Beyond Briggs: what Mustafa doesn’t show you – omissions of and conflicts with Muslim holy books
This is a very racial book. Mustafa Briggs seems predispositioned to looking at everyone in terms of race/skin color, but he doesn’t explain why race/skin color should be used (why not eye color or hair color? or, the inside color – everyone is the same – red). Or, why does it have to be color at all? That would be an interesting read if he used height instead of skin – tall people did this to short people; or, right-handed people did this to left-handed people. I find it sad that fellow humans will visually segregate humans based on what nature made them look like; aren’t we all just humans? He maintains racism is in “the wider Muslim community” on page 76, and “Anti-blackness is a global phenomenon, and people with darker skin tones face discrimination in nearly every culture and society – even within communities that are themselves identified as Black” (page 3). He agrees the Qur’an has a message of “respect for all, regardless of origin or complexion” (page 25), but then he proceeds to point out everyone’s complexion. He seems to insist on imposing race onto everyone: “It is therefore fitting to mention these distinguished Black figures who left such an indelible mark on Arab culture and history” (page 28); “Makhul was known for his deep black skin colour” (page 91) – this is also a logic error, black is not a color. So, the solution to racism is to use more race. A curious example of that is on page 97 about a 9th century book that Briggs highlights: “.. (The Superiority of the Blacks to the Whites) is another notable work by Al-Jahiz, where he makes an impassioned argument for the intellectual, moral, and physical superiority of blacks over whites.” It sounds like a forerunner to eugenics. Strangely, Briggs does not call it out as racism, but seems to excuse it: “Al-Jahiz wrote this text within a societal context in which anti-black discourse and colourism were unfortunately prevalent … His arguments challenge these negative stereotypes and prejudices” (page 97). Why not disregard race and just use the content of one’s character? Wouldn’t that be better and end racism?
Mustafa’s book also omits a lot where his point would conflict with the sacred texts of Islam, or the texts are silenced on a subject and achievements of Muslims are upheld instead; yet further, the texts may be bypassed if it conflicts with projecting a preferred race onto others. For examples, he points out on page 9 conflicting Hadith records where Jesus is described as black and white. He favors Jesus as black (page 24) and specifically holds up a report from Umar in Bukhari’s collection of Hadith that says Jesus was black with straight hair (no reference number given, but it appears to be no. 3441). But, that appears to be just one such report; more reports have Jesus as “whitish red complexion” or “whitish brown” for the same event ( - Sahih Al-Bukhari, Vol. 9, no. 6999, 7026, 7128; Vol. 7, no. 5902). This report was for a dream, as well, and unknown if meant to be a literal description. On page 75, he maintains the term white refers to spotless or “free from blemish. When they mean a white complexion, they say red ..” Umar also has a report for another dream that Jesus “was of red complexion, curly hair” ( - Sahih Al-Bukhari, Vol. 4, no. 3438); a different narrator has Jesus with a “moderate complexion inclined to the red and white colour” ( - Sahih Al-Bukhari, Vol. 4, no. 3439). Briggs also does not tell you that the incorrect term for Jesus is used throughout the Qur’an and Hadith – both use the Arabic word Isa (or Eissa) for Jesus, but Isa means Esau (Yesua means Jesus in Arabic).
He maintains Muhammad was black on page 73, and appears to be quoting past commentators and unnumbered Hadith for support: “.. a hadith .. describes him as ‘very black skinned’ .. ‘His beard was white as if it was cotton and he was a Black-skinned man’ ..” But, he does not mention which Hadith collections those are from; it is unknown if they are reliable (sahih). And, Briggs does not mention the several times the Hadith says Muhammad was white, and it sounds like more than just meaning spotless. The canonical Hadith mentions (grade: sahih): “.. describing the Prophet saying, ‘He .. had a rosy complexion, neither absolutely white nor deep brown ..” ( - Sahih Al-Bukhari, Vol. 4, no. 3547; published by Darussalam, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 1997; may be numbered differently with other publishers); “.. the Messenger of Allah was moving dirt with us. The dirt had covered the whiteness of his stomach ..” ( - Sahih Muslim, Vol. 5, no. 4670); “The Prophet raised his hands (in invocation) till I saw the whiteness of his armpits” ( - Sahih Al-Bukhari, Vol. 8, no. 6341); “The Prophet got up from his sleep with a flushed red face ..” ( - Sahih Al-Bukhari, Vol. 9, no. 7059); “While we were sitting with the Prophet in the mosque, a man came .. and then said: ‘Who amongst you is Muhammad?’ .. We replied, ‘This white man reclining on his arm’ ” ( - Sahih Al-Bukhari, Vol. 1, no. 63); “I heard Abu Juhaifa saying, ‘I saw the Prophet ..’ I said to Abu Juhaifa, ‘Describe him for me.’ He said, ‘He was white and his beard was black with some white hair” ( - Sahih Al-Bukhari, Vol. 4, no. 3544); (translator’s notes in parentheses-) “And a white (person – i.e. the Prophet) who is requested to invoke Allah for rain ..” ( - Sahih Al-Bukhari, Vol. 2, no. 1008); “I saw the Messenger of Allah with a white complexion and some white hairs” ( - Sahih Muslim, Vol. 6, no. 6081); “I said to him: ‘Did you see the Messenger of Allah?’ He said: ‘Yes, he was white with an elegant face’ ” ( - Sahih Muslim, Vol. 6, no. 6071).
