I’m so very torn on this book. In a lot of ways, it does something necessary in the space of mothers writing about their autistic children. Similarly, there are very few books about the experiences of autistic women, and especially late-diagnosed autistic women. In other ways, I felt like her perspective was limited and sometimes slipped through the cracks.
When Green focuses on her own experience, the reflection really resonates. I loved the way her experience parenting Carson intertwined with her experience being late-diagnosed, how navigating Carson’s autism by their side caused her to recontextualize her own memories. I found the depiction as a late-diagnosed woman extremely validating and accurate; a diagnosis truly makes you rethink your entire life and realize just how pervasive your autistic traits were, and just how little support you received for them.
Tying it in to the complex struggle of parenting Carson was interesting and compelling, and added a lot of depth to the memoir. Overall, Motherness is full of love, empathy, and acceptance. Green’s support for Carson and the strength of their family unit shine through, making it clear that she loves her child and family deeply.
However, there were a few moments that made me raise my eyebrow at Green’s framing. Near the end, she gets a bit more opinionated, which often left me questioning. Particularly, she talks about the framing of “autism moms” and how she finds the term unfair and derogatory. She positions autism moms as being uniquely “damned if they do, damned if they don’t”. While I agree that the opinions of mothers of autistic children do matter, and that autism affects parents too, it’s disingenuous to chalk it up to people misunderstanding autism moms or being cruel to them.
There are a lot of so-called autism moms that have done very real damage to their children and to the perception of autism at large. Especially the stereotype of the “warrior mom” has often been criticized by autistic people for centering the experience of the parent as a martyr. While Green doesn’t position herself this way, she reinforces the problem by not exploring it with sufficient complexity.
Secondly, when she talked about her beliefs about labels, and her hopes for the future, it came across as naive and privileged. Autism should be normalized, autistic people should be allowed to exist unapologetically in public, and receive support and acceptance for who they are. Similarly, mothers, not just mothers of autistic children, should receive patience, grace, and even assistance when their children are experiencing emotions in public. However, I didn’t fully agree with Green’s vision of a world with no labels. Labels are double-edged: crucial for accessibility and identity, but often stigmatized. Her argument would have felt stronger if balanced with this nuance.
Finally, and most glaringly, in the ending chapter titled, “Loving the Alien”, Green talks about Carson coming out as nonbinary and how “exasperating” it was. She mentions not understanding the term, but notably not any attempts to research it. Instead, she wrote about how it annoyed her and frustrated her to be constantly corrected by Carson to use “they/them” and “my child” instead of “my son”.
It’s one thing to acknowledge the challenge of suddenly changing habits or adapting routines, but Green doesn’t stop there. She talks about how infuriating it was for her to be constantly corrected, even going so far as to say "using the plural to denote the singular defies grammatical sense I've been taught as an English major”.
Maybe she was trying to be funny, but it runs way too close to transphobic language that it left a sour taste in my mouth. Also, it’s just not accurate at all, how are you an English major and don’t know that “they” can be a singular pronoun, too? It reads as dismissive of Carson's identity, despite her attempts at acceptance.
At first it didn’t bother me, but as I sat and thought about writing this review, I realized it completely made me recontextualize the rest of the memoir. The repeated use of ‘my boy’ and he/him pronouns throughout the book, only for Carson to come out as nonbinary in the final chapter, creates a jarring contrast, which feels especially discordant when paired with the chapter’s exasperated tone.
It’s very clear that Green loves Carson very much. In many ways, she is radically accepting even when she doesn’t understand, even when it frustrates her, even when it is a struggle. I appreciated that she didn’t sugarcoat the experience but instead showed autism in all of its complexity: joy, pain, connection, and isolation. It’s much more honest than many other books about autism are. However, I was left with an empty feeling.
Honestly, the last few chapters completely ruined my experience with the book. I wished she would have stuck to her own experience, how loving her child taught her to learn to love herself, and the complexity of autism, rather than inserting her own opinions on autism as a whole. I wouldn’t expect a political analysis from a book like this, but since Green included them, I wished they had more nuance and were explored with more depth rather than feeling one-sided or rose-tinted.
Motherness will resonate powerfully for autistic women navigating motherhood or a late diagnosis; for others, it may feel limited in scope. Maybe if I were earlier on the journey of understanding autism and how it appears as a late-diagnosed woman, I would have gotten a lot more than just validation out of this. While radical in some ways, I had hoped for more depth and critical insight.
I received an ARC of this title in exchange for an honest review.