What do you think?
Rate this book
Eva: Das Wunder des weiblichen Körpers – und wie er seit 200 Millionen Jahren die Entwicklung des Lebens auf der Erde vorantreibt
Goodreads Choice Award
Nominee for Readers' Favorite Nonfiction (2023)Warum menstruieren Frauen? Warum erkranken sie eher an Alzheimer als Männer? Und warum müssen wir Frauen in den Wechseljahren jede Nacht die Laken durchschwitzen? Viel zu lange hat sich die Wissenschaft fast ausschließlich auf den männlichen Körper konzentriert. Erst in den vergangenen 15 Jahre haben Forscher verschiedener Fachbereiche neue spannende Entdeckungen dazu gemacht, wie sich der weibliche Körper in den letzten 200 Millionen Jahren entwickelt hat, wie er funktioniert und was es wirklich bedeutet, biologisch eine Frau zu sein. Cat Bohannon zeichnet den Entwicklungsverlauf des weiblichen Körpers nach und rückt dabei unser Wissen über die Evolution und darüber, warum der Homo sapiens eine so erfolgreiche und dominante Spezies geworden ist, in ein ganz neues eine tiefgreifende Revision der Menschheitsgeschichte und ein dringend notwendiges Korrektiv für eine Welt, die bis vor kurzem vor allem den Mann im Blick hatte.
Audible Audio
First published October 3, 2023
6045 people are currently reading
82371 people want to read
About the author
Cat Bohannon
3 books265 followersResearcher, scholar, writer, freak. Cat completed her PhD in 2022 at Columbia University, where she studied the evolution of narrative and cognition. Her writing has appeared in The Atlantic, Scientific American, Science, The Best American Nonrequired Reading, Lapham's Quarterly, The Georgia Review, and on The Story Collider. Eve is her first book and a New York Times bestseller. She lives in the U.S. with her partner and two offspring.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 2,514 reviews
November 28, 2023
I am an evolutionary biologist, and my expertise influences my ultimately dim view of this book. The first two or three chapters, focused on paleontology and biology, were largely excellent. She does a great job describing the "tree thinking" she uses to identify her "Eves," the most recent common ancestor with a given trait. I'm not a paleontologist, but these data seem accurately described and contextualized. She does a reasonably good job of distinguishing sex and gender, although I don't think she gave a full description of the myriad ways in which "biological sex" reflects congruence among the distributions of many traits. There are several instances of beautiful descriptive writing in the first couple of chapters.
Beginning early on, however, the author starts making critical misstatements about the way evolution and natural selection work. She perpetuates several commonly held misunderstandings about NS, including repeated reference to "species fitness," which is simply not a real thing. She's not even accurately describing either the fully debunked version of group selection ("for the good of the species"), although I think this is what she is trying to suggest, nor the modern multi-level- selection version of group selection that can work under some very specific conditions that humans don't meet. She's just making up mechanisms of evolution that can't work. Her misunderstanding gets worse and worse throughout the book. At one point, she even asks if evolution might have anticipated the need for a trait. That's just not how evolution works - there is no forward view. The narrative abandons discussion of biology and the "Eves" she originally structured the book around, along with even a rudimentary understanding of how evolution occurs. This profound misunderstanding of how natural selection works then structures the second half of the book, which comprises the evolutionary psychology chapters. These chapters are incomplete, scarce on any data, and in the end, are often completely speculative, in large part because she conflates culture with genetically heritable traits and assumes that (most? all?) traits persist in populations because they are adaptive. Over and over again. The section on sexism, in a chapter that purports to be on love (but includes no mention of our ever-growing understanding of neuroendocrine mechanisms of bonding nor any of the extensive behavioral ecology non-primate literature) is particularly egregious, even going so far as to make specious claims about cause and effect on the basis of complicated behavioral, epidemiological, and political correlations.
I had thought to add this book to a list of books about evolution that my college biology majors could read to broaden their understanding of evolution, but the sheer unscientific nature of the last three chapters precludes that. I came back to add that the more I reflect on this book, the more frustrated I become that this passed review, and the more committed I am to providing excellent scientific education to my students because this is just bad science.
Beginning early on, however, the author starts making critical misstatements about the way evolution and natural selection work. She perpetuates several commonly held misunderstandings about NS, including repeated reference to "species fitness," which is simply not a real thing. She's not even accurately describing either the fully debunked version of group selection ("for the good of the species"), although I think this is what she is trying to suggest, nor the modern multi-level- selection version of group selection that can work under some very specific conditions that humans don't meet. She's just making up mechanisms of evolution that can't work. Her misunderstanding gets worse and worse throughout the book. At one point, she even asks if evolution might have anticipated the need for a trait. That's just not how evolution works - there is no forward view. The narrative abandons discussion of biology and the "Eves" she originally structured the book around, along with even a rudimentary understanding of how evolution occurs. This profound misunderstanding of how natural selection works then structures the second half of the book, which comprises the evolutionary psychology chapters. These chapters are incomplete, scarce on any data, and in the end, are often completely speculative, in large part because she conflates culture with genetically heritable traits and assumes that (most? all?) traits persist in populations because they are adaptive. Over and over again. The section on sexism, in a chapter that purports to be on love (but includes no mention of our ever-growing understanding of neuroendocrine mechanisms of bonding nor any of the extensive behavioral ecology non-primate literature) is particularly egregious, even going so far as to make specious claims about cause and effect on the basis of complicated behavioral, epidemiological, and political correlations.
I had thought to add this book to a list of books about evolution that my college biology majors could read to broaden their understanding of evolution, but the sheer unscientific nature of the last three chapters precludes that. I came back to add that the more I reflect on this book, the more frustrated I become that this passed review, and the more committed I am to providing excellent scientific education to my students because this is just bad science.
July 19, 2023
As an adult with significant disabilities, I can recall reaching this stage in my life when I became incredibly frustrated with what I perceived as the weaknesses and limitations of my physical being.
It seemed like everything was going wrong and deeply lamented the loss of feeling "normal."
After a while, I began a deep dive into various aspects of my disabilities. I learned about my body. I learned about spina bifida. I learned about hydrocephalus, amputation, and traumatic brain injury. I learned as much as I could about history and function and biology and the universality of my being.
Over time, I began to realize and accept that my body is pretty amazing.
I thought of this period of my life often while reading Cat Bohannon's remarkable "Eve: How the Female Body Drove 200 Million Years of Human Evolution," a deep dive into what the female body is, how it came to be, and how this evolution still shapes all our lives today.
Bohannon picks up where "Sapiens" left off, covering the past 200 million years to tell the story of what it really means to be a woman in a way that somehow, unfathomably, both incredibly entertaining and stunningly well researched with hundreds, and I mean hundreds, of cited sources along the way. "Eve" is both incredibly satisfying yet also leaves you craving more of Bohannon's curiosity, insight, knowledge, and wit.
"Eve" can be an overwhelming book. It's incredibly academic yet also remarkably accessible in language, style, and structure. Bohannon seemingly understands that to really get her points across she needs to find a way to immerse us in this information without leaving us gasping for our literary breaths. Mission accomplished.
I was in awe of both the intimacy and universality of "Eve" as Bohannon explores a variety of topics in exploring, essentially, what it means to biologically be a woman and that tells the story of womanhood throughout the centuries.
To call "Eve" some sort of feminist manifesto seems inadequate as it's really a manifesto for humanity that places, in ways never done before, women into the picture of medicine, neurobiology, paleoanthropology, and evolutionary biology.
Bohannon writes with candor the history of breasts and vaginas and womb and love and menopause and so much more. It's honestly deliriously awesome. It's informative yet it's far beyond informative because it builds a vision of womanhood that is truly awe-inspiring.
For far too long, the world has told the story of human history through the male body (though perhaps not the disabled male body). With "Eve," Bohannon passionately declares a corrective and beautifully brings to life the power and glory of the female body and how it truly has driven 200 million years of human evolution.
Bohannon's writing here is both profound in its knowledge and poetic in its narrative rhythms. I learned so much throughout "Eve," yet what is equally as profound is how much I actually enjoyed that learning from beginning to end. "Eve" is a revelatory vision of the history of womanhood that celebrates that history with a sense of joy and wonder.
It's not often that I reach the end of a 600-page book and think to myself "Give me more." But, oh yes, "Give me more!"
It seemed like everything was going wrong and deeply lamented the loss of feeling "normal."
After a while, I began a deep dive into various aspects of my disabilities. I learned about my body. I learned about spina bifida. I learned about hydrocephalus, amputation, and traumatic brain injury. I learned as much as I could about history and function and biology and the universality of my being.
Over time, I began to realize and accept that my body is pretty amazing.
I thought of this period of my life often while reading Cat Bohannon's remarkable "Eve: How the Female Body Drove 200 Million Years of Human Evolution," a deep dive into what the female body is, how it came to be, and how this evolution still shapes all our lives today.
Bohannon picks up where "Sapiens" left off, covering the past 200 million years to tell the story of what it really means to be a woman in a way that somehow, unfathomably, both incredibly entertaining and stunningly well researched with hundreds, and I mean hundreds, of cited sources along the way. "Eve" is both incredibly satisfying yet also leaves you craving more of Bohannon's curiosity, insight, knowledge, and wit.
"Eve" can be an overwhelming book. It's incredibly academic yet also remarkably accessible in language, style, and structure. Bohannon seemingly understands that to really get her points across she needs to find a way to immerse us in this information without leaving us gasping for our literary breaths. Mission accomplished.
I was in awe of both the intimacy and universality of "Eve" as Bohannon explores a variety of topics in exploring, essentially, what it means to biologically be a woman and that tells the story of womanhood throughout the centuries.
To call "Eve" some sort of feminist manifesto seems inadequate as it's really a manifesto for humanity that places, in ways never done before, women into the picture of medicine, neurobiology, paleoanthropology, and evolutionary biology.
Bohannon writes with candor the history of breasts and vaginas and womb and love and menopause and so much more. It's honestly deliriously awesome. It's informative yet it's far beyond informative because it builds a vision of womanhood that is truly awe-inspiring.
For far too long, the world has told the story of human history through the male body (though perhaps not the disabled male body). With "Eve," Bohannon passionately declares a corrective and beautifully brings to life the power and glory of the female body and how it truly has driven 200 million years of human evolution.
Bohannon's writing here is both profound in its knowledge and poetic in its narrative rhythms. I learned so much throughout "Eve," yet what is equally as profound is how much I actually enjoyed that learning from beginning to end. "Eve" is a revelatory vision of the history of womanhood that celebrates that history with a sense of joy and wonder.
It's not often that I reach the end of a 600-page book and think to myself "Give me more." But, oh yes, "Give me more!"
December 10, 2023
4.5 Stars
For years my husband has complained about not being able to hear dialogue in movies against the backdrop of the score and his inability to keep up with family conversations in restaurants among the ambient noise (note that we have 2 daughters, so all female). In the past I have shrugged away my irritation and told him to clean the wax out of his ears and suggested a good ENT. Well, it turns out that men's ears don't hear higher frequencies as well as women's and that their hearing loss of the higher frequencies (the range where most women speak) begins at age 25. Apparently this difference evolved as females needed to be able to hear their babies over the sounds in the canopy when they moved about. My husband thanks you, Cat Bohannon, and I have issued my apology.
Eve: How the Female Body Drove 200 Million Years of Human Evolution is an evolutionary and social history through the lens of the female body. The seeds of this book were planted with Bohannon's realization that most medical research was conducted on male subjects so the differences in the female body were not taken into account. Female bodies are not just male bodies with breasts and wide hips; there are fundamental differences.
Some fascinating (to me anyway) things I learned:
Adipose tissue (fat) is an organ. Women's fat and men's fat are different. Each fat deposit in our body has a different function. One example is that the fat in women's hips, thighs, and buttocks is full of long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids like those found in fish oil. At puberty, females begin storing these fats (which we can't obtain enough of from our daily diet) in order to nourish the brain and retinas of a fetus during a pregnancy and breastfeeding.
Most of us know about the immune system benefits that come with breastfeeding. Those babies who are breastfed get an added benefit. While the milk flows out of the nipple there is an upsuck of the baby's saliva. "Depending on what happens to be in baby's spit that day, the mother's breasts will change the particular composition of her milk. Her milk will actually change to include an agent to fight a specific pathogen or to include hormones to soothe a stressed baby.
Pregnant women with malaria are three to four times more likely to suffer from the most severe forms of the disease, and of those who do, 50 percent will die. . . . The entire reason the United States built the CDC [and located it in Atlanta] is that malaria was rampant throughout the American south. Malaria was finally eradicated in the United States in 1951." My footnote (not in the book): In 2023, for the first time since then, there have been 9 reported cases of locally acquired malaria in the U.S.--7 in FL, 2 in TX, and 1 in MD. Climate change?
Why do women live long after they are no longer reproduce and live longer and more healthfully than men? Bohannon posits that "whatever helps female bodies live on may simply benefit male bodies less, and losing more males may not cost primate societies that much. . . . From a scientific perspective, males don't really need to live as long as females to perpetuate the species." As to the why, Bohannon suggests that "Before we could write stuff down, it was especially important to have someone in the group who could remember earlier crises. It's usually not hard to find someone who can remember a difficult thing that happened ten years ago. It's much harder to find someone who remembers a difficult thing that happened forty years ago, or how, precisely, the community managed to find a workaround." This knowledge combined with gynecological and midwifery skills were the evolutionary pressures that selected women to live longer.