He points out Islamic nations were involved in the slave trade on pages 78-83, 131-4, 142, 144, 152, 154: “.. enslaved individuals who were brought from the East African coast and sold across various parts of the Islamic world ..” (page 78); “During the rise of the Umayyad Caliphate, African slaves were sourced from various regions through a combination of military conquests, trade networks, and indigenous African kingdoms involved in the trans-Saharan slave trade” (pages 78-9). It’s strange that he does not mention this in his following book in 2025 (Islam and the Making of the Modern World) – there he only mentions and criticizes the Western imperialism use of slavery (pages 54, 60); the Muslim slave masters do not get mentioned and criticized. However, in this book he does call out and criticize Muslim slave masters. He writes on pages 133-4, “It is essential that we acknowledge the historical crimes committed by all groups involved in the slave trade … It is time that we confront the uncomfortable truths of our shared past and work towards a more correct and inclusive portrayal of the historical events that shaped our world.” But, I wonder if he meant to include Muhammad in that, as well. Mustafa does not mention that Muhammad owned slaves in the Islamic holy books. Did Muhammad commit a historical crime, too?
One frequently finds in the Islamic holy books the practice of slavery was maintained. Manumission (not abolition) is also encouraged, but that didn’t stop Muhammad from owning slaves, which suggests the use of slavery is still an option – Muhammad did it, follow his example. The canonical Hadith (grade: sahih) states Muhammad owned slaves: “Allah’s Messenger had a slave called Mid’am ..” ( - Sahih Al-Bukhari, Vol. 5, no. 4234); “.. Anjasha, the slave of the Prophet ..” ( - Sahih Al-Bukhari, Vol. 8, no. 6202); “.. a beautiful slave woman, and the Messenger of Allah bought her for seven slaves ..” ( - Sahih Muslim, Vol. 4, no. 3500); “The Prophet got this statement written for me: ‘This is what Muhammad, Allah’s Messenger bought from Adda bin Khalid as a Muslim sells to another Muslim and that it (i.e., the bought slave) is neither sick, nor bad-behaved nor stolen’ ” ( - Sahih Al-Bukhari, Vol. 3, no. pre-2079; translator’s notes in parentheses). Muhammad mentions: “Your slaves are your brethren upon whom Allah has given you authority” ( - Sahih Al-Bukhari, Vol. 3, no. 2545). “Any slave who runs away from his masters is guilty of Kufr [disbelief], until he goes back to them … By Allah, it was narrated from the Prophet ..” ( - Sahih Muslim, Vol. 1, no. 228); “.. the Prophet said: ‘If a slave runs away, no Salat [prayer] will be accepted from him” ( - Sahih Muslim, Vol. 1, no. 230; published by Darussalam, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 2007; may be numbered differently with other publishers).
