals the financial incentives driving persecution. Paid by the head for each witch they identified, these professional accusers developed fraudulent techniques using retractable pins to "discover" the Devil's mark on their victims. Kincaid alone was responsible for 150-200 executions before being exposed and imprisoned for fraud in 1662.
Mitchell and Venditozzi work transparently within the constraints of Scotland's historical record. They acknowledge that "poor recordkeeping" leaves them "bereft of much of the detail" compared to the better-documented Salem trials, where contemporary recognition of injustice led to preserved records and family campaigns for vindication. Often, Scottish trials are documented only by financial records noting payments to executioners or the cost of hiring witch prickers. The authors' strength lies in synthesizing existing scholarship—particularly the foundational Survey of Scottish Witchcraft database—and making it accessible to modern readers, not in uncovering new archival material.
But don't think this book is only about a distant past that we have left behind long ago. The authors demonstrate the contemporary relevance of these historical events. Through interviews with activists like Leo Igwe of Advocacy for Alleged Witches, they document ongoing witchcraft accusations in Nigeria and Malawi, where people are still tortured and killed based on supernatural beliefs. The inclusion of "Miss B," a young girl tortured by her family in Nigeria in 2023, creates a shocking bridge between past and present. The authors draw explicit connections to faith-based child abuse in the UK, the rise of the misogynistic "trad wives" movement, and the battle over reproductive rights in the United States—noting that the judge cited in the draft opinion overturning "Roe v. Wade," Matthew Hale, was the same 17th-century figure who presided over English witch trials that influenced Salem.
The writing itself reflects the authors' backgrounds, combining Mitchell's legal precision with Venditozzi's narrative flair. They approach their subject with what they call "reverence to those who were accused of witchcraft and irreverence to everything else," employing humor and sarcasm to critique historical power structures while maintaining deep respect for the victims. Footnotes speculate whether the witches' practice of kissing the Devil's buttocks might be the origin of "kiss my ass," while observing that "the patriarchy is doing well in hell, what with the only man getting the desk job."
The authors take an unapologetically partisan stance and explicitly reject the notion of academic neutrality. The book is history as activism, designed to serve as a "pragmatic learning tool" to challenge "damaging patriarchal norms." The authors' goal is not scholarly debate but public mobilization—to "create a worldwide regiment of quarrelsome dames who are fighting for an equal place in the world."
By refusing to treat the witch trials as merely historical curiosities, Mitchell and Venditozzi demonstrate how the mechanisms that enabled persecution—fear, social anxiety, misogyny, and the scapegoating of vulnerable populations—remain active today. They warn that in an age of social media conspiracy theories and political polarization, a new iteration of witch trials is not out of the realm of possibility.
With "How to Kill a Witch," Mitchell and Venditozzi have created a work of popular history that achieves genuine political impact while remaining intellectually rigorous and emotionally powerful. Their campaign's success in securing Scotland's formal apology is just the beginning of an ongoing effort to establish memorials and legislative pardons. By transforming historical tragedy into a source of modern empowerment and vigilance, they have produced a book that does justice to its subject while serving as a crucial intervention in contemporary debates about power, persecution, and the enduring struggle for historical justice.
This review is of an advance reader's edition provided by NetGalley and Sourcebooks.
September 27, 2025
My partner and I were lucky enough to be invited to attend the Witches of Scotland event last week where they spoke about their book 𝐇𝐎𝐖 ᴛᴏ 𝐊𝐈𝐋𝐋 ᴀ 𝐖𝐈𝐓𝐂𝐇 at the Scottish Storytelling Centre.
I'd already bought and read a copy of the book, but was lucky enough to also get another copy and have it signed, so I've shared the Witches of Scotland love with a few bookish friends.