Where I feel Bohannon is less sure footed is in her hypothesis over the evolution of sexism. Do read her thoughts and come to your own conclusions.
Bohannon is an excellent writer--clear, engaging, informative, and entertaining. There is so much more than these bits that I have shared, and all of it is fascinating. If the topic interests you, by all means take the plunge and read this book!
Publication 2023
For years my husband has complained about not being able to hear dialogue in movies against the backdrop of the score and his inability to keep up with family conversations in restaurants among the ambient noise (note that we have 2 daughters, so all female). In the past I have shrugged away my irritation and told him to clean the wax out of his ears and suggested a good ENT. Well, it turns out that men's ears don't hear higher frequencies as well as women's and that their hearing loss of the higher frequencies (the range where most women speak) begins at age 25. Apparently this difference evolved as females needed to be able to hear their babies over the sounds in the canopy when they moved about. My husband thanks you, Cat Bohannon, and I have issued my apology.
Eve: How the Female Body Drove 200 Million Years of Human Evolution is an evolutionary and social history through the lens of the female body. The seeds of this book were planted with Bohannon's realization that most medical research was conducted on male subjects so the differences in the female body were not taken into account. Female bodies are not just male bodies with breasts and wide hips; there are fundamental differences.
Some fascinating (to me anyway) things I learned:
Adipose tissue (fat) is an organ. Women's fat and men's fat are different. Each fat deposit in our body has a different function. One example is that the fat in women's hips, thighs, and buttocks is full of long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids like those found in fish oil. At puberty, females begin storing these fats (which we can't obtain enough of from our daily diet) in order to nourish the brain and retinas of a fetus during a pregnancy and breastfeeding.
Most of us know about the immune system benefits that come with breastfeeding. Those babies who are breastfed get an added benefit. While the milk flows out of the nipple there is an upsuck of the baby's saliva. "Depending on what happens to be in baby's spit that day, the mother's breasts will change the particular composition of her milk. Her milk will actually change to include an agent to fight a specific pathogen or to include hormones to soothe a stressed baby.
Pregnant women with malaria are three to four times more likely to suffer from the most severe forms of the disease, and of those who do, 50 percent will die. . . . The entire reason the United States built the CDC [and located it in Atlanta] is that malaria was rampant throughout the American south. Malaria was finally eradicated in the United States in 1951." My footnote (not in the book): In 2023, for the first time since then, there have been 9 reported cases of locally acquired malaria in the U.S.--7 in FL, 2 in TX, and 1 in MD. Climate change?
Why do women live long after they are no longer reproduce and live longer and more healthfully than men? Bohannon posits that "whatever helps female bodies live on may simply benefit male bodies less, and losing more males may not cost primate societies that much. . . . From a scientific perspective, males don't really need to live as long as females to perpetuate the species." As to the why, Bohannon suggests that "Before we could write stuff down, it was especially important to have someone in the group who could remember earlier crises. It's usually not hard to find someone who can remember a difficult thing that happened ten years ago. It's much harder to find someone who remembers a difficult thing that happened forty years ago, or how, precisely, the community managed to find a workaround." This knowledge combined with gynecological and midwifery skills were the evolutionary pressures that selected women to live longer.
Where I feel Bohannon is less sure footed is in her hypothesis over the evolution of sexism. Do read her thoughts and come to your own conclusions.
Bohannon is an excellent writer--clear, engaging, informative, and entertaining. There is so much more than these bits that I have shared, and all of it is fascinating. If the topic interests you, by all means take the plunge and read this book!
Publication 2023
July 10, 2024
tl;dr crowd:
This is an extremely interesting book on human evolution, looking at various traits of modern humans and exploring how they -and we- came to be.
For everyone else, it's time for Sacrilegious Studies. We'll be discussing the biblical creation story.
In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth (but not hell because no one had pissed him off yet.)
The earth was without form, so he took it in his big hands and shaped it into a ball. This could be fun, God thought, tossing it from hand to hand.
So he created a bunch more planets, seven in fact. He also made Pluto but it was just a little dwarf, an afterthought, not really a planet at all.
It was dark so God said, Let there be light!, and there was light.
God called the light Day and everything dark he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day.
God was really pleased with himself and all he'd accomplished in just 24 hours, so he went back to Heaven and poured himself a beer.
When he awoke, he looked at Earth and thought, Well, that looks funny - there's no sky! And it's all covered by water!
So, God said, Let there be firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters!
And with that, a blue sky formed that he called Heaven. He then pushed the water aside into one place, making way for dry land.
God thought of how he'd made parts of the Earth look much older than others. 'That'll really screw with geologists some day,' he chuckled. And evening and morning were the second day.
The following day, God looked at the earth and saw how boring it was. All blue and brown and bland. He pulled out some paint samples he'd gotten at Walmart. Green would be a nice addition, he thought. Let there be grass!
God really loved the grass, how pretty it was, and how nice it felt under his bare feet. He decided if a little green was good, a lot would be even better. So he created trees and moss and algae in swimming pools. And evening and morning were the third day.
Remember that on the first day God created light and day and night? Well, the people who wrote the book of Genesis were Bronze Age nomads and didn't realise there couldn't be light or days and nights without a sun. So they had God create the sun and the moon on the fourth day!
He also created stars to make the night sky look pretty and for people to read their horoscopes by.
The next day he made fish and birds and the day after that he made all the land animals except humans. And God saw that it was good and yada yada yada.
The sixth day came along and God realized there was no one to appreciate all his hard work. Maybe the nonhuman animals were praising him but, like most English speakers, he couldn't be bothered to learn another language.
So God created Man in his own image and put him in charge of the Earth and all its inhabitants. He named him Adam and patted him on the head.
Adam was a little lonely since God wasn't always around to talk to. There were a lot of nonhuman animals around, but as we already know.... English speakers.
So Adam said to God, 'Do you have any more tricks up your sleeve? How 'bout making someone I can talk to who knows how to cook and clean?'
God reached inside Adam's chest and pulled out a rib. 'What the hell, God?' Adam screamed. 'That hurt!'
'Well, I need something to make her with, don't I?', God replied. 'I can't just make her out of nothing like I did the Earth and moon and everything else. She's a little more complicated than that.'
God set to work to turn that bone into flesh. All of a sudden, a woman walked up behind them.
'I haven't seen you guys around before,' she said. 'What'cha making there, big dude?'
They jumped in surprise, gawking at this beautiful, sexy, intelligent creature. 'Wh- wh- where did you come from?', God stammered. 'I was just gonna create you!'
The woman started laughing. 'I came from millions of years of evolution, from my mother and grandmothers and great-great grandmothers, all the way back to one-celled organisms. Where did you come from?'
They continued staring until Adam managed to say, 'You're just what I need! You speak English and can keep me company. I hope you can also cook and clean?'
With another laugh, Eve turned on her heel. 'Not for you, buddy. Not for you.'
Adam looked at God and God looked at Adam. Shrugging, God poured them both a beer.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
While some people believe the earth was created 6,000 years ago by a supernatural entity who made humans exactly as we are, scientists know that we descended from other creatures, just like every other animal and plant. We are as much a part of the animal kingdom as cats and dogs and woolly mammoths.
In Eve, author Cat Bohannon tells the story of humanity and how the female body drove evolution (the one with the XY chromosome, though not all women are born with it - gender is part of the brain make-up and doesn't correspond to the same sexual organs in everyone. In other words, sex and gender are two different things).
This is a fascinating book. The author goes through various features and traces their lineage, features such as breasts, pregnancy, tool use, language and voice. She goes back to the earliest known "Eve" for each trait and examines how they have evolved into their current forms in modern humans. As she says, "There’s no one mother of us all. Each system in our body is effectively a different age".
Eve wasn't created from Adam's rib, no more than Adam was created from a handful of dirt.
This is one of my two favorite nonfiction books this year. I made heaps of highlights and couldn't stop thinking about it even when I wasn't reading. It's very well written and witty at times. There are copious notes, which are well worth reading as you go along.
If you enjoy the story of evolution, you should find much to appreciate in this book.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
And as for Adam.....
After sulking for a day over his lostmaid companion, he thought of something to make him feel better. 'Uh, God? You know this rib you took out of me? I was thinking.... maybe you could make it into something else.'
He glanced down, 'I'm looking a little bare, if you know what I mean.'
So God created Adam's penis and the evening and the morning were the sixth day.
This is an extremely interesting book on human evolution, looking at various traits of modern humans and exploring how they -and we- came to be.
For everyone else, it's time for Sacrilegious Studies. We'll be discussing the biblical creation story.
In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth (but not hell because no one had pissed him off yet.)
The earth was without form, so he took it in his big hands and shaped it into a ball. This could be fun, God thought, tossing it from hand to hand.
So he created a bunch more planets, seven in fact. He also made Pluto but it was just a little dwarf, an afterthought, not really a planet at all.
It was dark so God said, Let there be light!, and there was light.
God called the light Day and everything dark he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day.
God was really pleased with himself and all he'd accomplished in just 24 hours, so he went back to Heaven and poured himself a beer.
When he awoke, he looked at Earth and thought, Well, that looks funny - there's no sky! And it's all covered by water!
So, God said, Let there be firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters!
And with that, a blue sky formed that he called Heaven. He then pushed the water aside into one place, making way for dry land.
God thought of how he'd made parts of the Earth look much older than others. 'That'll really screw with geologists some day,' he chuckled. And evening and morning were the second day.
The following day, God looked at the earth and saw how boring it was. All blue and brown and bland. He pulled out some paint samples he'd gotten at Walmart. Green would be a nice addition, he thought. Let there be grass!
God really loved the grass, how pretty it was, and how nice it felt under his bare feet. He decided if a little green was good, a lot would be even better. So he created trees and moss and algae in swimming pools. And evening and morning were the third day.
Remember that on the first day God created light and day and night? Well, the people who wrote the book of Genesis were Bronze Age nomads and didn't realise there couldn't be light or days and nights without a sun. So they had God create the sun and the moon on the fourth day!
He also created stars to make the night sky look pretty and for people to read their horoscopes by.
The next day he made fish and birds and the day after that he made all the land animals except humans. And God saw that it was good and yada yada yada.
The sixth day came along and God realized there was no one to appreciate all his hard work. Maybe the nonhuman animals were praising him but, like most English speakers, he couldn't be bothered to learn another language.
So God created Man in his own image and put him in charge of the Earth and all its inhabitants. He named him Adam and patted him on the head.
Adam was a little lonely since God wasn't always around to talk to. There were a lot of nonhuman animals around, but as we already know.... English speakers.
So Adam said to God, 'Do you have any more tricks up your sleeve? How 'bout making someone I can talk to who knows how to cook and clean?'
God reached inside Adam's chest and pulled out a rib. 'What the hell, God?' Adam screamed. 'That hurt!'
'Well, I need something to make her with, don't I?', God replied. 'I can't just make her out of nothing like I did the Earth and moon and everything else. She's a little more complicated than that.'
God set to work to turn that bone into flesh. All of a sudden, a woman walked up behind them.
'I haven't seen you guys around before,' she said. 'What'cha making there, big dude?'
They jumped in surprise, gawking at this beautiful, sexy, intelligent creature. 'Wh- wh- where did you come from?', God stammered. 'I was just gonna create you!'
The woman started laughing. 'I came from millions of years of evolution, from my mother and grandmothers and great-great grandmothers, all the way back to one-celled organisms. Where did you come from?'
They continued staring until Adam managed to say, 'You're just what I need! You speak English and can keep me company. I hope you can also cook and clean?'
With another laugh, Eve turned on her heel. 'Not for you, buddy. Not for you.'
Adam looked at God and God looked at Adam. Shrugging, God poured them both a beer.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
While some people believe the earth was created 6,000 years ago by a supernatural entity who made humans exactly as we are, scientists know that we descended from other creatures, just like every other animal and plant. We are as much a part of the animal kingdom as cats and dogs and woolly mammoths.
In Eve, author Cat Bohannon tells the story of humanity and how the female body drove evolution (the one with the XY chromosome, though not all women are born with it - gender is part of the brain make-up and doesn't correspond to the same sexual organs in everyone. In other words, sex and gender are two different things).
This is a fascinating book. The author goes through various features and traces their lineage, features such as breasts, pregnancy, tool use, language and voice. She goes back to the earliest known "Eve" for each trait and examines how they have evolved into their current forms in modern humans. As she says, "There’s no one mother of us all. Each system in our body is effectively a different age".
Eve wasn't created from Adam's rib, no more than Adam was created from a handful of dirt.
This is one of my two favorite nonfiction books this year. I made heaps of highlights and couldn't stop thinking about it even when I wasn't reading. It's very well written and witty at times. There are copious notes, which are well worth reading as you go along.
If you enjoy the story of evolution, you should find much to appreciate in this book.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
And as for Adam.....
After sulking for a day over his lost
He glanced down, 'I'm looking a little bare, if you know what I mean.'
So God created Adam's penis and the evening and the morning were the sixth day.
January 10, 2025
So many revelations about women's bodies to be found here. I love this book!
👉 Check out my Best books of 2024 on BookTube. 👈
This book also features in my 2024 Women's Prize deep dive . 👀
"Where women are undereducated, entire societies eventually go fallow. If history proves right, neglecting girls' education is a sign of a civilization's decline."
Did you know that the fat on women's butt and thighs is crucial to infant and fetal development? Or that women's bodies outpace men's bodies when it comes to physical endurance? What about the fact that schizophrenia predominantly affects men at a younger age than women? And how about menopause; do you know what evolutionary purpose it serves?
