What do you think?
Rate this book
The Bible's Cutting Room Floor: The Holy Scriptures Missing from Your Bible
The Bible you usually read is not the complete story. Some holy writings were left out for political or theological reasons, others simply because of the physical restrictions of ancient bookmaking technology. At times, the compilers of the Bible skipped information that they assumed everyone knew. Some passages were even omitted by accident.In The Bible's Cutting Room Floor, acclaimed author and translator Dr. Joel M. Hoffman gives us the stories and other texts that didn't make it into the Bible even though they offer penetrating insight into the Bible and its teachings.The Book of Genesis tells us about Adam and Eve's time in the Garden of Eden, but not their saga after they get kicked out or the lessons they have for us about good and evil. The Bible introduces us to Abraham, but it doesn't include the troubling story of his early life, which explains how he came to reject idolatry to become the father of monotheism. And while there are only 150 Psalms in today's Bible, there used to be many more.Dr. Hoffman deftly brings these and other ancient scriptural texts to life, exploring how they offer new answers to some of the most fundamental and universal questions people ask about their lives. An impressive blend of history, linguistics, and religious scholarship, The Bible's Cutting Room Floor reveals what's missing from your Bible, who left it out, and why it is so important.
304 pages, Kindle Edition
First published September 2, 2014
109 people are currently reading
724 people want to read
About the author
Joel M. Hoffman
27 books34 followersKnown for his "fresh insights and interpretations about religious life in the 21st century," Dr. Joel M. Hoffman presents to churches, synagogues, community groups, and university audiences across the world. He holds a Ph.D. in linguistics and has served on the faculties of Brandeis University and Hebrew Union College.
Dr. Hoffman lives in Westchester, NY.
Dr. Hoffman lives in Westchester, NY.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 62 reviews
March 12, 2015
This book presents material that would enhance our understanding of the Bible if it had been included. It begins with a history of Jerusalem followed by discussions of the Dead Sea Scrolls, the Septuagint and the works of Josephus. The author pulls from multiple sources to tell a fuller story of Adam and Eve, the Apocrypha to tell more about Abraham and concludes with the book of Enoch and a chapter on “The Big Picture”.
The book was hard to follow. In some places it seemed like a collection of facts. It would have been better (for me) with the last chapter reworked as an introduction. The book has a web site that gives a sense of its organization. (It is noted in the Appendix where I found it when I was done). This review is by chapter, because, until the “Big Picture” chapter that loosely ties them up, chapters read like independent units.
The first 43 pages, or almost 20% of the book, is a history of Jerusalem for which connections to the later material are never made.
The next Chapter tells how the Dead Sea Scrolls were found, bought/sold, preserved and assembled. Their content is shown by isolated examples such as the differences between the Damascus Document and Community Rule, how some of its psalms are those included in the Old Testament, and some of the elements of the War Scroll.
The third chapter on the Septuagint was full of detail. After three pages on the etymology of “r’am”, “migdal”, “eshet chayil” and the Greek word for snow, I skimmed the rest and went to Wikipedia. Like the chapter on the Dead Sea Scrolls, there is no overall view of its content or its meaning as a “cut” part of the Bible.
In the fourth chapter on Josephus there is finally something of the concept of “cut’ material and an overview of content and meaning. Here the author shows how some of Josephus' historical work has credibility problems but also has many areas where inclusion in the Bible would have added depth to it.
The chapter on the “post-apple” lives of Adam and Eve combines Greek, Latin, Gregorian, Slavic and Old Irish sources to tell a fascinating story. The couple seems to be in a fog (PSD?) and unable to adjust. They blame each other, build huts, pray, think of ways to back to their former life. The snake is punished too. Eve has what appears to be a flirtation with the devil, has a prophetic dream and more. There is no discussion of the specific sources or how or why they were “cut”.
Like the Adam and Eve sources, the story in the story of Abraham in the Apocrypha enriches our knowledge of him. Not only was he a lousy parent (which we know from the Bible) the Apocrypha shows him to be a rebellious son. The father of the founder of the world’s largest monotheistic religions was an idol maker! He sent his son, Abraham, out on a donkey to sell them. Abraham observes that the idols do not have the power to save themselves from breakage or fire. How and why this aspect of Abraham's spiritual development was cut from the Bible is not explained.
One section of the chapter on Enoch epitomizes my problem with this book. There are several jolting pages of stars mating with cows and producing elephants and lions, leopards feeding on sheep, snow white creatures binding up stars and casting them to the abyss and other less dramatic visions. There is no context until the end when the author explains Enoch’s message and how the visions are metaphors for history (i.e. the snow white calf is Adam and the female calf is Eve, etc.). At least in this section, the content is explained. While other episodes in the book are not so abstract, you are often left on your own a lot.
The Appendix is an annotated bibliography. It shows that there is little on this topic available for the general reader.
The author knows his material. I’m thinking that these were once separate lectures that were assembled into a book with a tight deadline.
The book was hard to follow. In some places it seemed like a collection of facts. It would have been better (for me) with the last chapter reworked as an introduction. The book has a web site that gives a sense of its organization. (It is noted in the Appendix where I found it when I was done). This review is by chapter, because, until the “Big Picture” chapter that loosely ties them up, chapters read like independent units.
The first 43 pages, or almost 20% of the book, is a history of Jerusalem for which connections to the later material are never made.
The next Chapter tells how the Dead Sea Scrolls were found, bought/sold, preserved and assembled. Their content is shown by isolated examples such as the differences between the Damascus Document and Community Rule, how some of its psalms are those included in the Old Testament, and some of the elements of the War Scroll.
The third chapter on the Septuagint was full of detail. After three pages on the etymology of “r’am”, “migdal”, “eshet chayil” and the Greek word for snow, I skimmed the rest and went to Wikipedia. Like the chapter on the Dead Sea Scrolls, there is no overall view of its content or its meaning as a “cut” part of the Bible.
In the fourth chapter on Josephus there is finally something of the concept of “cut’ material and an overview of content and meaning. Here the author shows how some of Josephus' historical work has credibility problems but also has many areas where inclusion in the Bible would have added depth to it.
The chapter on the “post-apple” lives of Adam and Eve combines Greek, Latin, Gregorian, Slavic and Old Irish sources to tell a fascinating story. The couple seems to be in a fog (PSD?) and unable to adjust. They blame each other, build huts, pray, think of ways to back to their former life. The snake is punished too. Eve has what appears to be a flirtation with the devil, has a prophetic dream and more. There is no discussion of the specific sources or how or why they were “cut”.
Like the Adam and Eve sources, the story in the story of Abraham in the Apocrypha enriches our knowledge of him. Not only was he a lousy parent (which we know from the Bible) the Apocrypha shows him to be a rebellious son. The father of the founder of the world’s largest monotheistic religions was an idol maker! He sent his son, Abraham, out on a donkey to sell them. Abraham observes that the idols do not have the power to save themselves from breakage or fire. How and why this aspect of Abraham's spiritual development was cut from the Bible is not explained.
One section of the chapter on Enoch epitomizes my problem with this book. There are several jolting pages of stars mating with cows and producing elephants and lions, leopards feeding on sheep, snow white creatures binding up stars and casting them to the abyss and other less dramatic visions. There is no context until the end when the author explains Enoch’s message and how the visions are metaphors for history (i.e. the snow white calf is Adam and the female calf is Eve, etc.). At least in this section, the content is explained. While other episodes in the book are not so abstract, you are often left on your own a lot.