-
𝐇𝐨𝐰 𝐭𝐨 𝐊𝐢𝐥𝐥 𝐚 𝐖𝐢𝐭𝐜𝐡 𝐢𝐬 𝐚 𝐛𝐨𝐨𝐤 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐝𝐞𝐭𝐚𝐢𝐥𝐬, 𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐩 𝐛𝐲 𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐩, 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐠𝐞𝐬 𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐭𝐚𝐤𝐞𝐧 𝐭𝐨 𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐟𝐲, 𝐭𝐫𝐲 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐮𝐥𝐭𝐢𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐥𝐲 𝐤𝐢𝐥𝐥 𝐚 𝐰𝐨𝐦𝐚𝐧 𝐚𝐬 𝐚 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐜𝐡 ... 𝐈𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐜𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐬𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐰𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐛𝐨𝐨𝐤 𝐰𝐞 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐞 𝐟𝐨𝐥𝐥𝐨𝐰𝐞𝐝 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐟𝐨𝐨𝐭𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐩𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐬𝐞 𝐰𝐡𝐨 𝐥𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐝 𝐡𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐫𝐞𝐝𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐲𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐬 𝐚𝐠𝐨, 𝐯𝐢𝐬𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐠𝐫𝐚𝐯𝐞𝐬, 𝐚𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐦𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐥𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐦𝐞𝐞𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐞𝐱𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐭𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐡𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐲, 𝐚𝐫𝐭, 𝐦𝐮𝐬𝐢𝐜, 𝐰𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 ... 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐭𝐫𝐮𝐭𝐡 𝐚𝐛𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐒𝐜𝐨𝐭𝐭𝐢𝐬𝐡 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐜𝐡 𝐭𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐥𝐬 𝐢𝐬 𝐛𝐥𝐨𝐨𝐝𝐲 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐡𝐨𝐫𝐫𝐢𝐟𝐢𝐜: 𝐰𝐞 𝐡𝐨𝐩𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐮𝐥𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐛𝐨𝐨𝐤 𝐢𝐬 𝐨𝐧𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐫𝐞𝐝𝐢𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝐥𝐞𝐧𝐠𝐭𝐡𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐩𝐞𝐨𝐩𝐥𝐞 - 𝐦𝐨𝐬𝐭𝐥𝐲 𝐦𝐞𝐧 - 𝐰𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐭𝐨 𝐢𝐧 𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐞𝐫 𝐭𝐨 𝐬𝐢𝐥𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐰𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐧.
-
How to Kill a Witch is the perfect companion book for anyone who is a fan of the Witches of Scotland podcast (and if you haven't listened to it already, you really should!)
The book includes some of the detail from the podcast, but also some new interesting and creative concepts. This is especially prevalent in the creative writing sections penned by Zoe Venditozzi, where she puts herself in the shoes of historical characters, and utilises creative license to bring unseen elements of the history we 𝘥𝘰 know to life.
-
𝐁𝐮𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐥𝐬 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐧𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐫 𝐩𝐥𝐞𝐚𝐬𝐚𝐧𝐭, 𝐛𝐮𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐝𝐢𝐟𝐟𝐞𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐭. 𝐍𝐨𝐭 𝐬𝐚𝐝, 𝐛𝐮𝐭 𝐪𝐮𝐞𝐞𝐫. 𝐍𝐨𝐧𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐮𝐬 𝐬𝐩𝐨𝐤𝐞 𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐰𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐞. 𝐖𝐞 𝐡𝐚𝐫𝐝𝐥𝐲 𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐧 𝐥𝐨𝐨𝐤𝐞𝐝 𝐚𝐭 𝐞𝐚𝐜𝐡 𝐨𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫. 𝐈 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐤, 𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐲, 𝐰𝐞 𝐰𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐯𝐨𝐮𝐬. 𝐒𝐢𝐱 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐛𝐢𝐠𝐠𝐞𝐬𝐭 𝐦𝐞𝐧 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐯𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐚𝐠𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐨𝐟 𝐮𝐬 𝐬𝐜𝐚𝐫𝐞𝐝 𝐡𝐚𝐥𝐟 𝐭𝐨 𝐝𝐞𝐚𝐭𝐡. 𝐖𝐞 𝐣𝐮𝐬𝐭 𝐰𝐚𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐢𝐭 𝐝𝐨𝐧𝐞. 𝐌𝐨𝐯𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐧𝐞 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐚 𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐮𝐠𝐠𝐥𝐞, 𝐛𝐮𝐭 𝐚𝐬 𝐬𝐨𝐨𝐧 𝐚𝐬 𝐢𝐭 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐨𝐩, 𝐰𝐞 𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐛𝐫𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐝 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐰𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐮𝐩 𝐭𝐨 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐫𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐞. 