All of that and more is covered in Eve, which proves a fascinating and revelatory book about women's bodies and the crucial role they play in both the existence and survival of the human race.
This book:
- Interrogates how the world’s safety mechanisms and scientific studies are designed to cater to men’s bodies.
- Encourages readers to discard the male lens through which we’ve been conditioned to examine human evolution.
- Reveals that for a society to survive, it must care for its girls and women by ensuring they are well fed, have access to health care and safe means of terminating unwanted or unviable pregnancies, and are educated.
- And whenever possible, Bohannon explores how the topics discussed relate to trans women and non-binary people (this is admittedly a small portion of the book, as more studies must be done for us to have substantial information in this regard).
Highly recommend this book (including the audiobook)!
👉 Check out my Best books of 2024 on BookTube. 👈
This book also features in my 2024 Women's Prize deep dive . 👀
"Where women are undereducated, entire societies eventually go fallow. If history proves right, neglecting girls' education is a sign of a civilization's decline."
Did you know that the fat on women's butt and thighs is crucial to infant and fetal development? Or that women's bodies outpace men's bodies when it comes to physical endurance? What about the fact that schizophrenia predominantly affects men at a younger age than women? And how about menopause; do you know what evolutionary purpose it serves?
All of that and more is covered in Eve, which proves a fascinating and revelatory book about women's bodies and the crucial role they play in both the existence and survival of the human race.
This book:
- Interrogates how the world’s safety mechanisms and scientific studies are designed to cater to men’s bodies.
- Encourages readers to discard the male lens through which we’ve been conditioned to examine human evolution.
- Reveals that for a society to survive, it must care for its girls and women by ensuring they are well fed, have access to health care and safe means of terminating unwanted or unviable pregnancies, and are educated.
- And whenever possible, Bohannon explores how the topics discussed relate to trans women and non-binary people (this is admittedly a small portion of the book, as more studies must be done for us to have substantial information in this regard).
Highly recommend this book (including the audiobook)!
February 27, 2024
A long, chatty, imaginative but sloppy work of popular science by a non-scientist. This one combines a handful of important facts to know about your body and a call to end the exclusion of women from medical testing; with speculation about the role of women and the female body in evolutionary history, which though hypothetical is at least fun to think about, and a useful counter to equally hypothetical male-centered assumptions; and with its own weird assumptions, bad facts and unnecessary personal asides. The pages do turn quickly, but in the end it’s more entertainment (if this is your thing) than education.
But to break it down. First, a few important or cool facts:
- The introduction is probably the most important chapter, calling attention to how much medical research (on humans and even on animals) includes exclusively male subjects… or if females are included, there’s no analysis of sex differences. The problem is that women are not small men. So for instance, prescriptions of pain meds will be inadequate because women’s livers process drugs more quickly. Even heart attacks look different in women—in fact, while women have fewer heart attacks than men, we’re more likely to die of them because they go unrecognized. I hope the introduction will be influential because this is a serious problem.
- It turns out even women’s fat is different. Fat deposits around the body are differently constituted, and women’s hips, butts and thighs store specific fatty acids used to make baby brains and retinas. You can’t get enough just during pregnancy, so your body starts hoarding them in puberty. What if you get a liposuction and then get pregnant? No one knows!
- A mother’s body actually communicates with the baby’s body through nursing. The nipple takes in and analyzes baby saliva, then adjusts the formula of the milk accordingly—for instance, with immune system boosters for a sick child. This communication can also have negative results: for instance, a very stressed mother can transmit that cortisol to the baby.
- Also, women who haven’t given birth and even men can lactate, though usually not much and usually requiring medication (and it doesn’t always work). Yes, there is a culture where men engage in so much childcare they’ve even been known to breastfeed!
Some evolutionary arguments I had doubts about:
- Breasts: why do we have them? You don’t need all that just to feed a baby. Bohannon argues that it’s probably not sexual selection because women have such a wide variety of breast sizes, all of which are functional for nursing. This seems to me like a good argument for why it is sexual selection, because if it’s only aesthetic rather than a survival or reproductive need, there’s more wiggle room.
- Menopause: why do we have it? Turns out, we’re one of only two species that do (the other being orcas); others reproduce till they die, sometimes much older than us. (Chimps and elephants can give birth in their 60s!) Bohannon posits that our bodies were once programmed to die around the time we now have menopause, but having some old people around was good for the community, so our bodies evolved to live longer but somehow women’s reproductive systems got left behind. I’m afraid I don’t follow this one either.
- Rape: how common was it among our ancestors? Bohannon argues not that common, because we don’t have twisty vaginas or spiked penises or cervixes that can be closed off to sperm, which some rape-prone species have evolved to facilitate or fight back against rape. This doesn’t seem very convincing: first because our bodies have indeed evolved mechanisms to protect us from injury during rape (this is why many women experience physiological arousal even though they’re definitely not into it), and second because, as Bohannon herself points out, we already have a much harder time conceiving than most species. A mallard duck’s “trapdoor” vagina means she has only a 2% chance of conceiving from rape, which is a big difference if you’re a species that normally only needs to mate once per cycle, but humans average only a 5% chance of pregnancy from any single encounter, and that’s when you’re young. Plus, Bohannon also argues that humans likely developed gynecology among our earliest tools—thus, evolved to get rid of unwanted pregnancies by intentionally aborting them, rather than our bodies doing it for us like other species. So we do in fact have adaptations to protect us, however imperfect, at least from dying. She also weirdly distinguishes “forcible rape” from “coercion” among chimps, with the former being not that common. I don’t follow that argument at all: “forcible rape” being uncommon among chimps tells us what, exactly, about all rape among humans?
- Brains: I was unimpressed with this chapter all around (except for the bit about how female sex hormones apparently help keep swelling down after a traumatic brain injury, resulting in better recovery, and potentially being developed into medication for everybody—that was cool). Bohannon falls into the trap of assuming that whatever we see around us must be biological rather than cultural, and while she does at least mention that differences among members of the same sex are far greater than differences between group averages, she still spills a lot of ink on those averages. She discusses differences in average test scores without even mentioning (until later) stereotype threat, and how these differences can be culturally programmed: even being reminded of a stereotype before a test alters scores to better fit the stereotype, so what does a lifetime in that cultural stew do to you? (You can read more about it in this excellent book.) She doesn’t consider whether girls’ average math scores might be depressed by a society that stereotypes math as a boy thing; whether young girls might have better verbal skills than boys because caretakers talk to and encourage them more; whether there might be societal reasons that men commit suicide more often than women. Despite the fact that the last has an enormous, 17%-of-the-planet-sized exception: in China women kill themselves more. She doesn’t even mention that.
- Sexism: Bohannon argues that sexism—including internalized sexism—is also hardwired, using as evidence the fact that many women (including apparently herself) are harsher on women than men: for instance, blaming the single woman rather than the married man for an affair. Perhaps because I don’t share her reaction on that point, this argument seems awfully weak, and again, Bohannon overlooks psychological and sociological explanations. Certainly having a common set of rules helps bind a community together, but just assuming your own cultural detritus is written into the genes of all humans is absurd.
Other stuff that was just weird or wrong:
- The bit about how men are faster but women have more endurance, illustrated by the fact that men beat women by 18% in a 5k, 11% in a marathon, but at 195 miles, women outrun men. How many people have ever run 195 miles in a go? Are they representative? Also, at the more common distances are we talking average runners or average winners?
- “There actually aren’t that many female prostitutes at work these days. By the most generous estimates, sex workers constitute only 0.6 percent of the U.S. population.” That’s… actually an enormous number if you ask me. A google search seems to bear it out, with an estimated total of 1-2 million sex workers in the U.S., 20% male and 80% female. So this footnote is perhaps accurate but in fact did more than anything else I’ve seen to convince me that sex work is a serious issue today.
- Then there’s the suggestion that “the latest numbers estimate that as many as 20 percent of humans are homosexual,” also so wildly huge that I went looking. Her citation is to an article I’m unable to access, but which claims nothing so grand in its abstract, instead stating that asking questions about sexuality in a veiled way makes people 65% more likely to report “nonheterosexual identity” and 59% more likely to report “same sex experiences.” The numbers I am able to find show a range of 4-8% by state of Americans identifying as “LGBT,” and the B is doing a lot of work there. Young people are far more likely to report an LGBT identity, but when you look at the breakdown, the increase is entirely in the fact that the numbers identifying as bisexual have shot up (with gays and lesbians holding steady at 3-4%, but 12% now calling themselves bi, thus leading to a spike in LGBT-identified people overall). Sexuality is fluid and often situational, so I’m not surprised a study digging for any indicia of “nonheterosexuality”—thus including people who are even a little bit bi—would hit 20% or even higher. But Bohannon calls all those people “homosexual,” i.e., gay or lesbian, and that’s flat wrong. Also, this statement is in service of the argument that we evolved this way to have extra childless adults to lend a hand in babysitting, which seems unconvincing given that plenty of adults are infertile without being gay, and that attraction as a cultural prerequisite for conception is by no means universal.
- Sadly, sloppiness with facts seems to be a pattern, even just with stuff I’m able to verify: take also the claim that “some say” that the Black Death killing 1/3 of the European population “[is] why Europe went through the Dark Ages, while the Islamic empires managed to flourish.” There is no source for this, presumably because even the most amateur of historians would immediately recognize it for hogwash: the Black Death struck Europe in the 1340’s, already in the late Middle Ages (which historians also no longer call the Dark Ages, but anyway), at which point the Islamic golden age—begun several centuries before—was by most accounts already over.
And I’ve barely scratched the surface. This is a long book, made longer with personal anecdotes and pop culture references and imaginary recreations of ancient life and virtue signaling the author’s trans inclusivity without offering much in the way of science, on how hormones begun at different times of life affect the body, etc. I did find the speculation about evolution relatively interesting, and I hope the author’s points about the absence of women from medical research will help jumpstart some necessary work. But a book that needs this much fact-checking, and full of this much questionable speculation, can’t be taken seriously.
But to break it down. First, a few important or cool facts:
- The introduction is probably the most important chapter, calling attention to how much medical research (on humans and even on animals) includes exclusively male subjects… or if females are included, there’s no analysis of sex differences. The problem is that women are not small men. So for instance, prescriptions of pain meds will be inadequate because women’s livers process drugs more quickly. Even heart attacks look different in women—in fact, while women have fewer heart attacks than men, we’re more likely to die of them because they go unrecognized. I hope the introduction will be influential because this is a serious problem.
- It turns out even women’s fat is different. Fat deposits around the body are differently constituted, and women’s hips, butts and thighs store specific fatty acids used to make baby brains and retinas. You can’t get enough just during pregnancy, so your body starts hoarding them in puberty. What if you get a liposuction and then get pregnant? No one knows!
- A mother’s body actually communicates with the baby’s body through nursing. The nipple takes in and analyzes baby saliva, then adjusts the formula of the milk accordingly—for instance, with immune system boosters for a sick child. This communication can also have negative results: for instance, a very stressed mother can transmit that cortisol to the baby.
- Also, women who haven’t given birth and even men can lactate, though usually not much and usually requiring medication (and it doesn’t always work). Yes, there is a culture where men engage in so much childcare they’ve even been known to breastfeed!
Some evolutionary arguments I had doubts about:
- Breasts: why do we have them? You don’t need all that just to feed a baby. Bohannon argues that it’s probably not sexual selection because women have such a wide variety of breast sizes, all of which are functional for nursing. This seems to me like a good argument for why it is sexual selection, because if it’s only aesthetic rather than a survival or reproductive need, there’s more wiggle room.
- Menopause: why do we have it? Turns out, we’re one of only two species that do (the other being orcas); others reproduce till they die, sometimes much older than us. (Chimps and elephants can give birth in their 60s!) Bohannon posits that our bodies were once programmed to die around the time we now have menopause, but having some old people around was good for the community, so our bodies evolved to live longer but somehow women’s reproductive systems got left behind. I’m afraid I don’t follow this one either.
- Rape: how common was it among our ancestors? Bohannon argues not that common, because we don’t have twisty vaginas or spiked penises or cervixes that can be closed off to sperm, which some rape-prone species have evolved to facilitate or fight back against rape. This doesn’t seem very convincing: first because our bodies have indeed evolved mechanisms to protect us from injury during rape (this is why many women experience physiological arousal even though they’re definitely not into it), and second because, as Bohannon herself points out, we already have a much harder time conceiving than most species. A mallard duck’s “trapdoor” vagina means she has only a 2% chance of conceiving from rape, which is a big difference if you’re a species that normally only needs to mate once per cycle, but humans average only a 5% chance of pregnancy from any single encounter, and that’s when you’re young. Plus, Bohannon also argues that humans likely developed gynecology among our earliest tools—thus, evolved to get rid of unwanted pregnancies by intentionally aborting them, rather than our bodies doing it for us like other species. So we do in fact have adaptations to protect us, however imperfect, at least from dying. She also weirdly distinguishes “forcible rape” from “coercion” among chimps, with the former being not that common. I don’t follow that argument at all: “forcible rape” being uncommon among chimps tells us what, exactly, about all rape among humans?
