1⭐️ – I’m furious. I’m disgusted. I’m disappointed.
One star. And honestly, that’s only because Goodreads doesn’t offer a “please launch this into the sun” option. I should’ve stopped, but sheer morbid curiosity about how this flaming trainwreck would end could possibly wrap up in a "happy ever after" kept me skimming. I should have DNFed. I wish I had. I’m angry. I’m exhausted. I need a drink and a hug from someone who’s never read this book.
I came into What Fury Brings with high expectations. I adore romantasy. I loved Tricia Levenseller’s The Shadow Between Us—fun, fierce, full of sharp characters and a darkly empowering vibe. The setup sounded wild in a way I love—women running the world, men getting snatched off the street for royal baby-making duties? I was like, “Yes, let’s see what happens when the roles are reversed!” Joke’s on me. What I thought would be a juicy twist on power turned out to be a dystopian fever dream that felt like someone asked, “What if toxic masculinity, but... estrogen?”.
Amarra is a world where equality went to die in six-inch heels. Instead of challenging the injustice, it recycles it with new faces and pretends that’s progress. Instead of offering any meaningful reflection, the book just drags out the greatest hits of historical misogyny, slaps a feminine label on it, and tries to pass it off as world-building. The book just copies all the worst parts of male-dominated history, flips the gender labels, and calls it innovation. In theory, Amarra flips the societal script. In practice, it doubles down on cruelty. Men are silenced, stripped of agency, auctioned off, imprisoned, and exploited. It’s not subversive. It’s not bold. And it’s definitely not a thoughtful critique of anything. The fact that a 13-year-old boy is sold into a harem—with no outrage, no resistance, and no reckoning—is horrifying. The book doesn’t just fail to condemn this system—it treats it as normalized, even justified. That’s not edgy. That’s deeply disturbing.
The narrative never once holds this world accountable. Not the system, not the characters, not even the protagonist. There’s no self-awareness, no growth, just a steady parade of abuse repackaged as empowerment. The only message I got was: “As long as the oppressor changes gender, it’s fine.” That’s not justice—it’s the same violence, recycled and rebranded. I was expecting rage and role reversal. I was not expecting it to depict child grooming and to talk about the sexual “initiation” of a 13-year-old. It made me sick to my stomach. The “sex workers” in this society? Not workers. They are sex slaves. Auctioned off. Enslaved. Not consenting. Let that sink in.
This is cruelty, rewritten with women as the abusers—and then applauded.
The romance (???) was the nail in the coffin for me. We’re supposed to root for a relationship where the male lead is kidnapped, imprisoned, physically, sexually, and emotionally abused—and falls in love with his captor, Olerra. The FMC never once reflects on her own behavior, and the book offers no insight into her psyche beyond “well, I’m not like those other abusive women” before proceeding to be not quite as abusive—BUT STILL ABUSIVE. And for me? That doesn’t cut it.
Repeated scenes where Sanos is chained spread eagle to the bed every night aren’t sexy—they're traumatic. He’s forced into objectifying and humiliating bondage attire. He is paraded around like a toy, his dignity stripped away, while the FMC flaunts her power. Their dynamic never changes. Even at the end, she doesn’t trust him. In some ways, she’s just as horrible as her cousin—just in different, more manipulative ways. She claims to be better, but she isn’t.
And the more I sit with it, the angrier I get.
This isn’t a tale of justice or healing. No, it’s Stockholm syndrome dressed up as romance. The idea that the MMC must be “housebroken” (direct term used) before he can be a good partner is horrifying. There is no romance in this book. Only rape, humiliation, physical abuse, and psychological torture.
The central “relationship” between Sanos and Olerra is not slow-burn or enemies-to-lovers. It is Stockholm syndrome. He is: kidnapped, drugged, chained (every single night, spread-eagle to a bed), gagged, dressed in humiliating bondage gear, paraded around publicly as an object, sexually assaulted—multiple times, subjected to non-consensual drugged sex, dehumanized in every way imaginable... How are you supposed to root for a romance that’s basically just her degrading him the entire time? He slowly loses all traits of masculinity. Honestly, I just felt sorry for him.
This isn't slow-burn romance. It's psychological domination with a romantic façade. There’s a moment where Sanos must be “housebroken” before being considered a suitable partner. That phrase alone should raise red flags. He is not respected. He is trained. That is not love.
The FMC sexually assaults the MMC multiple times. You cannot ask for consent from someone you’ve shackled, drugged, imprisoned, and gagged. He cannot consent, he is chained and drugged!!
The FMC is perhaps the most frustrating character of all. She spends the entire book degrading Sanos, controlling his every move, getting angry at him for things she herself caused, and contributing to his ongoing abuse. Even at the end, she doesn’t trust him. She never reflects. Never changes. Her biggest concern is becoming queen—not justice, not change, not liberation. The fact that she’s “less bad” than other women in the story is meaningless. That’s not a character arc. That’s not redemption. That’s just minimization. She condemns the men of Brutus for their past crimes, all while actively perpetuating the exact same evils.
And despite everything, the book still positions Olerra as the hero. Somehow, we’re expected to root for her. Somehow, we’re expected to buy the idea that this relationship is redemptive, that it's healing. It isn’t. No. Just no.