The Appendix is an annotated bibliography. It shows that there is little on this topic available for the general reader.
The author knows his material. I’m thinking that these were once separate lectures that were assembled into a book with a tight deadline.
September 2, 2019
This is a good introduction to readers who have never been exposed to Apocryphal or Pseudepigraphal books before. Otherwise known as non-canonical books of the Bible.
And I emphasize that it is an introduction. So that way if you aren’t interested in going any further in the study of the other books it won’t seem like time lost reading it.
And I emphasize that it is an introduction. So that way if you aren’t interested in going any further in the study of the other books it won’t seem like time lost reading it.
March 4, 2023
A 10 hour and 30 minute unabridged audiobook.
Quite an interesting listen, that ran the gamut from explaining why the Bible was abridged (scrolls became books but even books could only fit so many pages and things had to be trimmed down to keep one volume); to translation issues that mostly seemed to derive from translating literal words but not accounting for context; to explaining that to an audience that existed close to the time of writing, many stories would fit their place in time and not need further explanation. But to contemporary audiences we are missing those pieces.
Nice in depth dive into the Dead Sea Scrolls, and Josephus (how much of his stories where accurate as opposed to hyperbolic), and similar questions with the books of Enoch. I enjoyed it.
Quite an interesting listen, that ran the gamut from explaining why the Bible was abridged (scrolls became books but even books could only fit so many pages and things had to be trimmed down to keep one volume); to translation issues that mostly seemed to derive from translating literal words but not accounting for context; to explaining that to an audience that existed close to the time of writing, many stories would fit their place in time and not need further explanation. But to contemporary audiences we are missing those pieces.
Nice in depth dive into the Dead Sea Scrolls, and Josephus (how much of his stories where accurate as opposed to hyperbolic), and similar questions with the books of Enoch. I enjoyed it.
January 6, 2015
Half of this is a great book.
Hoffman starts out with several chapters detailing the socio-religious background of the Middle East within a couple of centuries of Christ -- the time in which the Old Testament canon was starting to solidify. Describing the tensions exhibited by the mainstream Jerusalem establishment, the Qumran community, and the nascent Christian movement, he shows how the differing emphases of each movement led to different priorities in holy writ. He then details what the variant translations in the Septuagint can tell us about scriptural understanding among the translators. Add to that a good chapter on Josephus and how his writings help elucidate social issues that went unspoken in the New Testament texts, and you've got a good basic grounding in the construction and amalgamation of the Bible.
Then it takes a bewildering turn, as Hoffman presents in depth the contents of "The Life of Adam & Eve," "The Apocalypse of Abraham," and "The Book of Enoch" (aka 1 Enoch). The inclusion of the first two is puzzling, in that Hoffman nowhere explains why those particular pseudepigraphic works are worthy of study instead of dozens of others. (1 Enoch is an important text from the intertestamental era, so its inclusion is more understandable.) Worse, aside from an unhighlighted mention that each text was composed about two thousand years ago, Hoffman treats each as the "continuation" of the canonical story, without any mention that both are obviously late-period compositions, written roughly a thousand years after the accounts in Genesis were set down. Rather than appropriately treating them as intertestamental reworkings/expansions of the earlier accounts meant by their anonymous authors to give a grounding of legitimacy to late-period theological concerns, Hoffman bizarrely treats them as historical sources, at least as trustworthy for factual data on their subject matter as the Genesis accounts. I'm still trying to wrap my head around how this kind of approach is supposed to increase anyone's understanding of either those books in particular or the formation of canon as a whole.
Despite the title, Hoffman gives absolutely no rationale either for the exclusion of "Adam & Eve" or "Abraham" from the canon (could it have been because the early Christians or pre-rabbinic Jews saw them as very obviously of late and untrustworthy composition), or for why they "should" have been included. For 1 Enoch, he simply asserts that it was excluded for theological grounds, with no real support for his contention.
My advice: Read the first few chapters, through his account of Josephus. Then toss it.
(This book was received for free in exchange for an honest review.)
Hoffman starts out with several chapters detailing the socio-religious background of the Middle East within a couple of centuries of Christ -- the time in which the Old Testament canon was starting to solidify. Describing the tensions exhibited by the mainstream Jerusalem establishment, the Qumran community, and the nascent Christian movement, he shows how the differing emphases of each movement led to different priorities in holy writ. He then details what the variant translations in the Septuagint can tell us about scriptural understanding among the translators. Add to that a good chapter on Josephus and how his writings help elucidate social issues that went unspoken in the New Testament texts, and you've got a good basic grounding in the construction and amalgamation of the Bible.
Then it takes a bewildering turn, as Hoffman presents in depth the contents of "The Life of Adam & Eve," "The Apocalypse of Abraham," and "The Book of Enoch" (aka 1 Enoch). The inclusion of the first two is puzzling, in that Hoffman nowhere explains why those particular pseudepigraphic works are worthy of study instead of dozens of others. (1 Enoch is an important text from the intertestamental era, so its inclusion is more understandable.) Worse, aside from an unhighlighted mention that each text was composed about two thousand years ago, Hoffman treats each as the "continuation" of the canonical story, without any mention that both are obviously late-period compositions, written roughly a thousand years after the accounts in Genesis were set down. Rather than appropriately treating them as intertestamental reworkings/expansions of the earlier accounts meant by their anonymous authors to give a grounding of legitimacy to late-period theological concerns, Hoffman bizarrely treats them as historical sources, at least as trustworthy for factual data on their subject matter as the Genesis accounts. I'm still trying to wrap my head around how this kind of approach is supposed to increase anyone's understanding of either those books in particular or the formation of canon as a whole.
Despite the title, Hoffman gives absolutely no rationale either for the exclusion of "Adam & Eve" or "Abraham" from the canon (could it have been because the early Christians or pre-rabbinic Jews saw them as very obviously of late and untrustworthy composition), or for why they "should" have been included. For 1 Enoch, he simply asserts that it was excluded for theological grounds, with no real support for his contention.
My advice: Read the first few chapters, through his account of Josephus. Then toss it.
(This book was received for free in exchange for an honest review.)
October 19, 2014
A decent intro to some (but not all, from a Christian perspective!) pseudepigraphal literature associated with the Jewish Tanakh and the Christian Bible.
Good parts are that Hoffman selects from specific Old Testament psuedepigrapha to explain some things, particularly in Genesis, that don't seem to make sense as we currently have them; that he explains a bit about the Septuagint in particular and translations in general; and that he gives at least a base-level overview of Josephus.
Not-so-good parts?
1. A bit too denigrator toward the Septuagint at times, including not mentioning that it (as reinforced by testimony from the Dead Sea Scrolls) contains sometimes sharply different versions of some books (he discusses Esther, but that's not at Qumran), namely Jeremiah, that might just reflect more current exemplars than the Masoretic Text.
2. He doesn't really explain why he chose what he chose for his matters of discussion in what's a relatively small book.
3. He has nothing, including no references to in-depth books in his appendix (unlike with OT pseudepigrapha) about NT pseudepigrapha. Yes, Hoffman is Jewish, but his book is clearly pitched to Christians as well as Jews.
