2.25 Stars
Characters/Relationships — 3/10
I didn’t particularly like these characters due to their lack of substance or nuance. To me, they all felt bland, one-note, and more like ideas of characters rather than actual people. I think the author maybe chose a couple of basic traits and thought that was enough for characterization. We don’t get any backstory that would inform character motivations or desires. Characters' emotions, and to some extent “personalities,” often come and go as the plot necessitates rather than as a reflection of who they are as consistent characters reacting to a situation.
Ru was nebulous as a main character; I had a hard time getting a sense of her personality beyond she likes vases, believes in magic, and has a brother (which is more so a handful of traits rather than a personality). She was incredibly repetitive in her thoughts and actions (and I didn't get the impression this was for any narrative purpose, i.e demonstrating Ru was set in her ways or playing it safe), and I didn’t feel like she had much development throughout the book. She is more or less the same character fundamentally at the beginning and the end of the book. Ru having new found strong emotions at the end of the book is not the same as her learning about herself, becoming a better version of herself, developing new beliefs, etc. Also, for a scholar, she was at times incredibly dense (ignoring obvious clues as to Fen’s identity, what D’Luc and the Children would want with the artifact, etc.). A lot of her reasoning felt childish and unsound rather than based on structured, logical conclusions from data as one would expect from a scholar; instead, she asks herself a lot of questions but doesn’t try to answer them.
Fen also felt wishy-washy, like the author wanted him to fulfill certain roles in certain scenes but did not build out a character to make these scenes feel cohesive. His character is instead relies more on his appearance and vibes rather than his personality. I could tell you much more about Fen’s looks than his beliefs, values, identity, etc. I think Fen’s blandness might be to allow readers to project whatever personality they want onto him. Additionally, Fen exists solely in relation to Ru but doesn’t do much as his own person which makes him uninteresting to read about. Who he is doesn't matter; what matters is that he everything he does is somehow related to Ru.
Personally, I found Fen’s protectiveness and near obsession with Ru unsettling and unwarranted instead of charming. Prior to the reveal that Ru and Fen are magically bonded, their attraction feels superficial. They go from infatuation to being willing to die for each other with very little gradated change in between. We are also told how their feelings towards each other are supposedly developing but we aren’t particularly shown this change in their interactions. To me, they just seemed to be experiencing physical attraction rather than the deep, emotional connection the book is trying to convince me that they share. Ru only seems to like Fen for his looks and that he saved her life a couple of times, but they don’t seem to share any interests, beliefs, or values that would make me think they are somehow linked by their souls.
The side characters and their relationships with each other and the main characters feel like they’re there just because the book needed more characters for Ru and Fen to interact with. All of the King’s Guard or the Tower’s professors sort of blurred together for me. Ru’s friends were likely there just to check off the box of ‘Ru’s friends.’
I do think the author did a good job with giving characters like Lord D’Luc and the regent distinct voices. I wish the more prominent characters were also given distinct voices to help characterize them.
Atmosphere/Setting — 4/10
I did enjoy that this book took place in what I think is supposed to be the Enlightenment Era in an academic setting, but I feel like enough was not done with the setting. The majority of this book takes place in a university, but I feel like it only did so for aesthetics rather than to explore a university setting. Because of this, the university often was more like a stage background rather than an actual place due to the focus on its appearance instead of things like its history, structure and organization, traditions, and student culture. I think the author really missed the opportunity to explore what makes this setting unique and how it fits into the larger world. For instance, is higher education expected in this world or is it a privilege, what are the goals of the students who attend the Tower, etc.
Writing Style — 5/10
The writing was decent and serviceable for this story. The prologue and beginning of the story was a little clunky and forced. I think the author was trying to establish an elevated, rich style found in high fantasy to draw in the reader, but I got the sense perhaps the author wasn't particularly comfortable with writing. Such a style is also not conducive to the actual story being told; this is not some sprawling, epic saga (which lends itself to more grandiose language) but rather a self-contained, lower fantasy story. The prose does settle into a more appropriately grounded yet still descriptive style that the author is clearly more comfortable with. I enjoyed this prose much more, because it helped this specific story flow much more organically.
That being said, the author might have been too comfortable at times in their writing to the point of carelessness. The writing became fairly repetitive in places; the author relied on many of the same metaphors, words, and phrases throughout. Often the author dedicated more space and words than was necessary to describing scenery or characters' appearance and often repeating the same information (I get it! Fen is tall and has dark hair. It doesn’t need to be mentioned every time we see him). I think the author was more comfortable writing descriptions rather than plot or dialogue and relied on descriptions to pad the book.
