What do you think?
Rate this book
Blue Gold: The Battle Against Corporate Theft of World's Water
Book by Maude Barlow
278 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 1999
36 people are currently reading
867 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 36 reviews
October 22, 2014
This is not a new review. The issues are nonetheless still topical...
There are not many surprises in BLUE GOLD. The primary message of Maud Barlow and Tony Clarke's book echoes the Blue Planet Project, a global campaign to assert the universal right to water, of which Barlow is one of the international leaders. It is the 'battle against the corporate world' - here in particular the 'theft of the world's water'. Of course, it is not so much a 'theft' of water - the world's water supply has been more or less stable since the beginning of time - rather the increasing control by a small group of multinationals over the water's allocation to the peoples of this planet.
Consequently, the strength of the book is in its coverage of the multi-national corporations, the 'Global Water Lords', and the exposure of their expanding power over water delivery and processing systems around the globe. Initiatives to privatize water delivery at a national level probably started with Napoleon III in France in the middle of the 19th century. At that time, governments were usually in charge of water management. Since then privatization has spread from France to the rest of the world. Today, Barlow and Clarke maintain, some 10 corporate players dominate the global water industry. Two French companies hold the lion's share. Most of these major players are multi-utility providers, which increase their hold on the water resources of countries and regions. Once a government opens a door to privatization of any of the water related services, such as water delivery or waste management, it abandons its right to take back control at any stage even if water user groups complain about bad or no service or the company does not live up to the contract. The rules and regulations of the WTO see to that, the authors claim. Although the percentage of national water systems controlled by multi-national corporations at the present time is small, Barlow and Clarke want to warn of the trend and its implication.
Examples are described where things have gone wrong: poor quality of project implementation resulted in water pollution and environmental damage, and/or communities and local business lost the water supply altogether. In these instances corporate water suppliers maintained their profit margin through cutting back in previously promised investments and/or increasing consumer rates. The latter was implemented without any regard to the capacity of the poor to pay. As a result, they could be cut off from the service.
Barlow and Clarke's analysis of the progression of the global water crisis and its origins is less satisfactory. A reader unfamiliar with complex topic of water might find the tour d'horizon overwhelming. The review of the diversity of root causes at local, national and regional levels is superficial and tends to present generalizations where concrete examples would have been more meaningful. The tendency to paint a black and white picture with big business as the main villain sidelines other major reasons for water crises around the world. Agriculture is only mentioned in passing, although some 70% of all water resources are used by agriculture: agribusiness and millions of small-scale and mid-size farmers across industrialized and developing countries. Implementing water conservation methods (through improved irrigation, drought tolerant crops, etc) could lead to substantial water resource savings.
Recent initiatives against global corporate water control highlighted in the section 'Fightback' are selective, emphasizing well-known international as well as North American cases. The approach is usually confrontational with clearly identified opposing sides. Examples of constructive multi-stakeholder collaboration efforts in many parts of the world which attempt to tackle water scarcity are not given enough recognition.
The 'Way Forward' spells out fundamental principles and recommends a series of standards that should be included in any agreement of public-private partnerships in the water delivery sphere. These include the involvement of water users in the planning of the systems, local stewardship and watershed protection, strengthen water preservation and reclaiming of polluted water systems. Underlying all these standards is the recognition of water as an essential part of life and the right of all beings to water whatever their social or economic status. A call for capacity building and education of consumers, communities, government officials and private sector actors at all levels should be added.
BLUE GOLD is an easy read, maybe for some too easy considering the seriousness of the topic. It covers very important ground, often in an overview fashion that tends to generalize and take a black and white stand. Although it is obvious that the authors did comprehensive research in preparation of the book, it shows a certain lack of thoroughness by not providing citation references (footnotes), adequate source listings and a bibliography or reading list.
There are not many surprises in BLUE GOLD. The primary message of Maud Barlow and Tony Clarke's book echoes the Blue Planet Project, a global campaign to assert the universal right to water, of which Barlow is one of the international leaders. It is the 'battle against the corporate world' - here in particular the 'theft of the world's water'. Of course, it is not so much a 'theft' of water - the world's water supply has been more or less stable since the beginning of time - rather the increasing control by a small group of multinationals over the water's allocation to the peoples of this planet.
