This book feels like a warm hug!
It reframes modern womanhood through the lens of economics, arguing that the persistent exhaustion many women feel is not a “personal failing” but the result of competing constraints that society refuses to acknowledge. Corinne Low introduces the idea of a personal utility function: essentially, your unique “life satisfaction scorecard”, to help women make decisions that reflect their values rather than inherited expectations.
Big Ideas
The old marriage bargain has collapsed
Women entered the workforce without receiving a matching shift in domestic labor. The 1950s economic model of “marital specialization” (one breadwinner, one full-time caregiver) no longer holds—but the social expectations of women’s caregiving labor remain.
The “squeeze” is structural, not personal weakness
Careers peak at the same time childrearing requires intense labor. Because women are now also investing in their own education and careers—not just men’s—there is no longer a “release valve” for households.
Love isn’t enough — partnership is about utility
Low pushes readers to evaluate relationships on practical, not just emotional, terms: Does a partner meaningfully contribute resources, childcare, time, and relief? “Love is the epsilon” (a small part of a larger formula).
Time is economic capital
Jobs are “technologies that convert time into money”—but unpaid caregiving is also production. Outsourcing is not luxury; it’s often rational specialization. Not doing so means hiring yourself for that job, at your own cost.
Motherhood is not “free”
Breastfeeding, intensive parenting, and maternal time are treated as invisible labor, although they have enormous opportunity costs. Reproductive capital depreciates just as female professional value is rising—a structural bind.
To get unstuck, you sometimes need a “global” change
Instead of trying to incrementally optimize a broken system (local maximization), women sometimes need a big shift in job, partner, childcare model, city, or expectations, in order to get on a better utility curve.
This book applies economics to lived female experience. Low demystifies academic economics without dumbing it down. By naming constraints—time scarcity, reproductive timelines, household specialization—she allows women to see their choices not as “failures at balance” but as rational responses to structural tradeoffs. Her book balances data and economic theory with the practical day to day luves of women where they must choose a partner, perform or pay for caregiving and value it as real capital and make reproductive choices in light of a career.
Her critique of the myth of “having it all” is mathematically grounded. The brilliance of the book is its insistence that constraints exist but within them, women can still maximize their utility—if they stop playing by male-default economic assumptions.