i can't rate this because i got about half way before realizing i was trying to break a reading slump not entrench it further and so finally called it quits. that sounds pretty damning and really it is, but i genuinely found this book fascinating. there was a bit early on where i thought to myself that if holly race got a few more books under her belt and she cared about being a good fantasist, there was something really there to work with. but as with a lot of authors currently working in this category she’s hampered by at best apathy towards the history of her genre and at worse gleeful ignorance.
now, i can already hear the indignant cries of ‘so she has to read tolkien?’ and actually no she does not. but she does have to read legitimate historians of women’s history of the tudor era (and alison weir, god bless her, does not qualify), as well as any fantasy or sf novel under the relatively broad umbrella of ‘feminist fiction’ published in the last eighty years. there is quite a lot of depth to both categories and i don’t know that she’s read the latter, but she lists quite a diverse list of the former and though one of them is a tiktok influencer (?) and another is alison weir, there’s a handful of really strong trained historians she cites whose work seems to have had no influence on her writing.
anyway. i’ll start with the good/neutral. the prose really clips along. i have tried some clunkers recently, but race—if not poetic—at least understands both sentence variance and rhythm. the castles also were fascinating and she clearly put a lot of thought into what they looked like and what they ought to represent. the gay and straight romances were equally boring—which sounds flippant but is me being serious. there’s a certain kind of relief that happens when you realize an author is not homophobic, romance is simply not their strong suit.
so. there are those at least.
the novel has two primary sin’s in my eyes: geography and women/history of women. the two are weirdly entangled so i’ll just go from the easiest problems and work my way out.
the book has a map of the kingdom of elben at its beginning with all the towns and castles which come up in the book labeled, and then some arrows pointing beyond the borders of the map to all the other countries and empires with which elben has relationships. this is representative of the kind of thinking that undergirds (and undermines) the book and sets up a weird orientalism which i dont think is deliberate or malicious, but is what naturally happens when you take elben/england as the center of your world (both literally in the map sense and figuratively) and don’t follow what that means to its logical conclusion.
i could not for the life of me figure out where everything was in relation to elben which was hampered first by my trying to graft real world politics she was drawing on onto the fantasy countries, and then by the realization that she had maybe? gotten rid of most of the world? i am still not entirely sure but i’m relatively sure quisto includes africa and parts of asia. which is insane. all of this would be fine (maybe) except for in the absence of my trying to logic out what country was which, the tensions and relations between elben and the rest of the world rang hollow. i know quisto is large and voracious, i know capaccia resents elben’s hard proof that the one true god chose them. but all of the economic and religious differences which drove relationships between monarchs in this era are absent because race either expects you to fill them in (and i could not because i could not figure who was who!) or she thought she had done enough (which she didn’t).
the flattening of the map has two pretty significant repercussions: the disappearance of muslims/arabs and the disappearance of the entrenched, by this point, rising tide of protestantism. ill get to the muslims and arabs in a bit, but i will be frank with you dear reader: i am not a tudor girlie but i know just enough of this time period, these monarchs, and the general politics of europe (which were very much driven by religion) to be dangerous lmao. there is a kind of reader and more importantly here a kind of writer who views religiosity and the religious person as one part myth and two parts village idiot. you do not have to believe in god or the angels, you do not even have to believe in an organizing principle in the universe. you do have to believe that even now, in this day and age, a person who believes in god understands empirical evidence and that faith is not empirically based. i know, again, the modern person has lost the ability to hold two contradicting things in their heart at the same time, but belief in god (whatever god that may be) was a cornerstone of medieval english life. race says that she is using history as inspiration and not as edict and that’s fine. but i can still see her condescension for people who have faith bubbling under the text. and i don’t really care if she thinks religious people are idiots so much as i care that because she thinks that and because she doesn’t understand the urgency with which it shaped medieval life, the basis of the inner lives of her characters and the conflicts she is attempting to graft onto elben ring hollow. there’s no wonder to the magic, no fervor driving the people of elben who have concrete proof that not only is god real but they’re his very special children. instead, bizarrely, you get jane and anne at alternate points using the word ‘patriotism’ to describe their relationship to their country. i don’t object to the word, but henry is literally divinely selected, the evidence is writ on his skin and on his country and everyone is super chill about this.