Consequently, the strength of the book is in its coverage of the multi-national corporations, the 'Global Water Lords', and the exposure of their expanding power over water delivery and processing systems around the globe. Initiatives to privatize water delivery at a national level probably started with Napoleon III in France in the middle of the 19th century. At that time, governments were usually in charge of water management. Since then privatization has spread from France to the rest of the world. Today, Barlow and Clarke maintain, some 10 corporate players dominate the global water industry. Two French companies hold the lion's share. Most of these major players are multi-utility providers, which increase their hold on the water resources of countries and regions. Once a government opens a door to privatization of any of the water related services, such as water delivery or waste management, it abandons its right to take back control at any stage even if water user groups complain about bad or no service or the company does not live up to the contract. The rules and regulations of the WTO see to that, the authors claim. Although the percentage of national water systems controlled by multi-national corporations at the present time is small, Barlow and Clarke want to warn of the trend and its implication.
Examples are described where things have gone wrong: poor quality of project implementation resulted in water pollution and environmental damage, and/or communities and local business lost the water supply altogether. In these instances corporate water suppliers maintained their profit margin through cutting back in previously promised investments and/or increasing consumer rates. The latter was implemented without any regard to the capacity of the poor to pay. As a result, they could be cut off from the service.
Barlow and Clarke's analysis of the progression of the global water crisis and its origins is less satisfactory. A reader unfamiliar with complex topic of water might find the tour d'horizon overwhelming. The review of the diversity of root causes at local, national and regional levels is superficial and tends to present generalizations where concrete examples would have been more meaningful. The tendency to paint a black and white picture with big business as the main villain sidelines other major reasons for water crises around the world. Agriculture is only mentioned in passing, although some 70% of all water resources are used by agriculture: agribusiness and millions of small-scale and mid-size farmers across industrialized and developing countries. Implementing water conservation methods (through improved irrigation, drought tolerant crops, etc) could lead to substantial water resource savings.
Recent initiatives against global corporate water control highlighted in the section 'Fightback' are selective, emphasizing well-known international as well as North American cases. The approach is usually confrontational with clearly identified opposing sides. Examples of constructive multi-stakeholder collaboration efforts in many parts of the world which attempt to tackle water scarcity are not given enough recognition.
The 'Way Forward' spells out fundamental principles and recommends a series of standards that should be included in any agreement of public-private partnerships in the water delivery sphere. These include the involvement of water users in the planning of the systems, local stewardship and watershed protection, strengthen water preservation and reclaiming of polluted water systems. Underlying all these standards is the recognition of water as an essential part of life and the right of all beings to water whatever their social or economic status. A call for capacity building and education of consumers, communities, government officials and private sector actors at all levels should be added.
BLUE GOLD is an easy read, maybe for some too easy considering the seriousness of the topic. It covers very important ground, often in an overview fashion that tends to generalize and take a black and white stand. Although it is obvious that the authors did comprehensive research in preparation of the book, it shows a certain lack of thoroughness by not providing citation references (footnotes), adequate source listings and a bibliography or reading list.
July 21, 2010
One thing that made the book difficult to follow was the fact that it uses so many different units for water use and the citations for the statistics they use are a bit dodgy. The world has X km^3 of fresh water, the average American uses B gallons/year, Los Angeles requires C barrels/year, they made a deal with Nevada to provide D acre-feet (per month? per year?) of water, and so on. The things I found to be really disturbing was aquifer depletion and diversion of freshwater sources and the lack of clean drinking water in much of the rest of the world, privatization was less problematic for me, because it seems just as much a problem of government mismanagement as corporate profiteering. Municipalities can provide cheap water if they don't spend enough on capital improvements, then when it comes time to upgrade infrastructure, instead of politically unpopular rate increases, they can privatize so consumers gripe about greedy corporations instead.