If the author wanted to write a female empowerment story, why did she write a world where, when given power, women became just as bad as men? Why, after 500 years of having that power, has society done nothing to grow or change for the better? Writing women who put men down doesn’t make them better women. Women are better than that.
If the book wanted to explore female rage, it could have. If it wanted to highlight how unchecked power corrupts regardless of gender, it should have. But instead, it revels in shock value without ever offering depth, critique, or consequence. If the author wanted to write a revenge book, then it should've actually been about that revenge and not whatever this was. Had all the injustice that was mentioned that happened 500 years ago been happening now and this society rose up as an immediate and flawed response, I might’ve bought into the setup more. But 500 years have passed—and yet they’ve made zero progress as a society?
And Amarra is supposed to be a queer-normative, progressive society. Really? The laws don't even make sense - how are there happy queer men in a kingdom where men aren't allowed to own land or hold jobs? What do they do for a living? Where do they sleep? We never get to meet any of them, or the trans man, or the supposedly happy and equal straight couples. Why would anyone born a woman come out as a man when men are treated worse than dirt? It doesn’t make sense. You can’t have this supposedly enlightened culture and also think it’s fine to put boys in chains and call it justice.
So let me get this straight: after 400+ pages of institutionalized abuse, human trafficking, and a romance built entirely on Stockholm Syndrome, the grand finale—the solution—is to have the male lead slap on some mascara, strut down the aisle in a dress, and voilà! Equality achieved.
And as for those two kingdoms, with their deep-seated grudges and toxic histories? Oh, they’re just supposed to merge effortlessly, like magic fairy dust fixes generations of trauma and hatred. Spoiler: it doesn’t work like that. This “happy ending” feels more like ignoring the mess than fixing it.
Let’s get this straight: this is not a romantasy. This is slave/captor/master dark fiction being falsely marketed under the veil of romantasy and “feminist revenge.” Sanos never stops feeling like a slave. His “housebreaking” is treated like a necessary process to make him a suitable partner. He’s not given agency. He’s not respected. The FMC sexually assaults the MMC multiple times, his consent is a joke—he can’t give it. Not when he’s chained. Not when he’s drugged. Not when his every move is controlled. She asks for consent, but he is chained and drugged—THAT IS NOT CONSENT. This is definitely not a romantasy and should not be marketed as such.
What truly enraged me is how deeply misleading the trigger warnings are. The book minimizes rape, slavery, grooming, and child sexual abuse as vague “dubious consent” or “bondage/kidnapping.” In truth, we are shown:
-A 13-year-old boy sold into a harem, where it's stated he will be “bedded” before reaching maturity.
-Men repeatedly drugged and forced into sex acts while restrained.
-“Sex workers” who are clearly sex slaves.
-Repeated SA scenes, where the male characters are physically unable to consent—and say no—yet are violated anyway.
-Use of date rape drugs.
-Public sexual humiliation used as punishment and entertainment.
I’m not squeamish. I’ve read brutal stories, dark romances, twisted revenge arcs—you name it. But this book was marketed as romantasy with “feminist themes.” What it actually contains is systemic sexual abuse, coercion, grooming, and slavery. It's just cruelty passed off as world-building and a trigger warning section that might as well have said “good luck.” The way it tries to paint women in a good light is astonishing. I have never read bigger hypocrisy in a book. They talk about women in other countries being raped and forced into submission—all while doing the same damn thing to their men.
Reading about men being brutalized by women didn’t make me feel empowered—it just made me uncomfortable. The concept had so much potential, but I found the execution really dehumanizing. It was frustrating to see women in the story not grow or evolve, even when given the chance to build something better. Instead of learning from the past, the new society felt just as stuck. This isn’t about being sensitive. I’m not easily shocked. I love dark stories, twisted romances, morally gray heroines, and revenge arcs. But this? This wasn’t dark with purpose. It was just bleak. It lacked catharsis. It lacked evolution. It glorified the very thing it pretended to question.
This is not romantasy. This is not feminist. This is not empowering.
This book is abuse without consequence, power without reflection, and rage without evolution. I wanted to see a critique of power, of cycles of violence, of how vengeance can twist justice. I wanted to feel something cathartic. I got none of that.
Instead, I got a book that glamorizes suffering, excuses rape, and pretends oppression is poetic as long as women are doing the oppressing.
This is not feminist rage. This is narrative rot.
Trigger Warnings:
-Mentions of sexual assault, but no scenes actually depicted → Scenes ARE depicted, including the scenes where the FMC is a frequent assailant
-Dubious consent → No. There is NO consent. These are slaves. It’s not dubcon it’s full on SA and he makes his lack of consent very clear
-Kidnapping/bondage, sometimes sexual → Non-consensual physical restraint. Not kink. It’s ‘bondage’ as in someone is being held against their will without establishing prior consent or a safe word (aka assault)
-Auctioning and selling of men
-Sex workers → Sex slaves.
-Mentions of grooming and underage sexual partners → Includes a graphic, deeply disturbing grooming scene. We explicitly see a child who has been bought by a pedophile and we are told what will happen to him.
I would also add:
- use of date rape drugs
- pedophilia
- power play
- severe humiliation in public and often of a sexual nature