pope urban ii didn’t need the body of christ to whip all of europe into a fervor and start the first crusade, and you are telling me the stag god’s church has divine proof and nothing? has been done? with this? never make your gods real, man. (i’m sure the trilogy, if not the book, will end with god is not real. i, unlike race, have read in this genre god bless.)
my understanding is that anne was very dangerously visibly involved in discussions of catholic reformation, that this was one of the markers of her intelligence and her bravery, and that her stance could not be uncoupled from the catholicism which catherine of aragon represented, or from again the turbulent political and religious waters that was moving through europe. but because the topography of the world in which elben is situated is unclear and because race has decided to make it one religion and strip out the nuance, and because race can’t write a person of faith and her condescension peeks through, the rich tapestry of this era is never actually fully transported to a fantasy space. there’s not really any interesting interpretations—it almost feels as if the castles came first, then anne boleyn, and then everything else (however little that ‘else’ may be).
that is to say nothing of what lies beyond europe which is: the rest of the world.
i will add one last thing re the map etc and it is that one of the fascinations which drove europe to greedy wars and then horrifying colonialism (aside from the bad personalities of their monarchs) was an absence of luxury as a resource or export. the taxes levied on european monarchs by the various islamic empires that controlled the mediterranean and the silk route were heavy and had to be paid because they did not have spices, silk, gems, incense, and so on. i don’t even think race really thought about the weird bewildering optics of giving elben its own gem mine for The Best Gem In The World and then giving elben an isolationism bubble. and this is again, one of those things that doesn’t read as malicious to me in the least and is a product of an author who is not curious enough to expand the breadth of her knowledge to support her world building.
but i digress.
i think, in a world of globalized entertainment everyone should watch a single harem drama. if you do not want to read the many books on roxalina, or abassid era concubinage, or whatever secret third thing there is, you could tune in to one three-hour episode of magnificent century, or its sequel series magnificent century: kosem, you could also watch the chinese drama legend of zhen huan or ruyi’s royal love in the palace. if you are going to write about polygamy you should read or watch any single piece of media from a country that had a history of either before deciding to write about it.
england does not have a history of polygamy. i dont think even pre-christian england had a history of polygamy. which is not me saying you cannot do a fantasy world where they have polygamy because clearly you can and for money! but if you are writing a fantasy based on 16th-century england, where the two religious juggernauts are christianity and islam and one of the key dividing factors between (about which the english are particularly obsessed and terrified of) is the harem, you do have to do a little more lifting than ‘god said to take 6 wives’. you certainly have to do more lifting than ‘god said to take six wives and those wives were not in the habit of talking to one another.’ you also cannot address this cultural tension by disappearing away the main political powers which did historically actually engage in this practice.
i dont even think that race did it wrong perse—it is just another example of a thing done of which she has no literacy and so there is nothing new or interesting or engaging.
i had a point about history of women which i thought i was going to belabor but my document is now three pages long. suffice to say i don’t find feminist retellings that are modern very compelling. im less interested in the fantasy of what a person might do with all the sensibilities of 2025 if catapulted into 1509 and more interested in what women had to do then and what they did do, whether those actions are to their detriment or their benefit. when boleyn calls seymour a gender traitor essentially for pretending to be stupid (poor seymour lmao) i was like, i don’t know that gender solidarity as a coalition or an idea had really crystallized and moreover, this moment aside, boleyn doesn’t really exemplify it. she’s loud and brave. that’s not really the same as class conscious.
anyway. really the great sin of this novel is that it’s ya fantasy that should have been published in 2002. it would not have fared very well a few years later (circa 2012). and ya fantasy is pretty much dead right now so that leaves adult fantasy and the vultures of adult sff publishing who, lacking the curiosity and passion which drove early pioneers in the genre, now peddle stick figures to us and tell us its the mona lisa. and it is truly demoralizing to know that this is not the worst out there and in fact may number in that wide category of middling to good because it does not get very much better.