At the end of the day, this issue boils down to answering two questions: (1) Do we - as consumers, as taxpayers, as human beings - want to pay for the full impact of our current water usage? and (2) what is the mechanism by which we pay for it? The book does a good job of cataloging the impact of our trend of water depletion and mismanagement, but as long as the answer to the first question is "no," any policy proposals to attempt to answer the second questions seem academic.
At the end of the day, this issue boils down to answering two questions: (1) Do we - as consumers, as taxpayers, as human beings - want to pay for the full impact of our current water usage? and (2) what is the mechanism by which we pay for it? The book does a good job of cataloging the impact of our trend of water depletion and mismanagement, but as long as the answer to the first question is "no," any policy proposals to attempt to answer the second questions seem academic.
December 16, 2023
Very factual and interesting. Some scary realisations around the global state of water
August 9, 2008
I'm surprised that it got so many good reviews, because this book didn't really do anything for me. I normally love reading about crises caused by things being commodified when they shouldn't be, but this book treated the issue pretty superficially and didn't really teach me anything new. The author also repeated herself a lot--like, she would say the same thing over and over again. Did I mention it was repetitive? ;)
I have no doubt that Barlow is an admirable advocate, but the whole book seemed it like it came straight off a website or something. Not to mention the fact that she discussed activists from Guyana in the "Africa" chapter--I mean, I can overlook typos, but if you're going to write a book you should at least get your basic geography straight.
I have no doubt that Barlow is an admirable advocate, but the whole book seemed it like it came straight off a website or something. Not to mention the fact that she discussed activists from Guyana in the "Africa" chapter--I mean, I can overlook typos, but if you're going to write a book you should at least get your basic geography straight.
May 31, 2011
According to Clarke the next war will be for water.
June 11, 2015
The most depressing book I've ever read and a must read for every human being.
NOW
NOW
April 27, 2021
With all the concern for the rising waters impacting coastlines and cities across the world, it may be hard to believe that there is a more pressing concerning regarding water. Namely fresh water and it's a developing crisis in every nation, on every continent.
Barlow takes a chilling look into what has been happening to our fresh water resources. How we have impacted the hydrological cycle of evaporation to rainfall to the ground which refills streams, aquifers and groundwater, which feeds the plants that can hold the soil with all it's natural nutrients in place. How any water falling into urban areas covered with concrete and asphalt is removed from that cycle. It is sent to the sea and mixed with sea salt, helping the rise of sea level and reduces precipitation in land-locked regions far from the seas and lakes. How we have dammed rivers devastating the natural watersheds and flow of water. Treated fresh water as if it's unlimited - for agriculture, technology, industry, recreation and more.
The precious water we require for life. Our demands double every year even as the world population increases. Water that is wasted growing water-demanding crops in areas that are in a perpetual state of drought. Where ancient techniques and needs are ignored. Where water is no longer considered a basic need but a commodity that transnational companies are buying the rights to. To extract millions of liters/gallons from one water-rich area and transport it to another for massive financial gains.
How transnational companies have gained the backing of the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund which is part of the World Bank and the International Bank for Reconstruction & Development. When a developing country requests a loan from the World Bank, one of the usual conditions is the privatization of water services with cost recovery. And those transnational companies are right there to step in especially since the International Finance Corp (also part of the World Bank) is there to provide capital funding to these major water companies.
The cost recovery part means that everyone must pay user fees that are to cover the FULL costs of water systems including operation, maintenance, and capital expenditures which results in the poor being cut off from access to water services - including sanitation - which leads to cholera and other disease outbreaks. There are instances where the expense for water for the local populace has jumped to nearly 20% of their annual income.
Despite the title, most world trade organizations favor the companies rather than the countries and definitely not the environment. A government must prove that it considered every possible conceivable option that private providers could possible provide to improve water quality and the effects of the its possible decisions before they can keep public ownership of its own water resources. At risk, is the authority of the government to regulate corporate activities within their own borders. In fact, a water system delivered by the public government could be considered a 'monopoly' and discriminatory against the foreign-based water corporations looking for marketing opportunities.
There is even a NAFTA clause that states that once a export flow between 2 member countries has been established, it can not be reduced or restricted and must guarantee the level established over the preceding three years. No matter the cause or reason for the reduction.