Good parts are that Hoffman selects from specific Old Testament psuedepigrapha to explain some things, particularly in Genesis, that don't seem to make sense as we currently have them; that he explains a bit about the Septuagint in particular and translations in general; and that he gives at least a base-level overview of Josephus.
Not-so-good parts?
1. A bit too denigrator toward the Septuagint at times, including not mentioning that it (as reinforced by testimony from the Dead Sea Scrolls) contains sometimes sharply different versions of some books (he discusses Esther, but that's not at Qumran), namely Jeremiah, that might just reflect more current exemplars than the Masoretic Text.
2. He doesn't really explain why he chose what he chose for his matters of discussion in what's a relatively small book.
3. He has nothing, including no references to in-depth books in his appendix (unlike with OT pseudepigrapha) about NT pseudepigrapha. Yes, Hoffman is Jewish, but his book is clearly pitched to Christians as well as Jews.
October 16, 2020
There is absolutely no doubt that this book is full of facts - and it definitely gives an accurate portrayal of understanding why these extra-biblical texts are considered important.
But wow, this was hard to follow. Which I don’t understand - because the first 20 pages? I WAS HOOKED. And then.... there was just fact. After facts. After facts. And sigh, the Dead Sea scrolls too a turn for the worse - I mean, I’m interested in how they were discovered... not so much in EVERY SINGLE PERSON that they sold them to, who discovered which cave - especially to find them already ransacked - ugh I started to skim and, sorry to say I didn’t stop.
This definitely has a prized place in the non-fiction part of my shelf... but I’ll only be taking it off for reference after a couple of double shot coffees.
But wow, this was hard to follow. Which I don’t understand - because the first 20 pages? I WAS HOOKED. And then.... there was just fact. After facts. After facts. And sigh, the Dead Sea scrolls too a turn for the worse - I mean, I’m interested in how they were discovered... not so much in EVERY SINGLE PERSON that they sold them to, who discovered which cave - especially to find them already ransacked - ugh I started to skim and, sorry to say I didn’t stop.
This definitely has a prized place in the non-fiction part of my shelf... but I’ll only be taking it off for reference after a couple of double shot coffees.
January 22, 2020
This was an interesting take on ancient texts not in the Tanakh or the Christian bible, but related to characters and events in books of one or both. The author looks at extra-biblical texts as well as those included in the Christian Old Testament but not in the Tanakh to get perspective on stories, characters, and events portrayed in the biblical canon. So for example, understanding of the book Breishit (Genesis) is enhanced by the Apocalypse of Abraham and the Book of Enoch. His thesis is that the ancient reader of the bible would have been familiar with these other texts and would have understood the stories differently because of them.
Some of the texts were ones I'm familiar with, and some new to me. Hoffman has a nice, conversational style that's very easy to read and understand. He makes good points about putting various biblical passages into a broader historical context. I feel at some times he overstates his case about the ancients understanding biblical text in this larger context. I would think those who not only could read but also had access to the huge variety of texts he references would be very few. Still, it's an interesting - and, to me, novel - way of looking at ancient texts that didn't make the cut to be included in the Tanakh.
Some of the texts were ones I'm familiar with, and some new to me. Hoffman has a nice, conversational style that's very easy to read and understand. He makes good points about putting various biblical passages into a broader historical context. I feel at some times he overstates his case about the ancients understanding biblical text in this larger context. I would think those who not only could read but also had access to the huge variety of texts he references would be very few. Still, it's an interesting - and, to me, novel - way of looking at ancient texts that didn't make the cut to be included in the Tanakh.
December 11, 2014
This was an interesting read. I am always intrigued to see what people think was left out of the Bible that should have been included, or on the other hand what made it's way in that they feel should have been excluded. Hoffman, a Jewish scholar, covered a vast amount of topics that gave a pretty indepth overview for both the biblical scholar and the newbie alike. Using history, religion, and language barriers Hoffman examines the stories and history that kept books out of Bible, such as the Book of Enoch, while allowing others to be included. This book did a nice job of explaining the political times of the Jewish people leading up to Jesus, which was fascinating. Politics play a dynamic role in everything we touch, so the importance of understanding the political issues at this time hold great value.
I was intrigued with the Hebrew language and how delicate it really is. The variations in how the text was translated by different people and small differences in placement of characters within the Hebrew language alter greatly the meaning. This book reminded me of another one I read recently: The Bible's Yes to Same Sex Marriage; which goes deep into fragmation theory.
Due to some of the challenges of this book I can see why it could be difficult to accept some of what the author says, but at the same does it does what it is sets out to do-Challenge US! To think,, to discover and to research on our own for truth! Topics that are covered are:
Contents:
Introduction
The Abridged Bible
Jerusalem
An Eternal City in Conflict
The Dead Sea Scrolls
How a Lost Goat Changed the World
The Septuagint
How Seventy Scholars Took Seventy Days to Get It Wrong
Josephus
The Only Man to Be a Fly on Every Wall
Adam and Eve
Falling Down and Getting Back Up
Abraham
Humans, Idols, and Gods
Enoch
The Beginning of the End
The Big Picture
Finding the Unabridged Bible
Appendix; Suggestions for Further Reading; Index
This book is definitely worth the read, even if you do not agree with the premise. You cannot argue against something if you do not know anything about it!
I was intrigued with the Hebrew language and how delicate it really is. The variations in how the text was translated by different people and small differences in placement of characters within the Hebrew language alter greatly the meaning. This book reminded me of another one I read recently: The Bible's Yes to Same Sex Marriage; which goes deep into fragmation theory.
Due to some of the challenges of this book I can see why it could be difficult to accept some of what the author says, but at the same does it does what it is sets out to do-Challenge US! To think,, to discover and to research on our own for truth! Topics that are covered are:
Contents:
Introduction
The Abridged Bible
Jerusalem
An Eternal City in Conflict
The Dead Sea Scrolls
How a Lost Goat Changed the World
The Septuagint
How Seventy Scholars Took Seventy Days to Get It Wrong
Josephus
The Only Man to Be a Fly on Every Wall
Adam and Eve
Falling Down and Getting Back Up
Abraham
Humans, Idols, and Gods
Enoch
The Beginning of the End
The Big Picture
Finding the Unabridged Bible
Appendix; Suggestions for Further Reading; Index
This book is definitely worth the read, even if you do not agree with the premise. You cannot argue against something if you do not know anything about it!
July 1, 2017
Overall an interesting read, though with some issues. First, the title, while meant to engage and intrigue the reader, is kind of presenting a false assumption. He is assuming that most any biblical sounding writing should have been included in the "Holy Scriptures," regardless of its content or acceptance in culture and history. While he does not push that issue throughout the book, the implication is still there, and the book falls short of making the case for that implication.
Basically, the book examines a handful of extra-biblical historical writings, and how their inclusion in today's accepted biblical books would have added to the biblical narrative. His analysis of such writings as the Book of Adam and Eve, Apocalypse of Abraham, Book of Enoch, and writings of Josephus provided some interesting insights.
He didn't really discuss in any depth the reasons these books were rejected, but seems to just assume their contents to be historically and supernaturally accurate and therefore worthy to be consider biblical canon, so that was a let down. But his examination at least provided some insight into what these writings contain, which is beneficial for those not familiar with these writings.