The canonical Hadith (grade: sahih) indicates Muhammad welcomed the use of slaves (Briggs also relies on the Hadith several times in the book; pages 1, 2, 8-9, etc): “Allah’s Messenger sent someone to a woman telling her to ‘Order her slave, carpenter, to prepare a wooden pulpit for him to sit on’ ” ( - Sahih Al-Bukhari, Vol. 1, no. 448-9; Sahih Muslim 2:1216); “I went along with the Prophet to the house of his slave tailor” ( - Sahih Al-Bukhari, Vol. 7, no. 5420); “.. the slave of the Messenger of Allah went to unpack the luggage ..” ( - Sahih Muslim, Vol. 1, no. 310); “.. the payment of debts has precedence over giving in charity or setting a slave free ..” ( - Sahih Al-Bukhari, Vol. 2, no. pre-1426). Here, Muhammad took a freed slave and sold him back into slavery – “A man manumitted a slave and he had no other property than that, so the Prophet cancelled the manumission (and sold the slave for him). Nu’aim .. bought the slave from him” ( - Sahih Al-Bukhari, Vol. 3, no. 2415). “The Prophet said, ‘None of you should flog his wife as he flogs a slave ..” ( - Sahih Al-Bukhari, Vol. 7, no. 5204); “Allah’s Messenger was asked about an unmarried slave-girl who committed illegal sexual intercourse. They heard him saying, ‘Flog her, and if she commits [it] .. again after that, flog her again, and on the third .. she should be sold, even for a hair rope” ( - Sahih Al-Bukhari, Vol. 3, no. 2232-4; publisher’s footnote reads – “A slave-girl .. is punished with 50 lashes ..”). Instead of freeing the slaves, the Qur’an at 24:33 says freedom can be earned from a Muslim slave master if the slave is ethically good enough.
Among the strangest omissions by Briggs is not only his silence that Muhammad owned slaves, but further that Muhammad owned black slaves in the holy books. Wouldn’t you want to know that in a book about black history in Islam? The canonical Hadith (grade: sahih) mentions: “I went to the upper room where the Prophet was and requested to a black slave of his ..” ( - Sahih Al-Bukhari, Vol. 3, no. 2468; Sahih Muslim, Vol. 4, no. 3695); “.. a black slave of Allah’s Messenger was (sitting) at the first ladder-step” ( - Sahih Al-Bukhari, Vol. 6, no. 4913; Sahih Muslim, Vol. 4, no. 3692); “Allah’s Messenger was on a journey and he had a black slave called Anjasha, and he was driving the camels ..” ( - Sahih Al-Bukhari, Vol. 8, no. 6161; Sahih Muslim, Vol. 6, no. 6036); “The Prophet said: ‘Sell him to me,’ and he bought him for two black slaves” ( - Sahih Muslim 4:4113); (translator’s notes in parentheses-) “.. an Ethiopian (black) slave whose head looks like a raisin’ ” ( - Sahih Al-Bukhari, Vol. 9, no. 7142; Sahih Muslim 3:3138); “Aishah added: It was the day of Eid and negroes were playing with leather shields and spears” ( - Sahih Al-Bukhari, Vol. 4, no. 2907). A black woman – a sign of disease: “The Prophet said, ‘I saw (in a dream) a black woman with unkempt hair going out of Al-Madina and settling at Mahaya’a, i.e., Al-Juhfa. I interpreted that as a symbol of epidemic of Al-Madina being transferred to that place (Al-Juhfa)” ( - Sahih Al-Bukhari, Vol. 9, no. 7038; Sahih Muslim 3:3342). A black man – a sign of evil: “The Messenger of Allah said: ‘.. They recite the Qur’an but it does not go any further than their collarbones .. Their sign will be a black man, one of whose upper arms will be .. like a piece of quivering flesh .. and they are the most hated of Allah’s creation to Him .. a man narrated to me from Ibn Husain that he said: ‘I saw that black man’ ” ( - Sahih Muslim, Vol. 3, no. 2456, 2468). “The Prophet said, ‘.. a black person .. from Ethiopia will demolish the Ka’bah’ ” ( - Sahih Al-Bukhari, Vol. 2, no. 1596).