Then there are the BITs - Bilateral Investment Treaties - between countries which allow a transnational corporation to use their home country in order to sue for millions in retaliation for another cancelling a contract of services. Local health agencies and provincial governors cannot interfere or fine the transnational for inadequate service or failures to provide on the part of the so-called Lords of Water without being dragged into international negotiations or the world court.
Horrified yet? At the time the book was published - 2002 - this was one of the fastest growing and least regulated industry. Bottling companies were jumping on the bottled water wagon. Barlow gave several common principles as well as what ordinary people could do in order to save their access to public water but it's nearly twenty years ago and corporations have been moving fast.
After reading this, you will likely not look at that bottle of cold water the same ever again. And you might not look at international trade treaties the same either.
2021-083
Barlow takes a chilling look into what has been happening to our fresh water resources. How we have impacted the hydrological cycle of evaporation to rainfall to the ground which refills streams, aquifers and groundwater, which feeds the plants that can hold the soil with all it's natural nutrients in place. How any water falling into urban areas covered with concrete and asphalt is removed from that cycle. It is sent to the sea and mixed with sea salt, helping the rise of sea level and reduces precipitation in land-locked regions far from the seas and lakes. How we have dammed rivers devastating the natural watersheds and flow of water. Treated fresh water as if it's unlimited - for agriculture, technology, industry, recreation and more.
The precious water we require for life. Our demands double every year even as the world population increases. Water that is wasted growing water-demanding crops in areas that are in a perpetual state of drought. Where ancient techniques and needs are ignored. Where water is no longer considered a basic need but a commodity that transnational companies are buying the rights to. To extract millions of liters/gallons from one water-rich area and transport it to another for massive financial gains.
How transnational companies have gained the backing of the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund which is part of the World Bank and the International Bank for Reconstruction & Development. When a developing country requests a loan from the World Bank, one of the usual conditions is the privatization of water services with cost recovery. And those transnational companies are right there to step in especially since the International Finance Corp (also part of the World Bank) is there to provide capital funding to these major water companies.
The cost recovery part means that everyone must pay user fees that are to cover the FULL costs of water systems including operation, maintenance, and capital expenditures which results in the poor being cut off from access to water services - including sanitation - which leads to cholera and other disease outbreaks. There are instances where the expense for water for the local populace has jumped to nearly 20% of their annual income.
Despite the title, most world trade organizations favor the companies rather than the countries and definitely not the environment. A government must prove that it considered every possible conceivable option that private providers could possible provide to improve water quality and the effects of the its possible decisions before they can keep public ownership of its own water resources. At risk, is the authority of the government to regulate corporate activities within their own borders. In fact, a water system delivered by the public government could be considered a 'monopoly' and discriminatory against the foreign-based water corporations looking for marketing opportunities.
There is even a NAFTA clause that states that once a export flow between 2 member countries has been established, it can not be reduced or restricted and must guarantee the level established over the preceding three years. No matter the cause or reason for the reduction.
Then there are the BITs - Bilateral Investment Treaties - between countries which allow a transnational corporation to use their home country in order to sue for millions in retaliation for another cancelling a contract of services. Local health agencies and provincial governors cannot interfere or fine the transnational for inadequate service or failures to provide on the part of the so-called Lords of Water without being dragged into international negotiations or the world court.
Horrified yet? At the time the book was published - 2002 - this was one of the fastest growing and least regulated industry. Bottling companies were jumping on the bottled water wagon. Barlow gave several common principles as well as what ordinary people could do in order to save their access to public water but it's nearly twenty years ago and corporations have been moving fast.
After reading this, you will likely not look at that bottle of cold water the same ever again. And you might not look at international trade treaties the same either.
2021-083
November 7, 2025
"Blaues Gold" ist ein aufrüttelndes und fast schon prophetisches Sachbuch. Die Autoren Maude Barlow und Tony Clarke entwerfen ein Szenario, in dem Wasser zur umkämpftesten Ressource des 21. Jahrhunderts wird – wertvoller als Öl.