𝐀 𝐠𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐭 𝐫𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐞𝐟 𝐡𝐚𝐝 𝐰𝐚𝐬𝐡𝐞𝐝 𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫 𝐮𝐬. 𝐖𝐞 𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐟𝐞𝐥𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐬𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐛𝐚𝐝 𝐡𝐚𝐝 𝐛𝐞𝐞𝐧 𝐩𝐮𝐭 𝐚𝐰𝐚𝐲 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐮𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐰𝐞 𝐧𝐞𝐞𝐝𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐨 𝐦𝐚𝐤𝐞 𝐚𝐛𝐬𝐨𝐥𝐮𝐭𝐞𝐥𝐲 𝐬𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐃𝐞𝐯𝐢𝐥 𝐰𝐨𝐮𝐥𝐝𝐧'𝐭 𝐛𝐞 𝐛𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐡𝐞𝐫 𝐛𝐚𝐜𝐤 𝐭𝐨 𝐜𝐚𝐮𝐬𝐞 𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐞 𝐭𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐛𝐥𝐞.
-
It's SO tempting to believe that people from decades and centuries ago were more ignorant and less intelligent (academically and emotionally) than people in the modern day, but it simply isn't true.
The authors draw clear parallels between the history of the witch trials, and the growing rhetoric of the modern day, where 𝘴𝘰𝘮𝘦 people in society are seeking to blame a vulnerable monority for their problems. There are also clear parallels in the limits and societal roles that were enforced against women in the 16th and 17th centuries, and the rollback of women's rights and bodily autonomy in the modern day.
And witch trials are still literally taking place in some countries and societies; it isn't just a figurative term. For more information on this please do look into the work that Leo Igwe is doing through Advocacy for Alleged Witches (AfAW).
-
𝐓𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐢𝐬 𝐚𝐛𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐩𝐞𝐨𝐩𝐥𝐞 𝐡𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐰𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐧 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐢𝐭'𝐬 𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐲 𝐢𝐦𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐭 𝐭𝐨 𝐤𝐞𝐞𝐩 𝐬𝐚𝐲𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭. 𝐘𝐨𝐮 𝐜𝐚𝐧 𝐬𝐚𝐲 𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐬𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐨𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐬 - 𝐢𝐭'𝐬 𝐚𝐛𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐞𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐨𝐦𝐢𝐜 𝐜𝐢𝐫𝐜𝐮𝐦𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝, 𝐲𝐞𝐬, 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭'𝐬 𝐢𝐦𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐭-𝐛𝐮𝐭 𝐠𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫'𝐬 𝐩𝐚𝐫𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭. 𝐎𝐫 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐜𝐚𝐧 𝐬𝐚𝐲 𝐢𝐭'𝐬 𝐚𝐛𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐝𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐢𝐭'𝐬 𝐚𝐛𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐩𝐞𝐨𝐩𝐥𝐞 𝐟𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫 𝐝𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐜 𝐬𝐩𝐚𝐜𝐞𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐛𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐚𝐫𝐢𝐞𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐲𝐞𝐬, 𝐢𝐭 𝐢𝐬, 𝐛𝐮𝐭 𝐠𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫 𝐢𝐬 𝐚 𝐩𝐚𝐫𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭. 𝐀𝐧𝐝 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐜𝐚𝐧 𝐬𝐚𝐲 𝐢𝐭'𝐬 𝐚𝐛𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐦𝐞𝐝𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐤𝐧𝐨𝐰𝐥𝐞𝐝𝐠𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐰𝐡𝐨'𝐬 𝐬𝐮𝐩𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐨 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐞 𝐢𝐭, 𝐲𝐞𝐬, 𝐛𝐮𝐭 𝐠𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫'𝐬 𝐚 𝐩𝐚𝐫𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐭𝐨𝐨. 𝐈𝐭'𝐬 𝐚𝐛𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐠𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫. 𝐀𝐧𝐝 𝐈 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐤 𝐰𝐞 𝐬𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐭𝐢𝐦𝐞𝐬 𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐠𝐞𝐭 𝐭𝐨 𝐬𝐚𝐲 𝐢𝐭 𝐛𝐞𝐜𝐚𝐮𝐬𝐞 𝐰𝐞'𝐫𝐞 𝐬𝐨 𝐛𝐮𝐬𝐲 𝐥𝐨𝐨𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐨𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫 𝐞𝐱𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐧𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬, 𝐰𝐡𝐢𝐜𝐡 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐱𝐭𝐮𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐲 𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐲 𝐢𝐦𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐭. 𝐁𝐮𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐜𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐥 𝐭𝐫𝐮𝐭𝐡? 𝐈𝐭'𝐬 𝐚𝐛𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐰𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐧.