I especially enjoyed the section on Josephus the most, as it provided information of a more historical aspect. Aside from that, much of the rest was hit or miss for me. While he didn't avoid or totally ignore the supernatural and God aspect, I felt throughout that he was often came across as if he was essentially ignoring God and the supernatural, and leaning more on a naturalist and human empowered approach to some conclusions.
In the end, I do not think he necessarily made a strong enough case for why these books definitely belong in the Bible, but Hoffman simply discusses what they bring to the table in adding to the story. I guess, based on the title, that I was expecting more of a defense for their inclusion, but that is not what we are given here.
I think what we do have is an interesting look into the contents of some of these extra-biblical writings, and how including them may impact today's understanding of some 0aspects of biblical theology.
Basically, the book examines a handful of extra-biblical historical writings, and how their inclusion in today's accepted biblical books would have added to the biblical narrative. His analysis of such writings as the Book of Adam and Eve, Apocalypse of Abraham, Book of Enoch, and writings of Josephus provided some interesting insights.
He didn't really discuss in any depth the reasons these books were rejected, but seems to just assume their contents to be historically and supernaturally accurate and therefore worthy to be consider biblical canon, so that was a let down. But his examination at least provided some insight into what these writings contain, which is beneficial for those not familiar with these writings.
I especially enjoyed the section on Josephus the most, as it provided information of a more historical aspect. Aside from that, much of the rest was hit or miss for me. While he didn't avoid or totally ignore the supernatural and God aspect, I felt throughout that he was often came across as if he was essentially ignoring God and the supernatural, and leaning more on a naturalist and human empowered approach to some conclusions.
In the end, I do not think he necessarily made a strong enough case for why these books definitely belong in the Bible, but Hoffman simply discusses what they bring to the table in adding to the story. I guess, based on the title, that I was expecting more of a defense for their inclusion, but that is not what we are given here.
I think what we do have is an interesting look into the contents of some of these extra-biblical writings, and how including them may impact today's understanding of some 0aspects of biblical theology.
February 5, 2015
This excellent book is like a collection of short essays.
The second chapter on the Dead Sea Scrolls was a great overview! He tells the crazy story of how they were found in the 20th Century, and then sets that community into a historic context that included early Christianity and Rabbinic Judaism. I almost wanted more!
The third chapter on the Septuagint was very linguistic. He compares the Greek translations and Hebrews root words for pages. If you're into this kind of puzzle that's great but I found it tedious. He also tells the legend of how the Septuagint was created, which was more fun to read.
The fourth chapter on Josephus is historically interesting. He tells the legendary autobiography of this Romanized Jew and then, after explaining all the reasons to doubt him, explains why he's still the best most trustworthy source. I didn't realize that Josephus wrote a summary of the Books of Moses -- and that the holy books Josephus was writing about were apparently not the same as what's in the Old Testament I know!
The later chapters are on the sequel to Adam and Eve, the Life of Abraham and Enoch 1. In the introduction the author explains why he thinks these are the most relevant psuedopigripha, but in the actual chapters there's not much analysis. He retells the story, adds some modern psychoanalysis of the main characters, and otherwise delivers a sermon. The historical context that they were written in doesn't get discussed much. The cons of these texts don't get discussed either.
The second chapter on the Dead Sea Scrolls was a great overview! He tells the crazy story of how they were found in the 20th Century, and then sets that community into a historic context that included early Christianity and Rabbinic Judaism. I almost wanted more!
The third chapter on the Septuagint was very linguistic. He compares the Greek translations and Hebrews root words for pages. If you're into this kind of puzzle that's great but I found it tedious. He also tells the legend of how the Septuagint was created, which was more fun to read.
The fourth chapter on Josephus is historically interesting. He tells the legendary autobiography of this Romanized Jew and then, after explaining all the reasons to doubt him, explains why he's still the best most trustworthy source. I didn't realize that Josephus wrote a summary of the Books of Moses -- and that the holy books Josephus was writing about were apparently not the same as what's in the Old Testament I know!
The later chapters are on the sequel to Adam and Eve, the Life of Abraham and Enoch 1. In the introduction the author explains why he thinks these are the most relevant psuedopigripha, but in the actual chapters there's not much analysis. He retells the story, adds some modern psychoanalysis of the main characters, and otherwise delivers a sermon. The historical context that they were written in doesn't get discussed much. The cons of these texts don't get discussed either.
March 25, 2015
Interesting trip through history and 4 extra biblical books. The author states that everyone writes with a bias and he is no exception. Everyone reads with a bias as well, and I am no exception. That said, this was interesting and informational, though briefly tedious at times. He does a great job of offering the different philosophies he has found in the Life of Adam and Eve, The Apocalypse of Abraham, the 1st Book of Enoch as well as Deuteronomy and Job. My take-away is that the jury is still out on why humans suffer, there is no good answer and probably no plan. It's an interesting look at other ideas, and certainly a great introduction to extra biblical books.
March 7, 2016
A waste of time to read. No new insights, just speculations without much information to back it. Don't waste your own time as well.
December 7, 2022
Disjointed, but valuable nuggets to find
I enjoyed a good portion of this book, but at times I wasn't sure what level the author was trying to engage the audience at. For example, if you're a reader familiar with the bible but with none of the scholarship (such as, say, an average Christian who uses the text only for their own religious purposes but has never taken a class on it beyond confirmation), this book is already a lot of new information that could be incredible and new...but then, it's not necessarily all the important information, nor a history of how things became canonized, which might be better to look into first.
But then, if you've already looked into those things, a lot of this isn't news. I came to this book having already read a lot of things for both general and scholarly audiences, and so this seemed a little too beginner-level, even patronizing to the minimally-knowledgeable.
And yet, it takes deep dives into several texts that even I had hardly heard of! Books like Enoch are well-known enough, being referred to in the text of the Bible itself and being part of the Apocrypha (which itself should maybe have been more emphasized here), but it's not entirely clear why the author decided to spend whole chapters on the Apocalypse of Abraham and the extra stories about Adam and Eve. Why not, for example, examine more pivotal texts that were used like scripture for a while and even had great influence on tradition, such as the Apocrypha (for the Jewish Bible), or for the New Testament, the Shepherd of Hermas or the Apocalypse of Peter, or on some of the gnostic writings? Nearly nothing about the New Testament Canon, though some of the ones discussed were nearly contemporary with them. While I agree with the author that including these would be an incredible addition (or even contradiction or correction) to the texts we ended up with, it almost seems like he decided to flesh out a few as a sample, and then realized that there was no way to cover all of them, and just ended. As some reviewers have said, this book almost reads better as a collection of essays - some about the history of the times, some on the histories of the texts themselves (see below for highlights), and some just about individual stories that didn't make the cut. But there doesn't seem to be a clear, repeatable thesis to follow throughout and tie the book together.
