***Imagine a Book Called 'How to Not Die Broke' That Was Written for People Earning Six Figure Incomes***
This book touts itself as a "science" book that takes a look at dating. Well as someone who keeps track of his dating life through spreadsheets and notes (for example, I know that 39.4% of the time I ask someone out on a second date, they ghost me), I was interested in what a science-oriented book had to say about dating. Unfortunately this book appears to be geared towards people having challenges for very different reasons, primarily women-oriented issues in modern dating.
Since this review will be personal, some background. I am a late-twenties man who has been single for four years, searching for a relationship. I have many 'boxes' women supposedly like to check off, like being tall, fit, having a high income, active social life, and interesting hobbies. I have had multiple ex-girlfriends who all lovely people (except for one). I get 1-2 dates a month and only one in these years led to something getting off the ground a little bit, though she coasted it back to runway very quickly. My approach to dating is to find someone who I felt a basic attraction to (lest you think I'm picky, I find the majority of women attractive) and has shared values. From there, you date to find compatibility in communication, reliability, and if things are clicking. My issue is that most women I date don't seem interested in additional dates, and the few that have gone some distance (like a month) ended from either a clash of communication styles or unwillingness for any forms of commitment. Can this book help me with my dating struggles?
Well, right from the start, Ury divides people who are struggling with dating into three categories: Romanticizers (alone because they want an instant spark), Maximizers (single because they're trying to find the perfect partner), and Hesitaters (don't feel ready to date). The book includes a quiz, and I scored low in all categories, tying between Romanticizer and Maximizer, but moreover, none of these seem to fit someone like me who has realistic ideas about building relationships, but is regularly rejected. Ury suggests asking friends if you're having a hard time figuring out what category you belong to. The three friends who I confide the most with about my dating life though all said that none of the categories fit me. Keep in mind, this is a "science book", and Ury mentions nothing about the studies she conducted to arrive at the three categories, so I'm led to conclude that she just made these up to group her clients into neat boxes; hardly a scientific process.
But according to Ury these are all just facets of the core reason people are single: "unrealistic expectations". Maybe this is true, but my own tracking doesn't support this hypothesis. 78.8% of my first dates, I'm interested in a second date (that feeling is mutual 20.8% of the time—I'm twice more likely to get ghosted than get a yes). I find most people I date to be interesting people who unfortunately do not reciprocate that interest. From talking with my male friends, my experience doesn't appear to be that unique, though I'm the only one crunching numbers. Her advice that targets those archetypes is sound, but largely useless for people like me.
From there, Ury gives some advice for online dating, how to meet people offline, and some dating advice. The dating advice is generally good, though there isn't much that wouldn't be found outside of a couple Google searches and was almost all stuff I was already doing. Find people that are actually excited about building a relationship instead of just leading you on! Great! Except I've only gone past the third date three times in four years, so it's not very pertinent. She then expands onto long-term relationship advice, which I found the most useful advice in the book (since I have the least amount of experience in this area). But unfortunately, not much that can get me through me initial hurdle of finding someone who wants to invest in me long-term.
Overall I found the book's approach to science to be very shaky. Ignoring her own highly-questionable theory that she proposes at the start, Ury cites a lot of different studies all over the place. Some are legitimate science that surface truths about the world of dating! Others, like the four-category attachment styles (that has an entire chapter devoted to it), are portrayed straight, ignoring their current disreputable status. I would firmly classify this book as pop-science, and would strongly encourage a reader to do further research on anything she cites if you're taking it as gospel.
At the very least, the book helps explain why so many women pass me over (overabundance of choice, unrealistic expectations, poor evaluative skills of what makes a good partner). But that doesn't really help me, since I'm not about to persuade someone that their approach to dating is wrong in a first date. It doesn't help me recover from the pain of being ghosted after what seemed to be a great date. These aren't easy questions to answer, but for someone trying to do all he can to avoid dying alone, I would've appreciated some thought given towards these issues.
If you are someone who is drowning in matches and people approaching you, but can't find love, you may find this book useful. If you're completely new to dating, especially online, or have taken a long break, you might find some parts useful.
For people like me, who match with 4.5% of my right-swipes (and that's over twice the male average!), this book has some good ideas and advice, but very little to help pull you out of the trajectory of dying alone if you've already done the obvious stuff any Google search would pull up and have a realistic view of building relationships. I get that the self-help market caters primarily to White urban women, so this might've been a publisher decision instead of callousness on Ury's part (I refuse to believe a dating coach is ignorant about people struggling to get dates or commitment), but it would've been nice to have the struggles a lot of men (and some women!) are having acknowledged.