-
I've spoken about these things before - especially in my Q&A for Mona Chollet's book 𝘐𝘯 𝘋𝘦𝘧𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘞𝘪𝘵𝘤𝘩𝘦𝘴: 𝘞𝘩𝘺 𝘞𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘯 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘚𝘵𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘰𝘯 𝘛𝘳𝘪𝘢𝘭 - but the witch trials were used to silence and control people, the vast majority of whom were women.
The term 'witch' could be applied to anyone, for a vast number of reasons, as it did not have a static definition. But it 𝘥𝘪𝘥 focus on a few characteristics, including women who were outspoken, childless/childfree women, and women who ages unapologetically.
The same women are being targeted now by the media, by the rollback of women's rights, and by the rise of fascism. The trad wife, clean girl, cottagecore aesthetic is NOT something to aspire to.
-
𝐅𝐚𝐢𝐫𝐢𝐞𝐬? 𝐖𝐢𝐭𝐜𝐡𝐞𝐬? 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐃𝐞𝐯𝐢𝐥? 𝐓𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐭𝐚𝐥𝐞 𝐦𝐚𝐲 𝐬𝐞𝐞𝐦 𝐧𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐞𝐧𝐬𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐭𝐨 𝐦𝐨𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐧 𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐭 𝐁𝐮𝐭 𝐢𝐧 𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐞𝐫 𝐭𝐨 𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐨𝐝 𝐛𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐞𝐞𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝟏𝟔𝐭𝐡 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝟏𝟖𝐭𝐡 𝐜𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐢𝐞𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐒𝐜𝐨𝐭𝐥𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐰𝐞 𝐦𝐮𝐬𝐭 𝐞𝐦𝐛𝐫𝐚𝐜𝐞 𝐚 𝐟𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐚𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐚𝐥 𝐭𝐫𝐮𝐭𝐡 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐞𝐩𝐨𝐜𝐡: 𝐦𝐚𝐠𝐢𝐜 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐥 ... 𝐒𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐭𝐢𝐦𝐞𝐬 𝐬𝐮𝐜𝐡 𝐛𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐞𝐟𝐬 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐰𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐧 𝐨𝐟𝐟 𝐚𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐭𝐮𝐩𝐢𝐝𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐨𝐫 𝐢𝐠𝐧𝐨𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐞𝐛𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐬. 𝐈𝐭 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐧𝐨𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐨𝐫𝐭. 𝐈𝐧 𝐚𝐧 𝐮𝐧𝐜𝐞𝐫𝐭𝐚𝐢𝐧 𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐥𝐝, 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐰𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐚 𝐰𝐚𝐲 𝐨𝐟 𝐦𝐚𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐬𝐞𝐧𝐬𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐮𝐧𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐝𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐨𝐟𝐟𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐚𝐧 𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐮𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐨𝐟 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐨𝐥.
-
I'd already bought and read a copy of the book, but was lucky enough to also get another copy and have it signed, so I've shared the Witches of Scotland love with a few bookish friends.