Don't get me wrong, however: I gave the book 4 stars instead of 3 because a lot of this was still incredibly informative. Here are some very valuable highlights:
1. His tone, unlike scholars such as Ehrmann, inform the reader of the scholarship without having a bone to pick. Ehrmann, for example, gives important insights and facts, but sells them as revelatory and provocative bombshells, perhaps reflecting the personal story he went through going from fundamentalist to agnostic. Hoffman, on the other hand, always seems to respect the text, the authors, and the audiences, giving only facts but never really trying to shock us. Of course, that may be surprising to readers who picked up this book precisely for these reasons. So even if that's disappointing, he's at least not trying to point fingers at the people who left them out and start conspiracies about purist cabals or whatever. (Not that Ehrmann does it, but my point is that Hoffman's tone is factual and observational, rarely commentary.)
2. The chapter on the Dead Sea Scrolls, and even the one on Josephus, are really worth a book on their own. He didn't sell them short (like I don't feel like I need to read a separate book on it - he didn't gloss over anything), but I'm super glad they're here. Really, it could have been done as separate books - one on the history of the texts and one on the content of the texts - but at least the reader can learn a lot about how we even know anything about the ancient texts. Of course, along the way he has to dispel myths about various things (such as what Josephus got wrong, or what he actually said and why), but the story of the Dead Sea Scrolls is itself worthy of its own docuseries.
3. Of the "cut" texts that he does go through (only three, really, though the book description mentions psalms and other texts), they do serve to flesh out a lot of the better known texts, and remind us that the audiences of the texts would themselves have been aware of other stories/texts that don't actually appear in our "final" version. Similar to say, Tolkien's Lord of the Rings, there are references to other stories, histories, characters, etc. that never appear in the main books but which Tolkien was developing separately or had in mind. Just so, the ancient world (especially of the Jews under Greece and Rome) lived in an environment that contained much more than just the versions we read today. The writers and audiences of what became the Bible didn't have *just* the Bible, and to make a Bible at all meant that not everything could make it in. And it's true, because of how the canonical texts are read today, that inclusion of these texts would certainly have changed our final interpretations of the stories in various ways. So I appreciated going through these texts, even if they were neither the most significant texts to hit the cutting room floor, nor a representative sample of all the texts that did.
4. Despite the lack of a clear thesis, you will absolutely learn something. The things you learn you'll be able to remember and do something with, unlike some of the more scholarly works that are dense and technical. You'll appreciate his entry-level approach any time you're reading about something that's new to you, and it'll stick better in the end. Likely it'll lead you to other works on the things you find most interesting.
I enjoyed a good portion of this book, but at times I wasn't sure what level the author was trying to engage the audience at. For example, if you're a reader familiar with the bible but with none of the scholarship (such as, say, an average Christian who uses the text only for their own religious purposes but has never taken a class on it beyond confirmation), this book is already a lot of new information that could be incredible and new...but then, it's not necessarily all the important information, nor a history of how things became canonized, which might be better to look into first.
But then, if you've already looked into those things, a lot of this isn't news. I came to this book having already read a lot of things for both general and scholarly audiences, and so this seemed a little too beginner-level, even patronizing to the minimally-knowledgeable.
And yet, it takes deep dives into several texts that even I had hardly heard of! Books like Enoch are well-known enough, being referred to in the text of the Bible itself and being part of the Apocrypha (which itself should maybe have been more emphasized here), but it's not entirely clear why the author decided to spend whole chapters on the Apocalypse of Abraham and the extra stories about Adam and Eve. Why not, for example, examine more pivotal texts that were used like scripture for a while and even had great influence on tradition, such as the Apocrypha (for the Jewish Bible), or for the New Testament, the Shepherd of Hermas or the Apocalypse of Peter, or on some of the gnostic writings? Nearly nothing about the New Testament Canon, though some of the ones discussed were nearly contemporary with them. While I agree with the author that including these would be an incredible addition (or even contradiction or correction) to the texts we ended up with, it almost seems like he decided to flesh out a few as a sample, and then realized that there was no way to cover all of them, and just ended. As some reviewers have said, this book almost reads better as a collection of essays - some about the history of the times, some on the histories of the texts themselves (see below for highlights), and some just about individual stories that didn't make the cut. But there doesn't seem to be a clear, repeatable thesis to follow throughout and tie the book together.
Don't get me wrong, however: I gave the book 4 stars instead of 3 because a lot of this was still incredibly informative. Here are some very valuable highlights:
1. His tone, unlike scholars such as Ehrmann, inform the reader of the scholarship without having a bone to pick. Ehrmann, for example, gives important insights and facts, but sells them as revelatory and provocative bombshells, perhaps reflecting the personal story he went through going from fundamentalist to agnostic. Hoffman, on the other hand, always seems to respect the text, the authors, and the audiences, giving only facts but never really trying to shock us. Of course, that may be surprising to readers who picked up this book precisely for these reasons. So even if that's disappointing, he's at least not trying to point fingers at the people who left them out and start conspiracies about purist cabals or whatever. (Not that Ehrmann does it, but my point is that Hoffman's tone is factual and observational, rarely commentary.)
2. The chapter on the Dead Sea Scrolls, and even the one on Josephus, are really worth a book on their own. He didn't sell them short (like I don't feel like I need to read a separate book on it - he didn't gloss over anything), but I'm super glad they're here. Really, it could have been done as separate books - one on the history of the texts and one on the content of the texts - but at least the reader can learn a lot about how we even know anything about the ancient texts. Of course, along the way he has to dispel myths about various things (such as what Josephus got wrong, or what he actually said and why), but the story of the Dead Sea Scrolls is itself worthy of its own docuseries.
3. Of the "cut" texts that he does go through (only three, really, though the book description mentions psalms and other texts), they do serve to flesh out a lot of the better known texts, and remind us that the audiences of the texts would themselves have been aware of other stories/texts that don't actually appear in our "final" version. Similar to say, Tolkien's Lord of the Rings, there are references to other stories, histories, characters, etc. that never appear in the main books but which Tolkien was developing separately or had in mind. Just so, the ancient world (especially of the Jews under Greece and Rome) lived in an environment that contained much more than just the versions we read today. The writers and audiences of what became the Bible didn't have *just* the Bible, and to make a Bible at all meant that not everything could make it in. And it's true, because of how the canonical texts are read today, that inclusion of these texts would certainly have changed our final interpretations of the stories in various ways. So I appreciated going through these texts, even if they were neither the most significant texts to hit the cutting room floor, nor a representative sample of all the texts that did.
4. Despite the lack of a clear thesis, you will absolutely learn something. The things you learn you'll be able to remember and do something with, unlike some of the more scholarly works that are dense and technical. You'll appreciate his entry-level approach any time you're reading about something that's new to you, and it'll stick better in the end. Likely it'll lead you to other works on the things you find most interesting.
June 1, 2018
Many people might not realize that what we today call "The Bible" did not come into existence until Pope Damasus I convened the Council of Rome in 382 that resulted in today's "books of the Bible" later compiled into Latin by St. Jerome. Before this time there were many other religious writings and texts that were considered important. The author puts it best when he says, "The Bible used to be a representative sample of a larger set of favorite texts, while now it's perceived to be the full collection." (p. 258)
Anyone who has actually read the whole Bible realizes immediately that there are duplicated stories, references in some books to other books now not in the "Bible" such as Jude quoting the Book of Enoch which is not in the Bible, and jarring fragments that make little sense (though they do when read with books now not in the Bible). Dr. Hoffman's book reminds of this history of the Bible's development in an easy, accessible way that is enjoyable to read and easy for the non-scholar to follow. He focuses on the Dead Sea Scrolls, the early Greek translation called the Septuagint, the ancient historian Josephus, and the non-Bible books Life of Adam and Eve, the Book of 1 Enoch, and the Apocalypse of Abraham, which touching briefly on other once highly regarded religious texts that ended up on the Bible's "cutting room floor."