- Brains: I was unimpressed with this chapter all around (except for the bit about how female sex hormones apparently help keep swelling down after a traumatic brain injury, resulting in better recovery, and potentially being developed into medication for everybody—that was cool). Bohannon falls into the trap of assuming that whatever we see around us must be biological rather than cultural, and while she does at least mention that differences among members of the same sex are far greater than differences between group averages, she still spills a lot of ink on those averages. She discusses differences in average test scores without even mentioning (until later) stereotype threat, and how these differences can be culturally programmed: even being reminded of a stereotype before a test alters scores to better fit the stereotype, so what does a lifetime in that cultural stew do to you? (You can read more about it in this excellent book.) She doesn’t consider whether girls’ average math scores might be depressed by a society that stereotypes math as a boy thing; whether young girls might have better verbal skills than boys because caretakers talk to and encourage them more; whether there might be societal reasons that men commit suicide more often than women. Despite the fact that the last has an enormous, 17%-of-the-planet-sized exception: in China women kill themselves more. She doesn’t even mention that.
- Sexism: Bohannon argues that sexism—including internalized sexism—is also hardwired, using as evidence the fact that many women (including apparently herself) are harsher on women than men: for instance, blaming the single woman rather than the married man for an affair. Perhaps because I don’t share her reaction on that point, this argument seems awfully weak, and again, Bohannon overlooks psychological and sociological explanations. Certainly having a common set of rules helps bind a community together, but just assuming your own cultural detritus is written into the genes of all humans is absurd.
Other stuff that was just weird or wrong:
- The bit about how men are faster but women have more endurance, illustrated by the fact that men beat women by 18% in a 5k, 11% in a marathon, but at 195 miles, women outrun men. How many people have ever run 195 miles in a go? Are they representative? Also, at the more common distances are we talking average runners or average winners?
- “There actually aren’t that many female prostitutes at work these days. By the most generous estimates, sex workers constitute only 0.6 percent of the U.S. population.” That’s… actually an enormous number if you ask me. A google search seems to bear it out, with an estimated total of 1-2 million sex workers in the U.S., 20% male and 80% female. So this footnote is perhaps accurate but in fact did more than anything else I’ve seen to convince me that sex work is a serious issue today.
- Then there’s the suggestion that “the latest numbers estimate that as many as 20 percent of humans are homosexual,” also so wildly huge that I went looking. Her citation is to an article I’m unable to access, but which claims nothing so grand in its abstract, instead stating that asking questions about sexuality in a veiled way makes people 65% more likely to report “nonheterosexual identity” and 59% more likely to report “same sex experiences.” The numbers I am able to find show a range of 4-8% by state of Americans identifying as “LGBT,” and the B is doing a lot of work there. Young people are far more likely to report an LGBT identity, but when you look at the breakdown, the increase is entirely in the fact that the numbers identifying as bisexual have shot up (with gays and lesbians holding steady at 3-4%, but 12% now calling themselves bi, thus leading to a spike in LGBT-identified people overall). Sexuality is fluid and often situational, so I’m not surprised a study digging for any indicia of “nonheterosexuality”—thus including people who are even a little bit bi—would hit 20% or even higher. But Bohannon calls all those people “homosexual,” i.e., gay or lesbian, and that’s flat wrong. Also, this statement is in service of the argument that we evolved this way to have extra childless adults to lend a hand in babysitting, which seems unconvincing given that plenty of adults are infertile without being gay, and that attraction as a cultural prerequisite for conception is by no means universal.
- Sadly, sloppiness with facts seems to be a pattern, even just with stuff I’m able to verify: take also the claim that “some say” that the Black Death killing 1/3 of the European population “[is] why Europe went through the Dark Ages, while the Islamic empires managed to flourish.” There is no source for this, presumably because even the most amateur of historians would immediately recognize it for hogwash: the Black Death struck Europe in the 1340’s, already in the late Middle Ages (which historians also no longer call the Dark Ages, but anyway), at which point the Islamic golden age—begun several centuries before—was by most accounts already over.
And I’ve barely scratched the surface. This is a long book, made longer with personal anecdotes and pop culture references and imaginary recreations of ancient life and virtue signaling the author’s trans inclusivity without offering much in the way of science, on how hormones begun at different times of life affect the body, etc. I did find the speculation about evolution relatively interesting, and I hope the author’s points about the absence of women from medical research will help jumpstart some necessary work. But a book that needs this much fact-checking, and full of this much questionable speculation, can’t be taken seriously.
November 2, 2023
DNF at page 54.
I don’t usually log my DNFs, but this has to be said: you cannot write a 600 page book about women’s bodies and how they have uniquely evolved in distinct ways from men only to disregard that and act like sometimes men CAN do these things—like when they don’t identify as men 🤗. That’s not how human biology works, and you should know that!
I don’t usually log my DNFs, but this has to be said: you cannot write a 600 page book about women’s bodies and how they have uniquely evolved in distinct ways from men only to disregard that and act like sometimes men CAN do these things—like when they don’t identify as men 🤗. That’s not how human biology works, and you should know that!
March 11, 2025
When I read a great work of nonfiction, like a really excellent book, one that I'm going to carry into my every day life, I spend days in a kind of trance, like I'm drunk on the book. That's what this book did to me, except it's also become a new filter through which I see and appreciate my own body.
To say I loved it would be an understatement.
Click here to hear more of my thoughts over on my Booktube channel, abookolive!
To say I loved it would be an understatement.
Click here to hear more of my thoughts over on my Booktube channel, abookolive!
July 26, 2023
We don’t have one mother; we have many. And to each Eve, her particular Eden: We have the breasts we do because mammals evolved to make milk. We have the wombs we do because we evolved to “hatch” our eggs inside our own bodies. We have the faces we do, and our human sensory perception along with it, because primates evolved to live in trees. Our bipedal legs, our tool use, our fatty brains and chatty mouths and menopausal grandmothers — all of these traits that make us “human” came about at different times in our evolutionary past. In truth, we have billions of Edens, but just a handful of places and times that made our bodies the way they are. These particular Edens are often where we speciated: when our bodies evolved in ways that made us too different from others to be able to breed with them anymore. And if you want to understand women’s bodies, it’s largely these Eves and their Edens you need to think about.
In an often recounted story, a journalist recalled being in an Anthropology class when her female professor held up a picture of an antler with 28 tally marks carved upon it, saying: "This is alleged to be man's first attempt at a calendar." We all looked at the bone in admiration. "Tell me," she continued, "what man needs to know when 28 days have passed? I suspect that this is woman's first attempt at a calendar." In Eve: How the Female Body Drove Human Evolution, author Cat Bohannon (with a Ph.D. from Columbia University in the evolution of narrative and cognition) expands on this idea of considering the needs of the female of our species when looking for the catalysts behind the great shifts in our development — from bipedal locomotion to language and tool use — and in a narrative that starts with the first tiny mammal that coexisted with the dinosaurs and traces that story up to today’s reality, Bohannon has assembled a fascinating, comprehensive, and entertaining study of what is usually left out of the story of “us” — all while making a forceful case for why focussing on the history of the female body matters for the future of all of humanity. In a quirky bit of formatting, Bohannon starts each chapter with a glimpse at the “Eve” of a new development — the Eve of lactation is a Morganucodon sweating beads of milk through her fur in an underground den during the Jurassic Period; the Eve of menopause is a grandmother using her experience to serve as an emergency midwife in early Jericho — and I found the format charming. I loved everything about this (even if it did take quite a while to read) and I would unhesitatingly recommend it to any reader. (Note: I read an ARC through NetGalley and passages quoted may not be in their final forms.)
It’s not that topflight scientists still think female bodies were made when God pulled a rib from Adam’s side, but the assumption that being sexed is simply a matter of sex organs — that somehow being female is just a minor tweak on a Platonic form — is a bit like that old Bible story. And that story is a lie. As we’ve increasingly learned, female bodies aren’t just male bodies with “extra stuff ” (fat, breasts, uteri). Nor are testicles and ovaries swappable. Being sexed permeates every major feature of our mammalian bodies and the lives we live inside them, for mouse and human alike. When scientists study only the male norm, we’re getting less than half of a complicated picture; all too often, we don’t know what we’re missing by ignoring sex differences, because we’re not asking the question.
I first encountered this idea of the Platonic form (and the Homo sapien female being merely a weaker variation on the male ideal) and its persistent chauvinism affecting medical research in Invisible Women. Relatedly, Bohannon includes in her Introduction recent research into women’s “gluteofemoral” fat (on hips, buttocks, and upper thigh) — ie., the “stubborn” padding that a woman might turn to liposuction to remove — writing that it is composed of unique and essential lipids (accumulated since childhood) that are vital during pregnancy and breastfeeding to build a baby’s brain and eyes. But apparently no one, before the author, ever asked what the ramifications might be when a post-liposuction woman becomes pregnant. When Bohannon later introduces the genesis of breasts and placental wombs and women's heightened sensory perception — each of which development was absolutely essential to evolving our species into what it is today — it’s hard not to think that perhaps the female form is the pinnacle of human evolution, with the stripped-down male contributing some sperm now and then. Bohannon makes a strong case that the first tools were probably gynecological — we were still opportunistic scavengers long after walking upright and growing large brains made human childbirth a risky business, so the first tools were likely not hunting related since we’re here to tell the tale — and she also makes the case that human language (with grammar and syntax that differentiates it from animal communication), however it arose, was passed down, mother to child:
The majority of scientific stories about the evolution of human language fall in line: at each turn, human innovation has been driven by groups of men solving man-problems. One popular tale holds that language happened because we became hunters, forming large parties (of men) who needed to shout complex directions at one another across wide savannas. But wolves are pretty fantastic hunters, do it in groups, come up with surprisingly complex plans for the hunt that depend on members performing diverse roles, and don’t have a lick of language…So the male narrative of the evolution of human language misses the point. Language isn’t like opposable thumbs or flat faces — traits that evolution wrote into our genes. Our capacity for learning and innovating in language is innate, but nevertheless, for the largest gains in intergenerational communication to persist over time, each generation has to pass language on to the next with careful effort, interactive learning, and guided development. Language, in other words, is something that mothers and their babies make together and is dependent on the relationship between them in those first critical three to five years of human life. A long, unbroken chain of mothers and offspring trying to communicate with each other — that’s what’s kept this language thing going from the beginning.
Eve is stuffed with interesting facts — I did not know that openings in a breastfeeding woman’s areola “uptakes” her baby’s saliva to scan for infection and send specific immunity supports, or that a stress hormone is released in women when they hear a baby crying (while the top frequencies of a crying baby are cut off in the male hearing range) or that reducing the number of girls married before they are eighteen by even 10 percent can reduce a country’s maternal mortality by 70 percent — supported by pages of footnotes and citations. I trusted the research. But Bohannon’s main thesis seems to be that, despite nearly dying off a couple of times, our species has been able to thrive and populate the entire planet primarily because we mastered gynecology; learning to have the right number of babies, raised at the right time, according to the resources of their mothers’ community. And while advances in birth control and midwifery did improve maternal outcomes, it was sexism — controlling the bodies of fertile females and controlling who had access to them — that did most of the work. Now that medical advances in birth control, midwifery, and gynecology ought to guarantee maternal outcomes — and this again stresses the need for proper medical research on the female body — Bohannon suggests that it’s past time we released ourselves from the cultural constraints of sexism. (Even in America, maternal death rates are on the rise: a hot combination of racism, sexism, ableism, reduced public support for female health, and the crippling of science-based sex education has finally made it more dangerous for American women to be pregnant than it used to be.)
Now, I’m hardly the sort of person who wants to think of women as simply baby factories. But as a species, let’s say all of us want to get smarter. That’s what it takes to cure cancer. To solve the climate crisis. How do we do that? For a start, we might want to acknowledge that human brains are something that are made primarily out of women’s bodies: first in their wombs, and then from their breast milk, and then from the quality of interactions mothers have with their children. So if you want the best possible chance to make a lot of kids with high IQs, you want healthy women who are fed well, and have been fed well, consistently, for at least two decades before they become pregnant. You want them to have had a rich and well-supported childhood education. And you want them to be well cared for throughout their reproductive lives, with readily available education about nutrition and healthy habits and newborn caretaking. You want them to have community resources available when they get sick and when their kids get sick. And, because STIs have such a proven effect on reproductive health, you want them to have ready access to prophylactics and good sex ed.
So, ultimately, this isn’t simply an objective overview of the science behind “how the female body drove evolution”. But as I agree with Bohannon’s conclusions regarding the need to eliminate the atavistic drive to control female bodies (which is somehow increasing around the world?), I’m still happy to have read this. It’s scholarly and engaging and necessary. This should absolutely be read alongside popular male-focussed histories like Yuval Noah Harari’s Sapiens; he left out the bits about how the first cities were made possible by wet nurses.
January 19, 2024
I have mixed feelings about this book. The main thing that appeals to me is her underlying premise that the theories about human evolution have largely been theorized by men, who assumed that “human innovation had been driven by groups of men solving man-problems.” So I appreciate her turning of the tables on those chauvinist assumptions. Unfortunately, it seems to me that she falls into the trap of thinking that natural selection has a plan, that evolution has direction or is aiming for something. It just doesn't work that way—we have certain genetics and if those tiny blueprints give us an advantage, our offspring may proliferate more than those of our neighbours (or not).
I had never thought of gynecology as an asset in the human evolution game, but I think she has a point. Females helping others with the labouring process would be a distinct advantage. However behaviours don't fossilize, so it's a largely theoretical argument, as is the chapter on our unusual condition known as menopause. Sure, it's a nice bonus to have wise elders to help with memories of previous solutions to thorny problems, but it's almost certainly an evolutionary accident.