Die zentrale These ist der fundamentale Konflikt: Sehen wir Wasser als Handelsware (ein "globales Geschäft", das privatisiert und an Börsen gehandelt werden kann) oder als Menschenrecht (ein öffentliches Gut, das allen frei zugänglich sein muss)?
Die Aktualität dieses Buches ist erschreckend, blickt man auf die Meldungen allein aus diesem Jahr (2025) in Frankreich. Während die Autoren die Gefahren der Privatisierung von Wasser aufzeigen, bestätigen die jüngsten Nachrichten die andere Seite der Medaille: die systemische Kontamination.
Barlow und Clarke warnen vor einer "globalen Wasser-Apartheid". Sie beginnt dort, wo das Vertrauen in das öffentliche Gut selbst zu versiegen droht.
Wenn (wie aktuell im Grand Est) öffentliches Leitungswasser wegen "ewiger Schadstoffe" (PFAS) gesperrt werden muss und (wie in französischen Überseegebieten) krebserregende Chemikalien die Grenzwerte im Trinkwasser überschreiten, scheint das öffentliche System zu versagen.
Der bittere Treppenwitz, den „Blaues Gold“ vorwegnimmt, lautet: Selbst die private Alternative ist keine Rettung. Die Berichte aus dem Frühjahr über massive Verunreinigungen (Pestizide, Bakterien, PFAS) in den bekanntesten Mineralwässern großer Konzerne (Nestlé) zeigen, dass die "garantierte Qualität" oft nur ein Marketingversprechen ist.
"Blaues Gold" ist ein leidenschaftlicher Appell, Wasser als öffentliches Gut zu verteidigen – sowohl gegen die Privatisierung, die es zur Ware macht, als auch gegen die industrielle Verschmutzung, die es unbrauchbar macht. Ein essenzielles Buch – seine Warnungen sind heute realer denn je.
Die zentrale These ist der fundamentale Konflikt: Sehen wir Wasser als Handelsware (ein "globales Geschäft", das privatisiert und an Börsen gehandelt werden kann) oder als Menschenrecht (ein öffentliches Gut, das allen frei zugänglich sein muss)?
Die Aktualität dieses Buches ist erschreckend, blickt man auf die Meldungen allein aus diesem Jahr (2025) in Frankreich. Während die Autoren die Gefahren der Privatisierung von Wasser aufzeigen, bestätigen die jüngsten Nachrichten die andere Seite der Medaille: die systemische Kontamination.
Barlow und Clarke warnen vor einer "globalen Wasser-Apartheid". Sie beginnt dort, wo das Vertrauen in das öffentliche Gut selbst zu versiegen droht.
Wenn (wie aktuell im Grand Est) öffentliches Leitungswasser wegen "ewiger Schadstoffe" (PFAS) gesperrt werden muss und (wie in französischen Überseegebieten) krebserregende Chemikalien die Grenzwerte im Trinkwasser überschreiten, scheint das öffentliche System zu versagen.
Der bittere Treppenwitz, den „Blaues Gold“ vorwegnimmt, lautet: Selbst die private Alternative ist keine Rettung. Die Berichte aus dem Frühjahr über massive Verunreinigungen (Pestizide, Bakterien, PFAS) in den bekanntesten Mineralwässern großer Konzerne (Nestlé) zeigen, dass die "garantierte Qualität" oft nur ein Marketingversprechen ist.
"Blaues Gold" ist ein leidenschaftlicher Appell, Wasser als öffentliches Gut zu verteidigen – sowohl gegen die Privatisierung, die es zur Ware macht, als auch gegen die industrielle Verschmutzung, die es unbrauchbar macht. Ein essenzielles Buch – seine Warnungen sind heute realer denn je.
July 17, 2019
This book is very one-sided (aka, liberal and anti-globalization and anti-free trade) and the authors use very strong words to convey their point, making no attempt to convince people who disagree with them. Yes, there is a crisis going on, and it has gotten somewhat worse since 2002, but repeatedly saying that entire countries are "left dry" and left without water at all is ridiculous. And this is coming from me, a person with an advanced degree in water environmental and policy. This should be read with caution, as they exaggerate many of their claims.