The author shows how a knowledge of these other texts can help inform you on what is in the Bible and he makes the interesting point that ancient readers might have been more familiar with some of these stories so they were not needed in the Bible itself. Other texts were omitted because theology changed and in the pre-printing press era, may not have been available or had already been lost.
This book is an excellent introduction to the subject, and my only complaint is I wish it was longer and had reviewed some of the other books that were "cut!" Many of the books and articles on these texts are very scholarly and hard for a regular reader to follow. Dr. Hoffman's discussions are easy to follow and very illuminating. Helpfully, the author does in his final chapter provide some suggestions for further reading. But this is an excellent, very readable, very interesting history of how the current Bible came to be and how reading some of the other early religious books that did not make it into the Bible can in fact illuminate you on the Bible!
Anyone who has actually read the whole Bible realizes immediately that there are duplicated stories, references in some books to other books now not in the "Bible" such as Jude quoting the Book of Enoch which is not in the Bible, and jarring fragments that make little sense (though they do when read with books now not in the Bible). Dr. Hoffman's book reminds of this history of the Bible's development in an easy, accessible way that is enjoyable to read and easy for the non-scholar to follow. He focuses on the Dead Sea Scrolls, the early Greek translation called the Septuagint, the ancient historian Josephus, and the non-Bible books Life of Adam and Eve, the Book of 1 Enoch, and the Apocalypse of Abraham, which touching briefly on other once highly regarded religious texts that ended up on the Bible's "cutting room floor."
The author shows how a knowledge of these other texts can help inform you on what is in the Bible and he makes the interesting point that ancient readers might have been more familiar with some of these stories so they were not needed in the Bible itself. Other texts were omitted because theology changed and in the pre-printing press era, may not have been available or had already been lost.
This book is an excellent introduction to the subject, and my only complaint is I wish it was longer and had reviewed some of the other books that were "cut!" Many of the books and articles on these texts are very scholarly and hard for a regular reader to follow. Dr. Hoffman's discussions are easy to follow and very illuminating. Helpfully, the author does in his final chapter provide some suggestions for further reading. But this is an excellent, very readable, very interesting history of how the current Bible came to be and how reading some of the other early religious books that did not make it into the Bible can in fact illuminate you on the Bible!
November 1, 2020
In general, it presents the different religious writings that either re-phrased, sourced or competed with our current versions of the Bible and Tanakh. In example, it talks about the source language of the original manuscripts and how translations resulted in different interpretations of phrases that resulted in different meanings. But many of these writings also had a different answer to the same spiritual question. The writer presents the information in a very academic nonjudgmental style. It’s a good introduction to the topic and the intent is to awaken a curiosity rather than sell an answer. It includes a good to-read list to continue the journey.
March 27, 2019
Joel Hoffman provided me exactly what I was looking for in this book. He gives an excellent vision of the history of how and why different books and scriptures found their way into what we know as the Bible. I especially appreciated how he addressed both Christian and Jewish versions. Joel does an excellent job explaining how different language translations accounted for numerous confusions perpetrated by different translators. I would definitely recommend this book to anyone interested in the origin of the Bible.
February 27, 2023
While this book contained some interesting information about pseudepigraphal literature, the author failed to address the process of canonization and because of this treated these works as those they were originally part of the Bible and later removed instead of recognizing the complexity of Second Temple Jewish beliefs on the canon.
March 8, 2023
Missing from the Bible are The Life of Adam and Eve, The Apocalypse of Abraham, Enoch, and other fragments. All are interesting in that they show the thinking and superstitions of ancient times. They were left out for various reason, some just because Catholic priests Jerome and Augustine didn't like them. Taking all in all, the writings of the Bible are the most influential words of all time.
September 17, 2025
The casual writing style made this book, which could have been in digestible, easy to read. However, the author often seems to mix up the difference between certain religious beliefs on the Christian side, and, and in trying to come across as witty, simply comes across as trying too hard. He definitely has certain values and theses that he wants to promote through the book.
December 22, 2017
Not recommended reading. It will irritate believers, confuse seekers and turn away unbelievers.
This book starts strong with history but falls quickly by presenting conjecture as fact. The author also presents his opinion and commentary as fact on scripture he clearly doesn't understand.
This book starts strong with history but falls quickly by presenting conjecture as fact. The author also presents his opinion and commentary as fact on scripture he clearly doesn't understand.
April 14, 2019
Fascinating look at which books were canonized and which hit the cutting room floor -- and why.
September 30, 2022
Fascinating look at the stories and details that didn't make the final draft of the Bible. Really enjoyed it!
December 23, 2024
I crushed this book in two days, it is a captivating read.
March 29, 2015
The Bible's Cutting Room Floor: The Holy Scriptures Missing From Your Bible seems to have a bit of a split personality. The first three quarters of the book focuses on the historical Middle East between 200 BC & 200 AD, and how the sociopolitical setting influenced late Jewish and early Christian holy writings. Included in this section is a short history of the region focusing on the city of Jerusalem and the Judean State, the history of the Dead Sea Scrolls discovery, a short description of the Dead Sea Scroll contents and how these scrolls helped describe the Qumran sect, a short history of the Septuagint with an introduction to comparing and contrasting it with the Torah and using this compare and contrast to understand what the translators understood, and an introduction to Josephus that includes many insights into the periods political issues. I found this portion of the book a well written introduction to biblical history, and recommend it to anyone, religious or not, who wants to understand a bit more about one of the primary collection of texts that has shaped Western Civilization. (3 stars for this portion of the book)
The second part of the book looks at some of the texts which did not make it into today's Bible - Jewish or Christian. Specifically addressed are the texts of "Life of Adam and Eve", "Apocalypse of Abraham" and "I Enoch". Although the information provided was of interest, it represents a total break from what Joel M. Hoffman was focused previously. This second section seems to have been added from material the author had been working on in order to fill pages instead of elaborate on the initial topic. A short exegesis is provided on each of these texts, but what is missing is how they fit into the rest of the story initiated in the first part of the book. Yes, the selected texts provide additional detail on stories which aren't fully told in today's Bible, but why were these texts selected over many others in the apocrypha and pseudepigrapha? How did these texts shape religious thought in the Jewish and Christian traditions? What do scholars have to say about their origin/when they were written? Why where they not included in the Jewish or Christian Bible? (The author does not address the historical account of how the Christian Bible was formed, nor is the Jewish tradition covered in much detail.)