-
𝐇𝐨𝐰 𝐭𝐨 𝐊𝐢𝐥𝐥 𝐚 𝐖𝐢𝐭𝐜𝐡 𝐢𝐬 𝐚 𝐛𝐨𝐨𝐤 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐝𝐞𝐭𝐚𝐢𝐥𝐬, 𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐩 𝐛𝐲 𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐩, 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐠𝐞𝐬 𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐭𝐚𝐤𝐞𝐧 𝐭𝐨 𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐟𝐲, 𝐭𝐫𝐲 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐮𝐥𝐭𝐢𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐥𝐲 𝐤𝐢𝐥𝐥 𝐚 𝐰𝐨𝐦𝐚𝐧 𝐚𝐬 𝐚 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐜𝐡 ... 𝐈𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐜𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐬𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐰𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐛𝐨𝐨𝐤 𝐰𝐞 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐞 𝐟𝐨𝐥𝐥𝐨𝐰𝐞𝐝 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐟𝐨𝐨𝐭𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐩𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐬𝐞 𝐰𝐡𝐨 𝐥𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐝 𝐡𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐫𝐞𝐝𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐲𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐬 𝐚𝐠𝐨, 𝐯𝐢𝐬𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐠𝐫𝐚𝐯𝐞𝐬, 𝐚𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐦𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐥𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐦𝐞𝐞𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐞𝐱𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐭𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐡𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐲, 𝐚𝐫𝐭, 𝐦𝐮𝐬𝐢𝐜, 𝐰𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 ... 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐭𝐫𝐮𝐭𝐡 𝐚𝐛𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐒𝐜𝐨𝐭𝐭𝐢𝐬𝐡 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐜𝐡 𝐭𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐥𝐬 𝐢𝐬 𝐛𝐥𝐨𝐨𝐝𝐲 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐡𝐨𝐫𝐫𝐢𝐟𝐢𝐜: 𝐰𝐞 𝐡𝐨𝐩𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐮𝐥𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐛𝐨𝐨𝐤 𝐢𝐬 𝐨𝐧𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐫𝐞𝐝𝐢𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝐥𝐞𝐧𝐠𝐭𝐡𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐩𝐞𝐨𝐩𝐥𝐞 - 𝐦𝐨𝐬𝐭𝐥𝐲 𝐦𝐞𝐧 - 𝐰𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐭𝐨 𝐢𝐧 𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐞𝐫 𝐭𝐨 𝐬𝐢𝐥𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐰𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐧.
-
How to Kill a Witch is the perfect companion book for anyone who is a fan of the Witches of Scotland podcast (and if you haven't listened to it already, you really should!)
The book includes some of the detail from the podcast, but also some new interesting and creative concepts. This is especially prevalent in the creative writing sections penned by Zoe Venditozzi, where she puts herself in the shoes of historical characters, and utilises creative license to bring unseen elements of the history we 𝘥𝘰 know to life.
-
𝐁𝐮𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐥𝐬 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐧𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐫 𝐩𝐥𝐞𝐚𝐬𝐚𝐧𝐭, 𝐛𝐮𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐝𝐢𝐟𝐟𝐞𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐭. 𝐍𝐨𝐭 𝐬𝐚𝐝, 𝐛𝐮𝐭 𝐪𝐮𝐞𝐞𝐫. 𝐍𝐨𝐧𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐮𝐬 𝐬𝐩𝐨𝐤𝐞 𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐰𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐞. 𝐖𝐞 𝐡𝐚𝐫𝐝𝐥𝐲 𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐧 𝐥𝐨𝐨𝐤𝐞𝐝 𝐚𝐭 𝐞𝐚𝐜𝐡 𝐨𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫. 𝐈 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐤, 𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐲, 𝐰𝐞 𝐰𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐯𝐨𝐮𝐬. 𝐒𝐢𝐱 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐛𝐢𝐠𝐠𝐞𝐬𝐭 𝐦𝐞𝐧 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐯𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐚𝐠𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐨𝐟 𝐮𝐬 𝐬𝐜𝐚𝐫𝐞𝐝 𝐡𝐚𝐥𝐟 𝐭𝐨 𝐝𝐞𝐚𝐭𝐡. 𝐖𝐞 𝐣𝐮𝐬𝐭 𝐰𝐚𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐢𝐭 𝐝𝐨𝐧𝐞. 𝐌𝐨𝐯𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐧𝐞 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐚 𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐮𝐠𝐠𝐥𝐞, 𝐛𝐮𝐭 𝐚𝐬 𝐬𝐨𝐨𝐧 𝐚𝐬 𝐢𝐭 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐨𝐩, 𝐰𝐞 𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐛𝐫𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐝 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐰𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐮𝐩 𝐭𝐨 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐫𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐞. 