They believe that water cannot and should not ever be treated as a private commodity, but fail to actually describe how their value of water as a common should be put into place in our laws and our society. A "water ethic" will not do it, but that's really all they seem to offer as a solution. They suggest pricing water, but at a very high rate for agriculture and industry--yet offer no solution for solving large domestic uses (fountains, toilets, watering lawns, etc). It seems the book is really just an attack on the free market.
They believe that water cannot and should not ever be treated as a private commodity, but fail to actually describe how their value of water as a common should be put into place in our laws and our society. A "water ethic" will not do it, but that's really all they seem to offer as a solution. They suggest pricing water, but at a very high rate for agriculture and industry--yet offer no solution for solving large domestic uses (fountains, toilets, watering lawns, etc). It seems the book is really just an attack on the free market.
July 5, 2022
The book is wonderful for water activists .. I loved it. Large efforts were spent on it.
October 10, 2022
it was alr idk
May 16, 2023
Was a slow read. So much so that I couldn’t complete it and even left the job where I had access to this book.
March 18, 2017
The book raises some interesting questions and has some suggestions for solving the water crisis, but the tone at times verges into the hysterical. This panicked approach may be justified because of the stakes, but it makes the book tedious to read at times. The author also irritated me by not using units consistently. They flip flopped the usage of Imperial and SI units. Sometimes the SI units are first and the Imperial would follow. Other times it was the reverse. Just pick one order and stick with it. Also ground water is two words not one.
February 28, 2011
I have to say that this was a disappointment. The authors throw around a lot of numbers and information about the topic itself and the private companies involved. Still, when it comes to giving more insight on how these things came to be and work on the inside, the book falls flat. The writers have a strong opinion on this topic, which in itself is nota bad thing, but it also finds it way into the writing and arguing. There are too many points that were only argued from one point of view or flat out made little sense. The most glaring one being that the author mention that the private water suppliers raise prices, but on the other hand also are responsible for increased water consumption. That is not intuitive and this paradox is never explained (besides the fact that “in order to make more profit, companies have to sell more of there products”…that is wrong they can also raise the prices…or reach more costumers and at the same time decrease the per-person-consumption). Anyway, further the author makes use of the over-exhausted WTO-WB-IMF arguments. In some way the book is the same old anti-globalization debate lacking some depth on the specific topic.
Another problem is the credibility of the author. Look, in general I support the author in being suspicious about the privatization of the water sector, but I want credible accounts and not cheer for manufactured arguments with a clear bias. As soon as the first chapter the authors are about to lose a part of that credibility, when they state that “there are no more doubts by experts that humans are responsible for the climate change”. Most informed people know that this is not the case. They are still enough assuming it might be a natural process to render this non-unanimous. Why can the authors not simply say that the majority of experts hold that opinion? Why taint your credibility for a rather casual argument left from the main subject? Now I have to assume that situation as described might be precarious but not (nearly) as bad as preached by the authors. I just could not trust these numbers anymore and some other points made by the author. Not to mention that now as the book is a bit dated, the situation must have been a lot worse than it seems as it was as described back then.
Not all is bad though. I liked the non-anti-globalization and anti-privatization parts, especially the early chapters on how the natural water cycle works and how we are about to do harm to it. Still I would assume there are more objective books on the market about this important subject.
Another problem is the credibility of the author. Look, in general I support the author in being suspicious about the privatization of the water sector, but I want credible accounts and not cheer for manufactured arguments with a clear bias. As soon as the first chapter the authors are about to lose a part of that credibility, when they state that “there are no more doubts by experts that humans are responsible for the climate change”. Most informed people know that this is not the case. They are still enough assuming it might be a natural process to render this non-unanimous. Why can the authors not simply say that the majority of experts hold that opinion? Why taint your credibility for a rather casual argument left from the main subject? Now I have to assume that situation as described might be precarious but not (nearly) as bad as preached by the authors. I just could not trust these numbers anymore and some other points made by the author. Not to mention that now as the book is a bit dated, the situation must have been a lot worse than it seems as it was as described back then.