I had never encountered the information on throat sacs in primates before, despite taking several primatology courses in university and volunteering as an education docent in natural history for 17 years. I was intrigued by the idea that the loss of throat sacs would have been an advantage for a primate that had made the switch to an upright posture. It made sense to me: the drainage of sinuses down the throat, resulting in more vocal sac infections, could be selected against. That the loss of vocal sacs would be a step towards the possible development of spoken language is a tempting new idea for me.
Generally, when she deals with actual fossil evidence, I like her conclusions. But all the theoretical speculations, while fun, are just that, speculations. There are entertaining footnotes aplenty and copious endnotes too (where I found some sources for the fascinating throat sac material). There is also a very long bibliography, which I appreciated. As with any “explanation“ of human behaviour, take it all with a very large grain of salt.
I had never thought of gynecology as an asset in the human evolution game, but I think she has a point. Females helping others with the labouring process would be a distinct advantage. However behaviours don't fossilize, so it's a largely theoretical argument, as is the chapter on our unusual condition known as menopause. Sure, it's a nice bonus to have wise elders to help with memories of previous solutions to thorny problems, but it's almost certainly an evolutionary accident.
I had never encountered the information on throat sacs in primates before, despite taking several primatology courses in university and volunteering as an education docent in natural history for 17 years. I was intrigued by the idea that the loss of throat sacs would have been an advantage for a primate that had made the switch to an upright posture. It made sense to me: the drainage of sinuses down the throat, resulting in more vocal sac infections, could be selected against. That the loss of vocal sacs would be a step towards the possible development of spoken language is a tempting new idea for me.
Generally, when she deals with actual fossil evidence, I like her conclusions. But all the theoretical speculations, while fun, are just that, speculations. There are entertaining footnotes aplenty and copious endnotes too (where I found some sources for the fascinating throat sac material). There is also a very long bibliography, which I appreciated. As with any “explanation“ of human behaviour, take it all with a very large grain of salt.
March 14, 2024
My Dream Date with Cat Bohannon
(A fictional event)
LCJ: Very nice to meet you.
CB: (looking sideways) One of the perks of publishing – I have to participate in these ‘win a date with the author’ lunches.
LCJ, pointedly ignoring the ungraciousness of CB’s response: I recently finished your book ‘Eve,’ and thought it was quite an amazing piece of scholarship wrapped up in accessible and engaging language.
CB: Oh? Well, that’s good to hear. Are you an academic or a biologist yourself?
LCJ: No, I’m a budding librarian and book nerd who spends his free time writing book reviews for Goodreads.
CB: (looks away)
LCJ: Which reminds me! I loved this (digs into his briefcase, pulls out the book and flips it to p. 257:
CB: It’s such an unnatural way to communicate, but many of us spend hours and hours every day doing it.
LCJ: Judging by the citations in the book, you’re one of those people. The fact that you wrote this while raising two children and writing a PhD Thesis on the variation of information density in long-form narrative…
CB: How did you know that?
LCJ: Google, and I read your Acknowledgements.
CB: Of course.
LCJ: There’s so many fun, chewy facts in here! (Turns the page to p. 259)
CB, cracking first smile of the afternoon: Men! You guys just….(shakes head)
LCJ: To be fair, many of these female patients were probably not brainy gorgeous redheads who paid their way through school by modeling.
CB: (looking at watch) Congratulations, you lasted for over two minutes before bringing that up. That may be a new record among the men who’ve read my book.
LCJ: Well, I started life as a “bloodsucking demon fetus,” after all (p.107).
CB: (Laughs) That was, of course, an exaggeration. Sort of. Even if it’s true.
LCJ: Your fellow New Yorker Deena Emera wrote a whole book about the difficulties surrounding the human placenta.
CB: (raising eyebows) So you’re not completely ignorant of biology?
LCJ, in a rare bout of modesty: Not completely
CB: So what do you think of my restatement of human evolution?
LCJ: Your choice of presentation was really good. As I said earlier, you force us to think about things in new ways. I like how you pointed out different body parts went through design freezes at various points in our evolutionary history, so our bladders are hundreds of millions of years old while our brains, in their current form, may only go back 50,000 years or so. That’s really an inspired way to tackle all this. And your proposal that young mothers probably had more to do with the invention of language and tools than Mighty Hunters sounds right to me.
CB: Thanks, but it didn’t answer my question.
LCJ: flips to p. 170: “Our feet are, in many ways, the biological equivalent of duct-taping your car’s bumper back on when you don’t have the money to send it to the body shop.” My wife, who is an ex-jock, is very beautiful – from the ankles on up. But her feet….
CB: (Laughs)
LCJ: Or how about this (flipping to p. 227): The part about the fertilized egg of an armadillo just floating around in the mother’s womb for up to eight months, until she finds a place with ample food and water and good shelter, before it implants itself in the womb? Fascinating.
CB: Isn’t it?
LCJ: Minor point: on p. 386, you mention that vaginal fluid is too acidic for sperm to survive for long – that the pH is too high.
CB: Right.
LCJ: Acidity is pH in the range of 0 to 7. High pH means the fluid is alkaline.
CB: Let’s not nitpick. What about the final, most important couple of chapters?
LCJ: (Sighs)
CB: I see – like most men, you can’t handle…(shakes head) You think I’m some sort of hysterical…
LCJ: Would you like me to treat your hysteria?
CB: Don’t be an asshole.
LCJ: I actually am fully on board with the call to action that comprises that last couple of chapters, and even if I am a male of postmenopausal age that offers no real benefit to society--
CB: That’s not exactly what I said—
LCJ: --I am not against outrage presented in books. I share your outrage.
CB: I’m glad.
LCJ: Just yesterday I learned that around 65,000 rapes have resulted in pregnancies in this country that cannot be aborted due to Roe v. Wade being overturned.
CB: Sickening. In the final chapter, I mentioned
LCJ: Although I completely agree with you, this is where I enjoyed the book less. Because, after eight truly thrilling chapters of science – the study of how things came to be – suddenly the book became prescriptive – how things should be, and what we need to do to achieve that.
CB: And you have a problem with that?
LCJ: I love a good call to action supported by science. But this was packaged and presented as a science book that suddenly had a call to action at the end, which felt a bit sleight-of-hand to me.
CB: Fine. But you liked the book?
LCJ: Liked it, admired it, felt it was important and well-written and I’m very glad I read it.
CB: Thanks for lunch.
LCJ: My pleasure.
(A fictional event)
LCJ: Very nice to meet you.
CB: (looking sideways) One of the perks of publishing – I have to participate in these ‘win a date with the author’ lunches.
LCJ, pointedly ignoring the ungraciousness of CB’s response: I recently finished your book ‘Eve,’ and thought it was quite an amazing piece of scholarship wrapped up in accessible and engaging language.
CB: Oh? Well, that’s good to hear. Are you an academic or a biologist yourself?
LCJ: No, I’m a budding librarian and book nerd who spends his free time writing book reviews for Goodreads.
CB: (looks away)
LCJ: Which reminds me! I loved this (digs into his briefcase, pulls out the book and flips it to p. 257:
Reading itself is a deeply strange activity. You’re asking a human brain to tune out nearly all sensory information from the outside world for a long stretch of time in order to focus on a small area of somewhat obscure black markings on a white background, carefully shifting the eyes across those markings in a given direction. And while the eyes are so carefully focused, the ears are supposed to ignore any sounds in the environment so that the mind, meanwhile, can discern those markings as bits of language and immediately interpret that language without any of the usual clues speakers give: no facial expressions, no hand gestures, no useful variation in pitch…Reading is an extraordinarily difficult thing for the brain to learn how to do.I think that really sums up the appeal of your writing – you bring up things people usually take for granted and force us to really think about them.
CB: It’s such an unnatural way to communicate, but many of us spend hours and hours every day doing it.
LCJ: Judging by the citations in the book, you’re one of those people. The fact that you wrote this while raising two children and writing a PhD Thesis on the variation of information density in long-form narrative…
CB: How did you know that?
LCJ: Google, and I read your Acknowledgements.
CB: Of course.
LCJ: There’s so many fun, chewy facts in here! (Turns the page to p. 259)
As late as the 1920’s, clitoral stimulation was considered the proper treatment for feminine hysteria. That meant doctors—typically male—were obliged to stimulate moody women to orgasm in clinical settings. Hilariously, most of the doctors seemed to find the task boring and tedious, which drove the invention of the electric vibrator….In an odd tying together of my life to your book, I once manufactured some of the electronics used in vibrators – the harder you squeezed, the more intense the vibrations. This was not considered part of our medical product portfolio, you’ll be happy to hear.
CB, cracking first smile of the afternoon: Men! You guys just….(shakes head)
LCJ: To be fair, many of these female patients were probably not brainy gorgeous redheads who paid their way through school by modeling.
CB: (looking at watch) Congratulations, you lasted for over two minutes before bringing that up. That may be a new record among the men who’ve read my book.
LCJ: Well, I started life as a “bloodsucking demon fetus,” after all (p.107).
CB: (Laughs) That was, of course, an exaggeration. Sort of. Even if it’s true.
LCJ: Your fellow New Yorker Deena Emera wrote a whole book about the difficulties surrounding the human placenta.
CB: (raising eyebows) So you’re not completely ignorant of biology?
LCJ, in a rare bout of modesty: Not completely
CB: So what do you think of my restatement of human evolution?
LCJ: Your choice of presentation was really good. As I said earlier, you force us to think about things in new ways. I like how you pointed out different body parts went through design freezes at various points in our evolutionary history, so our bladders are hundreds of millions of years old while our brains, in their current form, may only go back 50,000 years or so. That’s really an inspired way to tackle all this. And your proposal that young mothers probably had more to do with the invention of language and tools than Mighty Hunters sounds right to me.
CB: Thanks, but it didn’t answer my question.
LCJ: flips to p. 170: “Our feet are, in many ways, the biological equivalent of duct-taping your car’s bumper back on when you don’t have the money to send it to the body shop.” My wife, who is an ex-jock, is very beautiful – from the ankles on up. But her feet….
CB: (Laughs)
LCJ: Or how about this (flipping to p. 227): The part about the fertilized egg of an armadillo just floating around in the mother’s womb for up to eight months, until she finds a place with ample food and water and good shelter, before it implants itself in the womb? Fascinating.
CB: Isn’t it?
LCJ: Minor point: on p. 386, you mention that vaginal fluid is too acidic for sperm to survive for long – that the pH is too high.
CB: Right.
LCJ: Acidity is pH in the range of 0 to 7. High pH means the fluid is alkaline.
CB: Let’s not nitpick. What about the final, most important couple of chapters?
LCJ: (Sighs)
CB: I see – like most men, you can’t handle…(shakes head) You think I’m some sort of hysterical…
LCJ: Would you like me to treat your hysteria?
CB: Don’t be an asshole.
LCJ: I actually am fully on board with the call to action that comprises that last couple of chapters, and even if I am a male of postmenopausal age that offers no real benefit to society--
CB: That’s not exactly what I said—
LCJ: --I am not against outrage presented in books. I share your outrage.
CB: I’m glad.
LCJ: Just yesterday I learned that around 65,000 rapes have resulted in pregnancies in this country that cannot be aborted due to Roe v. Wade being overturned.
CB: Sickening. In the final chapter, I mentioned
It’s not quite accurate to say that loving another person is the the best thing that human beings do. Maybe it’s how we’re able to love our not-sisters in the way we love our sisters. That might be our best thing. The urge to protect others’ children, because most of us have an urge to protect children in general. The’s the best human thing – the way we took “primate” and made it better.And that led to a discussion of how much we would benefit by moving away from sexism and towards more reproductive choice and more male involvement in the duty of child raising.
LCJ: Although I completely agree with you, this is where I enjoyed the book less. Because, after eight truly thrilling chapters of science – the study of how things came to be – suddenly the book became prescriptive – how things should be, and what we need to do to achieve that.
CB: And you have a problem with that?
LCJ: I love a good call to action supported by science. But this was packaged and presented as a science book that suddenly had a call to action at the end, which felt a bit sleight-of-hand to me.
CB: Fine. But you liked the book?
LCJ: Liked it, admired it, felt it was important and well-written and I’m very glad I read it.
CB: Thanks for lunch.
LCJ: My pleasure.
January 29, 2024
Absolute woke garbage. Author went on and on about how different women are from men in ways of: anatomy, physiology, psyche. To only drag in men who pretend to be women and claim they ARE biological women. Didn’t you just write a whole book based on innate differences between WOMEN AND MEN? So how can a biological MAN claim to be a biological WOMAN?
Awful . What a waste of a good topic .
Awful . What a waste of a good topic .
March 12, 2024
There were a lot of unscientific "facts" thrown here and there with non scientific sources that I almost dnf-ed it many times. The last straw was me wondering "Must you really include politics in everything these days ? Even a science book?"
Just found out the author is not even a scientist.
Can anyone write a book and shelve it in the science section these days or what ?
Just found out the author is not even a scientist.
Can anyone write a book and shelve it in the science section these days or what ?
July 19, 2025
(2.8)So Eve is a chatty book that takes the aforementioned matrilineal perspective on evolution…and there’s some fun facts…primates don’t have rapey penises…who knew?
As with any book on evolution, anthropology or archaeology there’s a helluva lot of conjecture…telling me what you surmise from a partial skeleton from 500,000 years ago is more about the author’s active imagination.
Some of her assertions she has facts for, some she’s making subjective guesses, and some places she’s outright wrong.
Let’s go where she’s wrong
“The latest numbers estimate that as many as 20 percent of humans are homosexual.” Studies put that number at 5%…no where close to 20%…wouldn’t that 20% get in the way of evolution?