I believe Joel M. Hoffman missed a real opportunity to tell a greater story about the creation of today's Bible which he summarizes in the final chapter by not tying these last few texts into the greater story being told in this book. (2 stars for this portion of the book only because how out of place it was with the first and how the texts were summarily handled)
The second part of the book looks at some of the texts which did not make it into today's Bible - Jewish or Christian. Specifically addressed are the texts of "Life of Adam and Eve", "Apocalypse of Abraham" and "I Enoch". Although the information provided was of interest, it represents a total break from what Joel M. Hoffman was focused previously. This second section seems to have been added from material the author had been working on in order to fill pages instead of elaborate on the initial topic. A short exegesis is provided on each of these texts, but what is missing is how they fit into the rest of the story initiated in the first part of the book. Yes, the selected texts provide additional detail on stories which aren't fully told in today's Bible, but why were these texts selected over many others in the apocrypha and pseudepigrapha? How did these texts shape religious thought in the Jewish and Christian traditions? What do scholars have to say about their origin/when they were written? Why where they not included in the Jewish or Christian Bible? (The author does not address the historical account of how the Christian Bible was formed, nor is the Jewish tradition covered in much detail.)
I believe Joel M. Hoffman missed a real opportunity to tell a greater story about the creation of today's Bible which he summarizes in the final chapter by not tying these last few texts into the greater story being told in this book. (2 stars for this portion of the book only because how out of place it was with the first and how the texts were summarily handled)
July 1, 2019
The Bible most of us know today is essentially a "best of" collection (Codex) - this book delves into a number of holy writings of significance that were left out.
September 7, 2014
If you have ever wondered, either casually or with a more scholarly bent why certain stories were included in the Bible and others weren’t, or why there seemed to be gaps in what we get out of the text compared to the ancients, this is the book for you. The Bible’s Cutting Room Floor by Joel Hoffman will hold your interest. Hoffman’s work assumes a knowledge of the Bible and the ancient world. However, by no means do you need to be an Old Testament or Rabbinic scholar to understand it. Each chapter follows the pattern of stating his thesis, supporting it, restating it, and finally the conclusion. The final chapter wraps it all up nicely.
The book clearly explains the political situation in Jerusalem leading up to the time of Jesus, and following. This is a real help since the Bible itself lacks a lot of material on this. Its is understood that the reader just knows this stuff. Kind of like we understand 20th century American history. The following chapters discuss the Dead Sea Scrolls and their impact on scholarship and what we know of the historicity of certain events, following is a good discussion of the Septuagint (Greek “Bible”). Added to the Dead Sea Scrolls, the Septuagint, and the Torah writings, we then add Josephus’ work.
Working through the earliest patriarch’s of the Torah which forms the Old Testament in our current Bibles and is the Jewish sacred book, Hoffman examines the lives of Adam and Eve, Abraham and Enoch. Here he references books of the Apocrypha and other Wisdom literature found in the early traditions. In an accessible fashion he points us to the story and meaning behind our Sunday School reading and teachings. These are the big questions of life: why is there evil? If God created the world, why did Adam and Even sin? What of angels? Free will? Illness and suffering?
If you have an interest in the development of the people of the Near East and or an interest in Biblical scholarship you will enjoy this book. It is always intriguing to learn what what excluded from such important texts and (possibly) why. There is an appendix pointing the reader to further study and resources. Because the Roman and Greeks worlds intersected with the Jewish community this information is helpful to those looking for a greater understanding of the world of the Roman Empire. I absolutely recommend this book.
This is an unbiased review in exchange for an ARC.
www.meesh-stuff.tumblr
www.facebook.com
www.goodreads.com
www.amazon.com
9/6/14
The book clearly explains the political situation in Jerusalem leading up to the time of Jesus, and following. This is a real help since the Bible itself lacks a lot of material on this. Its is understood that the reader just knows this stuff. Kind of like we understand 20th century American history. The following chapters discuss the Dead Sea Scrolls and their impact on scholarship and what we know of the historicity of certain events, following is a good discussion of the Septuagint (Greek “Bible”). Added to the Dead Sea Scrolls, the Septuagint, and the Torah writings, we then add Josephus’ work.
Working through the earliest patriarch’s of the Torah which forms the Old Testament in our current Bibles and is the Jewish sacred book, Hoffman examines the lives of Adam and Eve, Abraham and Enoch. Here he references books of the Apocrypha and other Wisdom literature found in the early traditions. In an accessible fashion he points us to the story and meaning behind our Sunday School reading and teachings. These are the big questions of life: why is there evil? If God created the world, why did Adam and Even sin? What of angels? Free will? Illness and suffering?
If you have an interest in the development of the people of the Near East and or an interest in Biblical scholarship you will enjoy this book. It is always intriguing to learn what what excluded from such important texts and (possibly) why. There is an appendix pointing the reader to further study and resources. Because the Roman and Greeks worlds intersected with the Jewish community this information is helpful to those looking for a greater understanding of the world of the Roman Empire. I absolutely recommend this book.
This is an unbiased review in exchange for an ARC.
www.meesh-stuff.tumblr
www.facebook.com
www.goodreads.com
www.amazon.com
9/6/14
December 5, 2014
The Bible's Cutting Room Floor: The Holy Scriptures Missing From Your Bible
Joel M. Hoffman
This title intrigued me, so I gave it a read... The Bible's Cutting Room Floor: The Holy Scriptures Missing From Your Bible by Joel M. Hoffman. It's an interesting look at some writings that aren't part of the "normal" Bible as many people know it. It adds some additional perspective to what and how we got here in our understanding of scripture and history.
Contents:
Introduction - The Abridged Bible; Jerusalem - An Eternal City in Conflict; The Dead Sea Scrolls - How a Lost Goat Changed the World; The Septuagint - How Seventy Scholars Took Seventy Days to Get It Wrong; Josephus - The Only Man to Be a Fly on Every Wall; Adam and Eve - Falling Down and Getting Back Up; Abraham - Humans, Idols, and Gods; Enoch - The Beginning of the End; The Big Picture - Finding the Unabridged Bible; Appendix - Suggestions for Further Reading; Index
Hoffman is a Jewish scholar who has focused on history and religion. He examines material and additional books (such as the Dead Sea Scrolls) with a bent towards examining their story and place in history. For most people (like myself), things like the Book of Enoch consists of strange stories that kept it from being included in the Old Testament. But when placed against the backdrop of the times, it starts to make a bit more sense. It's also interesting that there are references to Enoch and his prophesies in the New Testament. It's very likely that material was familiar and accepted at one point, and at some point further down the line, others decided it was less accepted. Our perceptions are shaped by those decisions. He also does a good job in discussing how the same words in the Hebrew texts ended up being translated completely different in various places, often by minute alterations or shaping of certain letters.
I can see how some people would have a hard time reading this, as it forces you to challenge some of the conventional wisdom that's been handed down over centuries. But it also adds depth and color where it's lacking. If this is a topic of interest, it's worth reading.
Disclosure:
Obtained From: Library
Payment: Borrowed
Joel M. Hoffman
This title intrigued me, so I gave it a read... The Bible's Cutting Room Floor: The Holy Scriptures Missing From Your Bible by Joel M. Hoffman. It's an interesting look at some writings that aren't part of the "normal" Bible as many people know it. It adds some additional perspective to what and how we got here in our understanding of scripture and history.
