This Princess Kills Monsters has a lot potential, and some great elements, but suffers from structural issues and some troubling themes.
Princess Mellilot, a classic "underfoot fairytale stepdaughter" type, is sent by her sort-of-evil, definitely-a-dictator stepmother to be wed to the king of a small, non-magical kingdom. Melilot is unremarkable compared to her very powerful sisters, and despite loving them, also kind of resents them. Arriving in the kingdom to meet her fiance, things immediately go wrong when Melilot is attacked by monsters, and realizes the kingdom is waiting for her to save the day (except they're under the impression she's strong like her sisters). From here, the book advertises there will be a love triangle between one of the king's mysterious twelve identical hunters and the king's smokin' hot sister. That's where the problems with this book begin to really show.
The Good:
- The contrast between the insane fairy tale world Melilot is from and the mostly-non-magical kingdom the story takes place in is excellent and often humorous
- The humor is sometimes painfully corny, but when it's not, it can be pretty funny
- Overall, mostly the concept, setting, and fairy tail backdrop are the biggest strengths. The world is fun.
- The weaving of fairy tale content and elements was really enjoyable. The huntsmen are all pretty great, though honestly they didn't get enough screen time because we focused really hard a romance with... kind of the least interesting of the batch.
The Bad (SPOILERS AHEAD) :
- The promised love triangle romance is executed so poorly as to basically not exist. The romance arc with Sam comprises nearly 90% of the book's content, with the promised sapphic romance elements in the synopsis boiling down to a couple of short scenes where Angelique says a flirty one-liner and Melilot blushes. This make the synopsis feel wildly inaccurate, which is frustrating on its own, but it leads to structural and thematic issues in the third act of the book.
- Sam's reveal that he's a trans guy is a bit of a thematic shift for the book, and I feel a little silly for not seeing it coming. I liked this reveal, and I like Sam as a character, but given how absolutely little time the supposed sapphic love interest was given, and the total lack of relevance Sam's trans identity has to any character arc, this felt a little bit like a "bait and switch" from "love triangle with sapphic romance" to "hetero romance, but the guy is trans even though it's never relevant, and the woman is bi, even though it's also never really relevant". 90%+ of this book's content is focused on a straight romance where the queer nature of the characters is inconsequential to the story being told. Unfortunately, when these queer themes do come to the surface, it's surprisingly kind of... thematically misogynist? Which comes to the next point.
- The lesbian love interest that's shunted to the side and is built on like... four pieces of dialogue between the two characters.. is revealed to be THE villain. The explanation has lots of feminist undertones... women in our setting are second class citizens with no power, no rights, and women can't inherit the throne. Oh wow, that's a huge problem, right? Maybe we should actually side with this usurper because she's the only one in a position of power that cares about the rights of women in her country, right? WRONG, she's INSANELY EVIL. Like, she immediately begins monologuing about how she's been kidnapping and torturing animals since she was a child and how she's willing to murder anyone and everyone in her family solely because she wants power for the sake of power. Excuse me... What... the.. fuck?? So we've spent 90%+ of the story focused on a hetero romance, and even if we HAD given equal time to the sapphic love option, it doesn't matter because she's a serial killer animal torturing power hungry narcissist because... feminism? HOW IS ANYONE CALLING THIS A FEMINIST RETELLING???
- Casual misogyny abound. Grevase, the new king, presses back at every opportunity when a character is like "Hey, maybe.. women's rights?" with some variation of like "Well, it's too much, or maybe we'll talk about it later?" His fiance has to be literally bleeding to death and demanding it before he's like "Okay... I mean.. we'll try.. women's rights.. I guess.. if we have to." That's the side the reader is supposed to be cheering for!! Even after knowing his sister, whom he relied on and brought to the kingdom for guidance because he didn't know how to rule, was targeting the rest of the family because she'd been denied the right to rule due to her gender, Grevase does... nothing? Isn't like "Oh shit, maybe she has a point, actually" and instead lets his fiance murder the shit out of his sister. King Grevase's response to his sister's death, ultimately drawing its cause all the way back to the oppression of women in his kingdom, is to FORBID ANY MENTION OF HER EXISTENCE AND ERASE HER FROM HISTORY. Bruh. This is supposed to be a feminist retelling???
- The ending barely solved the core thematic issue of misogynistic oppression. The king begrudgingly lets his wife be a military leader and ends gendered segregation at her dying demand. And that's all the effort he takes. Setting up education and support programs for these women who were until now essentially baby factories? Well, that's his wife's responsibility, obviously. The king? He's going to keep his impossibly misogynist talking lion adviser in his position, but just... ignore him. Oh wait, except they're letting him give hours-long sexist diatribes at every royal meeting to discuss policy, and commission a second edition of his ultra ultra sexist book, which is like the entire UNDERPINNING of the sexist social and legal structure in their country. I am so sorry, because the bones of a good book are here, but this is a zero out of ten ending.
- The character arc for Melilot is kind of nonsensical. Like, yeah, her stepmother actually IS abusive, but maybe she actually DID abuse Melilot because she cared about her, and maybe actually she's AFRAID of Melilot who is now super powerful because really all she needed was to believe in herself... which she was only able to do because she... didn't have her abusive stepmother pointedly ruining her life. Melilot's abuse is hand waved away as like "Well there was no way to reach her and the queen ran out of options and what she did wasn't good but maybe she meant good" when it's like "Bruh, Melilot was a rebellious CHILD". She stands up to her stepmother after years of being neglected and abused "for her own good" and then is like "Well, maybe I'll still take quests from my stepmom, but only when I feel like it, and I'll do some traveling, but I'll probably come back and visit some every now and then". It just seems like the book's take on child abuse is like "maybe it's more complicated than we might think", which is frankly, just awful.