Gynecology is evolutionary…she wants to shoehorn midwifery into the human genome..she cites one group of bonobo monkeys…of course she has no other evidence of this since for hundreds of thousands of years Homo sapiens left no records.
Claims women care more about infrastructure products than men
“As troubling as it sounds, the data exist: when you leave men in charge, roads and bridges, dams are effectively left to rot.”
Weird bc it was men and the patriarchy that built all the roads, bridges and dams in the first place.
“Maybe it’s how we’re able to love our not-sisters in the way we love our sisters.”
This is the human altruism notion that somehow evolution has evolved for—its false.
If you have children you know your love for you own child is everything…other folks…not so much.
“And not just the Hitlers, or Pol Pots, or Assads, or even the less overtly murderous types, like the Trumps.”
Ding ding ding…the obligatory disparagement of Trump… Crops up in about 50% of the non fiction I read…love of Anthony Bourdain was the last culprit.
“For instance, if we don’t get a handle on climate change stat, it will—very predictably—destroy much of what we currently understand as “modern human life” on this planet.”
She knows the planets history and knows that primitive man thrived during an actual ice age when he had stone tools and fire…and still thinks a few degrees warmer will hamper a race that controls the nuclear fire…
“One of the strongest in Europe, in fact. Nearly all of the doom-and-gloom projections around birthrates ignore immigration and foreign worker programs.”
All birth rates are falling and it’s abject foolishness to think you can import sub Saharan African men and they will become French
“Many analysts believe the rise of right-wing extremist groups in the United States isn’t simply a pushback.”
What rise? She supplies no citation. If there was a new Klan the media would be reporting the event 24/7
“But the whole idea of IQ is controversial. For one thing, white Americans tend to have higher IQ scores, on average, than African Americans. But if you control for family income, most of those differences disappear.
There’s too much variation—and too much overlap—to be able to associate IQ meaningfully with race.”
False, read Murray’s book the bell curve. IQ has great explanatory power and even when controlled for income or twins separated at birth IQ follows lines of heredity not income…also race is highly predictive of IQ…sorry for that icky truth.
“not all language tests are created equal. For example, the SAT verbal test includes a number of verbal analogy questions, where you’re trying to determine whether one word is similar to another.”
The SAT hasn’t had analogies for over twenty years.
Finally, almost all her chapters are titled womb, gynecology, menopause and yet she clings to bowing to the trans movement and claiming that men who declare themselves women are in fact women.
Her whole book is based on female evolution carried by the second X genes and the manifold effects that these genes have on women’s bodies…and then she side slips over and hand waves that trans women are women and that some women don’t have uterus…
Really, Cat? Why then do you have a whole chapter about uteruses…so disingenuous…so Woke even in the face of her own cited science… her own quote, “Being sexed permeates every major feature of our mammalian bodies and the lives we live inside them, for mouse and human alike.”
But the above is where she’s wrong…there are quite a few interesting facts and surmises along the way.
As with any book on evolution, anthropology or archaeology there’s a helluva lot of conjecture…telling me what you surmise from a partial skeleton from 500,000 years ago is more about the author’s active imagination.
Some of her assertions she has facts for, some she’s making subjective guesses, and some places she’s outright wrong.
Let’s go where she’s wrong
“The latest numbers estimate that as many as 20 percent of humans are homosexual.” Studies put that number at 5%…no where close to 20%…wouldn’t that 20% get in the way of evolution?
Gynecology is evolutionary…she wants to shoehorn midwifery into the human genome..she cites one group of bonobo monkeys…of course she has no other evidence of this since for hundreds of thousands of years Homo sapiens left no records.
Claims women care more about infrastructure products than men
“As troubling as it sounds, the data exist: when you leave men in charge, roads and bridges, dams are effectively left to rot.”
Weird bc it was men and the patriarchy that built all the roads, bridges and dams in the first place.
“Maybe it’s how we’re able to love our not-sisters in the way we love our sisters.”
This is the human altruism notion that somehow evolution has evolved for—its false.
If you have children you know your love for you own child is everything…other folks…not so much.
“And not just the Hitlers, or Pol Pots, or Assads, or even the less overtly murderous types, like the Trumps.”
Ding ding ding…the obligatory disparagement of Trump… Crops up in about 50% of the non fiction I read…love of Anthony Bourdain was the last culprit.
“For instance, if we don’t get a handle on climate change stat, it will—very predictably—destroy much of what we currently understand as “modern human life” on this planet.”
She knows the planets history and knows that primitive man thrived during an actual ice age when he had stone tools and fire…and still thinks a few degrees warmer will hamper a race that controls the nuclear fire…
“One of the strongest in Europe, in fact. Nearly all of the doom-and-gloom projections around birthrates ignore immigration and foreign worker programs.”
All birth rates are falling and it’s abject foolishness to think you can import sub Saharan African men and they will become French
“Many analysts believe the rise of right-wing extremist groups in the United States isn’t simply a pushback.”
What rise? She supplies no citation. If there was a new Klan the media would be reporting the event 24/7
“But the whole idea of IQ is controversial. For one thing, white Americans tend to have higher IQ scores, on average, than African Americans. But if you control for family income, most of those differences disappear.
There’s too much variation—and too much overlap—to be able to associate IQ meaningfully with race.”
False, read Murray’s book the bell curve. IQ has great explanatory power and even when controlled for income or twins separated at birth IQ follows lines of heredity not income…also race is highly predictive of IQ…sorry for that icky truth.
“not all language tests are created equal. For example, the SAT verbal test includes a number of verbal analogy questions, where you’re trying to determine whether one word is similar to another.”
The SAT hasn’t had analogies for over twenty years.
Finally, almost all her chapters are titled womb, gynecology, menopause and yet she clings to bowing to the trans movement and claiming that men who declare themselves women are in fact women.
Her whole book is based on female evolution carried by the second X genes and the manifold effects that these genes have on women’s bodies…and then she side slips over and hand waves that trans women are women and that some women don’t have uterus…
Really, Cat? Why then do you have a whole chapter about uteruses…so disingenuous…so Woke even in the face of her own cited science… her own quote, “Being sexed permeates every major feature of our mammalian bodies and the lives we live inside them, for mouse and human alike.”
But the above is where she’s wrong…there are quite a few interesting facts and surmises along the way.
March 13, 2024
Do you have a favorite book yet for 2023? If not, let me offer you a serious contender.
This book rocked my female world. I don't know what I thought I was getting when I picked up this huge book, but Eve: How the Female Body Drove 200 Million Years of Human Evolution easily exceeded every single one of my expectations.
Bohannon presents the well-researched and timely information in such an engaging manner, I felt like each chapter was another episode in a documentary series devised specifically to educate, fascinate, and astound me.
Are there college courses based on this topic? If not, they could base them on this book, as it presents vital knowledge for any human to understand who we are, what we are capable of, and most importantly, why.
This book rocked my female world. I don't know what I thought I was getting when I picked up this huge book, but Eve: How the Female Body Drove 200 Million Years of Human Evolution easily exceeded every single one of my expectations.
Bohannon presents the well-researched and timely information in such an engaging manner, I felt like each chapter was another episode in a documentary series devised specifically to educate, fascinate, and astound me.
Are there college courses based on this topic? If not, they could base them on this book, as it presents vital knowledge for any human to understand who we are, what we are capable of, and most importantly, why.
November 16, 2025
3 Viscous Stars
Came across this appearingly well researched nonfiction tome while visiting our local library and found myself totally enthralled! With 437 qualifying pages I read it, book #4, in the Second Annual Long Books Challenge (LBC).
From the introduction clear through the 175 pages of bibliography and appendices females are put in a precarious position, nothing new there: Elizabeth Shaw has a problem, namely-Ridley Scott has her impregnated with a large vicious alien squid. Aboard the spaceship Prometheus, she has to find a way to abort her uninvited guest. Shambling to a futuristic medpod, she asks the computer for a C-section. "Error", it says, "this medpod is calibrated for male patients only."
This sad gender discrepancy and disparity of medical "care" revealed in Ridley Scott's 2012 movie, remains all too true regarding current day in situ medical matters. This discrepancy and disparity has been well documented in many recent non fiction accounts including Doing Harm: The Truth About How Bad Medicine and Lazy Science Leave Women Dismissed, Misdiagnosed, and Sick, Sex Matters: How Male-Centric Medicine Endangers Women's Health and What We Can Do About It, and Unwell Women: Misdiagnosis and Myth in a Man-Made World just to name a few.
As very interesting as this tome is, it is sooooo dense with information, and goes off on so many divergent tangents, that it often felt like a "neverending forever read", one of those mythical enduring volumes that may be forever read but never finished! I, for one, would have appreciated the book more had it been set up in a series of three or four digestible volumes rather than this one viscous volume, too often indigestible and agida inducing 🤢.
Much content consists of the authors theories and hypotheses and begs debate, a less fomenting exmple:
"time upon time, a too-small band of ancient hominids migrated, ceased reproducing with anyone but themselves, and did everything they could to survive and thrive and have yet more genetically similar offspring. This is why you and I are so closely related to one another no matter where on the planet we live. We should be more genetically diverse, but we're not."
start anywhere, what do you think? 🗣️🎙️
There were many examples explaining common ordinary life phenomena regardless of race, religion, culture, ethnicity, etc. Being child-free, I found the following example quite amusing:
"The human brain reaches peak synaptic density at about two years of age which, in theory, explains the tantrum filled behavior of 'the terrible twos': the emotional centers of the brain are more densely connected to every other part of the brain, so once an experiential-emotional cascade gets started, it's kind of hard to stop." (๑•̀ᗝ•́)૭ヽ(°〇°)ﾉ* ༘ ೀ⋆｡˚🥺
(not a tantrum but rather an experiential-emotional cascade! A rose by any other name...)
The tome is also rife with subtle (and not so subtle) anthropocentric bias:
"Peeing, sweating, and moving your body so that another member of your species can see what you're doing, and maybe even loosely understand what you want, is quite ordinary. So are most animals' vocalizations-they sing, bark, growl, and hiss, conveying rudimentary messages that other animals can understand. Speaking to someone isn't ordinary at all."
What the author fails to recognize here are the innumerable extraordinary methods by which many species percieve the environment and communicate that man can not even fathom! Seems a bit myopic in spite of all the documented research.
Returning, finally, to the crux of the text, the author poses the question:
"What happens when sexism turns into a runaway train? When a culture's sex-rules start to reduce the overall health, fertility, and competitive viability of a population?
As one famous American sexist aptly put it 'modern sexism is making us less healthy, wealthy, and wise.'"
Can you guess who said that🧚♀️🙋🏼? (No fair, B, you already scored a bingo 👏!)
Came across this appearingly well researched nonfiction tome while visiting our local library and found myself totally enthralled! With 437 qualifying pages I read it, book #4, in the Second Annual Long Books Challenge (LBC).
From the introduction clear through the 175 pages of bibliography and appendices females are put in a precarious position, nothing new there: Elizabeth Shaw has a problem, namely-Ridley Scott has her impregnated with a large vicious alien squid. Aboard the spaceship Prometheus, she has to find a way to abort her uninvited guest. Shambling to a futuristic medpod, she asks the computer for a C-section. "Error", it says, "this medpod is calibrated for male patients only."
This sad gender discrepancy and disparity of medical "care" revealed in Ridley Scott's 2012 movie, remains all too true regarding current day in situ medical matters. This discrepancy and disparity has been well documented in many recent non fiction accounts including Doing Harm: The Truth About How Bad Medicine and Lazy Science Leave Women Dismissed, Misdiagnosed, and Sick, Sex Matters: How Male-Centric Medicine Endangers Women's Health and What We Can Do About It, and Unwell Women: Misdiagnosis and Myth in a Man-Made World just to name a few.
As very interesting as this tome is, it is sooooo dense with information, and goes off on so many divergent tangents, that it often felt like a "neverending forever read", one of those mythical enduring volumes that may be forever read but never finished! I, for one, would have appreciated the book more had it been set up in a series of three or four digestible volumes rather than this one viscous volume, too often indigestible and agida inducing 🤢.
Much content consists of the authors theories and hypotheses and begs debate, a less fomenting exmple:
"time upon time, a too-small band of ancient hominids migrated, ceased reproducing with anyone but themselves, and did everything they could to survive and thrive and have yet more genetically similar offspring. This is why you and I are so closely related to one another no matter where on the planet we live. We should be more genetically diverse, but we're not."
start anywhere, what do you think? 🗣️🎙️
There were many examples explaining common ordinary life phenomena regardless of race, religion, culture, ethnicity, etc. Being child-free, I found the following example quite amusing:
"The human brain reaches peak synaptic density at about two years of age which, in theory, explains the tantrum filled behavior of 'the terrible twos': the emotional centers of the brain are more densely connected to every other part of the brain, so once an experiential-emotional cascade gets started, it's kind of hard to stop." (๑•̀ᗝ•́)૭ヽ(°〇°)ﾉ* ༘ ೀ⋆｡˚🥺
(not a tantrum but rather an experiential-emotional cascade! A rose by any other name...)
The tome is also rife with subtle (and not so subtle) anthropocentric bias:
"Peeing, sweating, and moving your body so that another member of your species can see what you're doing, and maybe even loosely understand what you want, is quite ordinary. So are most animals' vocalizations-they sing, bark, growl, and hiss, conveying rudimentary messages that other animals can understand. Speaking to someone isn't ordinary at all."