I wish the author could have leaned into the setting and given Ru’s inner monologue a more academic tone; this could have been something to help characterize Ru (maybe she’s a particularly logical and observant person). I also felt like the author overused narrative questions, but this is a personal preference.
Plot — 3/10
I’ll be frank: not a lot happens in terms of plot with this book, and the stuff that does happen isn’t particularly engaging. Not every book has to be action packed or high stakes, and that’s clearly not what the author intended here, but there wasn’t anything to propel the story forward in an engaging way that made me want to keep reading. Part of why the plot feels so weak and flimsy is due to Ru as a main character. She doesn’t have much agency to move herself from one event to the next; instead, the author moves the characters around like chess pieces as needed.
The middle third of this book was honestly really boring and slow to me. This section can easily be summarized in a single sentence: Ru takes the artifact to the palace, then to the Tower, and then studies it without any developments. During this time, the chapters become really repetitive. Ru either cries or passes out basically every chapter. The characters spend a lot of time sitting around and talking but not in a way that develops or provides more perspective to their relationships. They do not have distinct enough personalities or compelling enough relationships to make up for a lack of plot. This section definitely could have been trimmed down significantly to make room for more interesting and meaningful things to happen.
Also, the climax really didn’t do it for me. Honestly, it was pretty lackluster, cliched, and disappointing. I was left with the thought, “Oh, that’s it? That’s the climax? Shame.” The “twist” of Fen’s identity felt obvious and like a safe option, and for me, it cheapened and ruined the development of Ru and Fen’s relationship. The foreshadowing leading up to this point felt fairly heavy handed, and I was frustrated with Ru for missing so many obvious clues.
Intrigue — 3/10
The first chunk of the book is pretty interesting and engaging, especially the chapters at the dig site where they find the artifact. But after we meet Fen, the story loses a lot of momentum and the mystery of the artifact is put on hold while Ru pines after Fen. I don’t mind that there’s romance as a secondary plot, but the book almost doesn’t treat it as a secondary plot. The most interesting part of the book –you know, the destructive mysterious artifact— is put on the back burner for some reason?
The rest of this book just felt very surface-level and perfunctory. I think the author wanted to make some sort of commentary on the connection between magic and science but maybe didn’t have enough knowledge on science and scientific academia to make proper commentary. There was also a missed opportunity to make commentary on academic culture, especially with regards to how society treats less “academic” pursuits like art, music, writing, etc. Ru makes a comment on how if magic is real, then it surely exists in music. I also think it would have been really meaningful to explore consumption of and entitlement to art through the lens of magic.
Logic/Worldbuilding — 3/10
There were a few things that felt pretty illogical to me. Most of them have to do with Ru and her behavior. Ru seemed way too trusting at times especially when she is so protective of the artifact. Early on, we are introduced to the fact that Ru believes in magic and is somewhat ridiculed for it, but we don’t really get a good sense of why she is committed to this unusual belief. She seems to want to prove the existence of magic but doesn’t seem particularly driven to do so. One could argue that she wants to prove herself, but she doesn't face any particular backlash from her peers, the academic community, or society at large for her uncommon beliefs such that she would need to prove herself. I could understand if maybe magic was perhaps outlawed or suppressed historically and/or due to some connection to her family and culture, she wanted to restore the reputation of magic.
The worldbuilding overall was lackluster for me. This world is a basic, generic European-inspired fantasy world without much to make it stand out from any other world. I think so much more could have been done to explore religion, politics, and education to make this world feel unique. For me, worldbuilding is an integral part of a story, but I totally recognize it might not be as important for others.
Enjoyment — 3/10
Ultimately, I didn’t particularly enjoy this book. Eventually, I wanted to skim just to get through the book faster so I could move on to another book. I didn’t find myself looking forward to reading about any of the characters. I studied anthropology in university and was excited to read a book that incorporated archaeology and anthropology, but its inclusion was very surface level and disappointing. I don’t think this is a bad book, but it wasn’t for me. Luckily, I got this on kindle while it was free.
Final Score — 3.4/10 or ~2.25 stars
Side note: I can’t escape TNAIM. Imagine my horror when reading the acknowledgements and learning that this author and the author of TNAIM know each other.