𝐀 𝐠𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐭 𝐫𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐞𝐟 𝐡𝐚𝐝 𝐰𝐚𝐬𝐡𝐞𝐝 𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫 𝐮𝐬. 𝐖𝐞 𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐟𝐞𝐥𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐬𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐛𝐚𝐝 𝐡𝐚𝐝 𝐛𝐞𝐞𝐧 𝐩𝐮𝐭 𝐚𝐰𝐚𝐲 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐮𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐰𝐞 𝐧𝐞𝐞𝐝𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐨 𝐦𝐚𝐤𝐞 𝐚𝐛𝐬𝐨𝐥𝐮𝐭𝐞𝐥𝐲 𝐬𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐃𝐞𝐯𝐢𝐥 𝐰𝐨𝐮𝐥𝐝𝐧'𝐭 𝐛𝐞 𝐛𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐡𝐞𝐫 𝐛𝐚𝐜𝐤 𝐭𝐨 𝐜𝐚𝐮𝐬𝐞 𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐞 𝐭𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐛𝐥𝐞.
-
It's SO tempting to believe that people from decades and centuries ago were more ignorant and less intelligent (academically and emotionally) than people in the modern day, but it simply isn't true.
The authors draw clear parallels between the history of the witch trials, and the growing rhetoric of the modern day, where 𝘴𝘰𝘮𝘦 people in society are seeking to blame a vulnerable monority for their problems. There are also clear parallels in the limits and societal roles that were enforced against women in the 16th and 17th centuries, and the rollback of women's rights and bodily autonomy in the modern day.
And witch trials are still literally taking place in some countries and societies; it isn't just a figurative term. For more information on this please do look into the work that Leo Igwe is doing through Advocacy for Alleged Witches (AfAW).
-
𝐓𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐢𝐬 𝐚𝐛𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐩𝐞𝐨𝐩𝐥𝐞 𝐡𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐰𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐧 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐢𝐭'𝐬 𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐲 𝐢𝐦𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐭 𝐭𝐨 𝐤𝐞𝐞𝐩 𝐬𝐚𝐲𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭. 𝐘𝐨𝐮 𝐜𝐚𝐧 𝐬𝐚𝐲 𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐬𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐨𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐬 - 𝐢𝐭'𝐬 𝐚𝐛𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐞𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐨𝐦𝐢𝐜 𝐜𝐢𝐫𝐜𝐮𝐦𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝, 𝐲𝐞𝐬, 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭'𝐬 𝐢𝐦𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐭-𝐛𝐮𝐭 𝐠𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫'𝐬 𝐩𝐚𝐫𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭. 𝐎𝐫 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐜𝐚𝐧 𝐬𝐚𝐲 𝐢𝐭'𝐬 𝐚𝐛𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐝𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐢𝐭'𝐬 𝐚𝐛𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐩𝐞𝐨𝐩𝐥𝐞 𝐟𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫 𝐝𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐜 𝐬𝐩𝐚𝐜𝐞𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐛𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐚𝐫𝐢𝐞𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐲𝐞𝐬, 𝐢𝐭 𝐢𝐬, 𝐛𝐮𝐭 𝐠𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫 𝐢𝐬 𝐚 𝐩𝐚𝐫𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭. 𝐀𝐧𝐝 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐜𝐚𝐧 𝐬𝐚𝐲 𝐢𝐭'𝐬 𝐚𝐛𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐦𝐞𝐝𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐤𝐧𝐨𝐰𝐥𝐞𝐝𝐠𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐰𝐡𝐨'𝐬 𝐬𝐮𝐩𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐨 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐞 𝐢𝐭, 𝐲𝐞𝐬, 𝐛𝐮𝐭 𝐠𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫'𝐬 𝐚 𝐩𝐚𝐫𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐭𝐨𝐨. 𝐈𝐭'𝐬 𝐚𝐛𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐠𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫. 𝐀𝐧𝐝 𝐈 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐤 𝐰𝐞 𝐬𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐭𝐢𝐦𝐞𝐬 𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐠𝐞𝐭 𝐭𝐨 𝐬𝐚𝐲 𝐢𝐭 𝐛𝐞𝐜𝐚𝐮𝐬𝐞 𝐰𝐞'𝐫𝐞 𝐬𝐨 𝐛𝐮𝐬𝐲 𝐥𝐨𝐨𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐨𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫 𝐞𝐱𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐧𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬, 𝐰𝐡𝐢𝐜𝐡 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐱𝐭𝐮𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐲 𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐲 𝐢𝐦𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐭. 𝐁𝐮𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐜𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐥 𝐭𝐫𝐮𝐭𝐡? 𝐈𝐭'𝐬 𝐚𝐛𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐰𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐧.