What the author fails to recognize here are the innumerable extraordinary methods by which many species percieve the environment and communicate that man can not even fathom! Seems a bit myopic in spite of all the documented research.
Returning, finally, to the crux of the text, the author poses the question:
"What happens when sexism turns into a runaway train? When a culture's sex-rules start to reduce the overall health, fertility, and competitive viability of a population?
As one famous American sexist aptly put it 'modern sexism is making us less healthy, wealthy, and wise.'"
Can you guess who said that🧚♀️🙋🏼? (No fair, B, you already scored a bingo 👏!)
May 21, 2024
5/5 ★'s
This book is phenomenal!!! I truly believe all of us should read it once in our lives. This has given me so much information I always craved, but never knew where to start or how to find it.
Women, you must read this. Like, seriously, get it in your hands or ears right now! But once again, it's information we all need.
I listened to the audio version, and Cat narrated herself, making the feeling of the book perfect. You could hear her sarcasm, or seriousness depending on the situation. But the way she speaks and hands you the info is perfect and digestible.
I recommend to all of my Goodreads friends!
This book is phenomenal!!! I truly believe all of us should read it once in our lives. This has given me so much information I always craved, but never knew where to start or how to find it.
Women, you must read this. Like, seriously, get it in your hands or ears right now! But once again, it's information we all need.
I listened to the audio version, and Cat narrated herself, making the feeling of the book perfect. You could hear her sarcasm, or seriousness depending on the situation. But the way she speaks and hands you the info is perfect and digestible.
I recommend to all of my Goodreads friends!
January 15, 2025
Goodreader choice award. This was definitely an affront to a male centric regurgitation on the marvels of the female body. Cat Bohannons' idiosyncratic lens on a topic she finds fascinating, thrusts a more focused view to another "clever ape" that is definitely not male. She is quite a force when she expands on lactation to a level beyond pedestrian.
“Social influences have cognitive outcomes.”
—Cat Bohannon
Though some thought banal, nursing a little human is a magnificent climb up a "bubbie" mountain for an "on demand" milky reward. A tiny mouth prompts mom to make milk (in a symphonic co-cooperation). Baby sends Mom a signal with saliva transfer via chemicals causing breastmilk to adjust accordingly as to adequately nourish a baby as it grows. Most lyrical telling of the capabilities of the female body and how it plans (in advance) to care for its progeny.
“Social influences have cognitive outcomes.”
—Cat Bohannon
Though some thought banal, nursing a little human is a magnificent climb up a "bubbie" mountain for an "on demand" milky reward. A tiny mouth prompts mom to make milk (in a symphonic co-cooperation). Baby sends Mom a signal with saliva transfer via chemicals causing breastmilk to adjust accordingly as to adequately nourish a baby as it grows. Most lyrical telling of the capabilities of the female body and how it plans (in advance) to care for its progeny.
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
January 15, 2025
Reread in 2925
BTP nonfiction finalist
BTP nonfiction finalist
January 23, 2025
Cat Bohannon has achieved the almost impossible – turned a massive body of academic research on a very complicated subject into an accessible, often irreverent, and fascinating book.
She turns the usual biological science paradigm on its head by focusing on the evolution of the female body, from the first lactating and live young producing animals right through to humans.
These are some of the questions she tackles:
What does breast feeding do for mother and baby? Why do women menstruate, live longer than men, score better at every subject up till puberty when they crash? How is it that our species is so successful when our upright posture and big brains make childbirth so perilous? Why do we endure menopause and why are we more likely to get Alzheimer’s? Is there really such a thing as the female brain? What about language?
There’s a massive difference between biological sex – something wound deep into the warp and weft of our physical development … built over billions of years of evolutionary history –and humanity’s gender identity, which is a fluid thing and brain based and at most a few thousand years old.
Until very recently the study of biologically female bodies didn’t exist. The male body, ‘the norm’, is studied in labs unless there’s specific research on breasts, ovaries, uteri or female hormones – mostly for the practical reason that it’s difficult to control for the effects of female fertility cycles.
But male and female bodies don’t generate interchangeable results. ‘Being sexed permeates eery major feature of our mammalian bodies and the lives we live inside them, for mouse and human alike’.
A particular problem is pain relief drugs. Women metabolize drugs more quickly than men, so to achieve the same level of pain relief as a man they’re more likely to take more of the drug, heading towards addiction. ‘Likewise, women wake up faster from anaesthesia than men’ – effectively unknown before 2000.
Some of my favourite bits of information:
Adipose tissue is actually an organ that evolved from the same ancient organ as the liver Different types of fats do different jobs.
Women’s fat is different from men’s – thigh, buttock and belly fat contains lipids needed to make baby brains and retinas, so skinny mums are A Bad Thing. Fat removed in liposuction may well reappear in upper arms, which fact I rather meanly enjoy.
Males and females hear differently. Females hear at higher ranges than males. This means they’re more likely to hear a baby cry, than men who, as they lose hearing with age, have increasing difficulty hearing women’s voices, which are characteristically higher-pitched, but they do keep on hearing deeper men’s voices. ‘Because social power is typically assigned to men as they age, women’s voices are literally not being heard by men in power… She talks about the implications of this quite a bit.
Our brains reach about 80% of their adult size by age 2, and the remaining 20% takes much longer to build. At 2, the brain starts it first major ‘prune’, clearing away some synapses, strengthening some pathways and dampening others. The brain of a toddler is in fact rewiring itself.
Another massive rewiring takes place in puberty – most brains cope ok with this but some don’t, and yet another in the third trimester of pregnancy and the early months of motherhood – all at times when we need to be ready for new roles and forms of social behaviour.
We need to be able to solve problems in any environment, and that is much better done in a social context, not alone. The social brain needs years of training. Girls have to learn to live with the male gaze. What happens to our brains as we live with sexism? Our brains are formed as we learn to navigate social situations.
Gender, as opposed to biological sex, is fundamentally a set of social behaviours tied to how one’s self and one’s body interact in a social environment, how we process our experiences and incorporate them into our identities.
We are so linguistic that we can create language without sound but with GRAMMAR. The endless flexibility of human grammar lets us express an infinity of ideas with a limited vocabulary
If you learn a language after puberty, you will never have fluency. Cutoff for fluency in a second language ranges between 10-17, depending on who you ask.
We probably have menopause simply because we live for a long time, not because its useful to have grandmothers.
Her conclusion: the core of sexism is a massive set of rules that work to control reproduction. Nobody ever signed a contract for a sexist patriarchy. Efforts to change are notably difficult.
44% of the book is notes, footnotes, huge bibliography (90 out of 612 Kindle pages) and index.
Some worthwhile reviews
https://magazine.columbia.edu/article...
https://www.newscientist.com/article/...
https://www.kirkusreviews.com/book-re...
https://www.straitstimes.com/life/art...
She turns the usual biological science paradigm on its head by focusing on the evolution of the female body, from the first lactating and live young producing animals right through to humans.
These are some of the questions she tackles:
What does breast feeding do for mother and baby? Why do women menstruate, live longer than men, score better at every subject up till puberty when they crash? How is it that our species is so successful when our upright posture and big brains make childbirth so perilous? Why do we endure menopause and why are we more likely to get Alzheimer’s? Is there really such a thing as the female brain? What about language?
There’s a massive difference between biological sex – something wound deep into the warp and weft of our physical development … built over billions of years of evolutionary history –and humanity’s gender identity, which is a fluid thing and brain based and at most a few thousand years old.
Until very recently the study of biologically female bodies didn’t exist. The male body, ‘the norm’, is studied in labs unless there’s specific research on breasts, ovaries, uteri or female hormones – mostly for the practical reason that it’s difficult to control for the effects of female fertility cycles.
But male and female bodies don’t generate interchangeable results. ‘Being sexed permeates eery major feature of our mammalian bodies and the lives we live inside them, for mouse and human alike’.
A particular problem is pain relief drugs. Women metabolize drugs more quickly than men, so to achieve the same level of pain relief as a man they’re more likely to take more of the drug, heading towards addiction. ‘Likewise, women wake up faster from anaesthesia than men’ – effectively unknown before 2000.
Some of my favourite bits of information:
Adipose tissue is actually an organ that evolved from the same ancient organ as the liver Different types of fats do different jobs.
Women’s fat is different from men’s – thigh, buttock and belly fat contains lipids needed to make baby brains and retinas, so skinny mums are A Bad Thing. Fat removed in liposuction may well reappear in upper arms, which fact I rather meanly enjoy.
Males and females hear differently. Females hear at higher ranges than males. This means they’re more likely to hear a baby cry, than men who, as they lose hearing with age, have increasing difficulty hearing women’s voices, which are characteristically higher-pitched, but they do keep on hearing deeper men’s voices. ‘Because social power is typically assigned to men as they age, women’s voices are literally not being heard by men in power… She talks about the implications of this quite a bit.
Our brains reach about 80% of their adult size by age 2, and the remaining 20% takes much longer to build. At 2, the brain starts it first major ‘prune’, clearing away some synapses, strengthening some pathways and dampening others. The brain of a toddler is in fact rewiring itself.
Another massive rewiring takes place in puberty – most brains cope ok with this but some don’t, and yet another in the third trimester of pregnancy and the early months of motherhood – all at times when we need to be ready for new roles and forms of social behaviour.
We need to be able to solve problems in any environment, and that is much better done in a social context, not alone. The social brain needs years of training. Girls have to learn to live with the male gaze. What happens to our brains as we live with sexism? Our brains are formed as we learn to navigate social situations.
Gender, as opposed to biological sex, is fundamentally a set of social behaviours tied to how one’s self and one’s body interact in a social environment, how we process our experiences and incorporate them into our identities.
We are so linguistic that we can create language without sound but with GRAMMAR. The endless flexibility of human grammar lets us express an infinity of ideas with a limited vocabulary
If you learn a language after puberty, you will never have fluency. Cutoff for fluency in a second language ranges between 10-17, depending on who you ask.
We probably have menopause simply because we live for a long time, not because its useful to have grandmothers.
Her conclusion: the core of sexism is a massive set of rules that work to control reproduction. Nobody ever signed a contract for a sexist patriarchy. Efforts to change are notably difficult.
44% of the book is notes, footnotes, huge bibliography (90 out of 612 Kindle pages) and index.
Some worthwhile reviews
https://magazine.columbia.edu/article...
https://www.newscientist.com/article/...
https://www.kirkusreviews.com/book-re...
https://www.straitstimes.com/life/art...
March 26, 2024
2.5 stars rounded down. This was a frustrating read, portrayed as a popular science book when the author is definitely not a hard scientist (i.e., biologist) by training or expertise (her PhD from Columbia looks to be granted from the school's psychology or sociology department, so she's a social scientist by training). The other big red flag about Bohannon's credentials are that she's a relatively newly-minted PhD graduate (2022), not (yet) an established professor with robust principal investigator research accomplishments where she should have a stronger platform to discuss her research-informed opinions. Essentially this book reads as an extremely long research paper heavily interspersed with Bohannon's own opinions, with a lot of repetition and spurious conclusions thrown in.
Further reading:
T: The Story of Testosterone, the Hormone that Dominates and Divides Us by Carole Hooven, PhD
Aroused: The History of Hormones and How They Control Just About Everything by Randi Hutter Epstein, MD
This Is Your Brain on Birth Control: The Surprising Science of Women, Hormones, and the Law of Unintended Consequences by Sarah Hill, PhD
The Better Half: On the Genetic Superiority of Women by Sharon Moalem, MD, PhD
Invisible Women: Data Bias in a World Designed for Men by Caroline Criado Perez
Further reading:
T: The Story of Testosterone, the Hormone that Dominates and Divides Us by Carole Hooven, PhD
Aroused: The History of Hormones and How They Control Just About Everything by Randi Hutter Epstein, MD
This Is Your Brain on Birth Control: The Surprising Science of Women, Hormones, and the Law of Unintended Consequences by Sarah Hill, PhD
The Better Half: On the Genetic Superiority of Women by Sharon Moalem, MD, PhD
Invisible Women: Data Bias in a World Designed for Men by Caroline Criado Perez
February 19, 2024
Really enjoyed the first few chapters. Other parts were a bit of a slog. Also although there's an admirable list of references it was not always clear what was consensus, conjecture, or the authors opinion. Given the uncertainty I think I would have preferred more straight science and less sociology comment. I think at times it got a bit confused in what it was trying to do.
October 23, 2023
Eve is a fantastic read for anyone interested in women's history - and by that I mean prehistory, how women evolved. From the first chapter, on a small egg-laying burrowing mammal producing liquid through adapted skin patches for her nurslings, we see how the female body arose and how one small successful step drove another one.
Some chapters are not for the young or tender, but all regard physiology as part of an evolving life and situation, in which the female of the species did her best to produce healthy offspring and train them for life. We see the internal adaptations and the growing brain, the hormones of puberty, motherhood, and the change of life at menopause. Why older women are useful, why the wet nurse was responsible for explosive population growth in early farming towns. Plenty I knew, also plenty I did not know, all of which made perfect sense.
Finally the author looks at how medical science has not been testing anything much on women - for good reasons of course, mostly around childbearing - and many objects were not designed with women in mind. And how today, in some parts of the world, women and girls are 'last to eat, last to be educated' to quote another book I am reading. The shortsightedness of undervaluing the mothers of the next generation is, says the author, borne out by the lack of scientific progress among such cultures. Feeding the girl today gives her the store of nutrients to provide large brains, strong bones and good physique to her sons and daughters. The girl today is the Eve of the next generation.