Contents:
Introduction - The Abridged Bible; Jerusalem - An Eternal City in Conflict; The Dead Sea Scrolls - How a Lost Goat Changed the World; The Septuagint - How Seventy Scholars Took Seventy Days to Get It Wrong; Josephus - The Only Man to Be a Fly on Every Wall; Adam and Eve - Falling Down and Getting Back Up; Abraham - Humans, Idols, and Gods; Enoch - The Beginning of the End; The Big Picture - Finding the Unabridged Bible; Appendix - Suggestions for Further Reading; Index
Hoffman is a Jewish scholar who has focused on history and religion. He examines material and additional books (such as the Dead Sea Scrolls) with a bent towards examining their story and place in history. For most people (like myself), things like the Book of Enoch consists of strange stories that kept it from being included in the Old Testament. But when placed against the backdrop of the times, it starts to make a bit more sense. It's also interesting that there are references to Enoch and his prophesies in the New Testament. It's very likely that material was familiar and accepted at one point, and at some point further down the line, others decided it was less accepted. Our perceptions are shaped by those decisions. He also does a good job in discussing how the same words in the Hebrew texts ended up being translated completely different in various places, often by minute alterations or shaping of certain letters.
I can see how some people would have a hard time reading this, as it forces you to challenge some of the conventional wisdom that's been handed down over centuries. But it also adds depth and color where it's lacking. If this is a topic of interest, it's worth reading.
Disclosure:
Obtained From: Library
Payment: Borrowed
September 5, 2014
Anyone who has read through the whole Bible knows that books are mentioned that are not available today. Anyone who has looked at various versions of the Bible has encountered books such as the Maccabees that appear in Catholic Bibles, but not Protestant Bibles. If you have read about the extended process of creating the Bible, you would know that not all books that some believed to be scripture made it into the Biblical canon.
Readers may find the subtitle (The Holy Scriptures Missing From Your Bible) to be misleading as this book does not provide a listing of scriptures missing from the Bible. Rather, Joel Hoffman provides, in the first chapter, background on the social/political and cultural milieu during the writing of Scripture. He next provides a chapters on locating the Dead Sea Scrolls and the impact on Biblical understanding. This is followed by a chapter on the Septuagint and its influence on the Bible we have. He does a similar examination on how Josephus' writings interact with Scripture. Joel Hoffman then has three chapters that critique The Life of Adam and Eve, The Apocalypse of Abraham, and The Book of Enoch in relation to what these titles reveal that is not found in the rest of Scripture. He finishes with a look at the big picture of missing Scripture. He also includes an appendix of recommended sources for further investigation
Overall, the book is worth reading more for the broad picture Joe Hoffman paints regarding the multiple sources that inter-played in the creation of the scriptural canon than the look at individual books.
Readers may find the subtitle (The Holy Scriptures Missing From Your Bible) to be misleading as this book does not provide a listing of scriptures missing from the Bible. Rather, Joel Hoffman provides, in the first chapter, background on the social/political and cultural milieu during the writing of Scripture. He next provides a chapters on locating the Dead Sea Scrolls and the impact on Biblical understanding. This is followed by a chapter on the Septuagint and its influence on the Bible we have. He does a similar examination on how Josephus' writings interact with Scripture. Joel Hoffman then has three chapters that critique The Life of Adam and Eve, The Apocalypse of Abraham, and The Book of Enoch in relation to what these titles reveal that is not found in the rest of Scripture. He finishes with a look at the big picture of missing Scripture. He also includes an appendix of recommended sources for further investigation
Overall, the book is worth reading more for the broad picture Joe Hoffman paints regarding the multiple sources that inter-played in the creation of the scriptural canon than the look at individual books.
August 3, 2014
I won a copy of this book from Goodreads First Reads giveaway.
This was a engaging scholarly work that I found easy to read and full of information. I would give it 5 stars if its blurb was better describing what I found in the book. I had two things in mind when reading that blurb. The first was a sort of written version of History's special Banned from the Bible where scriptures that didn't end up in the canon are described. This book does have some of that but it is less than half the book covering only three such texts. The second was a story of canon making like Why Catholic Bibles Are Bigger. There is not really any discussion of why certain books made the cut and others didn't in this book despite the fact that the blurb mentions who cut them and why as part of the story. The book does spend a lot of time discussing extrabiblical texts like Josephus to explain the context of the times as a means to understand why it was in flux and why choices had to be made. This material was equally interesting just not what I was expecting to find in the text. I think that the thesis that the books that didn't make the cut was accidental oversight disregards a lot of conscious decisions based on the merit of the text made for many books. This may be geographic accident for some but certainly not all books that were left out.
Overall, very interesting book for anyone interested in the Bible or biblical times.
This was a engaging scholarly work that I found easy to read and full of information. I would give it 5 stars if its blurb was better describing what I found in the book. I had two things in mind when reading that blurb. The first was a sort of written version of History's special Banned from the Bible where scriptures that didn't end up in the canon are described. This book does have some of that but it is less than half the book covering only three such texts. The second was a story of canon making like Why Catholic Bibles Are Bigger. There is not really any discussion of why certain books made the cut and others didn't in this book despite the fact that the blurb mentions who cut them and why as part of the story. The book does spend a lot of time discussing extrabiblical texts like Josephus to explain the context of the times as a means to understand why it was in flux and why choices had to be made. This material was equally interesting just not what I was expecting to find in the text. I think that the thesis that the books that didn't make the cut was accidental oversight disregards a lot of conscious decisions based on the merit of the text made for many books. This may be geographic accident for some but certainly not all books that were left out.
Overall, very interesting book for anyone interested in the Bible or biblical times.
February 10, 2015
The Bible's Cutting Room Floor by Dr Joel M Hoffman is two books in one. The first half is the history of the creation of Bible in the centuries around the birth of Christ. It traces the history of translation, copying, and editing from the original Aramaic to Greek, Latin, and finally the English most Americans are familiar with.
The second half recounts holy scriptures that might have been included, but were left on the cutting room floor (in the metaphor of the book): Adam and Eve after the fall, Abraham's childhood, and Enoch.
This book represented a challenge for the author as explained in his own words...
"The ancient writings that make up the Bible's cutting room floor are ... well known within the halls of the academy, so there are plenty of scholarly essays ... Equally ... there's no shortage of popular books that overcome the ... academic prose but at the expense of accuracy."
This book is neither academic history nor historical fiction. Fiction or non-fiction is a decision faced by many history writers. I sense that academic writers particularly are torn between the readability and clarity of fiction versus the truth and accuracy of non-fiction. The former risks the academic's reputation and the latter risks the popular success of the writing.
In this case, I wonder if the author tried too hard to hit both marks, and instead hit none.
For more: http://1book42day.blogspot.com/2015/0...
The second half recounts holy scriptures that might have been included, but were left on the cutting room floor (in the metaphor of the book): Adam and Eve after the fall, Abraham's childhood, and Enoch.
This book represented a challenge for the author as explained in his own words...
"The ancient writings that make up the Bible's cutting room floor are ... well known within the halls of the academy, so there are plenty of scholarly essays ... Equally ... there's no shortage of popular books that overcome the ... academic prose but at the expense of accuracy."
This book is neither academic history nor historical fiction. Fiction or non-fiction is a decision faced by many history writers. I sense that academic writers particularly are torn between the readability and clarity of fiction versus the truth and accuracy of non-fiction. The former risks the academic's reputation and the latter risks the popular success of the writing.
In this case, I wonder if the author tried too hard to hit both marks, and instead hit none.
For more: http://1book42day.blogspot.com/2015/0...
Displaying 1 - 30 of 62 reviews