-
I've spoken about these things before - especially in my Q&A for Mona Chollet's book 𝘐𝘯 𝘋𝘦𝘧𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘞𝘪𝘵𝘤𝘩𝘦𝘴: 𝘞𝘩𝘺 𝘞𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘯 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘚𝘵𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘰𝘯 𝘛𝘳𝘪𝘢𝘭 - but the witch trials were used to silence and control people, the vast majority of whom were women.
The term 'witch' could be applied to anyone, for a vast number of reasons, as it did not have a static definition. But it 𝘥𝘪𝘥 focus on a few characteristics, including women who were outspoken, childless/childfree women, and women who ages unapologetically.
The same women are being targeted now by the media, by the rollback of women's rights, and by the rise of fascism. The trad wife, clean girl, cottagecore aesthetic is NOT something to aspire to.
-
𝐅𝐚𝐢𝐫𝐢𝐞𝐬? 𝐖𝐢𝐭𝐜𝐡𝐞𝐬? 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐃𝐞𝐯𝐢𝐥? 𝐓𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐭𝐚𝐥𝐞 𝐦𝐚𝐲 𝐬𝐞𝐞𝐦 𝐧𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐞𝐧𝐬𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐭𝐨 𝐦𝐨𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐧 𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐭 𝐁𝐮𝐭 𝐢𝐧 𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐞𝐫 𝐭𝐨 𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐨𝐝 𝐛𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐞𝐞𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝟏𝟔𝐭𝐡 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝟏𝟖𝐭𝐡 𝐜𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐢𝐞𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐒𝐜𝐨𝐭𝐥𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐰𝐞 𝐦𝐮𝐬𝐭 𝐞𝐦𝐛𝐫𝐚𝐜𝐞 𝐚 𝐟𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐚𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐚𝐥 𝐭𝐫𝐮𝐭𝐡 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐞𝐩𝐨𝐜𝐡: 𝐦𝐚𝐠𝐢𝐜 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐥 ... 𝐒𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐭𝐢𝐦𝐞𝐬 𝐬𝐮𝐜𝐡 𝐛𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐞𝐟𝐬 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐰𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐧 𝐨𝐟𝐟 𝐚𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐭𝐮𝐩𝐢𝐝𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐨𝐫 𝐢𝐠𝐧𝐨𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐞𝐛𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐬. 𝐈𝐭 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐧𝐨𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐨𝐫𝐭. 𝐈𝐧 𝐚𝐧 𝐮𝐧𝐜𝐞𝐫𝐭𝐚𝐢𝐧 𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐥𝐝, 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐰𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐚 𝐰𝐚𝐲 𝐨𝐟 𝐦𝐚𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐬𝐞𝐧𝐬𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐮𝐧𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐝𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐨𝐟𝐟𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐚𝐧 𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐮𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐨𝐟 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐨𝐥.
-
Displaying 1 - 30 of 131 reviews