Science papers are quoted throughout and many books are also referenced, right up to today's discoveries about disease, immunity, brown and white fats, and why women store vitamins from cod liver oil. I enjoyed Eve and hope to read more by this author.
I read an e-ARC from Net Galley. This is an unbiased review.
Some chapters are not for the young or tender, but all regard physiology as part of an evolving life and situation, in which the female of the species did her best to produce healthy offspring and train them for life. We see the internal adaptations and the growing brain, the hormones of puberty, motherhood, and the change of life at menopause. Why older women are useful, why the wet nurse was responsible for explosive population growth in early farming towns. Plenty I knew, also plenty I did not know, all of which made perfect sense.
Finally the author looks at how medical science has not been testing anything much on women - for good reasons of course, mostly around childbearing - and many objects were not designed with women in mind. And how today, in some parts of the world, women and girls are 'last to eat, last to be educated' to quote another book I am reading. The shortsightedness of undervaluing the mothers of the next generation is, says the author, borne out by the lack of scientific progress among such cultures. Feeding the girl today gives her the store of nutrients to provide large brains, strong bones and good physique to her sons and daughters. The girl today is the Eve of the next generation.
Science papers are quoted throughout and many books are also referenced, right up to today's discoveries about disease, immunity, brown and white fats, and why women store vitamins from cod liver oil. I enjoyed Eve and hope to read more by this author.
I read an e-ARC from Net Galley. This is an unbiased review.
July 2, 2024
A few years back, I remember learning the appalling fact that female bodies have traditionally been, and often still are, excluded from scientific research, drug trials, studies, etc because female bodies are, basically, too inconsistent. Reproductive cycles rely on a variety of hormones to trigger different cycle phases and produce bodily changes, and all of that makes getting reliable, reproduceable clinical results for [enter drug here]'s effects on the body very difficult.
So, science and medicine just... didn't.
Probably part of that is the patriarchy - male bodies are the default, and female bodies are the malformed, weaker version, and all that. It's not SCIENCE'S fault that the female body isn't understood as fully as the male body - have we tried just not having wrong bodies? Maybe one where the uterus doesn't wander around all willy-nilly?
This book examines, with a plethora of research and evidence, the ways which evolution is based on the needs of the female body. (By the way, my use of "male" and "female" refers to sex, not gender.)
Did you ever wonder where nipples came from? Imagine the looks you'd get trying to feed your baby if baby had to lick glandular secretions off your skin instead of having a handy dangly feed-tube that can be directed straight into the waiting food-hole. Ahhh, motherhood. So precious.
In all actuality though, it IS precious, and kind of wonderful (but not for me, thankyouverymuch). I learned that the nipple is actually a two way conduit that lets breast milk flow out, and baby's saliva flow in, and that the mother's body uses that saliva to assess what may be needed to support baby's health and adjusts the milk supply accordingly. I'd like to see Similac do that shit. (Seriously, fed is best. NO MOM SHAMING.)
Who even knew that the placenta prevents the mother's body from rejecting EVERY pregnancy as a parasitic invader? Not I. And I had to take 6th grade health class. Go figure.
There was a TON of surprising and fascinating information in this book, and it was presented in an accessible and interesting way, giving names and personalities to animals and primates long gone. Not truly anthropomorphizing, but just giving a bit of context around the lives they would have lived and the instincts that would have driven them and their behaviors.
I really enjoyed it, and highly recommend it.
So, science and medicine just... didn't.
Probably part of that is the patriarchy - male bodies are the default, and female bodies are the malformed, weaker version, and all that. It's not SCIENCE'S fault that the female body isn't understood as fully as the male body - have we tried just not having wrong bodies? Maybe one where the uterus doesn't wander around all willy-nilly?
This book examines, with a plethora of research and evidence, the ways which evolution is based on the needs of the female body. (By the way, my use of "male" and "female" refers to sex, not gender.)
Did you ever wonder where nipples came from? Imagine the looks you'd get trying to feed your baby if baby had to lick glandular secretions off your skin instead of having a handy dangly feed-tube that can be directed straight into the waiting food-hole. Ahhh, motherhood. So precious.
In all actuality though, it IS precious, and kind of wonderful (but not for me, thankyouverymuch). I learned that the nipple is actually a two way conduit that lets breast milk flow out, and baby's saliva flow in, and that the mother's body uses that saliva to assess what may be needed to support baby's health and adjusts the milk supply accordingly. I'd like to see Similac do that shit. (Seriously, fed is best. NO MOM SHAMING.)
Who even knew that the placenta prevents the mother's body from rejecting EVERY pregnancy as a parasitic invader? Not I. And I had to take 6th grade health class. Go figure.
There was a TON of surprising and fascinating information in this book, and it was presented in an accessible and interesting way, giving names and personalities to animals and primates long gone. Not truly anthropomorphizing, but just giving a bit of context around the lives they would have lived and the instincts that would have driven them and their behaviors.
I really enjoyed it, and highly recommend it.
February 9, 2024
Trans-inclusionary-feminist propaganda. I don’t think I’ve ever given a book a 1 star review before, if I hate a book that much I stop reading it and return it. But this book got worse and worse as it went on. Right in the beginning she makes a statement about sex and gender being different and I figured that she was just making a statement to appease the trans cultists so she wouldn’t get cancelled. After all, if sex and gender are different and she’s talking specifically about the evolution of the female body, that makes sense. But then she keeps conflating sex and gender and making bizarre statements that not all XX bodies identify as women, and stopping what she was talking about to affirm trans identity. It was cringe worthy but at least the rest of it was somewhat interesting, the science stuff. But then in the last half of the book she drops the science almost completely and goes full-on feminist. Making a lengthy defense of Hilary Clinton’s voice that sounds like she’s angry and yelling, it’s just because she’s a woman with a woman’s voice. Later she talks about how women make better politicians, except Margaret Thatcher, who is a hero of mine and I will take offense. She even lists genocidal leaders and then says “and even less obviously murderous leaders, like Trump.” Let’s compare the foreign policy between Trump and Hilary Clinton and see which one is more of a warmonger! It’s just a parade of the most surface level feminist talking points imaginable. She’s a stereotype of the liberal professor who talks at length about things she doesn’t actually know much about. I think we’ve all had that professor that turns a biology lecture into a rant about their personal political beliefs. As the book goes on it just gets worse. She thinks climate change is an existential threat. She thinks we should end the practice of child brides because if women get pregnant too young it can kill them or disable them for life, reducing the birth rate, and birth rate is important because evolution. But then implies the country that made the minimum marriage age 20 has it right. Look, children shouldn’t be having sex, getting married or getting pregnant. But 20?! But then we should educate girls above boys because it’s better for the economy, because it reduces the birth rate, which is actually fine because immigration. Totally contradicting what she said before. She also insists on calling miscarriages abortions and talking about how great and necessary they are. This strange mix of eugenics and feminism that leads her to advocate for every policy that reduces birth rates is amazing. There’s no logical statement anywhere in any of her political rants. STDs are even somehow blamed on conservatives and the solution is getting rid of all social norms against sex. Even judging a woman for stealing another woman’s husband is…wrong? I was dizzy with the leaps in logic. The problems with women dying in childbirth at higher rates in Texas is somehow the fault of anti-abortion laws and not the thousands of pregnant immigrants walking across the border to drop an anchor baby? She constantly cherry picks one stat after another and if you know anything about these topics you realize what she’s doing but most won’t. Even the decline of the Middle East is the fault of Western influence and no mention of the inbreeding! Yes, the decline of the Middle East is because of the generations of cousin marriage lowering their IQs. Talking about nutrition to raise IQs is great but criticize Islam’s practice of cousin marriage? No way!
I don’t like talking about people’s personal lives, but she keeps talking about it in the book, so I kind of have to. She’s such a stereotypical liberal feminist. So she once considered being a prostitute but her boyfriend said he’d break up with her so she didn’t. And implied that she regrets not doing it, or should have charged the boyfriend. She had an abortion. She’s had children, I think two, and also had an ectopic. She used to be a nude model at the art school. She donated her eggs to a couple who waited too long to have children. She thanked a husband who supported her for years while she worked on her book. But also said she had a boyfriend so I guess they got divorced before publication. Can we talk about the current boyfriend? He’s a man child who plays his video games on full volume without headphones, bothering her. They made a deal that he turn off the weapon sound effects but can keep the soundtrack. She doesn’t know why he won’t use headphones, and makes the excuse that he’s never lived with a girlfriend before and adulting is hard. Ouch! Why is she dating him? Is she significantly older than him? Is this man child around her children? Where’s the father of her children, the husband that supported her for years? Are these all different men? I have no idea. Dating the man who plays his video games too loud is something I did in my 20s, not a current situation I would mention in a book I was writing. I think it shows her warped sense of not believing in social norms or shame and not realizing or caring how she makes herself come off as really immature, and doesn’t realize the real-life consequences of liberal sexual attitudes. Unless this husband she thanked in the acknowledgment was abusive, her children would be better off around him instead of the man-child boyfriend. It’s so annoying because she spent all this time going over the biological and cultural evolution of the male and female bodies and reproductive strategies which show how very very important social norms are. We evolved to be wives and mothers and having our husbands around to help, hunt meat and protect us and our children. But then she flips it by saying that sexism just “doesn’t work anymore” even though she didn’t actually make a good argument for this. Things have gotten much worse by relaxing these social norms but somehow relaxing them even more…would fix things? I could write an entire book refuting every dumb thing she said in the last half of this book, but I will stop here because I doubt anyone would read it.
I don’t like talking about people’s personal lives, but she keeps talking about it in the book, so I kind of have to. She’s such a stereotypical liberal feminist. So she once considered being a prostitute but her boyfriend said he’d break up with her so she didn’t. And implied that she regrets not doing it, or should have charged the boyfriend. She had an abortion. She’s had children, I think two, and also had an ectopic. She used to be a nude model at the art school. She donated her eggs to a couple who waited too long to have children. She thanked a husband who supported her for years while she worked on her book. But also said she had a boyfriend so I guess they got divorced before publication. Can we talk about the current boyfriend? He’s a man child who plays his video games on full volume without headphones, bothering her. They made a deal that he turn off the weapon sound effects but can keep the soundtrack. She doesn’t know why he won’t use headphones, and makes the excuse that he’s never lived with a girlfriend before and adulting is hard. Ouch! Why is she dating him? Is she significantly older than him? Is this man child around her children? Where’s the father of her children, the husband that supported her for years? Are these all different men? I have no idea. Dating the man who plays his video games too loud is something I did in my 20s, not a current situation I would mention in a book I was writing. I think it shows her warped sense of not believing in social norms or shame and not realizing or caring how she makes herself come off as really immature, and doesn’t realize the real-life consequences of liberal sexual attitudes. Unless this husband she thanked in the acknowledgment was abusive, her children would be better off around him instead of the man-child boyfriend. It’s so annoying because she spent all this time going over the biological and cultural evolution of the male and female bodies and reproductive strategies which show how very very important social norms are. We evolved to be wives and mothers and having our husbands around to help, hunt meat and protect us and our children. But then she flips it by saying that sexism just “doesn’t work anymore” even though she didn’t actually make a good argument for this. Things have gotten much worse by relaxing these social norms but somehow relaxing them even more…would fix things? I could write an entire book refuting every dumb thing she said in the last half of this book, but I will stop here because I doubt anyone would read it.
January 12, 2024
2.5 stars. Call me old-fashioned, but I like my science books to at least pretend like they don’t have an axe to grind, to at least play-act at being objective. I might even agree with Cat Bohannon’s strident progressive position on women’s bodies, how they are important, and how they have been ignored and undervalued by the scientific community, but I found her tone... juvenile and unprofessional. Her footnotes are excessive and grating and contribute very little to the discussion at hand. I don’t even think what she shared here is necessarily wrong, but I could not get over her overly emotional and moralizing tone, which felt so inappropriate for the subject matter.
November 14, 2023
This book had its ups and downs. Found some chapters more interesting than others. The general topic was really interesting and mostly it was written really well and was an easy read. But occasionaly i did find myself just skimming through pages.
December 22, 2024
Will reread this one many times. Full of really interesting information and humor too, it was a real pleasure to read all 624 pages. However, it was so dense that I doubt I’ll remember much, which is why I plan to reread it many times throughout my life. And it made me even more grateful than I could’ve thought to be female.
I really enjoyed the experience of reading this one, rather than just the content.
I really enjoyed the experience of reading this one, rather than just the content.
September 7, 2023
thanks for the publishers and netgalley for a free copy in return for an open and honest review
Very detailed and interesting book looking at female body evolution has effected human evolution and has opened my eyes on certain subjects, the author tries to make the book simple in parts so the reader doesn't need a biological or medical knowledge to fully understand.
Very detailed and interesting book looking at female body evolution has effected human evolution and has opened my eyes on certain subjects, the author tries to make the book simple in parts so the reader doesn't need a biological or medical knowledge to fully understand.
September 14, 2024
I really struggled with this book. There are two parts to this book - the explanation of women's evolutionary biology, which was fact- based and fascinating. And then there was the ideological propagandist spouting of gender ideology talking points. The author would explain and evidence a point around female biology or evolution and would then blatantly talk in circles and contradict herself to ensure she got all the gender ideology narratives in there. It was embarrassing and infuriating to read. This book took me so long to read because of the unscientific, gross bastradisation of female biology and history to fit a backwards socio-political narrative - I had to put it down and walk away multiple times. I don't recommend this book at all.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 2,514 reviews