Danielle was a horrible mother. First, she talks about wanting to get her 5 year old son to stop with his “imaginary stories” and then just an hour or so later proceeds to engage her son in a pretend game of the floor is lava. Besides for the mixed messages this shows, I also believe that we should allow kids to be kids for as long as possible. I mean, he's only 5. What is so wrong with the kid talking about seeing something that she believes couldn’t have been real? Second, a flood is threatening their home. When a worker advises her to leave the house with her kid for their safety she decides not to go. Why? Because her jerk boyfriend says that the house is protected and safe. She has a kid. Better safe than sorry. Third, she leaves her kid with a friend, who she has mentioned previously that she doesn’t fully trust with the well-being of her child, to run to a locker to grab life vests and tells Vance that when her child ended up back outside, in the pouring rain, with the river over flowing and almost drowns again, was not her fault.
Not only is Danielle a horrible mother, but she is also stupid when it comes to the men in her life. After talking to one of her friends at the beginning of this book, she gets this idea in her head that she shouldn’t need a man in her life and that needing someone makes her appear weak. She clearly doesn’t love Tony, and when she starts to realize that she may have feelings for Vance she says that she needs to “analyze that desire for what it was (self-doubt, weakness) and put it in its place”. She then goes on to explain that all her needs can be earned herself and Tony will provide as compensation. That is not what she should be concerned about when thinking about a relationship. If she feels safe and secure with Vance, that does not make her weak.
With the writing style, it was hard to remember that the character, Zeke, was blind. Using words to describe things with the other senses would have helped pull the character trait forward. Other than that, Zeke was one of the few characters in this book that didn’t continually get on my nervous.
Tony is a jerk. The way he talks to Danielle and then turns around and says something different about her to someone else was disgusting. Not just Danielle either. Tony is a jerk to the people working under him as well.
Pete’s childish refusal to make up with his brother, Vance, over their father freezing to death and him loosing his foot to frost bite is stupid. First, their father died before Pete ventured out in search of him. Second, Pete wouldn’t have lost his foot if he had stayed inside the car like Vance wanted him to. So . . . Pete blames Vance for the fact that he lost his foot by going outside when Vance didn’t want him to go outside in the first place??? Pete’s argument makes no sense whatsoever, and the fact that his disagreement between them lasted 15 years . . . This is such a stupid, childish argument.
I hated most of these characters and there was too much religion talk in it for me, but the plot was good. That was the only thing keeping me invested in this book.
The ending was beautifully done. I loved what the author did to wrap up this book and how she explained the lights that the characters had been seeing in the water throughout the whole plot.