Not all is bad though. I liked the non-anti-globalization and anti-privatization parts, especially the early chapters on how the natural water cycle works and how we are about to do harm to it. Still I would assume there are more objective books on the market about this important subject.
December 14, 2010
What can I say... this was one of the most overwhelming books I have ever read, it took me almost 7 months to read because I had to keep taking time off to let my brain decompress. The entire book is incredibly dense, granted with lots of good (although highly alarming) information, but it was too much for me. I really couldn't wait to get to the "Way Forward" chapter in hopes of finding something uplifting. The last two chapters were good in the solutions and ideas offered, but they got really redundant.
Overall, I would only recommend this read to people who are seriously involved in work on water rights and environmental and economic activism around water. A better option for those who have an interest and passion in water issues, but aren't able to sit through 250 pages of intense reading, is to watch "Flow: For Love of Water" which features Barlow and many other great water activists.
I did greatly enjoy the last sentence of the book: The growing number of citizens and groups around the world who belong to the Blue Planet Project and other organizations fighting for a water-secure future believe in the beauty of this dream: that our global water crisis will become the source of global peace; that finally humanity will bow before Nature and learn to live at peace within the limits Nature gives us and with one another; and that through our work together, the people of the world will declare that the sacred waters of life are the common property of the earth and all species, to be preserved for all generations to come.
Overall, I would only recommend this read to people who are seriously involved in work on water rights and environmental and economic activism around water. A better option for those who have an interest and passion in water issues, but aren't able to sit through 250 pages of intense reading, is to watch "Flow: For Love of Water" which features Barlow and many other great water activists.
I did greatly enjoy the last sentence of the book: The growing number of citizens and groups around the world who belong to the Blue Planet Project and other organizations fighting for a water-secure future believe in the beauty of this dream: that our global water crisis will become the source of global peace; that finally humanity will bow before Nature and learn to live at peace within the limits Nature gives us and with one another; and that through our work together, the people of the world will declare that the sacred waters of life are the common property of the earth and all species, to be preserved for all generations to come.
August 4, 2011
A must read in the age of green technology. In order not to fall into the same trap of the green revolution, we have to be more aware and more informed about "green" technology and ponder on just how "green" green techs are. In an interrelated world, in an globalized economy, "green" needs a new definition and a new understanding. Water is not the only problem, but it is the lense which enables you to see from another perspective. Water is something we must reflect upon in order to make sense of our human conditions. Water is not just for drinking, it is not just a material. We need to understand its cultural contents, its political power, the consequences of its commodification and the multi-layer meanings, powers and controls that all tied up to water. It is much more than blue gold. How we conceive and use water determines our lives now and our future.
March 27, 2013
Brilliant book about water has been used as political, economical weapon from bankers, elites, and countries with geographical advantages over the weaker..Countries, banks, corporations have been relentlessly trying to capture limited global fresh water resources..and by leveraging the ownership of the water supplies; corporations, countries and banks, especially so called WTO, IMF, World Banks are united together, can control other countries for maximizing their own advantages without any regard for human lives. The so called New World Order and the Elites are using international trade pacts, agreements to kidnap and steal those with resources. Likewise, applies to rare-earth, metals, copper, oil, food, seeds...Must read book to understand the basic flaw of Supply/Demand when it is being used on universal supply of water..
April 24, 2010
This book speaks to a very specific point of view. Liberals will read it and think "how true, that's criminal, we have to do something!". Conservatives will think "oh brother, here we go again, blah blah blah". Unfortunately, the author takes many liberal assumptions for granted - people have the right to basic human needs regardless of their ability to pay, environmental uses are as important as human uses, corporations are inherently selfish and short sighted - but doesn't even attempt to convince those who don't share that point of view. Unfortunately, over the last 10+ years since this book was written the world has continued down the path she warns us about. We'll never change things by just preaching to the converted.
April 12, 2016
The book is a thorough and detailed look at
1. the world's limited freshwater resources,
2. how they are being reduced, and
3. how the remaining supplies and their delivery systems are being privatized, mostly to the detriment of the world's poor.