He mentions the achievements of women in a short section mainly on pages 195-210 involving areas such as business, knowledge of Islam, founding schools, artisans, but I found no scientific achievements as he lists for the men (page 99). A similar case is in his following book in 2025, Islam and the Making of the Modern World, where he lists only two women (see my 1-star review). And, in normal fashion, he does not point out what the Islamic holy books have to say about this. Rather strangely, on page 208 he mentions modern “Islamic feminists” with no mention of whether the holy books would approve such. On page 141, Briggs highlights a woman that won political office in Pakistan in 2018. National leaders are also mentioned: “.. Razia Sultan .. the first and only female monarch of the Delhi Sultanate in India .. from 1236 AD to 1240 … once powerful queen” (pages 147, 149); and in 16th century Nigeria, “Aissa Koli, who served as Queen Regent … Queen Aissa ruled for seven years, which was the stipulated term for all rulers .. a monarch ..” (page 186). But, would this be in harmony with the holy books of Islam? Briggs does not say; he silences the holy books here. Actually, the Qur’an and canonical Hadith (grade: sahih) have: “Allah’s Messenger .. said, ‘Such people as ruled by a lady will never be successful’ ” ( - Sahih Al-Bukhari, Vol. 5, no. 4425 published by Darussalam, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 1997; may be numbered differently with other publishers); “.. the Prophet .. said, ‘Never will succeed such a nation as makes a woman their ruler’ ” ( - Sahih Al-Bukhari, Vol. 9, no. 7099); “The Prophet said, ‘Many men reached perfection but none among the women reached perfection except Maryam (Mary), the daughter of Imran, and Asia, Pharoah’s wife’ ” ( - Sahih Al-Bukhari, Vol. 7, no. 5418); “.. the Prophet .. said: ‘No lady should travel on a journey of two days except with her husband or a Dhi-Mahram [male relative]’ ” ( - Sahih Al-Bukhari, Vol. 3, no. 1995; cf. Qur’an 33:33); “The Prophet said, ‘Isn’t the witness of a woman equal to half of that of a man?’ The women said, ‘Yes.’ He said, ‘This is because of the deficiency of a woman’s mind’ ” ( - Sahih Al-Bukhari, Vol. 3, no. 2658; cf. Qur’an 2:282); “The Prophet then said .. ‘I saw the (Hell) Fire, and I have never seen such a horrible sight as that before, and I saw that the majority of its dwellers were women’ ” ( - Sahih Al-Bukhari, Vol. 7, no. 5197; Sahih Muslim, Vol. 2, no. 2048); “The Prophet said, ‘After me I have not left any Fitnah (trial and affliction) more harmful to men than women’ ” ( - Sahih Al-Bukhari, Vol. 7, no. 5096; cf. Qur’an 64:14); “Narrated Aishah: The things which annul As-Salat (the prayers) were mentioned before me. They said, ‘Prayer is annuled by a dog, a donkey and a woman (if they pass in front of the praying people)’ ” ( - Sahih Al-Bukhari, Vol. 1, no. 511).
One may wonder how well Briggs understands Islam or adheres to it. You may have noticed, as I did, a problem with the cover design of the book. The front cover has an illustration of multiple humans. But, pictures of humans and animals are prohibited in Islam. His following 2025 book, Islam and the Making of the Modern World, also has two people and a camel on the front cover. Oddly, this image prohibition does not get mentioned in the books. The canonical Hadith states (grade: sahih): “Allah’s Messenger .. said, ‘.. whoever makes a picture will be punished on the Day of Resurrection and will be asked to give life to what he has created’ ..” ( - Sahih Al-Bukhari, Vol. 4, no. 3224); “Narrated Aishah .. ‘I bought a cushion with pictures on it .. for you to sit and recline on.’ Allah’s Messenger said, ‘The painters (i.e., owners) of these pictures will be punished on the Day ..” ( - Sahih Al-Bukhari, Vol. 3, no. 2105); “Narrated Aishah .. The Prophet entered .. while there was a curtain having pictures in the house. His face became red with anger, and then he got hold of the curtain and tore it into pieces” ( - Sahih Al-Bukhari, Vol. 8, no. 6109); “.. Allah’s Messenger said, ‘Angels do not enter a house in which there is a dog or a picture.’ He meant the images of creatures that have souls” ( - Sahih Al-Bukhari, Vol. 5, no. 4002). Strangely, Muslims in general will make pictures of humans or animals with their camera phones, on YouTube videos, or social media.
Briggs makes historical statements about early Islam that are easy to overlook: “.. the rise of Islam in the 7th century AD ..” (page 141). But, is that an accurate statement? When does “the time of Prophet Muhammad” (page 112) begin? It’s interesting that Briggs mentions coins with later Muslim nations – “even minting their own coins” (page 82) for a 9th century rebellion, and “The establishment of this sultanate can be traced back to the 10th century AD, a fact illuminated by ancient Mogadishan coins from that era” (page 124). But, what about coins minted by the early Muslim state? What does it say about Islam? Nevo notes that, “In ca. 77-79 [A.H.] / [AD] 696-99 ’Abd al-Malik reformed the coinage of the Arab state, abolishing the Byzantine traces from the designs of coins. The point of his reform is usually taken to be religious: to replace the coins’ iconography, forbidden by Islam, with religious formulae [words only]. But in fact the post-Reform coinage is not totally nonfigurative: the designs on the copper/bronze issues include depictions of birds, small animals (e.g., the hare), and what seems to be vessels strangely resembling those depicted on ancient Jewish coins .. (e.g., the menorah)” ( - Crossroads to Islam, 2003, page 163; co-author Yehuda Nevo, Middle Eastern archaeologist, Director of Field Research of the Negev Archaeological Project).
This is a shortened review due to space limit.