“The overwhelming evidence in the New Testament is that every congregation was led by a group of elders and not merely by a single pastor… With all the duties elders are required to perform, it is no wonder that in His wisdom God meant for each local church to be led by a plurality of leaders who can share the burden of the ministry.” (40, 51-52)
It only takes a cursory examination of journal articles and new publications in the field of church leadership to realize that many are looking to sources other than the New Testament for patterns/models of organizational structure. Interestingly, while many church leaders are moving in other directions, there are those in the corporate world who are discovering the many advantages of ‘servant leadership.’ In calling for “a return to a biblical model of government” (9), Merkle identifies the latter approach (servant leadership) as the corrective needed: “Leadership in the church is not about acquiring titles but about becoming a servant” (25).
Some might be surprised to learn that Benjamin Merkle, now the author of a second book advocating leadership of the local congregation by a plurality of elders, is an associate professor of New Testament and Greek at Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary. However, Merkle has espoused this emphasis consistently since his doctoral dissertation, which was a defense for the leadership of a plurality of elders in the local congregation published as The Elder and Overseer: One Office in the Early Church, Studies in Biblical Literature, Vol. 57. (New York: Peter Lang, 2003).
Actually, Merkle believes the New Testament supports a self-governing, congregational form of local church organization. He points out that many of the important decisions of the early church were not made by the elders alone, but were brought before the entire congregation. In this way, “the authority of elders is balanced by the authority of the congregation as a whole.” In support of local autonomy he writes – “There is no evidence in the New Testament that elders exercised authority outside their won congregation (in distinction from apostles, who appear to have had authority over multiple congregations” (38).
The book consists of only four chapters – each providing an answer to the question ‘Why elders?’ In fact, Merkle compares this book with his previous, 40 Questions About Elders and Deacons (Kregel, 2008), stating that “Why Elders? is a summary of that work in a condensed format focusing specifically on the topic of why every church should have elders” (15). His chapter titles tell us the reason for elders: It Is the Pattern of the New Testament Church; It Provides Help and Accountability for a Pastor; It Produces a Healthier Church; and, It Promotes the Biblical Role of Deacons.