The author's case is compelling, but the sheer volume of detail makes the book a slog to read and nulls the alarm the author is ringing. (The information is presumably a bit outdated by now, but the author wrote two follow up books on the same topic.) All the details seem to be because the author aims to make an airtight case. I did spot at least one typo (billion instead of million), so there may be some erroneous details, but it doesn't harm the overall case.
1. the world's limited freshwater resources,
2. how they are being reduced, and
3. how the remaining supplies and their delivery systems are being privatized, mostly to the detriment of the world's poor.
The author's case is compelling, but the sheer volume of detail makes the book a slog to read and nulls the alarm the author is ringing. (The information is presumably a bit outdated by now, but the author wrote two follow up books on the same topic.) All the details seem to be because the author aims to make an airtight case. I did spot at least one typo (billion instead of million), so there may be some erroneous details, but it doesn't harm the overall case.
Want to read
November 15, 2007I just listened to an incredibly inspiring interview with filmmaker and Fulbright Fellow Shalini Kantayya who was a participant on FOX’s "On the Lot," Steven Spielberg's reality show.
According to Kantayya, in 20 years, two thirds of the world's population -- over four billion people -- might not have adequate access to clean drinking water. She made a film, "A Drop of Life," to raise awareness of the water crisis.
In her interview, she recommends everyone read "Blue Gold."
Here's a link to the interview: http://bigvisionpodcast.libsyn.com/
According to Kantayya, in 20 years, two thirds of the world's population -- over four billion people -- might not have adequate access to clean drinking water. She made a film, "A Drop of Life," to raise awareness of the water crisis.
In her interview, she recommends everyone read "Blue Gold."
Here's a link to the interview: http://bigvisionpodcast.libsyn.com/
August 22, 2008
Overall, I found this issue compelling and the book well-written. Although I was certainly aware of many of these issues prior to reading this book, it brought more clarity into the truly terrifying water crises that are to come. I would have enjoyed the book more had it not been repetitive in places. I tired of the same stories being repeated. Given that the authors did appear to be on a rant in some places, I'm interested to get counterpoints on the trade policies that are described in this book.
December 11, 2011
I give this book two stars for the sole reason that I did not enjoy the writing style. It's a very fact-heavy book, and it reads much like a pompous person with an overabundance of general knowledge that goes around saying "Did you know...?" to anyone who will listen. Nevertheless, the topic of water as a commodity is intriguing and one that people in America especially probably know nothing about, unless they have been affected by the lack of it. This book, much like water itself, is very easy to dismiss but that does not make it any less important.
December 26, 2023
This is one of the books that completely and deeply changed me. I was passionate about water politics before but this took it to another level. I learned so much and would recommend it to anyone who wants to understand the privatization of natural resources: how it happened, what is has caused, and how might we change it.
August 24, 2007
Scary. All you need to know is that in 2000 the U.N. said that "water is not a right, it is a commodity." Result-poor people are gonna get royally screwed because they can't afford it as it's privitized.
Fights over access to water will be the main reason for conflict as it continues to run out.
Fights over access to water will be the main reason for conflict as it continues to run out.
January 11, 2011
Wow, what a depressing read. There are oil tankers that have already been converted into "water" tankers and they are taking water from Alaska to California. Many places across the world will run out of water in the next 10-20 years. Action plans in concluding chapter.
Want to read
July 26, 2016Ref documentary films:
"Flow: For Love of Water (2007)" - movie only, don't miss extra intervws / Atrazine toxicity in showering & ingestion
"The End Of Poverty (2008)" - book and movie
Petition for Article 31 - The Right to Water:
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid...
"Flow: For Love of Water (2007)" - movie only, don't miss extra intervws / Atrazine toxicity in showering & ingestion
"The End Of Poverty (2008)" - book and movie
Petition for Article 31 - The Right to Water:
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid...
July 15, 2008
when i read this book, i started to think twice thrice whether i really want to bring new life to earth ... i finished the book before even finish it.
November 19, 2008
This is a early 2000s look at the corporate globalization of water around the globe. Barlow is the expert in this field from the human rights standpoint.
November 6, 2009
Insightful reading.
August 20, 2010
Very eye opening book! We definitely need to get serious about our water - even in the United States.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 36 reviews